Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Interagency guideline on opioid dosing for chronic non-cancer pain: an educational pilot to improve care and safety with opioid treatment.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Washington State Agency Medical Directors' Group. Interagency guideline on opioid dosing for chronic non-cancer pain: an educational pilot to improve care and safety with opioid treatment. Olympia (WA): Washington State Department of Labor and Industries; 2007 Mar. 14 p. [52 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Guidelines for Initiating, Transitioning, and Maintaining Oral Opioids for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain

Table. Summary of Recommendations

Prescribing opioid doses up to 120 mg/day morphine equivalent dose (MED):

(Cumulative daily dose when using one or more opioids. See Table 2 in the original guideline document for specific opioid thresholds.)

Before exceeding 120 mg/day MED dose threshold:

(Cumulative daily dose when using one or more opioids. See Table 2 in the original guideline document for specific opioid thresholds.)

  • No pain management consultation needed if the prescriber is documenting sustained improvement in both function and pain.
  • Consider specialty consultation* if frequent adverse effects or lack of response is evident in order to address:
    • Evidence of undiagnosed conditions
    • Presence of significant psychological condition affecting treatment
    • Potential alternative treatment to reduce or discontinue use of opioids
  • Seek pain management consultation** to address:
    • Potential alternative treatment to opioids
    • Risk and benefit of a possible trial with opioid dose above 120 mg/day MED
    • Assistance with ongoing documentation of improvement in function and pain
    • Schedule for follow up with pain management specialist, if necessary

*See Specialty Consultation section below.

**See Pain Management Consultation section below.

Dosing Threshold for Pain Consultation

In order to improve the quality of care in the state of Washington, the state agencies, in collaboration with the physician panel, reviewed the available evidence and made the following recommendations:

  • In general, the total daily dose of opioid should not exceed 120 mg oral morphine equivalents.
  • Rarely, and only after pain management consultation, should the total daily dose of opioid be increased above 120 mg oral morphine equivalents.
  • Safety and effectiveness of opioid therapy for chronic non-cancer pain should be routinely evaluated by the prescriber.
  • Assessing the effectiveness of opioid treatment should entail tracking and documenting both functional improvement and pain relief.
  • A specialty consultation may be considered at any time if there is evidence of frequent adverse effects or lack of response to an opioid trial.

Morphine Equivalent Dose Calculation

For patients taking more than one opioid, the morphine equivalent doses of the different opioids must be added together to determine the cumulative dose.

All conversions between opioids are estimates generally based on "equianalgesic dosing" or ED. Patient variability in response to these EDs can be large, due primarily to genetic factors and incomplete cross-tolerance. It is recommended that, after calculating the appropriate conversion dose, it be reduced by 25 to 50% to assure patient safety.

See the original guideline document including Table 3 for more information. Also, refer to the "Opioid Dose Calculator" companion document (see the "Availability of Companion Documents" field).

When to Consider Prescribing Opioids

  • Other conservative measures have failed (e.g., non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], tricyclic antidepressants, antiepileptics and non-pharmacologic therapies) and opioids have not been tried.
  • Patient has demonstrated sustained improvement in function and pain level in previous opioid trial.
  • Patient has no relative contraindication to the use of opioids (e.g., active alcohol or other substance abuse).

Principles for Prescribing Opioids

  • Single prescriber
  • Single pharmacy
  • Patient and prescriber sign opioid agreement
  • Lowest possible effective dose should be used
  • Be cautious when using opioids with conditions that may potentiate opioid adverse effects (including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], congestive heart failure [CHF], sleep apnea, history of alcohol or substance abuse, elderly, or history of renal or hepatic dysfunction).
  • Do not combine opioids with sedative-hypnotics, benzodiazepines or barbiturates for chronic non-cancer pain unless there is a specific medical indication for the combination.
  • Assess function and pain status routinely (see Tools for Assessing Function and Pain section in the original guideline document).
  • Monitor for medication misuse (for a list of drug-seeking behaviors, see Reasons to Discontinue Opioids or Refer for Addiction Management section).
  • Random urine drug toxicology screening to objectively assure compliance (see Urine Drug Toxicology Screening section).

Instituting Opioid Treatment for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain

Prior to initiating chronic opioid therapy, the prescriber should comprehensively assess the risks and benefits of treatment. The prescriber is responsible for routinely monitoring the safety and effectiveness of opioid therapy in providing pain relief and improving function.

When instituting opioid therapy, both provider and patient should discuss and agree on:

  • Risks and benefits of opioid therapy supported by an opioid agreement
  • Treatment goals and provider's established criteria to evaluate the effectiveness of opioid therapy
  • A follow-up plan with specific time intervals to monitor treatment.

Treatment goals must include improvements in both function and pain while monitoring for and minimizing adverse effects.

Depression and anxiety disorders are frequently associated with the use of opioids. Extreme caution should be used, and a specialty consultation is strongly encouraged, prior to prescribing opioids when patients have a history of significant psychological conditions such as conversion disorder, somatization, borderline personality, mood disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), or history of alcohol or other substance abuse.

Transitioning Opioid Treatment from Acute Pain to Chronic Non-Cancer Pain

  • Acute pain is self-limiting and lasts from a few days to a few weeks following trauma or surgery.
  • Chronic pain persists beyond the anticipated healing period for the specific disease condition.

The level of pain during an acute phase does not necessarily and accurately predict the pain level in a chronic phase. Thus, opioid dosing for chronic treatment should be assessed and adjusted accordingly.

Tools for Assessing Function and Pain

The key to effective opioid therapy for chronic non-cancer pain is sustained functional improvement. While there is no universally accepted tool to assess opioid treatment, it is important to use a tool that monitors both function and pain. An assessment of function should consistently measure the same elements to adequately determine the degree of progress.

See the original guideline document for the list of tools for assessing function and pain.

Assessing Effects of Opioid Treatment

Long-term opioid treatment is associated with the development of tolerance to its analgesic effects. Evidence is accumulating that opioid treatment may also paradoxically induce abnormal pain sensitivity, including hyperalgesia and allodynia. Thus, increasing opioid doses may not improve pain control and function.

The prescriber should assess the risks and benefits of their patient's current opioid therapy. This assessment should include:

  • Function and pain status (see Tools for Assessing Function and Pain in the original guideline document)
  • Possible adverse effects of current opioid doses
  • Potential psychological condition affecting treatment
  • Possible drug combinations or conditions that may potentiate opioid adverse effects (such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, sleep apnea, history of alcohol or substance abuse, advanced age, or history of renal or hepatic dysfunction)
  • Any relative contraindication to the use of opioids (active alcohol or other substance abuse, see Urine Drug Toxicology Screening section).

If function and pain do not improve after a sufficient opioid trial, consider discontinuing opioids (see Weaning Opioids section). When there is evidence of significant adverse effects from opioid therapy, the provider should reduce the opioid dose and reassess the patient's status.

Otherwise, if no reasons for dose reduction or discontinuation are identified, and the prescriber feels (with support of objective measures of pain and function) that the patient is benefiting from current therapy, continuation would be appropriate. Ongoing therapy, however, entails ongoing assessment. The screening described above should be done on a regular basis to assess progression of therapy as the patient's condition changes over time.

Urine Drug Toxicology Screening

Urine drug toxicology screening can improve the prescriber's ability to safely and appropriately manage opioid treatment. Urine toxicology can verify if the patient is taking the prescribed medications. It can also identify if other psychoactive substances are consumed, but not reported, which may impact the patient's safety, function and treatment. The NIDA 5 (National Institute on Drug Abuse) is the most commonly used basic urine drug test that screens for five common drug classes:

  • Cannabinoids (marijuana, hash)
  • Cocaine (crack)
  • Amphetamines (methamphetamines, speed)
  • Opioids (heroin, opium, codeine, morphine)
  • Phencyclidine (PCP)

The NIDA 5 does not screen for many other drugs of abuse, such as barbiturates, benzodiazepines, hydrocodone, methadone, oxycodone, propoxyphene, or other synthetic drugs. An expanded urine drug toxicology panel can be ordered to screen for these substances.

Positive results from a urine toxicology screen should be interpreted with caution. Over-the-counter medication may occasionally cause a positive result, particularly in the amphetamines and opioids classes. In some circumstances a positive result may require confirmatory tests and consultation with a certified Medical Review Officer (MRO). To locate a MRO in your area, submit a search at the following website: http://www.aamro.com/locate/.

Specialty Consultation

Specialty consultation is recommended for ongoing severe pain symptoms with no improvement in function despite treatment with opioids. Consultation should address possible undiagnosed conditions, psychological conditions affecting treatment, and alternative treatments. The type of consultation obtained should be determined by the patient's presenting signs and symptoms. Consultation may be with, but not limited to, a physician specializing in psychiatry, neurology, anesthesiology, pain, physical medicine and rehabilitation, orthopedics, addiction medicine, rheumatology, or oncology.

Chronic opioid treatment can be challenging in patients with symptoms suggestive of mood, anxiety, and psychotic disorders. Consider psychiatric and/or psychological consultation for intervention if a psychological condition is affecting treatment. Patients with signs of alcohol or other substance abuse should be referred to an addiction specialist (see Referrals for Addiction Management or Opioid Agonist Treatment section in the original guideline document).

Pain Management Consultation

Although pain may be relieved at oral morphine doses up to 120 mg per day, pain relief is not necessarily associated with psychological or functional improvement. Because sustained functional improvement is so critical to effective opioid therapy for chronic non-cancer pain, the prescriber should ensure that the patient meets the following conditions before considering a dosage above 120 mg/day morphine equivalent dose (MED):

  • There are no significant psychological issues or evidence of drug-seeking behaviors, AND
  • The patient has demonstrated improvement in function and pain level previously at a lower dose.

If these conditions are met, the prescriber may seek a pain management consultation for a possible trial with opioid doses above 120 mg/day MED.

Consultation with a specialist does not necessitate transfer of the patient's care or on-going opioid prescribing. However, the consultant should advise the prescribing provider on a pain management plan that may include alternative treatments to reduce or discontinue use of opioids; adequate explanation of the risks and benefits of a possible trial with opioid dosing above 120 mg/day MED; and the need for ongoing documentation of improvement in function and pain.

See the original guideline document for information on how to find a pain management specialist.

Weaning Opioids

Not all patients benefit from opioids, and a prescriber frequently faces the challenge of reducing the opioid dose or discontinuing the opioid altogether. From a medical standpoint, weaning from opioids can be done safely by slowly tapering the opioid dose and taking into account the following issues:

  • A decrease by 10% of the original dose per week is usually well tolerated with minimal physiological adverse effects. Some patients can be tapered more rapidly without problems (over 6 to 8 weeks).
  • If opioid abstinence syndrome is encountered, it is rarely medically serious although symptoms may be unpleasant.
  • Symptoms of an abstinence syndrome, such as nausea, diarrhea, muscle pain and myoclonus can be managed with clonidine 0.1 – 0.2 mg orally every 6 hours or clonidine transdermal patch 0.1 mg/24 hours (Catapres TTS-1) weekly during the taper while monitoring for often significant hypotension and anticholinergic side effects. In some patients it may be necessary to slow the taper timeline to monthly, rather than weekly dosage adjustments.
  • Symptoms of mild opioid withdrawal may persist for six months after opioids have been discontinued.
  • Consider using adjuvant agents, such as antidepressants to manage irritability, sleep disturbance or antiepileptics for neuropathic pain.
  • Do not treat withdrawal symptoms with opioids or benzodiazepines after discontinuing opioids.
  • Referral for counseling or other support during this period is recommended if there are significant behavioral issues.
  • Referral to a pain specialist or chemical dependency center should be made for complicated withdrawal symptoms.

Recognizing and Managing Behavioral Issues during Opioid Weaning

Opioid tapers can be done safely and do not pose significant health risks to the patient. In contrast, extremely challenging behavioral issues may emerge during an opioid taper.

Behavioral challenges frequently arise in the setting of a prescriber who is tapering the opioid dose and a patient who places great value on the opioid he/she is receiving. In this setting, some patients will use a wide range of interpersonal strategies to derail the opioid taper. These may include:

  • Guilt provocation ("You are indifferent to my suffering")
  • Threats of various kinds
  • Exaggeration of their actual suffering in order to disrupt the progress of a scheduled taper

There are no fool-proof methods for preventing behavioral issues during an opioid taper, but strategies implemented at the beginning of the opioid therapy are most likely to prevent later behavioral problems if an opioid taper becomes necessary (see Instituting Opioid Treatment for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain section above).

Guidelines for Optimizing Treatment When Opioid Doses Are Greater Than 120 mg MED per Day

Assessing Effects of Opioid Doses Greater Than 120 mg MED per Day

As previously stated, ongoing opioid treatment requires ongoing assessment to optimize therapy. This is important in light of the development of hyperalgesia and other abnormal pain sensitivity with chronic high dose opioid treatment. If, after using the guidelines under Assessing Effects of Opioid Treatment section, the prescriber feels that current treatment is not benefiting the patient, a dose reduction or discontinuation is warranted. However, if current treatment is benefiting the patient as demonstrated by objective measures of pain and function, it may be appropriate to continue, while establishing a plan to monitor therapy as the patient's condition changes over time (see Principles for Prescribing Opioids section above).

How to Discontinue Opioids or Reduce and Reassess at Lower Doses

The prescriber should assess the patient's status after discontinuing or reducing the opioid dose to less than 120 mg MED per day. If the chosen assessment tool indicates improved patient status, other than subjective pain complaints, or if there is improvement in opioid-related side effects, maintain the patient off opioids or at the new reduced dose and reassess at a later time.

Conversely, if there is evidence of functional and symptomatic deterioration following opioid taper, the prescriber can resume prior dosing or strongly consider consulting with a pain management specialist to evaluate additional therapeutic options.

Referrals to Pain Centers

A referral for counseling or other support during opioid taper or dose reduction is recommended if there are significant behavioral issues. In addition, a multidisciplinary pain program may be considered when appropriate to address the psychosocial and cognitive aspects of chronic pain together with patients' physical rehabilitation.

Recognizing Aberrant Behaviors during Opioid Treatment

Patients who exhibit aberrant behaviors may or may not be at risk for opioid abuse. There is no universally accepted screening tool to predict aberrant behaviors with opioid treatment for chronic pain. However, it is important to identify aberrant behaviors as they can affect the medical management of your patients (see Reasons to Discontinue Opioids or Refer for Addiction Management section below).

Patients with a co-morbid psychiatric condition or addiction are at higher risk of uncontrolled opioid use despite their attempts to follow the treatment plan. Prescribers should seek a consultation with an addiction specialist if there is co-morbid substance dependence or abuse.

Reasons to Discontinue Opioids or Refer for Addiction Management

  • No improvement in function or pain after opioid trial
  • Opioid treatment produces significant adverse effects
  • Patient exhibits drug-seeking behaviors or diversion:
    • Selling prescription drugs
    • Forging prescriptions
    • Stealing or borrowing drugs
    • Frequently losing prescriptions
    • Aggressive demand for opioids
    • Injecting oral/topical opioids
    • Unsanctioned use of opioids
    • Unsanctioned dose escalation
    • Concurrent use of illicit drugs
    • Failing a drug screen
    • Getting opioids from multiple prescribers

See the original guideline document for information on referrals for addiction management or opioid agonist treatment.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is not specifically stated for each recommendation.

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Washington State Agency Medical Directors' Group. Interagency guideline on opioid dosing for chronic non-cancer pain: an educational pilot to improve care and safety with opioid treatment. Olympia (WA): Washington State Department of Labor and Industries; 2007 Mar. 14 p. [52 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2007 March

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Washington State Agency Medical Directors' Group - Independent Expert Panel

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER COMMENT

The Washington State Agency Medical Directors Group is comprised of the medical directors and health care administrators of six state agencies: Corrections, Health, Labor & Industries, Health Care Authority, Social and Health Services, and Veterans Affairs.

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Washington State Department of Labor and Industries

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Not stated

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Washington State Department of Labor and Industries (L&I)

Gary Franklin, MD, MPH
Lee Glass, MD
Jaymie Mai, Pharm D
LaVonda McCandless, RN, MSN
Henry Stockbridge, MD, MPH
Doug Tuman, RPh

Washington State Health Care Authority

Malcolm Dejnozka, MD
Nancy Fisher, MD
Donna Sullivan, Pharm D

Washington State Department of Health

Maxine Hayes, MD
George Heye, MD
Laurie Jinkins
Todd Herzog, CRNA
Nicole Oishi, LPN
Andy Mecca, RPh

Washington State Department of Corrections

Marc Stern, MD
Grant Deger, MD
Barbara Curtis, RN
Andre Rossi, Pharm D
Nichole Gerdes, Pharm D

Washington State Department of Social and Health Services

Jeff Thompson, MD
Siri Childs, Pharm D
Carolyn Coyne, MD
Doug Allen

University of Washington

James Robinson, MD, PhD
Peter Dunbar, MD
John Loeser, MD
Joseph Merrill, MD
Steven Riddle, Pharm D
Richard Ries, MD
Mark Sullivan, MD, PhD
Thomas Taylor, MD
Gregory Terman, MD
Tom Wyckizer, PhD

Private Practice Physicians

Greg Carter, MD
Charles Chabal, MD
Dianna Chamblin, MD
Mark Flanery, MD
Andrew Friedman, MD
Marvin Hoffert, MD
Gordon Irving, MD
Andrew Saxon, MD
David Sinclair, MD
David Tauben, MD
Thomas Williamson-Kirkland, MD
Thomas Shelton, DO
Patricia Sparks, MD
Robert Kalus, MD

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Not stated

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

The following are available:

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This summary was completed by ECRI Institute on April 14, 2008. The information was verified by the guideline developer on April 24, 2008.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which may be subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo