Forum Proceedings
August 13-14, 2007
Tucson, Arizona
Printer-friendly
Forum Proceedings (1.07 MB)
Welcome and Meeting Overview
Ana Maria López, MD, MPH, University of Arizona College of Medicine
Dr. López is Associate Dean for Outreach and Multicultural Affairs
and Associate Professor of Clinical Medicine and Pathology at the
University of Arizona. She is the Medical Director of the Arizona
Telemedicine Program. She received her AB in philosophy from Bryn
Mawr College and earned her MD from Jefferson Medical College.
After her residency and general internal medicine fellowship, Dr.
López received her MPH at the University of Arizona, and within
a year she also completed a fellowship in hematology/oncology.
For 10 years, she was Medical Director of the Women’s Health Initiative
at the University of Arizona. Since 1997 she has been Medical Director
of the Telemedicine Program, where she helps improve access to health
care for rural patients and her impact reaches far beyond the local
hospital setting. She is an experienced researcher whose work has
appeared in various peer-reviewed publications. These accomplishments
and others have earned her the Local Legends Award and a spot on
the list of the Best Doctors in America.
After welcoming participants, Dr. López will provide an overview
of this year’s forum and the three topics to be discussed: community
service learning programs in the context of community health centers;
cultural and linguistic competence and minority women’s health curriculum;
and Promotoras as community teachers for health profession
students.
“Service, Learning, and Community: Necessary Elements for Effective
Delivery of Human Needs”
Robert D. Shumer, PhD, University of Minnesota School of Social
Work
Dr. Shumer is an expert and pioneer in the field of service learning.
He is a member of the community faculty and a lecturer at the University
of Minnesota, where he developed and was director of the National
Service-Learning Clearinghouse, the largest source of information
about service learning in the United States.
Dr. Shumer received his BA from the University of California, Santa
Barbara and his MA in educational psychology from California State
University, Northridge. He earned his PhD in education from the
University of California, Los Angeles. He has contributed much
to the field of service learning through his research and publications.
He has received many grants, contributed to more than 25 studies,
and published more than 70 articles, monographs, book chapters,
and books. He has taught and developed curriculum for every level
of education from kindergarten to college, and he has worked with
faculty from major universities across the country to develop service-
and experiential-learning programs. He has been invited to speak
and present at local, state, regional, national, and international
conferences to share his extensive knowledge about experiential
learning.
Health occupations are located in the service sector. Health professionals
provide education and specialized services to meet the needs of
communities. How we conceptualize the organization and delivery
of services is critical to the effectiveness of programs and the
empowerment of individuals to ensure their needs are being met.
Service learning and community engagement are two terms used today
to describe the nature and context of connections between universities,
schools, and communities that address the concerns of civil society.
In this presentation, we discuss the reasons why service, learning,
and community involvement are important components of effective
delivery of health care in any community setting.
“Community Service Learning Programs in the Context of Community
Health Centers”
Vickie Ybarra, RN, MPH, Yakima Valley Farm Workers Clinic
Ms. Ybarra is Director of Planning and Development at Yakima Valley
Farm Workers Clinic, a large community/migrant health center in
central Washington State. She worked as Director of Community Health
Services for eight years before recently being promoted to her current
position. She has her undergraduate degree in nursing, and in 1996
completed her Master’s in Public Health at the University of Washington.
Most of her work involves development, oversight and evaluation
of support programs for Spanish-speaking pregnant women and families
with young children.
She is also active in her community with health care workforce
development, particularly working to increase the number of local
Hispanics entering nursing. Vickie is also active in statewide
health policy development as a member of the Washington State Board
of Health. She developed principles of community-campus collaboration
used by her health center; pioneered a pipeline to higher education
for Hispanic children through partnerships with K-12 schools, colleges,
universities, and residency programs; and engaged in community-based
participatory research partnerships that are addressing health disparities.
Ms. Ybarra serves on the Yakima School Board and is a board member
emeritus of Community-Campus Partnerships for Health. She was recently
appointed chair of the Washington State Governor’s Task Force on
Health Disparities.
This presentation will provide information on the efforts of the
Yakima Valley Farm Workers Clinic and its partners to expose middle
school to college students to health careers. Ms. Ybarra will discuss
the various components of the ConneX Program and the effect of budget
cuts on Title VII programs. In a post-HCOP climate, however, opportunities
have arisen for new partnerships, communication about concordance,
planning for change, program evaluation, and leadership.
Panel Discussion: “Community Service Learning in the Context
of Community Health Centers”
Representatives of Border States:
Sandra Daley MD, University of California, San Diego School
of Medicine
Adela Valdez, MD, University of Texas Health Science Center
at San Antonio (Harlingen Campus)
Dan Young, PhD, University of New Mexico
Jill Guernsey de Zapien, University of Arizona College of
Public Health
Sandra Daley
Dr. Daley is a Professor of Pediatrics and Assistant Dean of Diversity
and Community Partnerships at the University of California, San
Diego School of Medicine (UCSD). She received her medical degree
from the same university. After completing her residency training,
she spent 12 years of her professional career as a clinician medical
director. She became the Executive Director of the Comprehensive
Health Center, a community-oriented primary care clinic located
in the predominantly Hispanic and African-American low-income neighborhood
of southeast San Diego. Dr. Daley is of African origin and Hispanic
cultural background. She is fluent in Spanish and English.
Her professional and community activities involve the development
of innovative models of health care delivery and programs to increase
diversity in the workforce. She combines research and community
service by developing, implementing, and evaluating a school-linked
Health Service and Educational Models in a Community Outreach Partnership
Center in the Mid City area of San Diego and a Center of Excellence
in Partnership for Community Outreach, Research and Training (EXPORT).
Dr. Daley has participated in the design and implementation of
programs in partnership with agencies such as the San Diego Community
College District; the County Department of Health and Human Services;
the San Diego and Sweetwater School Districts; the San Diego Housing
Department; Children's Hospital and Health Center; and Mid City
for Youth.
As the Director of Pediatrics at the Comprehensive Health Center,
a community clinic in a predominantly Latino low-income community
in San Diego, Dr. Daley designed a Core Clinical Pediatric four-week
rotation at the Center. Dr. Daley describes how the 10 principles
of good practice in combining service and learning were applied
in the design of the clinical training experience.
Adela Valdez
Dr. Valdez is the Regional Assistant Dean at the Regional Academic
Health Center, a regional campus in Harlingen, Texas, of the University
of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio. In 2000, she completed
a one-year NYU/NHMA fellowship in Health Disparities with emphasis
in cultural competence. She is a past member of the state government
relations and diversity committees of the American Cancer Society
(ACS). Dr. Valdez was named as Presiding Officer of the governor-appointed
State Health Disparities Task Force (served 2001-2005). She is
Chairperson of the Valley Baptist Medical Center (VBMC) CME Committee,
and active member of the VBMC IRB committee. Dr. Valdez has lectured
at state health disparities conferences on health disparities, and
presented in academic medical centers on Folk Medicine and Mexican
American belief systems. She was named the state’s representative
to the Agency for Health Research and Quality national conference,
which focused on best practices and review of the National Health
Disparities Report (2004). Dr. Valdez’s past experiences include
AHEC Center Director, a state indigent hospital administrator, and
medical director. Dr. Valdez was the founding Interim Program Director
of the VBMC Family Practice Program.
Titled “Community Service Learning South Texas Style!” this presentation
introduces participants to the Rio Grande Valley service area and
the Multidisciplinary Primary Care Project. Dr. Valdez also tells
the story of Barry, a third-year medical student, and his positive
experience teaching middle school children about nutrition and health.
Dan Young
Dr. Young is the founding Director of the Research Service Learning
Program, supported within University College in the University of
New Mexico. As a faculty member at UNM, he directed the Middle-Level
Teacher Education Program. He received his BA in Anthropology/Linguistics,
M.Ed. in Curriculum and Instruction, and PhD in Curriculum and Instruction,
all from the University of Washington.
He was a Peace Corps Volunteer in Sierra Leone specializing in
Community Development, taught English in a Nigerian secondary school,
and has traveled extensively in India, where he is involved in rural
community development initiatives.
The Research Service Learning Program (RSLP) at the University
of New Mexico is in the process of creating a program Web site that
will provide campus and community partners with a comprehensive
set of servi ces. It will provide essential program-related information
about RSLP courses, community partners, community-based initiatives,
and program emphases. It will also provide partners with information
and tools, and may offer Web hosting.
The organization of the Web site is being conceived as a series
of concentric circles in which immediate needs (e.g., making students
aware of course offerings) are addressed first, followed by gradual
expansion to include UNM and community partners, links to relevant
resources, and so forth. The prospect of opening a Web site to
organizations across the state and region is thoroughly consistent
with the RSLP’s goal of serving the people of New Mexico and would
be a logical next step in the Web site’s development.
Jill Guernsey de Zapien
Ms. de Zapien is the Associate Dean for Community Programs
at the University of Arizona Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public
Health. With an academic professional appointment, Ms. de Zapien
has been involved in community-based public health interventions
and research in Arizona and throughout the Southwest and Mexico
for more than 20 years. As co-investigator of the Canyon Ranch
Center for Prevention and Health Promotion, the Reach 2010 Project,
the Binational TIES and PIMSA Projects, the Border Women’s Health
Institute and the Center for Health Equality, Ms. de Zapien partners
across the university to work directly with communities in the Southwest
to develop strategies for prevention interventions and the elimination
of health disparities. Jill is particularly proud of her collaborative
work with the promotora movement throughout Arizona and her
long-term commitment to community-based participatory research and
action. Most recently, she is serving as Principal Investigator
of a Community Campus Partnership grant to establish the Border
Health Service Learning Institute.
This presentation will discuss the creation of a Border Health
Service Learning Institute that will engage public health students,
faculty, and community partners in comprehensive community-based
collaboration to eliminate health disparities at the U.S.-Mexico
border. The University’s partners in this endeavor are the Arizona
Department of Health Services Border Health Office, the Southeast
Arizona Area Health Education Center and the Colegio de Sonora.
A week-long course for 20 master’s-level students will be offered
by the Institute in the summers of 2008 and 2009. In 2008, the
Institute will be implemented in Douglas/Agua Prieta, and in 2009,
it will be implemented in Ambos Nogales. The curriculum is being
developed by four faculty members, a research specialist and community
partners. The Institute will also include service learning activities
associated with Martin Luther King Day in 2008 and 2009, and will
correlate with specific activities designed with the partners.
The Institute will include students, faculty, and community partners.
Upon completion of the three-year project, continued collaboration
with partner organizations will ensure sustainability of the work.
“Tri-national Health Council’s Perspective on Service Learning
and Women’s Health”
Silvia Parra, Tohono O’odham Nation
Ms. Parra has extensive experience in working within the tribal
government system, most recently as the Chief Administrative Officer
of the Chairwoman of the Tohono O'odham Nation. In this capacity,
Ms. Parra provided oversight of tribal government operations and
collaborated across departmental disciplines to improve services
to community members.
Responsibilities included direct supervision of tribal indirect
and financial programs. Accomplishments included a 25% increase
in the indirect cost reimbursement rate; reduction in audit findings
within the single audit; and development of a uniform budget process.
Ms. Parra has also served as the Executive Director of Health and
Human Services of the Tohono O'odham Nation. As the Executive Director,
Ms. Parra was successful in collaborating in the development and
completion of the tribe's first “Community Health Assessment."
The health assessment included "face-to-face" interviews
with tribal members on the U.S. and Mexico sides of the border,
which is where U.S. federally - recognized tribal members reside.
Purpose: To describe cultural and logistical challenges
in providing health care services to tribal members on both sides
of the U.S.-Mexico border.
Learning Objectives: To recognize access to health care
issues faced by tribal members; to acknowledge how policy and practice
negatively impact health care delivery; and to recognize and see
the faces of those affected.
Recommendation: Provide learning opportunities to tribal
members on the use of contract health care and the cost of health
care when not delivered directly by the Indian Health Service.
Provide continuous education on the use of the tribe’s Health Transportation
Services. Provide information on how to manage chronic diseases.
“Cultural and Linguistic Competence and Minority Women’s Health
Curriculum”
Ana Nuñez, MD, Drexel University College of Medicine
Dr. Núñez is an Associate Professor of Medicine and Director
of the Center of Excellence in Women’s Health at the Drexel University
College of Medicine. She is also Director of the Women’s Health
Education Program at the College of Medicine. She received her
MD training at Hahnemann University. She has additional fellowship
training in medical education, health policy and health services
research. Dr. Núñez is a nationally recognized medical educator
in women’s health, primary care, cultural competency and health
disparities. She has served on numerous expert panels on women’s
health and cultural competency. She has been principal investigator
on a number of DHHS- and NHLBI-funded, educationally focused, health
services research studies. Dr. Núñez has presented nationally at
conferences addressing women’s health, curricular reform, women
and minorities in medicine, and cultural issues in health care delivery
and practice. Her research interests are in girls’ and women’s
health, minority women’s health, and culturally effective care.
She has been an advocate on eliminating health disparities along
gender and ethnic lines. She is a member of several professional
societies, including the American College of Physicians, American
Medical Association and National Academy of Women’s Health Educators.
To achieve cross-cultural effectiveness, health professional education
needs to augment and integrate specific elements and domains. Although
these core skills are needed for the entire population, they are
especially needed with minority women, who are more likely to have
the burden of gender health disparities. Comprehensive girls’ and
women’s health is defined as non-reproductive and reproductive health
of the whole person appropriate to the context of her world. Beyond
knowledge of food and habits, cross-cultural effectiveness includes
skills such as a non-stereotyping attitude, an understanding of
acculturation influence, a receptivity of a strengths-based approach
to difference, an awareness of variance within a broader normative
range, a fluidity and accuracy of interpretation of verbal and non-verbal
behavior beyond one singular frame, an ability to effectively see
one’s role within the dynamic, critical thinking about etiology
of cultural variance and health outcomes, and the ability to generate
a collaborative patient-health care professional team. Issues and
resources of cultural and linguistic competence, as well as health
priorities for minority women and educational strategies for integration,
will be discussed.
Panel Discussion: “Cultural and Linguistic Competence and Minority
Women’s Health Curriculum”
Representatives of Border States:
Patricia Cantero, PhD, Latino Health Access
Carmen Ferlan, Mariposa Community Health Center
Yolanda Gonzaga, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Susan Thom Loubet, New Mexico Women’s Agenda
Patricia Cantero
Dr. Cantero is Director of Evaluation for Latino Health Access,
a non-profit organization serving the Latino community in Orange
County. She received her Doctor of Philosophy in Preventive Medicine
from the University of Southern California (USC) and her Bachelor
of Arts in Psychology from San Diego State University. Dr. Cantero
has conducted research and published articles on Type 2 diabetes,
breast cancer, and smoking cessation. She is the recipient of several
honors and awards, including the National Cancer Institute Fellowship
and the National Institutes of Health Minority Access to Research
Careers grant. Dr. Cantero has also been a guest lecturer at USC
on topics ranging from gender and minority health to basic theory
and strategies for compliance.
Medical schools include cultural competence components in their
curriculums, and these could serve as examples for graduate programs
that lack it entirely. If graduate students acquire any cultural
competence, it is accidentally through research. It is essential
for graduate students who conduct research primarily with Latino
populations to also have a cultural competence curriculum. This
would improve the research design, implementation, analysis, and
interpretation of the findings, particularly in minority women’s
health. The Por La Vida Cuidándome curriculum was
created as a guide to conduct educational sessions on nutrition
and cancer prevention among low-income Latinas. It has been a tool
not only for Promotoras who conduct the sessions, but for
medical and graduate students seeking to acquire cultural competence
in minority women’s health. This discussion will focus on strategies
for utilizing programs such as the Por La Vida Cuidándome
curriculum to expose graduate students to culturally sensitive methods
of designing and conducting minority women’s health research.
Carmen Ferlan
Ms. Ferlan is a Health Education Specialist at Mariposa Community
Health Center. She was the U.S.-Mexico Border Health Commission
(USMBHC) Outreach Coordinator for the Office of Border Health Arizona
Delegation. She was responsible for working with the Arizona-Sonora
Delegation to plan and support binational public health. Ms. Ferlan
received her B.S. in Nutrition and a Master’s in Public Health from
the Autonomous University of Nuevo León in Monterrey, Mexico, where
she was the recipient of the "Academic Excellence" award
from the School of Public Health. Ms. Ferlan also holds the MIS
Master’s in Sciences Business Information Systems from the I.T.E.S.M.
(Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Studies) in Monterrey,
Mexico, where she was an Associate Professor for 21 years. During
that time, she taught the use of different methodologies, including
at-a-distance education via satellite, for the Humanities and Sciences
Division.
Ms. Ferlan was the Training Curricula Development Specialist at
the Mariposa Community Health Center for four and a half years,
during which time she developed several curricula for the Promotora
position, such as: Lupus Awareness Project and educational curricula;
Menopause; Salud para Mi (Overweight program); Salud Si III (nutrition
and exercise), Healthy Heart (Corazon Saludable); HRSA; and Promotora
Border Health Institute (Leadership Program). Ms. Ferlan
served as Director of the Summer Computer Camp Program for children
for four years at I.T.E.S.M. Ms. Ferlan was a founding Director
of "The Wellness Program" at the I.T.E.S.M. She taught
this program for four consecutive years and oversaw 30 campus sites
throughout Mexico, being responsible for developing, implementing
and evaluating health programs. Additional responsibilities included
the development and implementation of an individual physical condition
evaluation program, physical fitness activities, health education,
health promotion, printed health materials, and management of the
Program's Spanish language Web site. Ms. Ferlan received an Honorable
Mention for Health Promotion and Education from the Mexican Health
Foundation and Glaxo-SmithKline in 2001. She is a Martial Arts
Instructor of Japanese-style "Goju Ryu.”
Ms. Ferlan will discuss the development of a Promotora-based,
culturally relevant lupus intervention program. This curriculum
development process included a literature review; listening to lupus
patients; an internal team development process; curriculum design;
pre-testing of the pilot with staff and Promotoras; and continuous
improvement and evaluation.
Yolanda Gonzaga
Ms. Gonzaga is director of Administrative Operations for the Office
of Diversity and Multicultural Affairs at the Texas Tech University
Health Sciences Center in Lubbock. Her responsibilities include
overseeing all administrative functions of the office, management
of scholarships and foundation funds, advising, and mentoring. She
manages the outreach and enrichment programs, delivers diversity
workforce leadership segments, and conducts presentations to community
partners regarding diversity issues.
For the past year she has focused her career on mentoring and serving
underrepresented and disadvantaged students and is actively involved
in the Closing the Gaps P-20 Coalition focusing on the educational
pipeline. Prior to joining the Health Sciences Center, she served
as clinical business administrator at University Medical Center
and Gateways Counseling Center. Yolanda serves on the advisory
council for the Covenant School of Nursing and is involved with
several organizations within Texas Tech and the community.
She holds a Bachelor of Science Degree in Business Administration
and Health Organizational Management from Wayland Baptist University,
and a Master’s Degree in Business Administration.
Essential components in today’s workplace require an understanding
of cultural and linguistic competency. The past decade bears witness
to the increasing prevalence of health disparities in health care
delivery. Individuals of limited English proficiency experience
less than adequate access to health care, lower quality of care,
and poorer health status, according to reports by the Institute
of Medicine (IOM). Cultural and linguistic competency starts at
the front desk, and to provide the best service (health care or
professional services), providers must begin to recognize the importance
of the diversity needs of their customers and staff. They must
play a dual role by assessing and treating these individuals appropriately
and in a manner that is sensitive to their learning styles, needs,
and concerns.
Susan Thom Loubet
Ms. Loubet is co-founder of the New Mexico Women’s Agenda, where
she served as Executive Director since 1989. She graduated with
honors from Bryn Mawr College and received her Master’s Degree in
Teaching from Yale University. Loubet has dedicated much of her
efforts to improving the condition of women and children. She served
as Executive Director of the New Mexico Commission on the Status
of Women in 1994. In 1995 she helped plan and actualize the conference
on Breast Cancer and Connection to the Environment. She has been
very involved in public policy by serving on multiple committees
and task forces, participating both as a member of committees and
as a chair of committees. She dedicated three years, from 1994
to 1997, serving on the Development Task Force, and recently, in
2006, she was appointed to the Early Childhood Action Network by
the lieutenant governor. She is published, and her voice is heard
throughout New Mexico in a radio show called “Women’s Focus.” She
has hosted this show since 1990. Her radio documentaries—titled
“Women Going to Prison in New Mexico and What Happens When They
Get Out” and “Voices of Domestic Violence”—have received national
awards.
As New Mexico considered changes and challenges to its health care
system, several people involved in health care services delivery
and health care advocacy were concerned that reforms to the system
should bring a women-centered perspective that would focus on women’s
unique life experiences and women’s DNA structure. A Women’s Health
Advisory Council was established by Governor Richardson in March
2006 to explore the challenge of highlighting women’s health within
the larger health system. This council has worked in conjunction
with the community in general to develop background information
on the status of women’s health in New Mexico, develop ways to make
that information available to the public, and make recommendations
about women’s health policy, including performance measures and
outcomes specific to women’s health. There has been a particular
effort to extend the definition of women’s health beyond reproductive
health, with a focus on research on women’s health and women’s health
in the context of community and health care delivery specific to
women.
“Promotoras as Community Teachers for Health Profession
Students”
Marylyn M. McEwen, PhD, The University of Arizona College
of Nursing
Dr. McEwen is an Associate Professor at the University of Arizona
College of Nursing. After receiving her B.S. in Nursing at the
University of Arizona, she began as a clinical nurse at the Kino
Community Hospital. She served as head nurse at the University
Medical Center, joined the Pima Community College Faculty, and acted
as research specialist before receiving her Master’s in Nursing
from the University of Arizona. In 2003, she earned her PhD in
Clinical Nursing from the University of Arizona and was promoted
from lecturer to associate professor. She is a member of multiple
health associations, including the American Nurses Association since
2003. Her research, which has been supported by grants from the
National Institutes of Health and other agencies within the United
States Department of Health and Human Services, has resulted in
numerous publications. She has received many awards for her research,
teaching, and work as a nurse. In 2006, she was honored with the
Tucson Fabulous Fifty Nurse Award, and the American Public Health
Association awarded her the Public Health Nursing Creative Achievement
Award.
The contribution of Promotoras to the health care delivery
team has been well documented. The roles Promotoras assume
in the context of health care organizations and community-based
care are diverse and complex. The Promotora model is widely
supported by national organizations such as the American Diabetes
Association, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, and
the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The evidence
of Promotoras’ impact on the health of populations includes
improved behavioral and physiologic outcomes for persons with diabetes,
increased knowledge and health status for persons receiving interdisciplinary
case management, improved cardiovascular disease risk profiles,
improved prenatal care and birth outcomes, and improved access to
health care. In contrast to their roles in health care delivery,
the roles Promotoras assume as community teachers for health
profession students has received limited attention. This presentation
will focus on the roles and contributions of Promotoras to
teaching health profession students. Exemplars are provided from
an interdisciplinary rural health training program in which Promotoras
were members of an interdisciplinary faculty team that prepared
health profession students to deliver case management services to
select populations and respond to community health needs. The role
of the Promotora in contributing to students’ preparation
for clinical practice, research, and service will be discussed and
exemplars provided.
“Promotoras as Community Teachers for Health Profession
Students”
Representatives of Border States:
América Bracho, Latino Health Access
Jonah García, Healthy Start
Emma Torres, Campesinos Sin Fronteras
Cliff Littlefield, PharmD, HCOE University of Texas at Austin
América Bracho
Dr. Bracho is the Executive Director of Latino Health Access, a
center for health promotion and disease prevention located in Santa
Ana, California. This Center was created under her leadership to
assist with the multiple health needs of Latinos in Orange County.
Latino Health Access facilitates mechanisms of empowerment for the
Latino community and uses participatory approaches to community
health education. The programs train Community Health Workers as
leaders of wellness and change. Dr. Bracho worked as a physician
in her native Venezuela for several years, after which she came
to the U.S. to obtain a Master’s Degree in Public Health at the
University of Michigan. Her Public Health specialty is Health Education
and Health Behavior.
After completing her Master’s program, Dr. Bracho created and directed
the AIDS project for Latino Family Services in Detroit, Michigan,
for four years. The program integrated HIV education programs that
addressed needs confronted by the community, including the need
for jobs, parenting classes, women’s health services, drug treatment,
and many others. She has been a trainer, presenter and consultant
for numerous government and private agencies around the nation,
including The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, The National
Council of La Raza, the University of Michigan, the University of
California in Los Angeles, University of Maryland, Wayne State University,
University of California in Riverside, John Hopkins University,
University of California in San Diego, The U.S. – Mexico Border
Association, the Texas Department of Health, the Joslin Diabetes
Center, The National Conference of Lay Advisors, and The National
Conference of Community Outreach Workers, among others.
Jonah García
Ms. García is a licensed independent Master’s-level Social Worker
with more than 20 years’ experience in health, behavioral health
and other social services programming. Ms. García has spent much
of the last 10 years on “Systems of Care” development and program
administration. Her broad work history and experience has led Jonah
to concentrate efforts on serving individuals at the most vulnerable
points in their lives, prenatal development and early childhood.
Ms. García advocates that children are best served within the context
of their family and environment, and promotes the value of family
leadership in systems development.
Ms. García has been the Program Director for the La Clinica De
Familia Healthy Start Program in Las Cruces, New Mexico, since 1999.
Since that time, she has integrated the Healthy Start Program with
Adolescent Family Life, Bienestar (Health Education), Father/Father-Figure
Involvement, and Early Head Start Programs to provide more comprehensive
services to families.
Ms. García will respond to the "Promotoras as Teachers"
presentation from the perspective and socio-political experience
of the Healthy Start Program's utilization of Promotoras.
The Healthy Start Program is a component of La Clinica De Familia,
which is located in Doña Ana County, New Mexico, on the U.S.-Mexico
border. The program has been very successful in incorporating Promotoras
into its philosophy and practice, teaching and learning with the
communities through the particular skills brought and reproduced
by each Promotora. Hence, the program has been able to operate
in conjunction with community teams that, although centered on fostering
a strong sense of community health action, differ in their concrete
emphasis on the basis of their composition and Promotora
leadership. The program couples this flexibility to community needs
with its own requirements for standardizing case management through
Promotora work. This, in turn, creates a creative tension
for the ethos of Promotoras as teachers. The panelist will
conclude by examining the implications and opportunities that this
creative tension entails, especially in terms of the growth and
complexity possibilities that bringing students into the equation
could represent, both managerially and in terms of community service
learning pedagogy.
Emma Torres
Ms. Torres is a co-founder and Executive Director for Campesinos
Sin Fronteras (CSF), a grass-roots, non-profit, 501c3 community
organization serving the U.S.-Mexico border communities of Yuma
County, Arizona. She is presently serving a four-year presidential
appointment to the U.S.-Mexico Border Health Commission. Torres
is a nationally recognized Hispanic leader and a community health
advocate at the forefront of low-income immigrants and the farmworker
population’s needs. Torres is a Mexican immigrant who grew up working
alongside her farmworker parents. As an adult, she put herself
through school, and in May 2005 graduated with a Bachelor’s Degree
in Social Work from Northern Arizona University.
Torres has worked in social service and public health organizations
for more than 20 years. She began her community work with the WIC
Program, where she worked as a Community Nutrition Educator for
six years. She worked for 10 years at the Valley Community Health
Center, a 330 federally funded organization that she currently serves
as a Board Member. Torres began addressing U.S.-Mexico border community
health issues in 1999 through her employment with the Arizona Department
of Health Services Office of Border Health. Torres has worked her
way up from a low-income, low-literacy farmworker, young widow and
mother of two to her present position as Executive Director for
Campesinos Sin Fronteras.
Ms. Torres’ most recent honorable recognition was when she became
the 2005 recipient of the Ohtli Award presented by the Mexican Ministry
of Foreign Affairs. The Ohtli Award recognizes individuals for
their work, research and academic or cultural service that has contributed
significantly to the furthering of U.S.-Mexico relations, and whose
work contributes to the well-being of the community of people from
Mexican origin living in the United States.
Promotoras de Salud (Community Health Workers) have long
been described as the bridge between the community and formalized
clinical or social services. Promotoras are a source of
health information and service referrals, as well as role models,
support systems, community advocates, and a shoulder to cry on in
times of need. On the U.S.-Mexico border, where there is a shortage
of health providers and low-income communities face barriers to
accessing care, Promotoras help to fill a critical gap in
health service provision.
As teachers for health professionals, Promotoras offer insights
in two specific areas:
(1) Culturally appropriate patient care
Culturally appropriate care means creating an environment where
patients feel respected and at ease, and where they are able to
interact comfortably with clinical staff, ask questions, and understand
instructions or advice from clinicians. As community members themselves
and with experience as patient advocates, Promotoras provide
expertise on cultural skills and patient needs.
(2) Patient/community perspectives on health care quality and
access to services
Many systems beyond medical networks affect people’s health and
health care. Family issues, employment, education, housing, and
access to support services all have an impact on health status,
access to care, and patient compliance. Promotoras interact
with patients on a more personal level than health personnel are
able to, giving them the “big picture” of health care issues in
the community. Promotoras can help health providers understand
the many factors affecting patients, therefore increasing the appropriateness
of the medical care that providers offer.
“Building Successful Strategies for the Future”
Martha Medrano, MD, MPH, The University of Texas Health Science
Center at San Antonio
Dr. Martha A. Medrano was born and raised in El Paso, Texas, one
of eight children. She obtained her undergraduate degree in 1977
from the University of Texas at El Paso, where she graduated with
high honors. Dr Medrano attended the University of Texas Health
Science Center at San Antonio (UTHSCSA) Medical School, graduating
in 1981. She entered Pediatric Internship at UTHSCSA in 1981 and
completed a General Psychiatry Residency and Child Psychiatry Fellowship
at UTHSCSA in 1985. Since 1986, Dr Medrano has served on the faculty
of the Department of Psychiatry, Division of Child Psychiatry and
Alcohol and Drug Addiction. Dr Medrano describes herself as a community
psychiatrist spending most of her career involved in community programs
and activities. Because of her interest in health promotion and
prevention, she returned to school and obtained a Master’s in Public
Health in 1996 from the University of Texas Health Science Center
in Houston, while continuing full-time faculty status.
Dr. Medrano is the Director of the Medical Hispanic Center of Excellence
at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.
She is also the South Central Regional Director for Redes En
Acción, a multi-site grant funded by the National Cancer Institute
to target cancer awareness, training, and research within Hispanic
communities. She also serves on the Minority Women Panel of Experts
for the National Office on Women's Health and the National Advisory
Board for the National Hispanic Medical Association, and is the
UTHSCSA representative to the National Association of Hispanic Serving
Health Profession Schools. Her research area of interest is the
effect of childhood trauma on women drug addicts. She recently
served as guest editor for a special issue of women, drugs, and
trauma.
Dr Medrano has an interest in teaching medical students, and other
health professions students, about differences in cultural health
beliefs. She has assisted in the development of cultural competence
teaching materials, case vignettes and case simulation. Dr. Medrano
has partnered with the UTHSCSA Department of Family and Community
Medicine to create a Medical Spanish course for second-year medical
students and a Spanish-Speaking-Only patient rotation for senior
students.
Arizona State Meeting
Summary
Facilitator: Ana Maria Lopez, MD, University of Arizona
Recorder: Andrew Stuck, Program Coordinator, University
of Arizona
1. How can cultural and linguistic competence curricula encompass
not only those experiences that take place within schools but the
entire scope of formative experiences within and outside of schools?
We need to start the learning process earlier by exposing students
to our diverse communities and patient populations; e.g. field work
courses for pre-med students, such as the FACES Internship (undergraduate
course that allows students to explore cultural aspects of the health
care system while shadowing health professionals in local hospitals
-- www.diversity.medicine.arizona.edu), the Conversantes
class (course that prepares undergraduates in medical interpretation
techniques and terminology while serving as volunteer Spanish interpreters
in local clinics), and guided tours of communities and agencies
working in the U.S. - Mexico border region and American Indian reservations.
However, in order to do this, health professions schools need to
develop strong partnerships with undergraduate institutions and
communities.
We need to expose our undergraduate and graduate students to more
health professional role models who come from culturally diverse
backgrounds.
We also need to develop more Service Learning (SL) opportunities
and link them together (year-after-year whenever possible). For
example, the Commitment to Underserved People Program (CUP- http://pcrm.medicine.arizona.edu/CUP/cup.html)
–a medical student directed SL program that provides early clinical
experience in the context of community service to rural and underserved
populations in Arizona. Student leaders in CUP design, organize,
and manage clinical and health education programs starting in their
first year of medical school and continuing throughout their
four years of medical school. Medical students earn points for participating
in CUP and are recognize by the dean at graduation.
2. How can community service learning curricula facilitate the
formation of thought of our students, not only at the level of the
individual person but also at the level of the group’s culture and
society?
We need to change the institutional culture of our health professions
schools. We also need to change the perception of society in how
it views health professions schools; if society expects medical
schools to value cultural diversity, it can guide schools on this
path.
We need to reform the process of admission at our health professions
schools to take into account cultural and linguistic activities/proficiency
in the decision making process.
We need to create an institutional culture that values these experiences,
e.g. reforms admissions, tenure process of giving credit to professors
for mentoring students in these types of experiences and for working
with the community. After all, the University of Arizona is a “land-grant”
institution that embraces a threefold mission of excellence in teaching,
research and public service.
3. How can Promotoras as community teachers of health
professions students facilitate learning/teaching and formation
of groups seen taking place reciprocally?
Promotoras can fill the gap between the textbook and reality.
They can introduce students into the community: teach them about
its history, its resources, its values, its strengths and weaknesses.
Promotoras can facilitate students’ entry into the community
and also prepare the community for the students (what is expected
from the community and how community members can participate in
the teaching/learning process). However, Promotoras also
should be remunerated appropriately for their work.
Action Steps that evolve from the meeting:
- Identify more service learning opportunities/sites and develop
mutually beneficial partnerships with these individuals/agencies.
- Improve process of connecting students with service learning
sites (we will explore the possibility of developing a service learning
opportunities database and connecting it to our website).
- Explore linkages, and possibly share databases, with the Volunteer
Center of Southern Arizona (http://volunteersoaz.org)
and other organizations from around the state that promote/facilitate
volunteer experiences for students.
- Increase interdisciplinary learning opportunities for students
in the health professions, such as Nuestra Comunidad, Nuestra
Salud (www.pharmacy.arizona.edu/outreach/ncns).
Include Promotoras as community guides, cultural brokers
and teachers of these students.
- Increase awareness of tri-national issues among COE Consortium
members and federal and government officials.
California State Meeting
Summary
Facilitators: Kathy Flores MD, University of California
at San Francisco-Fresno, and Sandra Daley, MD, University of California
at San Diego
Note Taker: Adriana Padilla, M.D. University of California,
San Francisco School of Medicine Fresno Medical Education Program
1. How can cultural and linguistic competence curricula encompass
not only those experiences that take place within schools but the
entire scope of formative experiences within and outside of schools?
- Don’t make it an elective; integrate it into a holistic model
of interaction with others and integrate it within the entire
curriculum. Medical Education frequently teaches about the influence
of culture in clinical medicine by using a culture of “stereotypes”;
why can’t students learn to approach a patient without race backgrounds
and definitions-just to learn about a patient.
- There was a suggestion that we need a holistic approach to incorporate
cultural effectiveness. One of the participants teaches a course
on this at Alta Med.
- It was noted that academia teaches innovations via standardized
patients which can introduce and promote cultural bias; a challenge
is to learn from patients for patient’s sake, like the apprentice
model. Academic institutions are guided by licensing organizations
that demand standardized training and equal training of all medical
students.
- Always include patient feedback and have incentives for the
“effective health provider”.
2. How can community service learning curricula facilitate the
formation of thought of our students, not only at the level of the
individual person but also at the level of the group’s culture and
society?
- Provide time for more reflection in all activities, especially
in clinical medicine where the focus can be on pathological rather
than whole patient issues. It may be more appropriate to approach
Cross Cultural Effectiveness and cultural competence from the
perspective of “how do you approach a person who is not you”.
This approach to teaching and learning is often a part of the
Service Learning curriculum.
3. How can Promotoras/es as community teachers of health
professions students facilitate learning/teaching and formation
of groups seen taking place reciprocally?
- Opportunities can be missed in cultural effectiveness because
medicine approaches education via the pathological model. We
should work with other health care stakeholders like nursing,
pharmacy, etc, to come up with joint curricula that is informed
and perhaps partially conducted by Promotoras/es.
- Encourage home visits accompanied by or conducted by Promotoras/es.
At the end of the state meeting summarize it would be helpful to
include either recommendations or action steps that evolved from
these meetings. Please forward these summaries to me by Friday October
12th.
Summary and Recommendations:
- Cultural and linguistic competence curricula should be a part
of the required course curriculum rather than an elective course.
The influence of culture in clinical medicine can be taught by
emphasizing “How to approach a patient without race backgrounds
and definitions-just to learn about a patient rather than by using
a culture of “stereotypes”.
- Change core competency standards in schools of public health.
The standards for Schools of Public health do not talk about cultural
effectiveness or community service learning.
- Train the teachers in professional schools who don’t necessarily
have the interest or tools to teach cultural effectiveness. Sometimes
they have no incentive. Work with other non-medical organizations
who do it well, for example all educators have to certify with
CLAD standards-cultural effectiveness and communication.
- Offer communication courses.
- Consider the management and leadership training programs designed
for the “for-profit” sector.
- Work with corporations who focus on consumer satisfaction.
- Promote Team based activities. Include promotoras/es in the
design and implementation of cultural and linguistic competence
curricula and service learning activities.
- Work in partnership with community based promotora/es
training and education programs to obtain and/or institutionalize
funding for participation in teaching, training and research in
health sciences centers.
- Establish Areas of concentration in health professions schools,
residencies and fellowships that focus on service learning.
- Identify, encourage and reward mentor/role models that demonstrate
the passion for altruism and teach community service learning
to medical learners.
- Reward students and faculty for humanism and community civic
mindedness.
- Facilitate and promote participation in workshops and trainings
such as the National Conference on Community and Justice.
- Encourage interactions with agencies outside of the medical
professions.
Action Steps:
The University of California is expanding class size by 10% in
its Schools of Medicine. The students enrolled in the classes during
this expansion will be selected for their interest in working with
underserved populations and will participate in the Program in Medical
Education (PRIME). PRIME Curriculum and courses designed to teach
and train these students may inform the curriculum at each of the
schools. The University of California, Davis School of Medicine
PRIME program will focus on rural population medicine; University
of California, Irvine PRIME currently includes promotoras
in the design and implementation of curriculum for students in their
Latino Culture program [however since this is not an integral part
of the medical school budget process, the extent of involvement
of promotoras is limited by the funding constraints of external
grants and contracts); University of California, San Diego School
of Medicine PRIME will focus on populations at risk for health disparities;
University of California, San Francisco PRIME will focus on urban
underserved populations; and, University of California, Los Angeles
will focus on leadership and advocacy. The PRIME programs pose a
unique opportunity to evaluate and track the type of curriculum
and activities developed to teach; the extent to which these programs
incorporate service learning and cultural and linguistic competence
curricula and any of the recommendations from this consortium and
other experts in the field; and the extent of the integration of
PRIME curriculum, activities and teaching into the medical school.
New Mexico State Meeting
Summary
Facilitator: Dan Young, PhD, University of New Mexico
Recorder: Pamela DeVoe, MA, University of New Mexico
Guiding questions:
- How can cultural and linguistic competence curricula encompass
not only those experiences that take place within schools but
the entire scope of formative experiences within and outside of
schools?
- How can community service learning curricula facilitate the
formation of thought of our students, not only at the level of
the individual person but also at the level of the group’s culture
and society?
- How can Promotoras as community teachers of health professions
students facilitate learning/teaching and formation of groups
seen taking place reciprocally?
One of the main considerations for cultural competence is the inclusion
of all populations, especially minority and women, in teaching of
clinical skills and research.
NIH is so research focused that it doesn’t want to talk about service,
in terms of access to healthcare, cultural competence in medical
care, or the extent of diversity issues in medicine. For instance,
the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin
Diseases discovered that it had no minority data, so there is a
new focus now to do research on minority populations, including
translational research. NIH created a fund of money that translates
research into community service.
It is important to look at different populations, and regional
population differences. Health disparities—introduced as national
issue--Every NIH Institute has its own focus on health disparities.
Understanding differences in cultures precedes collaboration. So,
the question is how to get people involved in professional training
programs, applied research, etc., and in collaboration across disciplines.
Common themes of this group today are:
- community perspective—increasing service
- university—increasing diversity
- research—how does community have input; social side of research/service
- diversity—meaningful, accessible practices; how do we listen
to people about research agenda?
For today’s discussion---How can people in New Mexico work together
toward common goals? Specifically, what are best ways to direct
and prepare students toward an interest in health care, especially
from the high school age and older?
Education & Training—Cultural & Linguistic Competence
Curricula, Community Service Learning
What are some new ways to help minority students to be more successful----
institutions are not set up for minority students—and any changes
implemented will have to be an interdisciplinary effort.
Some women want to be nurses, but there is lack of support and
information available to minority students. Counselors need to
give information at high schools, colleges; they need to be motivational.
Lack of information blunts motivation.
For example, there was an education summit in Las Cruces for high
school dropouts, 100 kids attended and were asked why students drop
out—they say when they transition from middle school to high school,
they have no support from teachers and counselors—so they turn to
peers for information but can’t get the information and guidance
they need, so they give up and leave school.
We need to search for the common good, and to accomplish this research
in education and learning is needed. The public education environment
is passive, boring, etc., and colleges are same—not motivational
to students. How do we create culture change for the necessary
motivation? What about training for specific jobs? Education which
is focused on generalized learning has theoretical value, to promote
academics; but then loses the practical focus, the application—so
this is not a good fit.
At two-year schools, such as branch campuses and community colleges,
the focus is more applied, what we do is transformation; accomplished
by using community service learning. Our students are mainly adult
learners and connected to the community—so service learning experiences
are more meaningful because they take place in the students’ own
community.
To develop valuable service learning experiences, ask community
members what they need. For example, “If you could have one person
for 4 months working with you, how would you use them?” It would
be a valuable experience for graduate students to come to Gallup
(UNM Branch Campus) for real applied experience that is community
based, especially in Indian health and community health. Especially
considering, how common it is for graduate students to not know
about research until they are ready for dissertation. Applied practice
could be a valuable experience for them as well, especially when
integrated with research processes.
Service learning, however, is more the exception than rule. We
need to find ways to make it the rule, not just add service learning
projects but integrate these experiences into the regular curriculum.
To do this we need to put service learning into faculty portfolio
requirements, because most teachers will teach as they are paid
to teach, or as they are evaluated. So the question is, “how do
we move toward this common purpose?”
Can we work with kids at younger ages to get them involved in service
learning, etc., and any community- based learning, so they come
to college already knowing what it is about? Are communities willing
to invest in a common agenda?
Access—Promotoras as Community Teachers of Health Professions
Students
People confuse delivery of health care with paying for health care,
assuming that paying equates with quality access. Questions remain,
such as, in what ways does payment for services actually increase
access to services, what challenges remain for patients?
What does access to health care look like to men? What are the
particular health issues for men? Pregnancy initiatives are focused
on girls/women, but where are the boys/men? HIV also—where is the
focus on men?
Another point about access is language. In the border area, students
need to speak Spanish; for university students, if they cannot become
bilingual, they will have problems understanding fully what patients
are saying.
Institutional change.
The ability and willingness for institutions to change is another
issue. For example, the Promotora movement----it might be
beneficial to change institutional views to give college credit
for Promotoras’ training.
Mentoring.
NIH reports that seven of every 10 Latino students in the physical
sciences are girls. When recruiting for scholarship programs, these
social patterns need to be addressed. This is also true in engineering,
technology, biomedical engineering, etc. We need to be mindful
of keeping girls interested, and academically prepared and at the
same time find ways to engage boys academically and hold their interest
in school. Not only is recruiting necessary, but mentoring is also
important. Immigrants need mentors in U.S., we know education is
important, but we don’t know the system.
For example, one school offers help for students. There is a parents
and students program to visit universities, paid for by scholarship.
Most often these are pre-college scholar programs; mother-daughter,
father-son. Kids become motivated to attend college through these
visits. Parents and teachers are as important in recruiting students.
Opportunities for students exist, but there has to be preparation.
When scientists complete letters of reference for students for NIH
summer programs, they need to be detailed. So teachers need to be
taught how to write good letters, using specific examples. Teachers
have to be aware of the field, so students can get counseled.
Teacher letters, notes are important because they can use community-based
practitioners for references. Communities need to be concerned
with the quality of the service learning experiences they provide
for students. So there needs to be long term relationships between
schools and community based organizations.
The World Health Organization program has 20 years of different
projects. We should have a state strategy that goes over several
years, includes different disciplines, this will also have the benefit
of stopping the “free volunteer labor” issue that comes up in service
learning projects.
Choice is very important in learning. It creates engagement for
students, and when engaged, they have a higher level of commitment.
What is needed for long-term planning? Start with high-functioning
kids to build long-term commitment and credibility at community
sites. Establish and then maintain relationships in the community,
these sites will work with students year after year for the benefit
of both students and community members.
Goals, ideas for future directions
Based on this discussion, what are we willing to do? What is people’s
commitment? Changing school systems? Any project will take commitment.
I contacted Medicaid office to pilot a Promotora model for
case management, but also found that regulations and liabilities
must be dealt with first.
Universities are not the entities to change things. Communities
can change things, for instance the project of increasing members
from diverse communities in the health professions. An example
is the fairly new UNM BA/MD program—an idea which came from New
Mexico communities—and is an affirmation that we need more minorities
in medical school. We also offer Lottery scholarships, for 8 semesters,
UNM also starts undergraduates with a “bridge” scholarship. These
scholarships are a mixed blessing because students must come right
after high school and may not be ready yet for college, or ready
to make major career decisions.
It might be preferable to grant students credit for what they know
when they start university. Some deserving minority students don’t
even get into college. These kids want service and community learning.
If they take some work before college, the learning has more meaning
for them. Our challenge is engaging them intellectually and socially.
We’ll have to look at what goals are good for New Mexico long and
short term? The pipeline into health professions needs attention,
ways to ensure that students come to the university with preparation
in math and science. What do we need and what can we bring to accomplish
that?
Although there are lots of needs in New Mexico, there is also lots
of talent. Our problem is to connect the talent with the need---kids
in school equal talent, especially when they get to college. How
do we get the appropriate education for students and how do we help
them thrive in college? People can collaborate on ways to get there.
I know what I want to get out of this meeting, but I am not sure
what I can contribute, because the population I work with is different.
When I am not sure of what my place is, then I am not sure what
I can contribute to the discussion. I can offer interesting experience
with native communities. As someone who has done service learning
for a long time, I can help to offer sites, etc.
Another way to look at this is that relationships are reciprocal,
so if you know what you need, this also leads to what you each can
contribute.
At state meetings, we should try to move toward more practical
applications of what we’ve learned at the forum from Monday. What’s
real, what are we trying to work on? How do these connections at
the forum help the process? What mechanisms are now in place to
help us move forward? Whatever we come up with, what is in place
to help the process along?
Supervision for Community Service Learning
We would like students to be working with community groups. A barrier
is that in schools of social work, we need someone with a master’s
of social work to supervise graduate students. Every grant puts
in for master’s-level social workers to work in community however
this requires professional support in the community. A practical
thing might be to identify—if you have a social work student—what
could they do at agencies.
From the perspective of Women’s Health Clinic in Santa Fe—as a
clinic, we would like to see much more resource involvement. This
involves identifying the need students and clients have, so schools
can contact the clinic for these learning experiences. Social workers
at that site would find health resources for clients, do patient
counseling and advocacy, and do follow up.
Is supervision an issue for others? Who monitors students in the
community? An MSW needs an MSW to supervise, but other fields do
not necessarily need the same credential to supervise. Not every
agency has an MSW on staff. It is a matter of credentialing tasks,
not individuals. At our school, when it is a practicum and clinical
we do need an MSW to supervise, but otherwise when it is part of
a class, we don’t need an MSW.
Recruitment of students into Healthcare Training
At Sunland Park, we would like to see Promotoras give presentations
to school groups, and use a father, mother program where students
and parents come to the university, and gather information on health
careers. This exchange could happen once a week or once a month.
We could start with high school, and add middle and elementary when
there is funding. Students would be delighted to get this information—in
a summer camp, autumn camp, etc. format.
It has to be year round to gather students together. Also, make
sure information about resources is available to all students, especially
different parts of the state. Information needs to encompass opportunities
in all health careers.
We’re not reaching rural areas—students are not informed in middle
and high school. Young people involved in sports are more involved,
more in the know. In Anthony and Sunland Park, New Mexico, kids
with higher grades get the information from counselors and teachers.
As an average student, without a push from siblings, I would never
have gone forward. We need information about financial aid; students
are reluctant to ask for help, so if we can push it on students,
they need that extra help.
The UNM recruiting group is moving to other areas of the state
with information. Recruitment of New Mexico students into health
care, and retention of students in health care programs can be supported
through community service opportunities.
We could have Promotoras talk with students and have community
members talk with students, and that way community members also
gain confidence. This would give students information on what community
health needs are, and how some different health providers address
those needs. As Hispanic people, it is easier when Promotoras
interpret medical services to clients.
We have gone to schools to talk about social work. NMSU also has
career fairs. Use of community colleges would help students get
academics up to speed, then they could transfer to a four-year school.
But students who start at community colleges usually don’t transfer
to universities. This is only viable if there is a university presence
in the community college to keep that connection.
Improvements to better prepare students for health careers
We are acknowledging we have multiple needs, but we have to prioritize.
Before the workshop (this afternoon), we have to take some time
to decide what are our community needs, then school needs, then
state needs.
Kids don’t know how to read—we teach theory without experience,
but improving our dismal academic performance depends on applied
experiences.
Intel comes to town with a need for certain training, puts in some
funding, and whole schools turn around academic offerings. We have
lots of needs in New Mexico, but we could link needs with service
learning activities to address these.
How can we work together? When we send someone to community sites,
what is it we want them to accomplish? What do we want to happen?
At NMSU, had a needs assessment asking students what they see as
community issues, etc. There are many ways getting at service learning,
but we can also pay attention to student views.
Universities in Mexico require a year of social service at poor
clinics. Medical students also need to do this— it helps the community
and the students learn from the people. We could use community
clinics for these sites. We can have social work students go into
communities to work with poor people in Anthony, Sunland Park and
Chaparral, New Mexico.
We would need transportation and bilingual individuals with desire
to work in a community of underserved people. Students need to
be able to speak with clients, and commit to a year or more to follow
through. If you make requirements, this will happen.
Recommendations
- High school counselors need to be knowledgeable about the process
of training for health careers, and college in general, and regularly
share this information with students. Hold regular training sessions
for teachers and counselors so they can become informed in order
to communicate correct information.
- Ensure that education in high school and college has some emphasis
on practical application so that students can be motivated to
remain in school, and see the relevance of what they are learning
as training toward career opportunities.
- Engage Promotoras to speak with and work with students
in community settings to explain and describe the health care
needs in the community and show students how they can contribute.
- Expand service learning opportunities for high school and college
students in communities, in areas relevant to health care and
leadership development. Evaluate, improve, and report progress.
- Integrate service learning opportunities into the regular curriculum
in the state’s high schools and colleges.
- Integrate acknowledgement for service learning efforts into
faculty portfolios to encourage program building and compensate
faculty members for their efforts in service learning curricular
components.
- Continue to focus in the state on improving reading, writing,
mathematics, and science knowledge for all New Mexico students,
to ensure their career opportunities and the state’s need for
health care providers.
Texas State Meeting
Summary
Facilitator: Cliff Littlefield, Pharm D, University of Texas
at Austin, College of Pharmacy
Recorder: Larry Morningstar, DrPH, University of Texas
Health Science Center at San Antonio, Department of Family and Community
Medicine
Three questions were to be discussed during state meeting:
- How can cultural and linguistic competence curricula encompass
not only those experiences that take place within schools but
the entire scope of formative experiences within and outside of
schools?
- How can community service learning curricula facilitate
the formation of thought of our students, not only at the level
of the individual person but also at the level of the group’s
culture and society?
- How can Promotoras as community teachers of health professions
students facilitate learning/teaching and formation of groups
seen taking place reciprocally?
These questions require the Texas group to explore new dimensions
of human interactions and the concept of vulnerability that drive
and bring us together. We need to get to the roots and causes,
and get beyond the superficial differences that make us up. The
following themes emerged and correspondence of participants around
these themes is listed.
This touches on cultural and linguistic issues within schools,
and how uninformed our concepts are within and outside of schools
of education.
As institutions, we are getting more comfortable with cultural
differences within different communities. In the community, we
do not talk about our own individual differences, and it is reflected
in us as health care providers.
Current Cultural Competence (CC) models move across proficiency.
Pharmacy has had heated debates with terms, for example, the definitions
that are utilized for levels of CC proficiency. There has been
a redefining and articulating of CC.
It may be broader issues. For example, are we seeing a change in
academic versus in society? Demographic changes are undergoing dramatic
shifts and changes in population. We have the tendency to group
with people that look like us and think like us. But a new shell
is emerging that exposes us to our differences. What is important
about those differences? The “construct” is where we may get in
trouble. A society that is not familiar or similar to the emerging
minority groups and the society’s responses to these groups is an
ongoing issue. The solution to these perceived differences may
be the partnerships that can be created to navigate these differences.
We need to see our patients as people first. There are three complimentary
terms—awareness, cultural confidence (after provider-patient interaction
occurs well) and effectiveness—with all three being another aspect
of a CC continuum.
Linguistic and cultural awareness go beyond semantics differences.
For example, in the clinical setting, we need to include and test
CC of physicians. Sometimes, CC has to include the language of
patients who are not primary English speaking. Cultural sensitivity
is forgotten and impacts more than the language (Spanish) itself.
Those cultural values will make the differences. The doctor has
to connect with the patient’s culture. For example, an El Salvadoran
patient may say his problem is “lungs were pricked: “Pulmones estan
picado.” This regional difference in the same language of Spanish
requires a cultural translation. The patient was describing symptoms
of TB. Being able to speak and translate the language does not
assure cultural competence.
Enhancing the interaction between the provider and their patients
is key. We need to be empathetic. Culture differences may not
be as important as connection between the individuals. Barriers
can be overcome because you as a doctor care about the patient.
Obstacles to care may include using the wrong language or cultural
terms. Perhaps the patients are very poor and many obstacles exist,
and they are unable to tell you how poor they are. And you as a
provider may not understand the issue and experience of poverty.
We need to think about cultural humility. Accept that you do not
know or understand about poverty and other issues such as gender,
geography, age, history, immigration status, education, social economic
status. Admit what you really do not know and build the relationship
with your patient from there. Humanism is the culture of being human.
There is a time constraint placed upon doctors as to how much time
they spend with patients. When you have to translate into a different
language and from a different culture, it becomes may problematic
and a struggle to do in 20 minutes when a doctor has only a set
amount of time. In the culture of medicine, the physician may not
feel that they have the time to be empathic.
Over time you will pick up knew knowledge about your patients as
people. Try to learn something new from your patients that you
do not know before with each interaction.
Cultural Competence may be assuming we are mainstream as
physicians and may not be thinking like our patients. Why is it
that a line is drawn as to what is mainstream? We are a not a melting
pot. The patient do have a culture and they bring it to the table
as we do as physicians.
This discussion for some participants grew beyond the paradigm
of CC. When you strip it all away, isn’t it what one chooses to
understand? What is the psychosocial context of health? How do
people communicate and work within these variances? What can I
get my hands on? Behaviors are emulated and modeled. We define
ills from a lot of different sectors and there are system influences.
We need to communicate, teach and practice effective techniques
of providing care taking all these issues into consideration.
One participant always start the CC seminar by asking the question:
What is your culture? And ask student to define it for themselves.
I think of culture as a salad—some are tomatoes, some are carrots,
but we all are members of a this community salad. As providers we
focus on patient-centered care but to be better providers, we need
to understand ourselves and our culture first to understand how
this interaction impact on the care we provide for our patients.
Isn’t it a reasonable expectation to make health professions students
more sensitive to cultures? We can attempt to determine the impact
that learning has post training 1 year to 2 to 10 years. Should
we be concerned with the decay associated with learning over time
and does this learning decay as the providers enter into the real
health professions workforce? One way to measure sustainability
may be initially a pre-test of knowledge and then post-test again
at year two after the completion of training. The outcomes that
will demonstrate the degree of sustainability of CC training may
be that the providers are working in community health centers or
underserved areas
UTHSCSA medical students self-select to rotate in Harlingen, Texas,
an underserved community and already have an open attitude about
CC and therefore learn more about the culture of the community and
patients. The Lower Rio Grande Valley students were re-acculturated
to the Hispanic culture on the US Mexico Border after spending their
first two years in San Antonio. Our evaluation touched upon what
they have learned to apply CC in the clinical setting which re-enforced
what they learned in their first two years in medical school.
What is the role of humanism, poverty and what the medical students
may see from private practice? About 76% of physicians said they
are successful when they feel they have communicated well with their
patients. Being bilingual is seen as highly desirable by practicing
physicians. Seeing CC in action in the practice setting, what is
the longevity and longitudinal effect of the CC pedagogy if the
previous medical student enters private practice?
What effect does it have to come if some of medical student in
a clinical rotation group comes from a Rio Grande Valley public
school versus a prep school background? Have they learned to respect
the local community? How do they interact with each other? Is
there campus life for minority medical student when formal or distinct
subgroup form? Realistically, what do you tell them as faculty
members when you observe these in subgroups form?
On campus, what do you do to foster community within the campus?
What is the individual makeup of the first-year medical students,
and how do we bring a group of total strangers together and engage
with other people outside their subgroup?
It is important that faculty model to students not judging their
peers by perceived economic class and label all their peers as the
same. The point is the diversity of your medical school class depends
on admission criteria of the institution and barriers or access
in creating a diverse student body within the institution.
CC is not a hat that we can change when it is convenient. We need
to know that is in use all the time and informs and molds our behavior.
It is demonstrating respect and trust with our colleagues, students
and patients. We need to demonstrate CC in a qualitative way in
all aspects of our institutions.
Here is a story of a white Anglo male. He is introduced to urban
life and is terrified. He comes from a place where, as it developed,
his world view is very small and his maturity is narrow. This creates
anxiety. There is pulling and holding during the first two years,
a sense of where can I go next. From interacting with him, how
would we examine health outcomes and their impact with a sense of
community and providers? Given the right stimulation, this can
transforms this individual and all of us.
The medical student participant was trying to understand the discussion
while not having attended a lot of meetings with physicians. He
observed how everyone was focused and struggling with how CC is
defined. If we as faculty were struggling with CC terms and concepts
he imagined it would really hard to teach this as an institution
to students. Students feel pressured to understand basic medical
student concepts, especially pathology because a test is coming.
Students are limited by time. By shadowing physicians, Hispanic
students in medical school observed CC in action. He has been involved
with MAPA (the Mexican-American Physicians Association). The students
are allowed to evaluate our courses. He commented in his course
evaluation that a clinical skills lecturers describe the typical
San Antonio Mexican is obese, etc., introducing personal biases
and stereotypes into their teaching of culture. It might be important
to go back and tell these educators that not all Hispanics are the
same. Good role modeling is to teach empathic behaviors and not
prejudice.
Dr. Ana Nunez in her presentation today mentioned that within the
system of health professions, we can take care of patients in a
CC manner, but what can the provider do to change a culturally incompetent
system? How do we model or CC to the larger system? How I can
be a more effective health professional by attempting to impact
the system? In the health system environment—on self-reflection—we
are not perfect. If you care enough to see these barriers and make
an effort to go over them, that is where you as the provider can
connect with the patient and vice versa. We need to screen individuals
in the system for cultural incompetence. Overt examples of personal
bias and poor model of CC behavior should be addressed quickly.
What is the adult learning principal to communicate change in practice
over time? A 4th-year medical elective places students
into the undeserved community, maybe at a CHC. This is a moment
of opportunity. Some programs have seen changes in attitudes and
behaviors, an impact on residency selection, and infusion of values
into residency practices. These are social determinants of health
and cultural awareness.
It is may be more effective in a field such as biochemistry to
infuse CC with case vignettes. Cultural anthropology and other disciplines
may be needed in teaching CC in the curriculum. These are skills
that an anthropologist, for example, might have in introducing the
topic from a different disciplines perspective.
Where do medical students start their learning about community
lay workers? The medical students need an environment that allows
for learning and they need permission to ask questions about preconceived
concepts, such as Promotoras and asking questions like “where
do they come from?”
It is important to differentiate behavioral aspects, for example,
thinking versus doing. For example, how would a provider touch
a Hispanic patient in a culturally appropriate manner? In Hispanic
culture, touching on arm may be acceptable but in majority culture
it may be perceived as be sexual harassment. Also, coldness exhibited
by a White doctor may be offensive to some patients from other cultures
in whose native countries that behavior may not be appropriate.
However, one cannot assume and in fact White doctors will understand
that better than some Hispanic doctors.
Dr. Littlefield asked how the information learned at this Forum
can be used in members’ work.
There is a statewide Area Health Education Center (AHEC) network.
Each AHEC program does things differently, but they all work around
major themes in approaching certain issues. Steve Shelton offered
to disseminate what he learned about CSL in the eastern part of
the state. Pam Danner offered to share with the west and on the
border AHEC network. The AHEC program requested to add each group
member to its statewide distribution list.
Within the Consortium support, there is budget money to host a
statewide meeting, but instead, the group will explore piggyback
it to another planned meeting, possibly AHEC. Consortium members
will be planning during the year and will continue to communicate
about this option. The AHEC program has been involved with outreach
work through Promotores. The AHEC network is about to complete
the train-the-trainer application focusing advising kids to enter
health careers. Using students to promote health careers is an
additional idea for a new CSL project.
Selective Recommendations:
- Each institution should select a current community health issue
as an area of focus.
- Build collaborate in CSL within our own institutions is seen
as a big opportunity.
- Acknowledge that the priorities of institutions might not be
what the priorities of the border might be currently but CSL might
be the bridge to new initiatives.
- Focus school curriculum on health disparities in the southern
region.
- Follow trend regarding public health sources on the Border?
- Gain better understanding of the major need of our students?
The focus should center around workforce necessities of the Border
communities.
- Assure measures that will document successes?
- Acknowledge that lack of funding limits our capabilities.
- Redefine measure of success from get students into Medical School
“to find their niche along the way and that’s OK.”
- Return to our institutes with a commitment to strategize on
how we are going to impact our communities via CSL.
- Broaden our discussion from health disparities and workforce
improvement to improve health on the border.
|