ClinicalTrials.gov
 Home    Search    Study Topics    Glossary  
 

  Full Text View  
  Tabular View  
  Contacts and Locations  
  No Study Results Posted  
  Related Studies  
Safety and Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin A Injection in Patients With Painful Artificial Knee Joint

This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified by Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, September 2007

Sponsors and Collaborators: Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center
University of Minnesota
Arthritis Foundation
Information provided by: Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00403273
  Purpose

Primary Total Knee joint replacement surgery is highly successful surgery for relieving pain and improving function in patients with disabling arthritis. Unfortunately, like all biomedical devices, prosthesis failure is a complication of knee replacement surgery that leads to disabling pain, stiffness and loss of function. Approximately 1% of the knee replacements fail every year leading to a 20% failure rate over 20 years. The common causes of failure of prosthetic joint are infection, loosening, trauma or wear of the prosthesis. Currently, a revision surgery is the best option for long term pain relief (analgesics or other pain medications are options but are of limited benefit). Surgery may not be feasible in patients due to advancing age, other medical conditions and surgical/technical difficulties or patient's choice. In addition, the results from revision surgery are not as good as the initial knee joint surgery. Therefore, there is a great need for a novel, targeted therapy that provides an option to patients who are unfit, unable, or unwilling to undergo surgery.

In our recent pilot study, a single injection of Botulinum toxin A (Botox) in painful natural knee, ankle and shoulder joints of patients with various types of arthritis led to significant and durable improvement in pain and function and was safe to use. We propose this 6-month study to compare pain relief, improvement of function and safety of an injection of Botulinum toxin compared to placebo in patients with a painful prosthetic knee joint. Both patients and investigators will be blinded to the treatment assignment to a patient until the study is completed. We will assess the amount and duration of pain relief, improvement in function and short term safety of Botulinum toxin using standard validated measures. Patients will be evaluated at baseline, 2 weeks, 1-, 2-, 3-, 4- and 6-months after a single injection of either placebo or BoNT/A in the hip or knee prosthesis. If successful, this will offer a new treatment option for patients with a chronically painful knee prosthetic joint, provide more insight into the origin and cause of pain in prosthetic joints and direct future investigations in new directions.


Condition Intervention Phase
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Drug: Botulinum toxin A
Drug: Normal Saline
Phase II

MedlinePlus related topics:   Knee Replacement   

ChemIDplus related topics:   Sodium chloride    Clostridium botulinum toxin    Botulinum toxin A   

U.S. FDA Resources

Study Type:   Interventional
Study Design:   Treatment, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Official Title:   Botulinum Toxin A for Painful Prosthetic Knee: Randomized, Controlled Study

Further study details as provided by Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Change in Pain Severity on 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale [ Time Frame: 2- or 3-month ]
  • Change in Pain Severity on 0-10 cm VAS [ Time Frame: 2-/3-months ]
  • Change in Pain Severity on WOMAC Pain Subscale (0-100) [ Time Frame: 2-/3-months ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Patient global assessment of response to treatment. [ Time Frame: 2-/3-months ]
  • Physician global assessment of response to treatment [ Time Frame: 2-/3-months ]
  • Improvement in Physical Function subscale of the WOMAC and WOMAC total [ Time Frame: 2-/3-months ]
  • Qualitative assessment of pain relief [ Time Frame: 2-/3-months ]
  • Time to Onset of Pain Relief and duration of pain relief [ Time Frame: Upto 6-month data ]
  • Change in joint function as measured by active and passive range of motion, time for 50-feet walk and Time to perform sit to stand 10 times without using arms to push up (Timed Stands Test) and Timed up-and-go (TUG) tests [ Time Frame: Time of Maximum improvement upto 6-months ]
  • QOL: generic health status measure, the SF-36 and specific health status measures, the WOMAC [ Time Frame: 2-/3-months ]
  • Clinical assessment of joint erythema, warmth, swelling and tenderness [ Time Frame: Upto 6 months ]
  • Manual muscle strength testing of flexion and extension. [ Time Frame: Upto 6-months ]
  • Clinically important change in pain (at least a 2-point or 30% decrease in pain severity on 0-10 Numeric rating scale (NRS)) at 2-mo follow-up (FU) visit [ Time Frame: 2-/3-months ]
  • Minimal Clinically Important Improvement (MCII) on WOMAC physical function subscale [ Time Frame: 2-/3-months ]
  • Baseline Serum and Joint Fluid Cytokine Levels [ Time Frame: Baseline values ]
  • Change in Serum and Joint Fluid Cytokine Levels [ Time Frame: Baseline to time of maximum or no pain relief ]

Estimated Enrollment:   50
Study Start Date:   July 2006
Estimated Study Completion Date:   October 2008

Arms Assigned Interventions
A: Experimental
Single Intra-articular Injection of 100 units of Botulinum toxin A in 5 cc of normal saline in the Painful TKA at screening visit
Drug: Botulinum toxin A
100 units of Botulinum toxin A in 5 cc of normal saline in the Painful TKA at screening visit
B: Placebo Comparator
Single Intra-articular Injection of 5 cc of normal saline in the Painful TKA at screening visit
Drug: Normal Saline
Single Intra-articular Injection of 5 cc of normal saline in the Painful TKA at screening visit

Detailed Description:

This 6-month randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind trial will compare a single intra-articular (IA) injection of 100 units of Botulinum Toxin A (BoNT/A) to placebo for improvement in pain, function and quality of life (QOL), and safety in patients with painful total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients will be recruited at the Minneapolis VA Medical Center. Patients will be eligible if they are over age 18, have TKA, have pain ≥6/10 on 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) and are not candidates for revision surgery. The primary outcome is: (1) change in pain severity (on 0-10 NRS) 2 months after IA injection; Secondary outcomes that will be assessed at each follow-up (FU) visit include: (1) clinically meaningful pain relief (≥2-point or ≥30% decrease in pain severity on 0-10 NRS) 2 months after IA injection; (2) or (2) Minimal Clinically Important Improvement on Western Ontario MacMaster Arthritis Index (WOMAC) function subscale 2 months after IA injection; (3) amount of pain relief; (4) patient and physician global assessment of response; (5) QOL assessed by WOMAC and Short-form 36 (SF-36) scores; (6) change in function by Timed Stands Test (TST) and Timed-up-and-go (TUG) tests. We will determine time to onset of and duration of pain relief and time to improvement in function. Safety will be assessed by structured interview form for adverse effects, sensory and manual muscle strength testing, and index joint examination for swelling, erythema and tenderness.

At visit #1, after informed consent and screening for inclusion/exclusion criteria, patients will undergo: index joint X-ray, laboratory tests; history, physical examination, index joint pain history, comorbidity and medication history; patient pain assessments, WOMAC and SF-36; and blinded index joint, neurological examination, TST and TUG tests. 50 patients will be randomized to receive either IA BoNT/A 100 units or sterile saline in the index joint. FU phone interviews at 2 and 4-weeks will include pain assessments, WOMAC, patients' global assessment and adverse effects. Interim visits at 2, 3 and 4-months will be identical to visit #1, but will also include patients' and physicians' global assessment and there will be no joint injection. End of study visit at 6 months will be identical to interim visits with the addition of index joint X-ray and laboratory tests.

Multiple analysis of variance and generalized estimating equations will be used for analysis of continuous and categorical outcomes respectively. Chi-square tests will be used to compare frequency of adverse events. Analysis will be intention-to-treat with last observation carried forward for missing data.

  Eligibility
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female subjects, 18 years of age or older.
  • Written informed consent and written authorization for use or release of health and research study information have been obtained.
  • Subject has chronic Prosthetic knee joint pain for more than 3 months.
  • Subject has pain 6 or greater on a 10 point Numerical Pain Rating scale
  • Ability to follow study instructions and likely to complete all required visits.
  • Negative urine pregnancy test on the day of treatment prior to the administration of study medication (for females of childbearing potential). (if applicable)
  • Negative infectious etiology workup (joint aspiration, serological parameters such as Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP) and clinical examination).
  • Patients who were considered not to be candidates for Prosthetic knee joint revision surgery and have failed traditional treatments including oral pain medications, as determined by referring orthopedic surgeon

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of aminoglycoside antibiotics, curare-like agents, or other agents that might interfere with neuromuscular function.
  • Any medical condition that may put the subject at increased risk with exposure to BOTOX ®including diagnosed myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or known disorders of neuromuscular function
  • Females who are pregnant, breast-feeding, or planning a pregnancy during the study or who think that they may be pregnant at the start of the study, or females of childbearing potential who are unable or unwilling to use a reliable form of contraception during the study.
  • Know allergy or sensitivity to any of the components in the study medication.
  • History of recent or ongoing alcohol or drug abuse.
  • Known, uncontrolled systemic disease.
  • Concurrent participation in another research study
  • Any condition or situation that, in the investigator's opinion, may put the subject at significant risk, confound the study results, or interfere significantly with the subject's participation in the study.
  • Patients whose pain is rated as less than 6 on a 10 point Numerical Pain Rating scale at the screening visit
  Contacts and Locations

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00403273

Contacts
Contact: Jasvinder Singh, MBBS, MPH     612-467-4190     jasvinder.singh@va.gov    
Contact: Anthony Kouba, MPH     612-467-2720     anthony.kouba@va.gov    

Locations
United States, Minnesota
Minneapolis VA Medical Center     Recruiting
      Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55417
      Contact: Jasvinder Singh, MBBS, MPH     612-467-4190     jasvinder.singh@va.gov    
      Contact: Ruth Brady, BS     612-467-4190        
      Principal Investigator: Jasvinder Singh, MBBS, MPH            
      Sub-Investigator: Maren Mahowald, MD            
      Sub-Investigator: Richard Schmidt, MD            
      Sub-Investigator: Edward Santos, MD            
      Sub-Investigator: Terrence Gioe, MD            
      Sub-Investigator: Hollis Krug, MD            
Minneapolis VA Medical Center     Recruiting
      Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55417
      Contact: Jasvinder Singh, MBBS, MPH     612-467-4190     jasvinder.singh@va.gov    
      Contact: Anthony Kouba, MPH     612-467-2720     anthony.kouba@va.gov    
      Principal Investigator: Jasvinder Singh, MBBS, MPH            
      Sub-Investigator: Maren Mahowald, MD            
      Sub-Investigator: Richard Schmidt, MD            
      Sub-Investigator: Edward Santos, MD            
      Sub-Investigator: Terrence Gioe, MD            
      Sub-Investigator: Hollis Krug, MD            

Sponsors and Collaborators
Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center
University of Minnesota
Arthritis Foundation

Investigators
Principal Investigator:     Jasvinder Singh, MBBS, MPH     Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center    
  More Information


Study ID Numbers:   1-singh
First Received:   November 21, 2006
Last Updated:   September 19, 2007
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:   NCT00403273
Health Authority:   United States: Food and Drug Administration

Keywords provided by Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center:
Painful Knee Arthroplasty  
Botulinum Toxin A  
Randomized Controlled Trial  
Pain and Function  

Study placed in the following topic categories:
Botulinum Toxins
Pain

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Anti-Dyskinesia Agents
Therapeutic Uses
Central Nervous System Agents
Pharmacologic Actions

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on October 03, 2008




Links to all studies - primarily for crawlers