|
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsored by: |
Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences |
Information provided by: | Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00452738 |
The objective of this study is to examine the effects of pre surgery dog visits as compared to a costumed character or parents-only on the consumption of pain medication after surgery. It is hypothesized that pre surgery dog visits will reduce post surgical stress and anxiety.
Condition | Intervention |
Post Tonsillectomy Pain |
Behavioral: Therapy dog Behavioral: Costumed character Behavioral: Parents-only |
MedlinePlus related topics: | Anxiety |
Study Type: | Interventional |
Study Design: | Treatment, Randomized, Single Blind, Placebo Control, Single Group Assignment, Efficacy Study |
Official Title: | The Effect of Pre Surgery Dog Visits on Post Surgery Consumption of Pain Medication |
Estimated Enrollment: | 90 |
Study Start Date: | April 2007 |
Estimated Study Completion Date: | February 2008 |
Recent research has revealed that children who are highly anxious prior to surgery experienced more problems post surgery. These problems included reporting of more pain and requested more pain medication during hospitalization and home follow up. Consumption of pain medication may not be the optimal pain management program. In contrast, numerous human-animal interaction studies have shown that animals tend to have a calming effect on people, reduce stress, and lesson anxiety. Therefore, the primary objective of this study is to examine the effect of pre surgery dog visits as compared to a costumed character or parents-only on the consumption of pain medication after surgery.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 4 Years to 7 Years |
Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
United States, Oklahoma | |||||
Oklahoma State University Surgi-Center | |||||
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States, 74107 |
Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences |
Principal Investigator: | Sherril M Stone, PhD | Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences |
Principal Investigator: | Stan Sherman, DO | Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences |
Principal Investigator: | Chaunda Capers, BS | Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences |
Arkow, P. (1993). Pet therapy: A study and resource guide for the use of companion animals in selected therapies (7th ed.). Humane Society of the Pikes Peak Region. Colorado Springs: CO
  |
Barba, B. (1995). A critical review of research on the human/companion animal relationship 1988-1993. Anthrozoos, 8(1), 9-15.
  |
Bell, J. R. (2006). Visitation dogs carry C. difficile, MRSA, Salmonella. Family Practice News, 28.
  |
Donowitz, L. G. (2002). Pet therapy. Concise Reviews of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, 21, 64-66.
  |
Friedman, E., Thomas, S. A., & Eddy, T. J. (2000). Companion animals and human health: Physical and cardiovascular influences. In A. L. Podberscek, E. S. Paul, & J. A. Serpell (Eds), Companion animals and use: Exploring the relationship between people and pets (pp. 125-142). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  |
Jalongo, M. R., Astorino, T., & Bomboy, N. (2004). Canine Visitors: The Influence of therapy Dogs on Young Children's Learning and Well-Being in Classrooms and Hospitals. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32(1), 9-16.
  |
Melson, G. F. (2001). Why The Wild Things Are. Harvard University Press. Cambridge: MA.
  |
Schantz, (1990). Reviews and research reports; Preventing potential health hazards incidental to the use of pets in therapy. Anthrozoos, 4(1), 114-123.
  |
Study ID Numbers: | 2006036 |
First Received: | March 23, 2007 |
Last Updated: | January 22, 2008 |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00452738 |
Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
|
|