Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

The management of priapism

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Erectile Dysfunction Guideline Update Panel. The management of priapism. Baltimore (MD): American Urological Association, Inc.; 2003. Various p. [25 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse: the recommendations without the associated supporting text have been excerpted from the guideline. For full context, please refer to the original guideline document.

Recommendation 1:

In order to initiate appropriate management, the physician must determine whether the priapism is ischemic or nonischemic. (Based on Panel consensus.)

Recommendation 2:

In patients with an underlying disorder, such as sickle cell disease or hematologic malignancy, systemic treatment of the underlying disorder should not be undertaken as the only treatment for ischemic priapism. The ischemic priapism requires intracavernous treatment, and this should be administered concurrently. (Based on Panel consensus.)

Recommendation 3:

Management of ischemic priapism should progress in a step-wise fashion to achieve resolution as promptly as possible. Initial intervention may utilize therapeutic aspiration (with or without irrigation) or intracavernous injection of sympathomimetics. (Based on Panel consensus and review of limited data.)

Recommendation 4:

If ischemic priapism persists following aspiration/irrigation, intracavernous injection of sympathomimetic drugs should be performed. Repeated sympathomimetic injections should be performed prior to initiating surgical intervention. (Based on Panel consensus and review of limited data.)

Recommendation 5:

For intracavernous injection of a sympathomimetic agent, the Panel recommends use of phenylephrine because this agent minimizes the risk of cardiovascular side effects that are more common for other sympathomimetic medications. (Based on Panel consensus and review of limited data.)

Recommendation 6:

For intracavernous injections in adult patients, phenylephrine should be diluted with normal saline to a concentration of 100 to 500 mcg/mL, and 1 mL injections made every 3 to 5 minutes for approximately one hour, before deciding that the treatment will not be successful. Lower concentrations in smaller volumes should be used in children and patients with severe cardiovascular disease. (Based on Panel consensus.)

Recommendation 7:

During and following intracavernous injection of sympathomimetic drugs, the physician should observe patients for subjective symptoms and objective findings consistent with known undesirable effects of these agents: acute hypertension, headache, reflex bradycardia, tachycardia, palpitations, and cardiac arrhythmia. In patients with high cardiovascular risk, blood pressure and electrocardiogram monitoring are recommended. (Based on Panel consensus.)

Recommendation 8:

The use of surgical shunts for the treatment of ischemic priapism should be considered only after a trial of intracavernous injection of sympathomimetics has failed. (Based on Panel consensus.)

Recommendation 9:

A cavernoglanular (corporoglanular) shunt should be the first choice of the shunting procedures because it is the easiest to perform and has the fewest complications. This shunting procedure can be performed with a large biopsy needle (Winter) or a scalpel (Ebbehøj) inserted percutaneously through the glans. It can also be performed by excising a piece of the tunica albuginea at the tip of the corpus cavernosum (Al-Ghorab). Proximal shunting using the Quackels or Grayhack procedures may be warranted if more distal shunting procedures have failed to relieve the priapism. (Based on Panel consensus and review of limited data.)

Recommendation 10:

Oral systemic therapy is not indicated for the treatment of ischemic priapism. (Based on Panel consensus and review of limited data.)

Recommendation 11:

In the management of nonischemic priapism, corporal aspiration has only a diagnostic role. Aspiration with or without injection of sympathomimetic agents is not recommended as treatment. (Based on Panel consensus and review of limited data.)

Recommendation 12:

The initial management of nonischemic priapism should be observation. Immediate invasive interventions (embolization or surgery) can be performed at the request of the patient, but should be preceded by a thorough discussion of chances for spontaneous resolution, risks of treatment-related erectile dysfunction and lack of significant consequences expected from delaying interventions. (Based on Panel consensus and review of limited data.)

Recommendation 13:

Selective arterial embolization is recommended for the management of nonischemic priapism in patients who request treatment. Autologous clot and absorbable gels, which are non-permanent, are preferable to coils and chemicals, which are permanent, in the interventional radiologic management of nonischemic priapism. (Based on Panel consensus and review of limited data.)

Recommendation 14:

Surgical management of nonischemic priapism is the option of last resort and should be performed with intraoperative color duplex ultrasonography. (Based on Panel consensus and review of limited data.)

Recommendation 15:

The goal of the management of a patient with recurrent (stuttering) priapism is prevention of future episodes while management of each episode should follow the specific treatment recommendations for ischemic priapism. (Based on Panel consensus.)

Recommendation 16:

A trial of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists or antiandrogens may be used in the management of patients with recurrent (stuttering) priapism. Hormonal agents should not be used in patients who have not achieved full sexual maturation and adult stature. (Based on Panel consensus.)

Recommendation 17:

Intracavernosal self-injection of phenylephrine should be considered in patients who either fail or reject systemic treatment of stuttering priapism. (Based on Panel consensus.)

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

An algorithm is provided in the original guideline document for the diagnosis and treatment of priapism.

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is not specifically stated for each recommendation. Recommendations are based on review of the literature and the panel members' own expert opinions or consensus.

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Erectile Dysfunction Guideline Update Panel. The management of priapism. Baltimore (MD): American Urological Association, Inc.; 2003. Various p. [25 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: Guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2003

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. - Medical Specialty Society

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

American Urological Association, Inc. (AUA)

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Erectile Dysfunction Guideline Update Panel

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Panel Members: Drogo K. Montague, MD (Co-Chair); Jonathan Jarow, MD (Co-Chair); Gregory A. Broderick, MD; Roger R. Dmochowski, MD; Jeremy P.W. Heaton, MD; Tom F. Lue, MD; Ajay Nehra, MD; Ira D. Sharlip, MD

Consultants: Hanan S. Bell, PhD; Patrick M. Florer; Charles B. Hathaway, PhD

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Not stated

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

None available

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on June 24, 2003. The information was verified by the guideline developer on August 25, 2003.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is copyrighted by the American Urological Association, Inc. (AUA).

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo