Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Complete Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

VHA/DoD clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and management of hypertension in the primary care setting.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Veterans Administration, Department of Defense. VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for diagnosis and management of hypertension in the primary care setting. Washington (DC): Veterans Administration, Department of Defense; 2004 Aug. 99 p.

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: Diagnosis and management of hypertension in the primary care setting. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (U.S.); 1999 May. Various p.

COMPLETE SUMMARY CONTENT

 
SCOPE
 METHODOLOGY - including Rating Scheme and Cost Analysis
 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 BENEFITS/HARMS OF IMPLEMENTING THE GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS
 CONTRAINDICATIONS
 QUALIFYING STATEMENTS
 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GUIDELINE
 INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (IOM) NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY REPORT CATEGORIES
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

SCOPE

DISEASE/CONDITION(S)

Hypertension

GUIDELINE CATEGORY

Diagnosis
Evaluation
Management
Screening
Treatment

CLINICAL SPECIALTY

Cardiology
Family Practice
Internal Medicine

INTENDED USERS

Advanced Practice Nurses
Nurses
Physician Assistants
Physicians

GUIDELINE OBJECTIVE(S)

  • To describe the critical decision points in the management of hypertension
  • To provide a clear and comprehensive guideline incorporating current information and practices for practitioners throughout the Department of Defense (DoD) and Veterans Health Administration system
  • To improve local management of patients with hypertension and patient outcomes

TARGET POPULATION

Veterans and Department of Defense beneficiaries 17 years and older with hypertension

This guideline is not directed to the treatment of pregnant patients.

INTERVENTIONS AND PRACTICES CONSIDERED

Screening/Evaluation/Diagnosis

  1. Blood pressure measurements using properly calibrated and validated instruments
  2. Screening for hypertension at appropriate intervals based on risk factors (at least annually in adults)
  3. Follow-up at appropriate intervals (1 year, 2 months, 1 month, within 1 week, and immediately, depending on initial blood pressure measurements)
  4. Staging of patients based on blood pressure reading
  5. Patient history pertinent to hypertension
  6. Physical examination to evaluate for signs of secondary hypertension or hypertensive organ damage
  7. Laboratory and other diagnostic procedures (urinalysis, complete blood cell count, blood chemistry, lipid profile, 12-lead electrocardiography, creatinine clearance, microalbuminuria, 24-hour urine protein, blood calcium, uric acid, fasting triglycerides, glycosylated hemoglobin, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, thyroid-stimulating hormone levels, limited or standard echocardiography)
  8. Testing for identification of secondary causes (thyroid stimulating hormone level, 24-hour urine, serum potassium, serum calcium and parathyroid hormone levels, urinalysis, urine sediment, serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate)
  9. Assessment of risk factors for cardiovascular disease and target organ damage

Management/Treatment

  1. Diet and lifestyle modification:
    • Weight reduction
    • Limitation of alcohol intake
    • Limitation of sodium intake
    • Patient education
    • Aerobic exercise
    • Diet modification (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension [DASH] diet)
    • Cessation of tobacco use
  2. Pharmacologic therapy:
    • Thiazide diuretics
    • Beta-blockers
    • Nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (NCCBs)
    • Dihydropyridine (DHPs) calcium channel blockers
    • Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI)
    • Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs)
    • Alpha blockers
    • Alpha-beta blockers
    • Centrally acting drugs
      • Clonidine (tablet and patch)
      • Methyldopa
    • Peripherally acting drugs
      • Reserpine
    • Vasodilators
      • Minoxidil
      • Hydralazine
    • Aldosterone antagonists
      • Eplerenone
      • Spironolactone
    • Fixed dose combinations
  1. Treatment follow-up (3 to 6 month intervals)
  2. Adjustment of therapy and identification of causes if inadequate response
  3. Strategies to promote treatment adherence
  4. Special considerations for patients with comorbid conditions (diabetes mellitus, kidney disease, chronic heart failure);stroke prevention; and patients exposed to high ambient temperatures and/or extreme conditions

Interventions Considered But Not Recommended

Short acting calcium channel blockers

MAJOR OUTCOMES CONSIDERED

  • Blood pressure readings
  • Incidence of hypertension and prehypertension
  • Tolerability of therapy (e.g., patient satisfaction with care, quality of life, and adherence to treatment regimen)
  • Side effects of drug therapy
  • Racial difference in incidence of drug side effects
  • Morbidity and mortality due to hypertension

METHODOLOGY

METHODS USED TO COLLECT/SELECT EVIDENCE

Searches of Electronic Databases

DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED TO COLLECT/SELECT THE EVIDENCE

Selection of Evidence

Published, peer-reviewed, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were considered to constitute the strongest level of evidence in support of guideline recommendations. This decision was based on the judgment that RCTs provide the clearest, scientifically sound basis for judging comparative efficacy. The Working Group made this decision recognizing the limitations of RCTs, particularly considerations of generalizability with respect to patient selection and treatment quality. Meta-analyses that included random controlled studies were also considered to be the strongest level of evidence, as well as reports of evidence-based systematic reviews.

A systematic search of the literature was conducted. It focused on the best available evidence to address each key question and ensured maximum coverage of studies at the top of the hierarchy of study types: evidence-based guidelines, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews. When available, the search sought out critical appraisals already performed by others that described explicit criteria for deciding what evidence was selected and how it was determined to be valid. The sources that have already undergone rigorous critical appraisal include Cochrane Reviews, Best Evidence, Technology Assessment, and Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) reports.

The search continued using well-known and widely available databases that were appropriate for the clinical subject. In addition to Medline/PubMed, the following databases were searched: Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCTR). For Medline/PubMed, limits were set for language (English), date of publication (1999 through May 2002), and type of research (RCT and meta-analysis). For the CCTR, limits were set for date of publication (1990 through 2002). Once definitive reviews or clinical studies that provided valid relevant answers to the question were identified, the search ended. The search was extended to studies/reports of lower quality (observational studies) only if there were no high quality studies.

Exclusion criteria included reviews that omitted clinical course or treatment. Some retrieved studies were rejected on the basis of published abstracts, and a few were rejected after the researchers scanned the retrieved citation for inclusion criteria. Typical exclusions included studies with physiological endpoints or studies of populations that were not comparable to the population of interest (e.g., studies of hypertension in children or pregnancy).

The results of the search were organized and reported using reference manager software. At this point, additional exclusion criteria were applied. The bibliographies of the retrieved articles were hand-searched for articles that may have been missed by the computer search. Additional experts were consulted for articles that may also have been missed.

Literature Review and Inclusion Criteria

As a result of the original and updated literature reviews, articles were identified for possible inclusion. These articles formed the basis for formulating the guideline recommendations. The literature search for the guideline update was validated by: (1) comparing the results to a search conducted by the independent research and appraisal team; (2) a review of the database by the expert panel; and (3) requesting articles pertaining to special topics from the experts in the working group.

NUMBER OF SOURCE DOCUMENTS

Not stated

METHODS USED TO ASSESS THE QUALITY AND STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE

Weighting According to a Rating Scheme (Scheme Given)

RATING SCHEME FOR THE STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE

Quality of Evidence

I: Evidence obtained from at least one properly done randomized controlled trial

II-1: Evidence obtained from well designed controlled trails without randomization

II-2: Evidence obtained from well designed cohort or case-control analytic study

II-3: Evidence obtained from multiple time series; dramatic results of uncontrolled experiments

III: Opinion of respected authorities, case reports, and expert committees

Overall Quality

Good: High grade evidence (I or II-1) directly linked to health outcome

Fair: High grade evidence (I or II-1) linked to intermediate outcome; or moderate grade evidence (II-2 or II-3) directly linked to health outcome

Poor: Level III evidence or no linkage of evidence to health outcome.

Net Effect of Intervention

Substantial:

  • More than a small relative impact on a frequent condition with a substantial burden of suffering, or
  • A large impact on an infrequent condition with a significant impact on the individual patient level

Moderate:

  • A small relative impact on a frequent condition with a substantial burden of suffering, or
  • A moderate impact on an infrequent condition with a significant impact on the individual patient level

Small:

  • A negligible relative impact on a frequent condition with a substantial burden of suffering, or
  • A small impact on an infrequent condition with a significant impact on the individual patient level

Zero or Negative:

  • Negative impact on patients, or
  • No relative impact on either a frequent condition with a substantial burden of suffering, or
  • An infrequent condition with a significant impact on the individual patient level

METHODS USED TO ANALYZE THE EVIDENCE

Review of Published Meta-Analyses
Systematic Review with Evidence Tables

DESCRIPTION OF THE METHODS USED TO ANALYZE THE EVIDENCE

Preparation of Evidence Tables (reports)

A group of clinician reviewers and other researchers in health care, with experience in evidence-based appraisal, independently read and coded each article that met inclusion criteria. Each article was turned into a one-page summary of the critical appraisal by the research team and added to a central electronic database. Clinicians from the Center for Evidence-Based Practice at the State University of New York, Upstate Medical University, Department of Family Medicine [SUNY] contributed several of the appraisal reports. Each of the evidence reports covered:

  • Summary of findings
  • Methodology
  • Search terms
  • Resources searched
  • Summary table of findings
  • Critical appraisal of each study

Quality ratings were made for each evidence using the grading scale presented in the "Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Evidence" field in this summary. The quality rating procedure used in this update was different from the rating scale used in the development of the original guideline in 1999. Where adjustments to the update process were made, articles from the original process were re-graded to reflect the changed rating scale (e.g., the level of recommendation [R] was assigned for each evidence, based on study design and significance of the quality of the evidence).

Lack of Evidence - Consensus of Experts

The majority of the literature supporting the science for these guidelines is referenced throughout the document and is based upon key randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and longitudinal studies published from 1999 through 2003. Following the independent review of the evidence, a consensus meeting was held to discuss discrepancies in ratings and formulate recommendations. Where existing literature was ambiguous or conflicting, or where scientific data was lacking on an issue, recommendations were based on the clinical experience of the Working Group. These recommendations are indicated in the evidence tables as based on "Working Group Consensus."

METHODS USED TO FORMULATE THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Expert Consensus

DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED TO FORMULATE THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Guideline Development Process

The Offices of Quality and Performance and Patient Care Service, in collaboration with the network Clinical Managers, the Deputy Assistant Under Secretary for Health, and the Medical Center Command of the Department of Defense (DoD) identified clinical leaders to champion the guideline development process. During a preplanning conference call, the clinical leaders defined the scope of the guideline and identified a group of clinical experts from the Veterans Administration (VA) and DoD that formed the Guideline Development Working Group.

At the start of the update process, the clinical leaders, guideline panel members, outside experts, and experts in the field of guideline and algorithm development were consulted to determine which aspects of the 1999 guideline required updating. These consultations resulted in the following recommendations that guided the update efforts: (1) update any recommendations from the original guideline likely to be effected by new research findings; (2) provide information and recommendations on health systems changes relevant to hypertension care; (3) address content areas and models of treatment for which little data existed during the development of the original guideline; and (4) review the performance and lessons learned since the implementation of the original guideline.

The Working Group participated in a face-to-face session to reach a consensus about the guideline recommendations and to prepare a draft document. The draft was revised by the experts through numerous conference calls and individual contributions to the document.

RATING SCHEME FOR THE STRENGTH OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS

  Net Benefit of the Intervention
Overall Quality of Evidence Substantial Moderate Small Zero or Negative
Good A B C D
Fair B B C D
Poor I I I I

COST ANALYSIS

A formal cost analysis was not performed and published cost analyses were not reviewed.

METHOD OF GUIDELINE VALIDATION

Peer Review

DESCRIPTION OF METHOD OF GUIDELINE VALIDATION

Experts from the Veteran Administration (VA) and Department of Defense (DoD) internal medicine, cardiology, and primary care reviewed the final draft, and their feedback was integrated.

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

The recommendations for the diagnosis and management of hypertension (HTN) in the primary care setting are organized into 2 major algorithms. Each algorithm, the objectives and recommendations or annotations that accompany it, and the evidence supporting the recommendations are presented below. The quality of evidence (QE) grading (I-III); overall quality (Good, Fair, Poor); and final grade of recommendations (R) (A-D, I) are provided for specific statements. These grades, along with "net effect of the interventions" are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

  • Screening for Elevated Blood Pressure
  • Management of Elevated Blood Pressure
  1. Any Adult in the Health Care System

    Recommendation

    1. Screen adults for elevated blood pressure (BP)
  2. Obtain Blood Pressure

    Recommendation

    1. Blood pressure should be measured with a technique using a properly calibrated and validated instrument:
      • Patient should be seated quietly for 5 minutes with back supported, feet on the floor, and arm bared, unrestricted by clothing, and supported at heart level. Measurement of BP in the standing position may be indicated for patients at risk for postural hypotension or at the discretion of the clinician.
      • Smoking, exercise, or caffeine ingestion should not have occurred within 30 minutes prior to the BP measurement.
      • The appropriate blood pressure cuff size should be chosen for the patient. The cuff should be wrapped snugly around the arm with the bladder centered over the brachial artery. The bladder should encircle at least 80% of the arm.

      For Auscultatory Measurements Only:

      • Palpated radial pulse obliteration pressure should be used to estimate the systolic BP (SBP). The cuff should then be inflated 20 to 30 mm Hg above this level for the auscultatory determinations.
      • Position the stethoscope over the brachial artery and rapidly inflate the cuff. Deflate the cuff at a rate of 2 to 3 mm Hg per second, listening for Phase 1 and Phase 5 Korotkoff sounds. The first appearance of sound (Phase 1) is used to record the SBP. Phase 5, at the disappearance of sound, is the diastolic BP (DBP) in adults. Listen 10 to 20 mm Hg below Phase 5 for any further sound then deflate the cuff completely.
      • The BP should be recorded in even numbers with the patient's position, arm used, and cuff size documented.
      • BP readings should be repeated in the same arm and averaged, if different. Two minutes should elapse before repeating the BP measurement. If the readings differ by more than 5 mm Hg, additional measurements should be obtained.
    1. Measurements can be taken with a mercury sphygmomanometer, but a recently calibrated aneroid manometer or a validated electronic device is an acceptable alternative.
  Recommendations Sources QE Overall Quality R
1 Use the standardized technique to measure blood pressure. Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP) Cooperative Research Group, 1991
"Major outcomes," 2002
I Good A

QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix E in the original guideline document)

  1. Is SBP >120 or DBP >80 mm Hg?

    Objective

    Identify patients with abnormal elevated blood pressure.

    Recommendation

    1. Screen adults for elevated blood pressure, defined as a systolic blood pressure 120 mm Hg and above or a diastolic blood pressure 80 mm Hg and above.
  Recommendations Sources QE Overall Quality R
1 Blood pressure measurement can identify adults at increased risk for cardiovascular disease due to high blood pressure. Sheridan, Pignone, & Donahue, 2003 I Good A
2 The treatment of high blood pressure substantially decreases the incidence of cardiovascular disease and causes few major harms. Sheridan, Pignone, & Donahue, 2003 I Good A
3 SBP>120 mm Hg or DBP > 80 mm Hg is higher than optimal in terms of vascular risks. Lewington et al., 2002 I Fair to Good B

QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix E in original guideline document)

  1. Annually Screen For Blood Pressure

    Objective

    Screen for future elevation of blood pressure.

    Recommendations

    1. Blood pressure screening should occur periodically.
    2. Blood pressure screening is recommended annually for adults 50 years of age and older and/or for those who have prehypertension and/or other cardiovascular risk factors.
    3. Blood pressure screening is recommended at indeterminate intervals, preferably annually. This may occur at the time of routine preventive care or routine health assessments.
  Recommendations Sources QE Overall Quality R
1 Blood pressure screening should occur periodically. Sheridan, Pignone, & Donahue, 2003 II-1 Fair B
2 Blood pressure screening annually for adults older than 50 and/or for adults with prehypertension and/or other cardiovascular risk factors Franklin et al., 1997 II-3 Fair B
3 Annual screening for healthy adults Experts Consensus III Poor I

QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix E in original guideline document)

  1. Address Other Cardiovascular Risk Factors

    Objective

    Evaluate and address all modifiable cardiovascular risk factors.

    Recommendations

    1. Screening lipid profile should be done per the VHA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Dyslipidemia
    2. Screening for diabetes mellitus should be done per the VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Diabetes Mellitus
    3. Reduction/cessation of the use of tobacco and cigarette should be addressed per the VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Tobacco Use
    4. A heart-healthy lifestyle including optimum weight maintenance (and/or weight loss, when needed), diet rich in fruits, vegetables, and low fat dairy products, and an exercise program emphasizing daily or near daily aerobic activity should be recommended.
    5. Aspirin should be recommended to patients who have hypertension and diabetes mellitus (DM) (see the VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Diabetes Mellitus) or ischemic heart disease (IHD) (see the VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for Management of Ischemic Heart Disease) and should be recommended to patients who already have vascular disease (e.g., cerebrovascular disease or cardiovascular disease).
  1. SBP >140 or DBP >90 or DBP >80 with DM?

    Recommendation

    1. The diagnosis of hypertension (HTN) should be determined by BP readings on two separate patient visits. A minimum of two BP measurements should be performed during a patient visit:
      • Patients with SBP >140 or DBP >90 (Stage 1 hypertension) or with DBP >80 mm Hg and concomitant diabetes mellitus or chronic kidney disease should have their blood pressure confirmed generally within 1 to 2 months.
      • Patients with SBP >160 or DBP >100 (Stage 2 hypertension) should be appropriately evaluated by a healthcare provider, typically within 1 month--or sooner if the clinical situation warrants.
  1. Initiate Lifestyle Modification

    Objective

    Provide dietary and lifestyle changes to help treat HTN and assist in reducing risk factors for cardiovascular disease.

    Recommendations

    1. Lifestyle modifications (LSM) aimed at controlling hypertension should be recommended in all cases. These methods can be used by themselves or in combination with drugs. (B)
    2. Individual LSM are effective; however, addressing multiple modifications may have a greater effect on reducing blood pressure. (B)
    3. Successful implementation will require multiple visits and close follow-up. (B)
    4. Education may take place in either individual or group settings involving allied health professionals. (B)
    5. Clinician empathy increases patient trust, motivation, and adherence to therapy.
    6. Physicians should consider their patients' cultural beliefs and individual attitudes in formulating therapy.
  Recommendations Sources QE Overall Quality R
1 Initiate LSM for prehypertension Staessen et al., 2004
Obarzanek et al., 2003
I Good A
2 Addressing multiple modification Appel et al., 2003
Miller, 2002
Staessen et al., 2004
I Fair B
3 Reduce sodium intake Appel et al., 2003
Hooper et al, 2003
Jurgens & Graudal, 2004
I Fair B
4 Limit alcohol consumption Xin et al., 2001 I Fair B
5 Reduce/maintain body weight (body mass index [BMI]<25) Neter et al., 2003
Mulrow et al., 2004
I Fair B
6 Daily exercise Whelton et al., 2002
Kelley, Kelley, & Tran, 2001
I Fair B
7 Dietary approaches rich in fruits, vegetables, and low-fat dairy products, with overall reduced saturated and total fat content Stamler, 1997
Cappuccio et al., 1995
Appel et al., 2002
I Fair B
8 Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Diet Obarzanek et al., 2003 I Fair B

QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix E in original guideline document)

  1. Obtain History

    Objective

    Elicit historical features that may influence clinical decision-making.

    Recommendations

    The patient's medical history pertinent to hypertension should include:

    1. Duration, levels, and nature of BP elevation
    2. History or symptoms to rule out coronary heart disease (CHD), heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, renal disease, DM, dyslipidemia, and gout
    3. Survey for baseline symptoms of sexual dysfunction, depression, cough, and angioedema
    4. Family history of hypertension, premature CHD, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), DM, dyslipidemia, or renal disease
    5. Other symptoms suggesting other causes of elevated BP
    6. Results and adverse effects of any previous antihypertensive therapy
    7. History of recent change in weight, physical activity, tobacco use
    8. Dietary assessment, including intake of sodium, saturated fat, and caffeine
    9. History of all prescribed and over-the-counter medications, herbal remedies, and dietary supplements, some of which may raise blood pressure or interfere with the effectiveness of antihypertensive medications
    10. History of alcohol and illicit drug use (especially cocaine and other stimulants)
    11. Psychosocial and environmental factors (e.g., family situation, employment status and working conditions, level of comprehension) that may influence HTN control

    The following major risk factors are the components of cardiovascular risk in patients with hypertension:

    1. Tobacco use
    2. Dyslipidemia
    3. Diabetes Mellitus
    4. Obesity (body mass index [BMI] > 30)
    5. Physical inactivity
    6. Microalbuminuria or estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 mL/min
    7. Age (>55 years for men, >65 years for women)
    8. Family history of cardiovascular disease for women younger than 65 or men younger than 55
  1. Perform Physical Examination

    Objective

    Elicit physical signs that may influence clinical decision-making.

    Recommendation

    A physical exam should evaluate for signs of secondary HTN or hypertensive organ damage. At a minimum, vital signs should include height, weight, and two or more blood pressure readings with the patient seated.

    If the patient is at risk for postural hypotension or has symptoms of orthostasis, a standing blood pressure should also be measured in addition to seated or supine. The two blood pressure measurements should be separated by 2-minute intervals.

    A focused examination should include the following:

    1. Fundoscopy
      1. Arteriovenous (AV) nicking or arterial narrowing
      2. Hemorrhages
      3. Exudates
      4. Papilledema
    2. Neck
      1. Carotid bruits and pulses
      2. Jugular venous distention
      3. Thyromegaly
    3. Heart
      1. Normal rate and regular rhythm
      2. Apical impulse
      3. Precordial heave
      4. Clicks, murmurs, third or fourth heart sounds
    4. Lungs
      1. Crackles
      2. Wheezes or rhonchi
    5. Abdomen
      1. Masses (e.g., aortic aneurysm, polycystic kidneys)
      2. Bruits
    6. Extremities
      1. Peripheral arterial pulses
      2. Femoral bruits
      3. Edema
    7. Central and peripheral nervous systems
      1. Signs of prior cerebrovascular accident (CVA)
      2. Signs or symptoms of dementia

    Target organ damage associated with clinical cardiovascular diseases includes:

    1. Heart diseases
      1. Left ventricular hypertrophy
      2. Angina or prior myocardial infarction
      3. Prior coronary revascularization
      4. Heart failure
    2. Stroke or transient ischemic attack
    3. Chronic kidney disease (nephropathy)
    4. Peripheral arterial disease
    5. Retinopathy
  1. Perform Laboratory and Other Diagnostic Procedures

    Objective

    Determine the baseline data on patient's health status, the existence of secondary causes of HTN, and the risk factors contributing to the disease process.

    Recommendations

    Routine laboratory tests for the investigation of all patients with hypertension

    1. Urinalysis (UA)
    2. Blood chemistry (potassium, sodium, blood urea nitrogen [BUN], creatinine, fasting glucose)
    3. Fasting lipid profile (total cholesterol [TC], high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C], low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], triglycerides [TG])
    4. 12-lead electrocardiography

    Optional Laboratory Tests*

    1. Hematocrit, complete blood cell count
    2. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group (MDRD) equation**
    3. Blood calcium
    4. Urinary protein excretion (24-hour urine collection or spot urine for protein/creatinine ratio)
    5. Uric acid
    6. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c)
    7. Thyroid-stimulating hormone (thyrotropin) (TSH)
    8. Transthoracic echocardiography to determine the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy

    * May have clinical utility in certain instances

    ** Calculators and modeling aids. Available at: http://www.nkdep.nih.gov/healthprofessionals/tools/gfr_adults.htm

    Estimation of proteinuria and creatinine clearance (Clcr) may be done by single urine and blood tests instead of collecting 24-hour urines. To estimate urinary protein excretion, obtain a single urine specimen for protein concentration (in mg/dL) and creatinine concentration (in mg/dL). The protein-to-creatinine ratio (protein concentration divided by the creatinine concentration) estimates the 24-hour protein excretion in grams per day (see original guideline document for example).

    There are now several formulas available to estimate Clcr. One of the simplest uses the patient's age, serum creatinine (Scr), weight in kilograms, and sex to estimate Clcr. Normal Clcr is >100 cc/min, but diminishes with age. The estimation formula is (140-age)/Scr x wt/72 x 1.0 (if male) or 0.85 (if female) (see original guideline document for example).

  Recommendations Sources QE Overall Quality R
1 Routine tests: Urinalysis, Blood Chemistry, Fasting Lipid Profile, ECG Chobanian et al., 2003 III Poor I

QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix E in original guideline document)

  1. Is a Secondary Cause Suspected?

    Objective

    Detect underlying disease(s) responsible for secondary HTN using additional laboratory tests.

    Recommendation

    An early discussion or consultation with an appropriate specialist is encouraged when a patient is suspected of having secondary hypertension (see table below titled "Recommended Testing for Patients Suspected of Having Secondary Hypertension")

Recommended Testing for Patients Suspected of Having Secondary Hypertension

Disease Features Recommended Test/Referral
Cushing's syndrome and other glucocorticoid excess states including chronic steroid therapy Amenorrhea
Increased dorsal fat
Diabetes mellitus
Edema
Hirsutism
Moon facies
Purple striae
Truncal obesity
History
24- hour urine for free cortisol
Dexamethasone suppression test
Hyperparathyroidism Hypercalcemia
Polyuria/polydipsia
Renal stones
Serum calcium and parathyroid hormone (PTH) level
Hyperthyroidism Anxiety
Brisk reflexes
Hyperdefecation
Heat intolerance
Tachycardia
Tremor
Weight loss
Wide pulse pressure
Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH)
Free T4
Pheochromocytoma Labile BP
Orthostatic hypotension
Paroxysms (headaches, palpitations, sweating, pallor)
Tachycardia
Plasma metanephrines or 24-hour urine for metanephrines and/or catecholamines
Consider referral to specialist
Primary hyperaldosteronism K+ <3.5 mEq/L in patients not on diuretic therapy; or
K+ <3 mEq/L in patients on diuretic therapy
Muscle cramps
Polyuria
Weakness
Plasma aldosterone and plasma renin activity
24 hour urinary aldosterone level on a high sodium diet
Kidney disease Abnormal urine sediment
Elevated serum creatinine
Hematuria on two occasions or structural renal abnormality (e.g., abdominal or flank masses)
Proteinuria
Urinalysis; estimation of urinary protein excretion and creatinine clearance by using a single random urine test; renal ultrasound may also be considered (See annotation H in original guideline document.)
Consider referral to nephrology
Renovascular disease Abdominal bruits over the renal arteries
Abrupt onset of severe HTN
Diastolic BP >115 mm Hg
Initial onset age >50 years old
Worsening BP control when previously stable
Evidence of atherosclerotic vascular disease
There are a variety of screening tests for renovascular HTN, depending on equipment and expertise in institutions. Magnetic resonance angiography, renal artery Doppler, and post-captopril renograms are used.
However, there is no single best test for renovascular HTN, and consultation with experts in your institution is recommended.
Intravenous pyelogram is relatively contraindicated in diabetes and no longer recommended as screening test for renovascular disease.
Sleep apnea Daytime somnolence
Fatigue
Obesity
Snoring or observed apneic episodes
Referral for sleep study
Aortic Coarctation Weak or delayed femoral pulses Computerized tomography angiography
Drug or substance induced

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including Cox-2 Inhibitors
Sympathomimetics (e.g., decongestants, anorectics)
Oral contraceptives
Adrenal steroids
Erythropoietin
Cyclosporine, tacrolimus
Cocaine, amphetamines
Excessive alcohol use
Licorice
Selected dietary supplements (e.g., ma huang, ephedra, bitter orange)

History
Urine toxicology as indicated
  1. Initiate Treatment for Hypertension

    Objective

    Select the most effective therapy to control blood pressure.

    Recommendations

    Pharmacotherapy (see also Annotation M in the original guideline document)

    1. According to the baseline blood pressure and the presence or absence of complications, it appears reasonable to initiate therapy either with a starting dose of a single agent or with starting-doses of two agents. (See Appendix B Recommended Dosage for Selected Hypertension Drug Therapy in the original guideline document).
    2. To reach target blood pressure, it is likely that a large proportion of patients will require combination therapy with more than one agent.
    3. Drug therapy should be initiated in conjunction with LSM.
    4. Initial combination therapy with two drugs--particularly low-dose combinations--is more effective in achieving target level BP.
    5. Initial combination therapy with two drugs maybe preferable for patients in STAGE 2 HTN.

    Non-Pharmacologic Therapy (See also Annotation G in the original guideline document)

    1. Prescribe LSM in all patients with prehypertension or HTN. Certain lifestyle modifications have been shown to decrease blood pressure in randomized clinical trials; other lifestyle modifications are also important in decreasing cardiovascular risk. These non-pharmacologic measures can be sufficient to control BP or to decrease the amount of required medication.
    2. If patients with stage 1 HTN do not adhere to LSM or are adherent to LSM and show no improvement in blood pressure level for 3 to 6 months, initiate drug therapy.
    3. In addition to lifestyle modifications, drug therapy should be considered in patients with prehypertension and DM.
    4. Additional compelling indications should be considered in determining non-pharmacologic, as well as pharmacologic treatment.

Management of Elevated Blood Pressure for Adults

BP Classification SBP DBP LSM Initial Drug Therapy
Prehypertension 120-139 80-89 Yes Consider for those with DM when BP 140/80 or greater
Stage 1 Hypertension 140-159 90-99 Yes Thiazide-type diuretic unless contraindicated or not tolerated (Consider angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors [ACEIs], angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs], beta blocker [BB], calcium channel blocker [CCBs])
For compelling indication see Table "Preferred Agents in Patients with Comorbidities" below.
Stage 2 Hypertension >160 >100 Yes Drug therapy with 2 drugs for most patients. This should include a thiazide-type diuretic unless contraindicated or not tolerated (Consider ACEIs, ARBs, BB, CCB)
For compelling indication see Table "Preferred Agents in Patients with Comorbidities" below.
  1. Drug Treatment

    Objective

    Determine the most appropriate drug therapy regimen based on available evidence and patient comorbidities.

    Recommendations

    1. Thiazide-type diuretics are recommended as first line therapy for drug treatment of hypertension either as monotherapy or in combination with other agents. (A)
    2. The following may be used as alternative or supplementary therapy:
      1. ACEIs (A)
      2. ARBs (A)
      3. Beta-blockers (A)
      4. Long-acting calcium channel blockers (A)

    Other Supplemental Agents

    1. Reserpine can be used as supplemental therapy when other agents do not provide clinical adequate response. (A)
    2. Other agents may be used as additional therapy in refractory hypertension or as supplementary therapy when other drugs are contraindicated or limited by adverse effects. These include:
      1. Centrally acting drugs (e.g., clonidine, methyldopa) (B)
      2. Vasodilators (e.g., hydralazine, minoxidil) (B)
      3. Aldosterone antagonists (e.g., spironolactone, eplerenone) (B)
      4. Combined alpha-beta blockers (B)
      5. Alpha blockers (B)

    Avoid use of:

    1. Alpha-blockers should be avoided as monotherapy (D), may be used as supplemental therapy. (B)
    2. Short-acting calcium channel blockers should not be used as there is no evidence of benefit. (D) Short-acting dihydropyridine (DHP) calcium channel blockers may cause harm. (D)

Preferred Agents In Patients With Uncomplicated Hypertension

Condition Preferred Agents Alternate Agents Other Agents Comments
HTN - without compelling indications Thiazide-type diuretic ACEI
ARB
Beta-blocker CCB
Aldosterone antagonist
Alpha-blocker Clonidine Reserpine Vasodilator
  1. Immediate-release nifedipine should not be used.
  2. An ARB may be considered in a patient who is intolerant to an ACEI.
  3. Alpha-blockers are useful in treating symptomatic BPH, but are not recommended as monotherapy for treating HTN.

Compelling Indications for Individual Drug Classes

Recommendations for initial antihypertensive therapy in patients with HTN who also have certain compelling conditions may differ from other patients with HTN but in general, these patients should still be considered for thiazide-type diuretics--in addition to the compelling medication--based on the benefit seen in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) in patients on diuretics. More specifically, the recommendations in the Table below titled "Preferred Agents in Patients with Comorbidities" include medications that have demonstrated improved outcomes or provided clinical improvement in the treatment of patients with certain conditions that may or may not be directly related to hypertension itself. These conditions addressed include: post-myocardial infarction, systolic heart failure (HF), kidney disease, diabetes, and stroke prevention.

Other specific recommendations are for choice of agent in treatment of pilots and patients whose work/duty requires special consideration (pilots, and service person in extreme weather conditions).

MOST COMPELLING INDICATIONS SHOULD INCLUDE A THIAZIDE-TYPE DIURETIC

Preferred Agents in Patients with Comorbidities

  Preferred Agents Additional/Alternative Other Agents
DM* Thiazide-type diuretic and/or
ACEI
ARB
CCB
Beta-blocker
 
Systolic HF ACEI
Beta-blocker
ARB
Hydralazine-Nitrate
Aldosterone antagonist
Diuretic (for treatment of volume overload)
LADHP
CKD** ACEI
ARB
Diuretic (thiazide or loop, based on kidney function)
Beta-blocker
NCCB
LADHP
 
Post Stroke Thiazide-type diuretic
and
ACEI
   
Post-MI Beta-blocker
ACEI
NCCB
Thiazide-type diuretic
LADHP

Other Special Populations

  Preferred Agents Alternate Agents Comments
African Americans Thiazide-type diuretic
ACEI
  Differences in efficacy are not as apparent when diuretics are added to ACEIs and beta -blockers
High ambient temp and/or extreme conditions ACEI
ARB
CCB
Low dose Thiazide-type diuretic
For patent already deployed consider CCB

* For patients with diabetes mellitus, please refer to the VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Diabetes Mellitus.

**For patients with kidney disease.

ACEI = angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB = angiotensin receptor blocker; NCCB = nondihydropyridine calcium channel blocker; CKD = chronic kidney disease; LADHP = long-acting dihydropyridine calcium cannel blocker

  1. Is BP Control Adequate and Therapy Tolerable?

    Objective

    Assess adequacy of HTN control and adverse effects to treatment.

    Recommendations

    The primary objective in hypertension treatment is to decrease blood pressure to less than 140/90 mm Hg, or to lower goals in selected patient populations.

    1. Patients should be seen within 1 month after the initiation of therapy to determine adequacy of HTN control, degree of patient adherence, and presence of adverse effects. (Allied health professional may be useful to conduct these follow-up visits.)
    2. Earlier follow-up may be necessary for patients:
      1. Requiring blood tests
      2. At increased risk for adverse outcomes from HTN due to very high BP or target organ damage
      3. At risk for postural hypotension
    3. Assessment of blood pressure control should be based on measurement of BP in the clinic setting. Out of office measurements may provide useful clinical information.
    4. Once the patient's BP is controlled, follow-up at 3 to 6 month intervals (depending on patient status) is generally appropriate.
    5. Older persons, persons with diabetes, those with neurological disease and patients with postural symptoms should be evaluated for postural hypotension.
    6. Target level for blood pressure is included in the following table.

Target Values For HTN Control (ADOPTED FROM JNC7)

Condition Target (SBP/DBP mm Hg) Level of Evidence (QE, R) Resource*
Hypertension <140/90 <150/90 (I,A)

<140/90 (II,B)
SBP: SHEP, Syst-Eur

DPB: HDFP, HOT
Diabetes <140/80 (I, A) UKPDS, HOT
DM + Nephropathy <140/80 (I, A) IDNT, RENAAL, MDRD
Chronic Kidney Disease <140/90 <140/90 (I, A)
<130/80 (III, C)
AASK
Proteinuria >1g/day <125/75 (III, C) Post analyses MDRD

SHEP = Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly; Syst-Eur = Systolic Hypertension in Europe; HDFP = Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program; HOT = Hypertension Optimal Treatment; UKPDS = United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study; IDNT = Irbesartan in Diabetic Nephropathy Trial; RENAAL = Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonist Losartan; MDRD = Modification of Diet in Renal Disease; AASK = African American Study Of Kidney Disease And Hypertension

The VA/DOD Hypertension Guideline recommends a minimal target threshold that is based on level I evidence derived from randomized clinical trials. For persons with diabetes this is 140/80 mm Hg, and for persons without diabetes 140/90 mm Hg. The VA/DOD Hypertension Guideline also acknowledges that there are data from multiple observational studies, including pooled data from randomized clinical trials (level II evidence) demonstrating that lower blood pressure levels are associated with risk reduction for adverse outcomes; the relationship is linear without a threshold. Consequently, clinicians are encouraged to set target values for each patient based upon their individual circumstances, including tolerance of medications.

  Recommendations Sources QE Overall Quality R
1 Treat for HTN if SBP >150 mm Hg Lewington et al., 2002
SHEP Cooperative Research Group, 1991
Staessen et al., 1997
II-2
I

I
Good
Good

Good
A
2 Treat for HTN if SBP >140 mm Hg Lewington, et al., 2002
Chobanian et al., 2003
II-2
III
Good
Poor
B
3 Treat for HTN if DBP >90 mm Hg Lewington et al., 2002 II-2 Good A
4 Confirm SBP >140 mm Hg or DBP >90 mm Hg on 2 or more visits, unless there are other clinical reasons for beginning therapy immediately (e.g., if target organ damage) Sheridan, Pignone, & Donahue, 2003 III Fair C
5 Confirm and/or begin treatment within 1 month if SBP >160 mm Hg or DBP >100 mm Hg SHEP Cooperative Research Group, 1991 III Fair C
6 Classify SBP 120 to 139 mm Hg or DBP 80 to 89 mm Hg as "prehypertension" Chobanian et al., 2003
Lewington, et al., 2002
II-2 Good B

QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix E in the original guideline document)

  1. Continue Current Treatment; Reinforce Lifestyle Modification; Follow up at Next Regular Visit

    Objective

    Follow patients who attain the desired target BP.

    Recommendations

    1. Once the patient's BP is stabilized, follow-up at 3- to 6-month intervals (depending on patient status) is generally appropriate.
    2. Decrease or cessation of antihypertensive drug therapy is possible in patients who are willing to do so and whose BP is very well controlled. Cessation may be considered in patients well controlled on monotherapy. These patients should be closely followed-up.
  Recommendations Sources QE Overall Quality R
1 Follow-up visits may occur every three to six months Birtwhistle et al., 2004 IIa Good B
2 Decrease or cessation of antihypertensive drug therapy Nelson et al., 2003 I Fair B

QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix E in original guideline document)

  1. Self Monitoring

    Objective

    Assess and promote blood pressure control.

    Recommendations

    1. Home blood pressures may be used as a supplement to, but should not wholly substitute for, obtaining clinic blood pressures to assess or promote blood pressure control.
    2. If home blood pressure monitoring is used, a minimum of two measurements per day for at least two days should be obtained and then averaged in order to provide a reliable estimate of home blood pressure.*
    3. In order to improve accuracy and interpretation of home blood pressure measurements, the use of a device with a memory function is recommended rather than relying on the patient's recall or diary.
    4. Home blood pressure monitoring may assist in detecting a white coat effect or poorer control at home than in the office.

    * Note: Patients enrolled in a formal Care Coordination\Telehealth (CC-TH) should follow the instructions of the CC-TH program.

  Recommendations Sources QE Overall Quality R
1 Home blood pressure may be used as an alternative to clinic blood pressure in improving blood pressure control Ebrahim, 1998
Boulware et al., 2001
I Good B
2 If home blood pressure monitoring is used, a minimum of two measurements per day for at least two days should be obtained and then averaged in order to provide a reliable estimate of home blood pressure Stergiou et al., "Self-monitoring," 1998 I Good B
3 In order to improve accuracy and interpretation of home blood pressure measurements, the use of a device with a memory function is recommended rather than relying on the patient's recall or diary Bachmann et al., 2002 I Good B
4 The use of home blood pressures may be used as a reliable alternative to 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the detection of the white coat effect Stergiou et al., "White coat," 1998 I Good B

QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix E in original guideline document)

  1. Adjust Therapy

    Objective

    Modify drug therapy to help achieve BP control.

    Recommendations

    If the blood pressure continues to be elevated, clinicians may consider choosing one of the strategies that have proven effective in the treatment of HTN.

    1. Increase the dose of the original medication.
      • Titrating the dose usually means doubling the dose. Be aware of the dose response that is not always linear although adverse effects may increase with higher doses.
    2. Add another agent
      • If a thiazide-type diuretic is not chosen as the initial drug, it should be used as the second agent, unless contraindicated or not tolerated, especially because it frequently enhances the effects of the initial agent and has the best cardiovascular outcome data. (IA)
      • When using combination therapy select those agents that have been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality. (A)
      • When using combination therapy select agents from different classes and provide benefit for comorbid condition or compelling indications if they exist. (C)
      • Combination therapy includes a potential for drug-drug interactions, but these are uncommon.
    3. Consider care management by pharmacist in the follow-up and adjustment of medication to improve blood pressure goal. (B)
    4. Involving other allied health professionals in follow-up may as well improve blood pressure control. (C)
  Recommendations Sources QE Overall Quality R
1 Add second agent Materson, Reda, & Williams, 1996
"Major outcomes," 2002
I Good A
2 Thiazide-type diuretic should be used as one of the agents in combination therapy "Major outcomes," 2002
Chobanian et al., 2003
I Good A
3 When using combination therapy, select agents from different classes Group Consensus III Poor C
4 Involving other allied health professionals in follow-up Group Consensus III Poor C
5 Consider care management by pharmacist in the follow-up   I Fair B

QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix E in the original guideline document)

  1. Reassess Adherence

    Objective

    Identify causes of inadequate response to therapy following dose or stepwise titration.

    Recommendation

    Adherence to an antihypertensive medication regimen can be improved by a multi pronged approach including:

    • Address barriers for obtaining the medications (administrative, economic, etc.).
    • Simplify medication regimens incorporating patient's preference.
    • Coordinate with other health care team members to improve monitoring of adherence with prescriptions of pharmacological and lifestyle modification.
    • Educate patients and patients' families about their disease/treatment regimens.
    • Encourage greater patient responsibility/autonomy in monitoring their blood pressure and adjusting their prescriptions.

    Causes of Inadequate Response to Therapy are shown in Table 11 of the original guideline document.

    The primary care provider should employ measures that assist in improving patient adherence to treatment. Many of these measures are designed to engage the patient in his or her wellness. The table below titled "Strategies to Improve Patient Adherence to Antihypertensive Therapy" lists several suggestions to improve the patient's adherence to therapy.

Strategies to Improve Patient Adherence to Antihypertensive Therapy

  1. Be aware of signs of patient non-adherence to therapy (e.g., missed appointments, missed refills).
  1. Establish the goal of therapy early: to reduce BP to non-hypertensive levels with minimal or no adverse effects.
  1. Educate patients about the disease and involve them and their families in its treatment. Have them measure blood pressure at home.
  1. Maintain contact with patients.
  1. Integrate pill taking into routine activities of daily living.
  1. Prescribe medications that require no more than twice daily dosing if possible.
  1. Ask about adverse effects and adjust therapy to prevent, minimize, or ameliorate side effects.
  1. Enlist the support of pharmacist in adjusting medication with regular follow-up.
  1. Consider group visits for education
  1. Consider Consultation

    Objective

    Determine appropriate point in time to consider consultation to improve hypertension management.

    Recommendation

    From a clinical perspective, referral to, or consultation with hypertension specialists or those with particular expertise in the relevant clinical area should be considered if there is:

    1. Failure to achieve target blood pressure goals when on appropriate doses of three medications, one of which should typically be a thiazide-type diuretic and assuming that other remedial causes of inadequate response have been identified and addressed
    2. Suspected secondary cause for hypertension

Hypertension and Comorbid Conditions (From Appendix C in the original guideline document)

C1 Patients with Diabetes with SBP >140 or DBP >80 mm Hg

Recommendations

  1. Patients with diabetes with hypertension (systolic BP >140 or diastolic BP >-90 mm Hg) should:
    • Begin anti-hypertensive therapy with a diuretic or an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)
    • If ACEI induced side-effects occur, consider switching to an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)
    • Use other preferred agents (beta blockers, long acting calcium channel blockers) as necessary, depending on other comorbid conditions or compelling indications to achieve a blood pressure <140/80 mm Hg.
  2. Patients with diabetes with initial SBP <140 mm Hg and DBP between 80 and 89 mm Hg (within the "pre-hypertensive" category identified by JNC 7) may benefit from lowering diastolic blood pressure to < 80 mm Hg. (A)
  3. Individuals with diabetes whose blood pressures is <140/80 mm Hg who have clinical cardiovascular disease may benefit from ACEI therapy even without a reduction in blood pressure. (A)
  4. In patients with diabetes with renal insufficiency (i.e., serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL) and proteinuria (i.e., >1 g/24h) there are some data suggesting that further BP lowering (<125/75 mm Hg) may slow progression of renal disease. Lower BP should be achieved, if feasible and practical, depending on the tolerance of medications and side effects of BP lowering. (B)
  Recommendations Sources QE Overall Quality R
GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS
1 Treatment of HTN in patients with diabetes to retard progression of macrovascular complications and DM Hansson et al., 1998
"Major outcomes," 2002
I Good A
2 Target BP of <140/80 mm Hg for patients with diabetes with HTN, due to high-risk for cardiovascular disease Group Consensus III Poor C
3 Consideration of lower BP targets (<125/75 mm Hg) to slow the progression of renal disease for patients with diabetes with elevated serum creatinine and/or urinary protein excretion above 1 g/day   II-2 Fair B
GENERAL THERAPEUTIC RECOMMENDATIONS
4 Antihypertensive therapy with thiazide diuretic or ACEI for patients with diabetes with BP >140/80 mm Hg. Switch to ARB if ACEI-induced side-effects occur, then use other agents to achieve BP target <140/80 mm Hg Hansson et al, 1998
Yusuf et al., 2000
I Good A
SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC RECOMMENDATIONS
5 ACEI for normotensive patients with type 1 DM and proteinuria and for patients with type 2 DM and microalbuminuria or a high-risk for cardiovascular disease Yusuf et al, 2000 I Good A
6 Consideration of ACEI for normotensive patients with type 1 DM   I Fair B
7 Treatment with ARBs for patients with type 2 DM and nephropathy, microalbuminuria, or HTN and left ventricular hypertrophy   I Good A
8 Combination ACEI and NCCB to provide renal protection in patients with inadequate response to an ACE-I alone   II-2 Fair B
9 Diuretics to enhance the BP lowering effects of other antihypertensive agents.   I Good A
THERAPEUTIC CAUTIONS
10 Use caution in prescribing long-acting DHCCBs without an ACEI or ARB because of the risk of less renal protection and/or adverse cardiovascular outcomes.   I Good A

QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix E in the original guideline document)

C2 Kidney Disease

Objective

To provide recommendations on pharmacologic therapy for renal preservation in patients with kidney disease, regardless of blood pressure level

Recommendations

  1. ACEI may be preferred agent for patients with HTN and kidney disease (reduced kidney function with proteinuria). ARB may be substituted for patients with ACEI-induced cough.
  2. In African Americans with hypertensive kidney disease, ACEI may be a first line therapy for treating HTN.
  3. A diuretic should be used when a second blood pressure medication is needed or if hyperkalemia occurs. Thiazide diuretic may be used if estimated GFR >30 cc/min/1.73m2, but loop diuretics are usually needed for lower kidney function. Potassium-sparing diuretics should be avoided in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
  4. A stable increase of serum creatinine as much as 35% above baseline after ACEI or ARB initiation may be tolerated, as long as hyperkalemia does not occur. ACEI or ARB should be discontinued, or other potentially reversible causes of kidney failure investigated if progressive and rapid rise of serum creatinine continues. Since CKD is associated with progressive rise in creatinine over years, ACEI or ARB should not be discontinued for this situation, since these medications are renoprotective.
  5. When treating HTN in patients with non-diabetic kidney disease, use of combined therapy with ACEI and ARB may offer more renoprotection than with either class of medication alone.
  6. Avoid potential nephrotoxic medications such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), COX-2 inhibitor, aminoglycosides, intravenous (IV) contrast, and excessive diuretic use.
  7. Monitor kidney function over time by estimating GFR or Clcr. Consider consulting with a nephrologist if a non-diabetic patient has nephrotic range proteinuria, or kidney function is < 30 cc/min/1.73m2.
  Recommendations Sources QE Overall Quality R
1 ACEI for treating HTN in African Americans patients Wright et al., 2002 I Good A
2 ACEI more effective in patients with HTN and kidney disease The GISEN Group, 1997
Jafar et al., 2001
I Good A
3 ACEI and ARB may offer more renoprotection than with either class of medication alone in patient with nondiabetic kidney disease Nakao et al., 2003 I Good A

QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix E in the original guideline document)

Chronic Heart Failure (HF)

Objective

To provide recommendations on pharmacologic therapy for patients with HTN and concomitant chronic heart failure (HF) due to systolic dysfunction

The recommendations in this annotation refer to patients with Stage C heart failure (HF) (e.g., patients with past or current HF symptoms and evidence of structural heart damage).

Many of the classes of medications used to treat patients with hypertension have also been shown to provide benefit in patients with chronic HF. If the patient continues to have an elevated blood pressure despite optimal treatment for HF based on the following recommendations, additional antihypertensive medications should be initiated (except for NCCBs or nifedipine) to achieve blood pressure goal.

Recommendations

  1. A diuretic should be used in the treatment of patients with signs of fluid overload.
  2. All patients should be treated with an ACEI unless contraindicated or not tolerated. These agents improve HF symptoms, functional status, and quality of life, while decreasing frequency of hospitalization and mortality.
  3. A beta-adrenergic blocker should be used in conjunction with an ACEI in all patients who are considered stable (i.e., minimal or no signs of fluid overload or volume depletion and not in an intensive care unit), unless contraindicated or not tolerated. These agents have been shown to reduce mortality and decrease the symptoms of HF.
  4. An ARB should be considered as an alternative to an ACEI in patients who are on a diuretic, beta-adrenergic blocker, and usually digoxin and are unable to tolerate an ACEI due to cough or possibly, angioedema.
  5. The combination of hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate (HYD/ISDN) may be considered as an alternative to an ACEI in patients who are on a diuretic, beta-adrenergic blocker, and usually digoxin and are unable to tolerate an ACEI due to hypotension, renal insufficiency, or possibly, angioedema.
  6. Digoxin (although not effective for the treatment of HTN) should be used in patients whose symptoms persist despite treatment with an ACEI, a beta-adrenergic blocker, and a diuretic. Digoxin reduces symptoms associated with HF and decreases the risk for hospitalizations due to HF but does not improve mortality.
  7. Low dose spironolactone (an aldosterone antagonist) should be considered in patients with recent New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV HF and current Class III or IV symptoms and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35%, provided the patient has preserved renal function and normal potassium levels. This therapy improves symptoms (as assessed by change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class), decreases hospitalizations for worsening HF, and decreases mortality.
  Recommendations Sources QE Overall Quality R
1 Diuretic in patients with signs of fluid overload Hunt et al., 2001 III Fair B
2 ACEI for all patients unless contraindicated/not tolerated "Comparative effects of therapy," 1988
SOLVD Investigators, 1991
Cohn et al., 1991
CONSENSUS Trial Study Group, 1987
Garg & Yusef, 1995
Hunt et al., 2001
I

I
I
I

II-2
III
Good A
3 Beta-adrenergic blocker in conjunction with an ACEI in all stable patients unless contraindicated/not tolerated "Effect of metoprolol," 1999
The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II (CIBIS-II), 1999
Leizorovicz et al., 2002
Shibata, Flather, & Wang, 2001
Hunt et al., 2001
I
I

II-2
II-2

III
Good A
4 ARB should be alternative to an ACEI in patients on a diuretic, beta-adrenergic blocker, and usually digoxin and are unable to tolerate an ACEI Cohn & Tagnoni, 2001
Granger et al., 2003
McMurray et al., 2003
Pfeffer et al., 2003
Hunt et al., 2001
I
I
I
I
III
Good A
5 HYD/ISDN as alternative to an ACEI in patients on a diuretic, beta-adrenergic blocker, and usually digoxin and are unable to tolerate an ACEI Cohn et al., 1986
Cohn et al., 1991
I
I
Fair B
6 Digoxin in patients with symptoms despite an ACEI, beta-adrenergic blocker, and diuretic Digitalis Investigation Group, 1997
"Comparative effects of therapy," 1988
Jaeschke, Oxman, & Guyatt, 1990
I

I

II-2
Good A
7 Aldosterone antagonist in patients with severe HF unless contraindicated/not tolerated Pitt et al., 1999 I Good A

QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix E in the original guideline document)

C4 Stroke Prevention

Recommendations

  1. When an ACEI is used as principal therapy after stroke, a thiazide (or similar) diuretic should be used to assure maximal effect. (A)
  2. Diuretics remain a principal agent for risk reduction after stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) based on data on primary prevention studies and extrapolation from the PROGRESS trial on secondary prevention. (Primary prevention of stroke A; Secondary prevention B)
  3. Alternatives (in alphabetical order) include ACEI/ARB, beta-blockers, dihydropyridine (long-acting) or diltiazem calcium channel blockers. (Primary prevention I, A Secondary prevention B)
  4. In post-stroke patients with pre-hypertension, the addition of an ACEI may be considered but should be with a diuretic, as noted above (level of evidence for secondary prevention A). An ACEI may provide additional benefit to existing antihypertensive therapies or for patients who are not hypertensive for primary stroke protection (Primary prevention A).
  Recommendations Sources QE Overall Quality R
1 In post-stroke patient using ACEI as principal therapy, a thiazide (or similar) diuretic should be used to assure maximal effect "Randomised trial," 2001 I Good A
2 Diuretics as a principal agent for risk reduction after stroke or TIA
  • Primary prevention
  • Secondary prevention
"Major outcomes," 2002
Turnbull, 2003
Psaty, Lumley, & Furberg, 2003
Collins & MacMahon,1994
"Randomised trial," 2001
PATS Collaborating Group, 1995
I






III
Good






Poor
A






C
3 Alternatives to diuretics (in alphabetical order)

ACEI/ARB, beta-blockers, dihydropyridine (long-acting) or diltiazem calcium channel blockers
  • Secondary prevention
Yusuf et al., 2000
Staessen et al., 1997
Dahlof et al., 2002
Psaty, Lumley, & Furberg, 2003
"Major outcomes," 2002
Hansson et al., "Randomised," 1999
Hansson et al., "Effect," 1999
"Randomised trial," 2001
III Poor C
4 ACEI may provide additional benefit to existing antihypertensive therapies or for primary stroke prevention

In post-stroke patients with pre-hypertension, the addition of an ACEI for secondary prevention may be considered but should be with a diuretic
Yusuf et al., 2000

"Randomised trial," 2001
I

I
Good

Good
A

A

QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix E in the original guideline document)

C5 High Ambient Temperature and/or Extreme Conditions

These recommendations are based on consensus opinion that considers the available literature, experience in the field, and physiology.

  1. Patients who are likely to be deployed should preferably be started on ACEI/ARB or CCB. Diuretics, if needed, should be used in low doses. This stipulation also applies to those who do extreme physical activity and are prone to dehydration. Patients should be stable on their medications prior to deployment. Clinicians should discuss how deployment might effect blood pressure control and describe potential complications of treatment with their patients as part of pre-deployment processing. If possible, the patient should be monitored for signs and symptoms of dehydration and adequate blood pressure control for the first 7 to 10 days of deployment while they are becoming acclimatized.
  2. For patients who are diagnosed with and/or started on treatment for hypertension during a deployment, dihydropyridine CCBs are the preferred agents in the desert environment since they are available in once a day formulations, do not limit heart rate, and do not require electrolytes to be checked after initiation.

Definitions:

Strength of Evidence

I: Evidence obtained from at least one properly done randomized controlled trial

II-1: Evidence obtained from well designed controlled trails without randomization

II-2: Evidence obtained from well designed cohort or case-control analytic study

II-3: Evidence obtained from multiple time series; dramatic results of uncontrolled experiments

III: Opinion of respected authorities, case reports, and expert committees

Overall Quality

Good: High grade evidence (I or II-1) directly linked to health outcome

Fair: High grade evidence (I or II-1) linked to intermediate outcome; or grade evidence (II-2 or II-3) directly linked to health outcome

Poor: Level III evidence or no linkage of evidence to health outcome

Net Effect of Intervention

Substantial:

  • More than a small relative impact on a frequent condition with a substantial burden of suffering, or
  • A large impact on an infrequent condition with a significant impact on the individual patient level

Moderate:

  • A small relative impact on a frequent condition with a substantial burden of suffering, or
  • A moderate impact on an infrequent condition with a significant impact on the individual patient level

Small:

  • A negligible relative impact on a frequent condition with a substantial burden of suffering, or
  • A small impact on an infrequent condition with a significant impact on the individual patient level

Zero or Negative:

  • Negative impact on patients, or
  • No relative impact on either a frequent condition with a substantial burden of suffering, or
  • An infrequent condition with a significant impact on the individual patient level

Recommendation Grade

  Net Benefit of the Intervention
Overall Quality of Evidence Substantial Moderate Small Zero or Negative
Good A B C D
Fair B B C D
Poor I I I I

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

REFERENCES SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The annotations that accompany the algorithms in the guideline document include a reference, when required, and evidence grading for each of the recommendations (see the "Major Recommendations" field).

BENEFITS/HARMS OF IMPLEMENTING THE GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS

POTENTIAL BENEFITS

  • Consistent high level quality of care for patients with hypertension
  • The guideline can assist primary care providers or specialists in the early detection of symptoms, assessment of the clinical situation, determination of appropriate treatment, and delivery of individualized interventions.
  • It is known that lowering blood pressure decreases deaths from stroke and coronary events, prevents progression to more severe hypertension, and reduces mortality

POTENTIAL HARMS

Adverse effects of pharmacologic therapy (see Appendix B of original guideline document)

CONTRAINDICATIONS

CONTRAINDICATIONS

  • Beta- blockers are contraindicated in patients with asthma.
  • Thiazides are contraindicated in patients with gout.
  • Intravenous pyelogram is relatively contraindicated in diabetes.
  • Eprosartan is contraindicated in 2nd and 3rd trimesters of pregnancy.
  • Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) contraindicated in patients with angioedema and should be avoided in second and third trimesters of pregnancy.
  • Verapamil is contraindicated in patients with atrioventricular node dysfunction (2nd or 3rd degree heart block) and/or left ventricular (systolic) dysfunction when ejection fraction is <45%.

QUALIFYING STATEMENTS

QUALIFYING STATEMENTS

  • Clinical practice guidelines, which are increasingly being used in health care, are seen by many as a potential solution to inefficiency and inappropriate variations in care. Guidelines should be evidenced-based as well as based upon explicit criteria to ensure consensus regarding their internal validity. However, it must be remembered that the use of guidelines must always be in the context of a health care provider's clinical judgment in the care of a particular patient. For that reason, the guidelines may be viewed as an educational tool analogous to textbooks and journals, but in a more user-friendly tone.
  • Although this guideline represents the best evidence-based practice on the date of its publication, it is certain that medical practice is evolving and that this evolution will require continuous updating of published information. In addition, the reader is reminded that this document is intended as a guideline and should not supersede the clinical judgment of the health care provider.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GUIDELINE

DESCRIPTION OF IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS

Clinical Algorithm
Pocket Guide/Reference Cards
Quality Measures
Resources

For information about availability, see the "Availability of Companion Documents" and "Patient Resources" fields below.

INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (IOM) NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY REPORT CATEGORIES

IOM CARE NEED

Getting Better
Living with Illness

IOM DOMAIN

Effectiveness
Patient-centeredness

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Veterans Administration, Department of Defense. VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for diagnosis and management of hypertension in the primary care setting. Washington (DC): Veterans Administration, Department of Defense; 2004 Aug. 99 p.

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

1999 May (revised 2004)

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Department of Defense - Federal Government Agency [U.S.]
Department of Veterans Affairs - Federal Government Agency [U.S.]
Veterans Health Administration - Federal Government Agency [U.S.]

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

United States Government

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

The Hypertension Working Group

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

The list of contributors to this guideline includes internists, specialists, primary care providers, program specialists, administrators, external peer review physicians, and expert consultants in the field of guideline and algorithm development.

Guideline Update Working Group

Veterans Affairs Working Group Members: Peter Glassman, MBBS, MSc. (Co-chairman); Paul R Conlin, MD; William Cushman, MD; Elaine Furmaga, PharmD; Leonard Pogach, MD; Thakor G. Patel, MD

Department of Defense Working Group Members: Douglas, Kevin, MAJ, MD (Co-chairman); Robert Manaker, LtCol, MC, USAF; Angela Allerman, PharmD, BCPS; Vincent P. Fonseca, LtColMD, MPH; Doreen Lounsbery, COL, MD, MHA; Paul G. Welch, LTC, MC, USA; Bell Michael R MAJ USACHPPM; Angela Klar, RN, MSN, ANP, CS

Facilitator: Oded Susskind, MPH

Coordinator: Joanne Marko, MS, CCC-SLP

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Not stated

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: Diagnosis and management of hypertension in the primary care setting. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (U.S.); 1999 May. Various p.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available from the Department of Veterans Affairs Web site.

Print copies: Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Quality and Performance (10Q) 810 Vermont Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20420.

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This summary was completed by ECRI on May 1, 2001. The information was verified by the guideline developer as of November 1, 2001. This NGC summary was updated by ECRI on May 27, 2005.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

No copyright restrictions apply.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo