Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Prevention of influenza: recommendations for influenza immunization of children, 2007-2008.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

All clinical reports and policy statements from the American Academy of Pediatrics automatically expire 5 years after publication unless reaffirmed, revised, or retired at or before that time.

** REGULATORY ALERT **

FDA WARNING/REGULATORY ALERT

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse: This guideline references a drug(s) for which important revised regulatory information has been released:

  • April 02, 2008, Relenza (zanamivir): GlaxoSmithKline informed healthcare professionals of changes to the warnings and precautions sections of prescribing information for Relenza. There have been reports (mostly from Japan) of delirium and abnormal behavior leading to injury in patients with influenza who are receiving neuraminidase inhibitors, including Relenza.
  • March 4, 2008, Tamiflu (oseltamivir phosphate): Roche and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) informed healthcare professionals of neuropsychiatric events associated with the use of Tamiflu, in patients with influenza. Roche has updated the PRECAUTIONS section of the package insert to include the new information and guidance under the Neuropsychiatric Events heading.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 ** REGULATORY ALERT **
 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Definitions for the grades of evidence (A-D) and guideline definitions for evidence-based statements can be found at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Recommendations

Influenza immunization is recommended for the following groups:

  • Healthy children 6 through 59 months of age (recommendation; evidence Grade B).
  • Children at high risk and adolescents with underlying medical conditions, including: asthma or other chronic pulmonary diseases, such as cystic fibrosis (recommendation; evidence grade B).
  • Hemodynamically significant cardiac disease.
  • Immunosuppressive disorders or therapy.
  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
  • Sickle cell anemia and other hemoglobinopathies.
  • Diseases requiring long-term aspirin therapy, such as juvenile idiopathic arthritis or Kawasaki disease (trivalent inactivated vaccine [TIV] only).
  • Chronic renal dysfunction.
  • Chronic metabolic disease, such as diabetes mellitus.
  • Any condition that can compromise respiratory function or handling of secretions or can increase the risk of aspiration, such as cognitive dysfunction, spinal cord injuries, seizure disorders, or other neuromuscular disorders.
  • Household contacts and out-of-home caregivers of children younger than 5 years and children who are at risk of all ages. Immunization of close contacts of children younger than 6 months may be particularly important, because these infants cannot be immunized (recommendation; evidence grade B).
  • Children who required regular medical follow-up or hospitalization during the preceding year because of chronic metabolic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus; renal dysfunction; hemoglobinopathies; or immunodeficiency caused by medication or by HIV infection.
  • Any female who will be pregnant during influenza season (TIV only).

In addition, immunization with either TIV or live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) is recommended for the following individuals to prevent transmission of influenza to those at risk, unless contraindicated:

  • Individuals 5 years and older.
  • Healthy contacts and caregivers of other children or adults at high risk of developing complications from influenza infection (recommendation; evidence grade B).
  • Close contacts of immunosuppressed individuals (TIV only if severely immunosuppressed).
  • Health care workers or volunteers.

Information about influenza surveillance is available through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Voice Information System (influenza update, 888-232-3228) or at www.cdc.gov/flu.influenza infection.

Definitions

Definitions Grades of Evidence

  1. Well-designed randomized, controlled trials or diagnostic studies performed on a population similar to the guideline's target population
  2. Randomized, controlled trials or diagnostic studies with minor limitations; overwhelmingly consistent evidence from observational studies
  3. Observational studies (case-control and cohort design)
  4. Expert opinion, case reports, or reasoning from first principles (bench research or animal studies)

Guideline Definitions for Evidence-Based Statements

Statement Type Definition Implication
Strong Recommendation The subcommittee believes that the benefits of the recommended approach clearly exceed the harms (or that the harms clearly exceed the benefits in the case of a strong negative recommendation) and that the quality of the supporting evidence is excellent (grade A or B). Clinicians should follow a strong recommendation unless a clear and compelling rationale for an alternative approach is present.
Recommendation The subcommittee believes that the benefits exceed the harms (or that the harms exceed the benefits in the case of a negative recommendation), but the quality of evidence is not as strong (grade B or C). In some clearly identified circumstances, recommendations may be made on the basis of lesser evidence when high-quality evidence is impossible to obtain and the anticipated benefits outweigh the harms. Clinicians also should generally follow a recommendation but remain alert to new information and sensitive to patient preferences.
Option Either the quality of evidence that exists is suspect (grade D) or well-performed studies (grade A, B, or C) show little clear advantage to one approach versus another. Clinicians should be flexible in their decision making in regards to appropriate practice, although they may set boundaries on alternatives; patient preference should play a substantial influencing role.
No Recommendation There is both a lack of pertinent evidence (grade D) and an unclear balance between benefits and harms. Clinicians should feel little constraint in their decision making and be alert to new published evidence that clarifies the balance of benefit versus harm; patient preference should play a substantial influencing role.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

A clinical algorithm, "Algorithm for determining recommended influenza immunization actions for children," is provided in the original guideline document.

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see "Major Recommendations").

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2007 Apr (revised 2008 Apr 1)

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

American Academy of Pediatrics - Medical Specialty Society

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

American Academy of Pediatrics

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Committee on Infectious Diseases

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Committee on Infectious Diseases, 2007-2008: Joseph A. Bocchini, Jr, MD, Chairperson; Henry H. Bernstein, DO; John S. Bradley, MD; Michael T. Brady, MD; Carrie L. Byington, MD; Penelope H. Dennehy, MD; Robert W. Frenck, Jr, MD; Mary P. Glode, MD; Harry L. Keyserling, MD; David W. Kimberlin, MD; Sarah S. Long, MD; Lorry G. Rubin, MD

Liaisons: Robert Bortolussi, MD, Canadian Paediatric Society; Richard D. Clover, MD, American Academy of Family Physicians; Marc A. Fischer, MD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Richard L. Gorman, MD, National Institutes of Health; R. Douglas Pratt, MD, Food and Drug Administration; Anne Schuchat, MD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Benjamin Schwartz, MD, National Vaccine Program Office; Jeffrey R. Starke, MD, American Thoracic Society

Ex Officio: Carol J. Baker, MD, Red Book Associate Editor; Larry K. Pickering, MD, Red Book Editor

Consultants: Edgar O. Ledbetter, MD; H. Cody Meissner, MD

Staff: Alison Siwek, MPH

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Not stated

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

All clinical reports and policy statements from the American Academy of Pediatrics automatically expire 5 years after publication unless reaffirmed, revised, or retired at or before that time.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Policy Web site.

Print copies: Available from American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Blvd., P.O. Box 927, Elk Grove Village, IL 60009-0927.

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

None available

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on May 15, 2007. The information was verified by the guideline developer on May 23, 2007. This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on March 10, 2008 following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory on Tamiflu (oseltamivir phosphate). This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on April 9, 2008 following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory on Relenza (zanamivir). This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on May 16, 2008. The updated information was verified by the guideline developer on May 20, 2008.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions. Please contact the Permissions Editor, American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), 141 Northwest Point Blvd, Elk Grove Village, IL 60007.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo