Primary Outcome Measures:
- Target vessel failure (TVF) defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization at 9 months post-procedure. [ Time Frame: 9 months post procedure ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Composite of MACE defined as death, myocardial infarction (Q wave and non-Q wave), emergent bypass surgery, or repeat target vessel revascularization at 30 dys and 3, 6, 9, and 12 mo, and 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 yrs post-procedure; [ Time Frame: 30 dys and 3, 6, 9, and 12 mo, and 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 yrs post-procedure ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Angiographic binary restenosis (>/=50% diameter stenosis) 8 mo post-procedure; [ Time Frame: 8 months post-procedure ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- In-stent and in-lesion MLD at 8 mo post-procedure; [ Time Frame: 8 months post-procedure ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Target lesion revascularization at 9 mo post-procedure; [ Time Frame: 9 months post-procedure ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Target vessel revascularization at 9 mo post-procedure; [ Time Frame: 9 months post-procedure ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Device success defined as achievement of a final residual diameter stenosis of <50% (by QCA), using the assigned device only. If QCA is not available, the visual estimate of diameter stenosis is used; [ Time Frame: Study Completion ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Lesion success defined as the attainment of <50% residual stenosis (by QCA) using any percutaneous method; [ Time Frame: Study Completion ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Procedure success defined as achievement of a final diameter stenosis of <50% (by QCA) using any percutaneous method, without the occurrence of death, MI, or repeat revascularization of the target lesion during the hospital stay; [ Time Frame: During the hospital stay ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Costs associated with the index hospitalization and length of stay, and repeat hospitalizations during the 12-month post-procedure follow-up period. [ Time Frame: 12-month post-procedure ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
This is a multicenter (55 sites), prospective, 2-arm randomized, double-blind study designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the sirolimus-coated Bx VELOCITYTM stent as compared to the uncoated Bx VELOCITYTM stent. A total of 1100 patients will be entered in the study and will be randomized on a 1:1 basis. Patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions >/=15mm and </=30mm in length and >/=2.50mm to </=3.5mm in diameter by visual estimate who meet all eligibility criteria will be either randomized to the sirolimus-coated Bx VELOCITYTM stent or the uncoated Bx VELOCITYTM stent. Patients will be followed at 30 days, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, and 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 years post-procedure, with approximately 850 patients having repeat angiography at 8 months. A subset of approximately 17 centers will participate in an intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) sub study, in which all patients at these centers will be enrolled in the sub study. Additionally, data will be collected for a medical economic analysis. These data will include costs associated with the index hospitalization and length of stay, and rehospitalizations during the 12-month follow-up period. This is a single lesion treatment study. Patients who have had interventions of other lesions within 30 days of the study procedure or have interventions planned after the index procedure are excluded. It is anticipated that the total length of the study will be 101 months: 5 months to complete patient enrollment and 8 years for follow-up.