Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Cervical cancer.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Singapore Ministry of Health. Cervical cancer. Singapore: Singapore Ministry of Health; 2003 Feb. 45 p. [112 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

The recommendations that follow are those from the guideline's executive summary; detailed recommendations can be found in the original guideline document. Each recommendation is rated based on the level of the evidence and the grades of recommendation. Definitions of the grades of the recommendations (A, B, C, Good Practice Points) and level of the evidence (Level I-Level IV) are presented at the end of the Major Recommendations field.

Screening

B - To reduce the incidence and mortality rate of cervix cancer, effective screening and preventive strategy must be actively pursued, in addition to early detection of disease and effective therapy (Anderson et al., 1995; Laara, Day, & Hakama, 1987). (Grade B, Level IIa)

Stage IA

B - Total hysterectomy is the treatment of choice for microinvasive cervical cancer in patients who have completed their family. In selected patients, fertility-sparing surgery may be considered. (Grade B, Level III)

Stage IB – IIA

A - Current evidence indicates that both radical surgery and pelvic radiotherapy result in equivalent cure rates for early localized cervical cancer (Landoni et al., 1997). (Grade A, Level Ib)

A - The addition of post-operative treatment using a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy has been shown to improve survival outcome for patients with tumour involvement of pelvic lymph nodes, resection margins, and/or parametrial tissue (Sedlis et al., 1999; Peters et al., 2000). (Grade A, Level Ib)

The optimal treatment for bulky (>4cm) cervical cancer remains controversial.

Stage IIB – IVA

A - The treatment of choice for locally advanced cervical cancer is concurrent chemoradiation. (Grade A, Level Ia)

Metastatic Cancer

B - The main aim of treatment for patients with metastatic cancer is palliation of symptoms. (Grade B, Level IIa)

Recurrent Cancer

B - The treatment employed for patients with recurrent cervical cancer is dependent on their previous treatment modality and the exact anatomical site of relapse. (Grade B, Level IIa)

Ovarian Conservation

B - Ovarian conservation should be considered for young patients (Sutton et al., 1992). (Grade B, Level IIa)

Hormone Replacement Therapy

B - There is no clinical evidence that Hormone Replacement Therapy should be withheld from patients with a history of cervical cancer (Gadducci et al., 1997; Burger et al., 1999; Ploch, 1987; Sadan et al., 1989; Wren, 1994). (Grade B, Level IIa)

Definitions:

Grades of Recommendations

Grade A (evidence levels Ia, Ib): Requires at least one randomised controlled trial as part of the body of literature of overall good quality and consistency addressing the specific recommendation.

Grade B (evidence levels IIa, IIb, III): Requires availability of well conducted clinical studies but no randomised clinical trials on the topic of recommendation.

Grade C (evidence level IV): Requires evidence obtained from expert committee reports or opinions and/or clinical experiences of respected authorities. Indicates absence of directly applicable clinical studies of good quality.

Good Practice Points: Recommended best practice based on the clinical experience of the guideline development group.

Levels of Evidence

Level Ia: Evidence obtained from meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Level Ib: Evidence obtained from at least one randomised controlled trial.

Level IIa: Evidence obtained from at least one well-designed controlled study without randomisation.

Level IIb: Evidence obtained from at least one other type of well-designed quasi-experimental study.

Level III: Evidence obtained from well-designed non-experimental descriptive studies, such as comparative studies, correlation studies and case studies.

Level IV: Evidence obtained from expert committee reports or opinions and/or clinical experiences of respected authorities.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

REFERENCES SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see "Major Recommendations").

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Singapore Ministry of Health. Cervical cancer. Singapore: Singapore Ministry of Health; 2003 Feb. 45 p. [112 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2003 Feb

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Singapore Ministry of Health - National Government Agency [Non-U.S.]

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Singapore Ministry of Health

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Workgroup on Cervical Cancer

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Workgroup Members: Assoc Prof Ho Tew Hong, Chief of Gynaecology, Head and Senior Consultant, Gynaecological Oncology Unit, KK Women's & Children's Hospital (Chairman); Assoc Prof Tay Sun Kuie, Senior Consultant, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Singapore General Hospital; Assoc Prof Lim Fang Kan, Senior Consultant, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National University Hospital; Assoc Prof A Ilancheran, Senior Consultant, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National University Hospital; Assoc Prof G C Raju, Senior Consultant, Department of Pathology, National University Hospital; Dr Soh Lay Tin, Senior Consultant, Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre; Dr Christopher Wynne, Chief/Senior Consultant, Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Hospital; Dr Tay Eng Hseon, Consultant, Gynaecological Oncology Unit, KK Women's & Children's Hospital; Dr Jeffrey Low, Consultant, Gynaecological Oncology Unit, KK Women's & Children's Hospital; Dr Chew Sung Hock, Consultant, Histopathology, KK Women's & Children's Hospital; Dr Khoo Tan Hoon Seng, Consultant, Department of Therapeutic Radiology, National Cancer Centre; Dr Lee Khai Mun, Consultant, Department of Therapeutic Radiology, National Cancer Centre; Dr Lim Siew Eng, Consultant, Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Hospital; Dr Pornchai Jonglertham, Senior Registrar (Oncology), Johns Hopkins - NUH International Medical Centre; Dr Pritam Singh, Consultant Gynaecologist, Gynaecology Associates, Mt Elizabeth Hospital; Dr Ching Kwok Choy, K C Ching Clinic and Surgery, Mt Elizabeth Hospital, Visiting Specialist, KK Women's & Children's Hospital

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Not stated

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

None available

PATIENT RESOURCES

The following is available:

  • Patient education brochure on cancer of the cervix. Singapore: Singapore Ministry of Health; 2003. 41 p.

Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the Singapore Ministry of Health Web site.

Please note: This patient information is intended to provide health professionals with information to share with their patients to help them better understand their health and their diagnosed disorders. By providing access to this patient information, it is not the intention of NGC to provide specific medical advice for particular patients. Rather we urge patients and their representatives to review this material and then to consult with a licensed health professional for evaluation of treatment options suitable for them as well as for diagnosis and answers to their personal medical questions. This patient information has been derived and prepared from a guideline for health care professionals included on NGC by the authors or publishers of that original guideline. The patient information is not reviewed by NGC to establish whether or not it accurately reflects the original guideline's content.

NGC STATUS

This summary was completed by ECRI on November 28, 2003.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo