ClinicalTrials.gov
 Home    Search    Study Topics    Glossary  
 

  Full Text View  
  Tabular View  
  Contacts and Locations  
  No Study Results Posted  
  Related Studies  
Study of the Economics of Pulmonary Artery Catheter Use in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.

Sponsors and Collaborators: University of Pittsburgh
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Information provided by: University of Pittsburgh
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00234767
  Purpose

Study of the long term outcomes and economic impact of the pulmonary artery catheter in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS/ALI) patients.


Condition Intervention Phase
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Acute Lung Injury
Lung Diseases
Device: Pulmonary Artery Catheter
Behavioral: Protocolized Fluid Management
Phase III

U.S. FDA Resources

Study Type:   Observational
Study Design:   Natural History, Longitudinal, Defined Population, Prospective Study
Official Title:   Economic Analysis of Pulmonary Artery Catheter Use (EA-PAC)

Further study details as provided by University of Pittsburgh:

Estimated Enrollment:   650
Study Start Date:   September 2001
Estimated Study Completion Date:   September 2006

Detailed Description:

The pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) is a commonly used device that provides hemodynamic data to guide care of the critically ill, such as patients with acute lung injury or the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS/ALI). Clinicians believe PAC use improves decision-making and patient outcomes but evidence is lacking and recent data suggest the PAC may increase mortality as well as considerably increasing costs. In response, the NHLBI funded a large multicenter trial (Fluid And Catheter Treatment Trial (FACTT) (N01-HR-46054-46064)) where ARDS/ALI patients were randomized to receive a PAC or the less invasive central venous catheter (CVC) and received a liberal or conservative fluid management protocol in response to data provided by the PAC or CVC. The primary end-point is in-patient mortality.

We are complementing FACTT with a concurrent economic analysis of the PAC. Our aims are to: 1.) compare differences between study arms in long-term survival, quality of life, and quality-adjusted survival; 2.) compare differences between study arms in acute care and long-term costs; 3.) calculate the cost-efficacy of PAC use (i.e., the balance of costs and effects under the controlled environment of the FACTT trial), and; 4.) estimate cost-effectiveness under more “real-world” conditions and produce life-time cost-effectiveness ratios, thereby facilitating comparison of our results to other cost-effectiveness analyses.

We are achieving Aims 1-3 by augmenting FACTT data collection with detailed information on hospital costs, extended survival follow-up for a minimum of one year, and post-discharge patient interviews to determine quality of life and resource use in the first year. We will achieve Aim 4 by constructing a microsimulation model first calibrated by results from FACTT and published data on life-expectancy and costs and then adjusted to reflect the broader patient case-mix and clinical effects of PAC use in routine clinical practice. We are using patient-level data from the King County Lung Injury Project epidemiology study (NHLBI HL-96-014) to adjust case-mix and patient-level data from a large pragmatic trial of PAC use in the United Kingdom to adjust the clinical effects of PAC use.

The results of our adjunct to FACTT will substantially amplify the value of the data being collected and provide, for the first time, robust estimates from randomized data of the economic effects of the widespread application of this important technology.

  Eligibility
Ages Eligible for Study:   13 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Enrolled in the Fluid and Catheter Treatment Trial (FACTT)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Did not consent to economic substudy and long-term follow-up
  Contacts and Locations

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00234767

Sponsors and Collaborators

Investigators
Principal Investigator:     Derek C Angus, MD, MPH     University of Pittsburgh    
  More Information


CRISMA Laboratory Webpage- CRISMA coordinates the EA-PAC study  This link exits the ClinicalTrials.gov site
 

Study ID Numbers:   R01 HS011620
First Received:   October 5, 2005
Last Updated:   October 7, 2005
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:   NCT00234767
Health Authority:   United States: Institutional Review Board

Keywords provided by University of Pittsburgh:
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome  
ARDS  
Acute Lung Injury  
ALI  
Cost-effectiveness
Pharmacoeconomics
Long-term follow-up

Study placed in the following topic categories:
Respiratory Tract Diseases
Lung Diseases
Respiration Disorders
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult
Acute respiratory distress syndrome

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Pathologic Processes
Disease
Syndrome

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on October 17, 2008




Links to all studies - primarily for crawlers