Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Preventing skin cancer: findings of the Task Force on Community Preventive Services on Reducing Exposure to Ultraviolet Light.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

The relationship between the strength of evidence of effectiveness and the strength of the recommendation is defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Recommendations of the Task Force on Community Preventive Services regarding the use of selected interventions to prevent skin cancer by reducing exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light

Setting-specific Interventions

Intervention: Educational and policy approaches in primary schools

Task Force recommendation for use: Recommended: sufficient evidence of effectiveness in improving children’s sun-protective "covering-up" behavior

Intervention description: Modified short-term curricula using didactic teaching; interactive class- and home-based activities; interactive CD-ROM multimedia programs, peer education; and policy changes

Key findings: Refer to the original guideline document

Intervention: Educational and policy approaches in recreational or tourism settings

Task Force recommendation for use: Recommended: sufficient evidence of effectiveness in improving adult sun-protective "covering-up" behavior

Intervention description: Single-and multicomponent interventions designed to increase knowledge; influence attitudes, beliefs, and intentions; and change behavior of adults and children

Key findings: Refer to the original guideline document

Task Force conclusion: Insufficient evidence to determine effectiveness in improving children’s sun-protective behaviors

Intervention description: Included one or more of the following: educational brochures, including culturally relevant materials and photographs of skin cancer lesions; sun-safety training of and role-modeling by lifeguards, aquatic instructors, and outdoor recreation staff; sun-safety lessons, interactive activities, and incentives for parents and children; increasing available shaded areas; providing sunscreen; and point-of-purchase prompts

Key findings: Refer to the original guideline document

Intervention: Educational and policy approaches in child care centers

Task Force conclusion: Insufficient evidence to determine effectiveness

Intervention description: Ranged from a curriculum that included interactive classroom and take-home activities to staff education, brochures for parents, and a working session to develop skin protection plans for centers. All focused on some combination of increasing application of sunscreen, scheduling activities to avoid peak sun hours, increasing availability of shade and encouraging children to play in shady areas, and encouraging children to wear sun-screen.

Key findings: Refer to the original guideline document

Intervention: Educational and policy approaches in occupational settings

Task Force conclusion: Insufficient evidence to determine effectiveness

Intervention description: Single-and multicomponent interventions designed to increase knowledge; influence attitudes, beliefs, and intentions; and change behavior of workers. Included one or more of the following: surveys and questionnaires to assess knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, intentions, and behavior; sun-safety training of safety officers, managers, outdoor recreation and swimming pool staff; peer-leader modeling of sun-safe behaviors; brochures or didactic instruction; sun-safety lessons, interactive activities, and incentives for parents and children; provision or promotion of sun-protective gear or products (wide-brimmed hats, long-sleeved shirts, sunglasses, sunscreen, and shade structures); and screening and assessment by dermatologists

Key findings: Refer to the original guideline document

Intervention: Educational and policy approaches in health-care settings and for providers

Task Force conclusion: Insufficient evidence to determine effectiveness

Intervention description: Single-or multicomponent interventions designed to increase knowledge, attitudes, sun-protective behaviors, and counseling behaviors of providers (e.g., physicians, nurses, physician assistants, medical students, and pharmacists), with the ultimate aim of improving clients' sun-protective behaviors

Health-care settings (i.e., pharmacy, drugstore, clinic, physician’s office, and medical schools) also used to recruit and change client’s (patient’s) knowledge, attitude, and sun-protective behaviors

Included provider education sessions, Internet-based education, videos, and role modeling. No policy approaches used in this setting

Key findings: Refer to the original guideline document

Target Population-specific Interventions

Intervention: Interventions oriented to children’s parents or caregivers

Task Force conclusion: Insufficient evidence to determine effectiveness

Intervention description: Single-and multicomponent interventions designed to increase knowledge; influence attitudes, beliefs, and intentions; and change behavior of parents or caregivers (including teachers and coaches) and children under their care. Included one or more of the following: surveys and questionnaires to assess knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, intentions, and behavior; educational brochures, newsletters, tip cards, and postcard reminders at end of summer sun-safety

Key findings: Refer to the original guideline document

Communitywide Interventions

Intervention: Media campaigns alone

Task Force conclusion: Insufficient evidence to determine effectiveness

Intervention description: Mass media with or without small media. Majority were low-intensity interventions using television programs, CD-ROM-based information kiosks, and reporting of UV index. Small media included brochures, flyers, newsletters, informational letters, or videos.

Key findings: Refer to the original guideline document

Intervention: Communitywide multicomponent interventions

Task Force conclusion: Insufficient evidence to determine effectiveness

Intervention description: Combinations of individual-directed strategies, media campaigns, and environmental and policy changes, in an integrated effort in a defined geographic area (city, state, province, or country). Programs may also incorporate setting-specific strategies. Usually delivered with a defined theme, name or logo, and set of messages

Studies were included if they occurred in a defined geographic area and included at least two components and more than a single setting.

Comprehensive communitywide interventions defined as multilevel (i.e., include multiple individual-directed, setting-specific, and communitywide components), addressing a substantial proportion of the population in a defined area, and lasting longer than 1 year

Key findings: Refer to the original guideline document

Definitions:

Strength of Evidence of Effectiveness = Strength of Recommendation

The strength of each recommendation is based on the evidence of effectiveness (i.e., an intervention is recommended on the basis of either strong or sufficient evidence of effectiveness).

If insufficient evidence to determine effectiveness is found, this means that it was not possible to determine whether or not the intervention works based on the available evidence.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The Task Force recommendations in this report are based on the systematic review and evaluation of 85 qualifying studies, all of which had good or fair quality of execution. In general, the strength of evidence of effectiveness corresponds directly to the strength of recommendations (see the "Major Recommendations" field).

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2003 Oct 17

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Task Force on Community Preventive Services - Independent Expert Panel

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Task Force on Community Preventive Services on Reducing Exposure to Ultraviolet Light

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Mona Saraiya, MD, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); Karen Glanz, PhD, Cancer Research Center of Hawaii, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii; Peter Briss, MD, Division of Prevention Research and Analytic Methods, Epidemiology Program Office, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia; Phyllis Nichols, MPH, Division of Prevention Research and Analytic Methods, Epidemiology Program Office, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia; Cornelia White, MPH, Division of Prevention Research and Analytic Methods, Epidemiology Program Office, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia; Debjani Das, MPH, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Not stated

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available from the Community Guide Web site.

Print copies: Available from the Community Guide Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, MS E-90, Atlanta, GA 30333.

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

The following general background articles are available:

  • Briss PA, Brownson RC, Fielding JE, Zaza S. Developing and using the Guide to Community Preventive Services: Lessons learned about evidence-based public health. Annu Rev Public Health 2004; 25:281-302.
  • Truman BI, Smith-Akin CK, Hinman AR, Gebbie KM, Brownson R, Novick LF, Lawrence RS, Pappaioanou M, Fielding J, Evans CA, Jr., Guerra F, Vogel-Taylor M, Mahan CS, Fullilove M, Zaza S, Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Developing the Guide to Community Preventive Services—overview and rationale. Am J Prev Med 2000 Jan;18(1 Suppl):18-26.
  • Pappaioanou M, Evans CA, Jr. Development of the Guide to Community Preventive Services: A U.S. Public Health Service initiative. J Public Health Manag Pract 1998 Mar;4(2):48-54.
  • Zaza S, Lawrence RS, Mahan CS, Fullilove M, Fleming D, Isham GJ, Pappaioanou M, Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Scope and organization of the Guide to Community Preventive Services. Am J Prev Med 2000 Jan;18(1 Suppl):27-34.
  • Briss PA, Zaza S, Pappaioanou M, Fielding J, Wright-de Aguero L, Truman BI, Hopkins DP, Mullen PD, Thompson RS, et al, and the Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Developing an evidence-based Guide to Community Preventive Services—methods. Am J Prev Med 2000 Jan;18(1 Suppl):35-43.
  • Zaza S, Wright-de Aguero L, Briss PA, Truman BI, Hopkins DP, Hennessy MH, Sosin DM, Anderson L, Carande-Kulis VG, Teutsch SM, Pappaioanou M, Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Data collection instrument and procedure for systematic reviews in the Guide to Community Preventive Services. Am J Prev Med 2000 Jan:18(1 Suppl):44-74.
  • Carande-Kulis VG, Maciosek MV, Briss PA, Teutsch SM, Zaza S, Truman BI, Messonier ML, Pappaioanou M, Harris.J.R., Fielding J, Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Methods for systematic reviews of economic evaluations for the Guide to Community Preventive Services. Am J Prev Med 2000 Jan;18(1 Suppl):75-91.
  • Novick LF, Kelter A. The Guide to Community Preventive Services: a public health imperative. Am J Prev Med. 2001 Nov;21(4 Suppl):13-5.

Users can access the complete collection of companion documents at the Community Guide Web site.

Print copies: Available from the Community Guide Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, MS E-90, Atlanta, GA 30333.

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on May 28, 2004. The information was verified by the guideline developer on July 9, 2004.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

No copyright restrictions apply.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo