ClinicalTrials.gov
 Home    Search    Study Topics    Glossary  
 

  Full Text View  
  Tabular View  
  Contacts and Locations  
  No Study Results Posted  
  Related Studies  
Randomized Comparison Angioplasty Outcomes at Hospitals With and Without on-Site Cardiac Surgery

This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified by Johns Hopkins University, May 2008

Sponsored by: Johns Hopkins University
Information provided by: Johns Hopkins University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00549796
  Purpose

Angioplasty is a procedure which opens blocked heart arteries using balloons and/or stents. Most U.S. states and all national heart organizations require that angioplasty be done only at hospitals that can also perform open heart surgery. The reason for this is that there is a risk that angioplasty can cause injury to the heart artery that might require open heart surgery to fix. Open heart surgery is a backup in case it is needed. The risk that open heart surgery will be needed is very small. Nevertheless, without more research, many state Departments of Health and all national heart organizations do not want to change the requirement for having on-site open heart surgery wherever angioplasty is performed. Some States already allow this; and European heart organizations already allow it, as well.

This study is designed to determine whether the safety and benefits of angioplasty are the same at hospitals that perform angioplasty either with or without open heart surgery backup.

Patient who enter the study have a heart catheterization at a hospital without a heart surgery program. If they need angioplasty, then they are randomized to either stay at the hospital without heart surgery for their angioplasty or to be transferred for the procedure to a hospital with heart surgery. For every four patients, three stay at the hospital without heart surgery and one is transferred.

The study is designed to show that there is no detectable difference between the safety and benefits of the procedure at the two types of hospital (with and without heart surgery). The cost of the procedure at the two hospital types is also compared.


Condition Intervention
Coronary Arteriosclerosis
Angina Pectoris
Other: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

MedlinePlus related topics:   Angina    Angioplasty    Coronary Artery Disease    Heart Surgery   

U.S. FDA Resources

Study Type:   Interventional
Study Design:   Health Services Research, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Official Title:   Randomized Comparison Angioplasty Outcomes at Hospitals With and Without on-Site Cardiac Surgery

Further study details as provided by Johns Hopkins University:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Mortality [ Time Frame: 6 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • MACE = death + MI + TVR [ Time Frame: 9 Months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • emergency CABG [ Time Frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • myocardial infarction [ Time Frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • target vessel revascularization (TVR) [ Time Frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • any subsequent revascularization (ASR) [ Time Frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • heart failure and class [ Time Frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • angina and class [ Time Frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • stroke [ Time Frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • composite adverse endpoint (MACE) [ Time Frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • MACE = death + MI + TVR [ Time Frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • MACE = death + MI + ASR [ Time Frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • angiographic (end-procedure) complications (embolization, dissection, no reflow, etc) [ Time Frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • angiographic (procedural) success (<20% residual stenosis and TIMI 3 flow) [ Time Frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • completeness of revascularization [ Time Frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • percent of patients with complete or partial revascularization [ Time Frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • bleeding (non-CABG transfusion, vascular repair) [ Time Frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • length of stay [ Time Frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • total direct medical cost [ Time Frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • major resource consumption patterns (hospital and ICU days, surgeries, hospitalizations) [ Time Frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Estimated Enrollment:   18000
Study Start Date:   April 2006
Estimated Study Completion Date:   May 2011
Estimated Primary Completion Date:   May 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Arms Assigned Interventions
1: Active Comparator
PCI performed at a hospital with co-located (on-site) cardiac surgery
Other: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
Patients undergo routine, clinically indicated PCI
2
PCI performed at a hospitals without co-located (on-site) cardiac surgery
Other: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
Patients undergo routine, clinically indicated PCI

  Eligibility
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Pre-catheterization:

  • Must be undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization for suspected CAD
  • Be at least 18 years of age
  • Must not be pregnant (negative pregnancy test) or must not be of childbearing potential must be able to give informed consent.

Post-catheterization:

  • Coronary artery disease judged to be clinically and angiographically significant
  • Ability to perform PCI with equipment available at the local site
  • Procedure risk judged to be not high (see below)

Exclusion Criteria:

Pre-catheterization:

  • Inability to give informed consent
  • ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
  • Pregnancy

Post-catheterization:

  • High likelihood of requiring a device not available at the hospitals without SOS
  • No need for PCI
  • Need for coronary artery bypass surgery
  • High procedural risk (see below)

High procedural risk criteria are:

  • PCI of unprotected left main coronary artery
  • PCI of left circulation lesion in the presence of critical (>70%) unprotected left main coronary artery lesion
  • Poor left ventricular function (EF< 20%) and need to perform PCI in a vessel supplying significant myocardium
  Contacts and Locations

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00549796

Contacts
Contact: Thomas Aversano, MD     410-550-9821     taversan@jhmi.edu    

Locations
United States, Alabama
Crestwood Medical Center     Recruiting
      Huntsville, Alabama, United States, 35801
United States, Georgia
Archbold Memorial Hospital     Recruiting
      Thomasville, Georgia, United States, 31792
      Contact: Richard Kerensky, MD     229-551-0083        
Fairview Park Hospital     Active, not recruiting
      Dublin, Georgia, United States, 31021
Spalding Regional Medical Center     Recruiting
      Griffin, Georgia, United States
Southeast Georgia Health System     Recruiting
      Brunswick, Georgia, United States
Southern Regional Medical Center     Recruiting
      Riverdale, Georgia, United States
Hamilton Medical Center     Recruiting
      Dalton, Georgia, United States, 30722
Tanner Medical Center     Recruiting
      Carrollton, Georgia, United States
Tift Regional Medical Center     Recruiting
      Tifton, Georgia, United States
Wellstar Cobb Hospital     Recruiting
      Austell, Georgia, United States
United States, Illinois
Advocate South Suburban Hospital     Recruiting
      Hazel Crest, Illinois, United States, 60429
Little Company of Mary Hospital     Recruiting
      Evergreen Park, Illinois, United States
United States, New Jersey
Bayonne Medical Center     Recruiting
      Bayonne, New Jersey, United States, 07002
Holy Name Hospital     Recruiting
      Teaneck, New Jersey, United States
Monmouth Medical Center     Recruiting
      Long Branch, New Jersey, United States
Muhlenberg Regional Medical Center     Recruiting
      South Plainfield, New Jersey, United States
Raritan Bay Medical Center     Recruiting
      Perth Amboy, New Jersey, United States
Robert Wood Johnson Medical Center     Recruiting
      Hamilton, New Jersey, United States
Somerset Medical Center     Recruiting
      Somerville, New Jersey, United States
Trinitas Hospital     Recruiting
      Elizabeth, New Jersey, United States
Virtua-West Jersey Hospital Marlton     Recruiting
      Evesham, New Jersey, United States
United States, North Carolina
Duke Health Raleigh Hospital     Recruiting
      Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27609
Rowan Regional Medical Center     Recruiting
      Salisbury, North Carolina, United States
United States, Ohio
Community Health and Wellness Center     Recruiting
      Bryan, Ohio, United States, 43506
Fort Hamilton Hospital     Recruiting
      Fort Hamilton, Ohio, United States
Knox Community Hospital     Recruiting
      Mount Vernon, Ohio, United States
Southern Ohio Medical Center     Recruiting
      Portsmouth, Ohio, United States
United States, Oregon
Legacy Meridian Park Hospital     Recruiting
      Portland, Oregon, United States
United States, Texas
Kingwood Medical Center     Recruiting
      Kingwood, Texas, United States

Sponsors and Collaborators
Johns Hopkins University

Investigators
Study Director:     Thomas Aversano, MD     Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions    
  More Information


Responsible Party:   Johns Hopkins University ( Thomas Aversano )
Study ID Numbers:   NA_000230, C-PORT E Trial
First Received:   October 24, 2007
Last Updated:   May 12, 2008
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:   NCT00549796
Health Authority:   United States: Institutional Review Board

Keywords provided by Johns Hopkins University:
coronary artery disease  
angioplasty  
stent  
percutaneous coronary intervention
on-site cardiac surgery
randomized trial

Study placed in the following topic categories:
Coronary Disease
Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Signs and Symptoms
Heart Diseases
Myocardial Ischemia
Vascular Diseases
Angina Pectoris
Pain
Ischemia
Arteriosclerosis
Coronary Artery Disease
Chest Pain

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Cardiovascular Diseases

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on October 17, 2008




Links to all studies - primarily for crawlers