ClinicalTrials.gov
 Home    Search    Study Topics    Glossary  
 

  Full Text View  
  Tabular View  
  Contacts and Locations  
  No Study Results Posted  
  Related Studies  
Fresh-Frozen Plasma Infusions to Reduce Risk of Bleeding Related to Invasive Procedures

This study has been terminated.

Sponsors and Collaborators: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Transfusion Medicine/Hemostasis Clinical Research Network
Information provided by: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00233246
  Purpose

This study will compare patients with mild to moderate prolongation of the INR test who receive FFP infusions prior to invasive hepatobiliary procedures for bleeding complications to patients who do not receive FFP infusions. Bleeding complications will be defined as meeting one or more of the following:

  1. Intrahepatic hematoma greater than 1 ml/kg of patient weight as seen on post-procedure ultrasound examination performed between 4 to 30 hours after the procedure.
  2. Greater than 1.6g/dL hemoglobin decline measured within 4 to 30 hours post-procedure compared with the pre-procedure value, in the absence of another identified bleeding source to account for the hemoglobin drop.
  3. Need for transfusion of packed red blood cells for procedure-related bleeding while in the study.

The secondary endpoints of this study will be: 1) The need to perform subsequent procedures (angiography, embolization, additional imaging study including computerized tomography (CT) scan, surgery) to diagnose or to arrest procedure-related bleeding OR the need for subsequent medical therapies (FFP, coagulation factor concentrates, anti-fibrinolytics) to treat procedure-related bleeding between time of procedure and the end of patient's time in the study. If necessary, the relationship of procedure or therapy to procedure-related bleeding will be assessed by an adjudication panel; 2) The predictive value of INR; 3) The effect of study treatment on change in INR; 4) The cost of preventing one bleed; 5) The predictors of bleeding other than INR; 6) The number of transfusion-associated adverse events encountered to prevent one bleed; and 7) The effect of treatment on bleeding grade.


Condition Intervention Phase
Blood Coagulation Disorders
Procedure: FFP Infusion
Phase III

Genetics Home Reference related topics:   hemophilia   

MedlinePlus related topics:   Bleeding Disorders   

U.S. FDA Resources

Study Type:   Interventional
Study Design:   Prevention, Randomized, Open Label, Placebo Control
Official Title:   Study of Hemostasis and Invasive Procedures (SHIP: A TMH CTN Study)

Further study details as provided by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI):

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Clinically significant bleeding (measured 4 to 30 hours after invasive hepatobiliary procedure)

Estimated Enrollment:   1300
Study Start Date:   March 2006

Detailed Description:

BACKGROUND:

It is important to determine whether or not prophylactic FFP is necessary for patients with mild to moderate elevation of the INR who require an invasive procedure. It is also important to establish whether routine pre-procedure coagulation tests are predictive of bleeding outcomes at the time of a significant invasive procedure. Although prophylactic FFP is often given to such patients before invasive procedures, there is little evidence to show that pre-procedure INR in this range is predictive of procedure-related bleeding or that prophylactic FFP reduces this risk.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

After obtaining consent and verifying eligibility requirements, the study staff will randomize the patient to one of two treatment groups. One group will receive a prophylactic FFP infusion before the hepatobiliary procedure. The other group will not receive prophylactic FFP.

The dose of FFP will be approximately 10 ml/kg. The dose of FFP for each patient will be determined in one of two ways in accordance with local policies: 1) rounding to the nearest integer number of units (Method 1); or 2) using split units (Method 2). The method chosen may vary between patients (e.g., a physician might decide to dose adult patients by rounding to the nearest integer number of units and to dose pediatric patients using split units).

Method 1: The dose of FFP will be the number of units that comes closest to a dose of 10 ml/kg, determined as follows: nearest integer to (10 x weight in kg)/200. Decimals .5 and higher should be rounded up to the next integer. Decimals less than .5 should be rounded down (e.g., a 70 kg patient would receive 4 units, while a 69 kg patient would receive 3 units).

Method 2: The dose of FFP will be chosen in order to come as close as possible to a dose of 10 ml/kg, and can contain either full units, split units, or a combination thereof.

After the FFP infusion (if any) and within 2 hours prior to the hepatobiliary procedure, blood will be drawn for laboratory tests and for the repository. Although Study of Hemostasis and Invasive Procedures (SHIP) will not be a truly blinded study, the clinicians performing the hepatobiliary procedure and the radiology team performing the post-procedure ultrasound will not be told whether the participant received prophylactic FFP. They will also not know the results of the immediate pre-procedure Prethrombin Time (PT)/INR and Partial Thomboplastin Time (PTT) tests.

Participants in the study may not be treated with any other systemic hemostatic agents prior to the procedure. Local hemostatic treatments may be used during the procedure, according to standard practice. The invasive hepatobiliary procedure techniques, all other concomitant treatments and interventions, and all post-procedure treatments and interventions are at the discretion of the treating physicians. Participants will be followed for clinical evidence of bleeding and will be treated as needed for any bleeding that may occur.

Repository samples will only be used for genetic and protein tests of hemostasis, coagulation, and fibrinolysis.

SHIP is designed as a one-sided non-inferiority study. The null hypothesis is that the proportion of patients not given prophylactic FFP who meet the criteria for the bleeding endpoint is at least .04 higher than the proportion of patients given prophylactic FFP who meet the criteria for the bleeding endpoint. The goal of this study is to determine whether there is strong evidence that the difference between the two treatment plans is not that large.

  Eligibility
Ages Eligible for Study:   4 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Undergoing one of the following percutaneous abdominal or transjugular invasive procedures: liver biopsy; liver-biliary abscess drainage; biliary tree drainage; or radio-frequency ablation of hepatic tumor
  • Platelet count greater than or equal to 70,000/microliter
  • INR greater than or equal to 1.3 and less than or equal to 1.9 (must not be based on a sample drawn within 24 hours of any prior FFP treatment)
  • A PTT less than or equal to 50 sec

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of warfarin, heparin, low molecular weight heparin, or other anticoagulant therapy within 5 days of the planned procedure (exceptions: prophylactic heparin injections into central venous catheters for catheter maintenance, prophylactic heparin (standard or low-dose) for prevention of deep venous thrombosis, and/or aspirin)
  • History of severe allergic reaction to plasma products
  • Use of any of the following second-generation anti-platelet agents: abciximab, tirofiban, clopidogrel, or ticlopidine
  • Currently receiving any dialysis
  • History of clinically significant bleeding diathesis, including Hemophilia A or B, von Willebrand's Disease, or congenital Factor VII deficiency
  • Known history of a coagulation-factor inhibitor within the month prior to the procedure (In the absence of a known history, testing is not required)
  • Active major bleeding; bleeding from gastrointestinal, pulmonary, mouth/throat, genito-urinary tract, or central nervous system sites (excludes guaiac positive stool sample without gross blood or melena, minor epistaxis, minor gum bleeding, microscopic hematuria, superficial bruises, normal menses, or minor vaginal spotting)
  • Pediatric patients requiring sedation in order to undergo a post-procedure ultrasound examination
  • Already received FFP in the 24 hours before the planned invasive procedure
  Contacts and Locations

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00233246

Locations
United States, Georgia
Emory University    
      Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
United States, Iowa
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics    
      Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242
United States, Maryland
Johns Hopkins Hospital    
      Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
University of Maryland Medical Center    
      Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
United States, Massachusetts
Massachusetts General Hospital    
      Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
United States, Minnesota
University of Minnesota    
      Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
Mayo Clinic    
      Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
United States, New York
Weill Medical College of Cornell University    
      New York, New York, United States, 10021
United States, North Carolina
University of North Carolina Hospital    
      Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27514
Duke University Medical Center    
      Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
United States, Pennsylvania
University of Pennsylvania    
      Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
University of Pittsburgh Presbyterian and Shadyside Hospital    
      Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
United States, Texas
University of Texas SW Medical Center    
      Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
United States, Washington
Puget Sound Blood Center Div of Research    
      Seattle, Washington, United States, 98104
United States, Wisconsin
Blood Center of SE Wisconsin    
      Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53201

Sponsors and Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Transfusion Medicine/Hemostasis Clinical Research Network

Investigators
Principal Investigator:     Susan Assmann, PhD     New England Research Institutes, Inc.    
Principal Investigator:     Mark Brecher, MD     University of North Carolina Hospital    
Principal Investigator:     George Buchanan, MD     University of Texas SW Medical Center    
Principal Investigator:     James Bussel, MD     Weill Medical College of Cornell University    
Principal Investigator:     John Hess, MD, MPH     University of Maryland Medical Center    
Principal Investigator:     Christopher D. Hillyer, MD     Emory University    
Principal Investigator:     Barbara Konkle, MD     University of Pennsylvania    
Principal Investigator:     David Kuter, MD     Massachusetts General Hospital    
Principal Investigator:     Jeffrey McCullough, MD     University of Minnesota    
Principal Investigator:     Janice McFarland, MD     Blood Center of SE Wisconsin    
Principal Investigator:     Paul Ness, MD     Johns Hopkins University    
Principal Investigator:     Thomas Ortel, MD, PhD     Duke University    
Principal Investigator:     Sherrill J. Slichter, MD     Puget Sound Blood Center Div of Research    
Principal Investigator:     Ronald Strauss, MD     University of Iowa    
Principal Investigator:     Darrell Triulzi, MD     University of Pittsburgh Presbyterian and Shadyside Hospital    
Principal Investigator:     James R. Stubbs, MD     Mayo Clinic    
  More Information


Study ID Numbers:   326, U01 HL72028, U01 HL72072, U01 HL72191, U01 HL72196, U01 HL72248, U01 HL72289, U01 HL72290, U01 HL72291, U01 HL72299, U01 HL72305, U01 HL72331, U01 HL72346, U01 HL72355, U01 HL72359, U01 HL072283
First Received:   October 3, 2005
Last Updated:   December 20, 2006
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:   NCT00233246
Health Authority:   United States: Federal Government

Study placed in the following topic categories:
Hemorrhagic Disorders
Hematologic Diseases
Blood Coagulation Disorders
Vascular Diseases
Hemorrhage
Hemostatic Disorders

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Cardiovascular Diseases

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on October 03, 2008




Links to all studies - primarily for crawlers