Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Common breast problems.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • University of Michigan Health System. Common breast problems. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan Health System; 2007 Oct. 10 p. [7 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC): The following key points summarize the content of the guideline. Refer to the full text for additional information, including detailed information on evaluation and imaging techniques, specific breast signs and symptoms, assessment and management of women of high risk women, and the anxious patient. Definitions for the levels of evidence (A, B, C, D) are provided at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Palpable Mass or Asymmetry (See Figure 1 in the original guideline document)

  • Discrete solid masses have a medium to high index of suspicion because physical exam cannot be a reliable tool to rule out malignancy.
    • Breast imaging is the best diagnostic approach.
    • Fine needle aspiration (FNA) by a qualified practitioner is an acceptable diagnostic tool, though if it precedes imaging it may disrupt tissue and affect mammography sensitivity. If aspiration reveals cyst, send fluid for cytology if it is bloody, if mass does not resolve completely with aspiration, or if cyst is recurrent in same location. A definitive report of fibroadenoma by fine needle aspiration requires no further workup. Masses not reported as definitive fibroadenomas or cysts should be evaluated by a breast specialist.

    Follow up physical exam after imaging or FNA is important. Cysts that recur are more likely to be malignant, and any nondiagnosed mass that persists should be evaluated by a specialist whether imaging has detected it or not.

  • A non-discrete possible mass or thickening has a lower index of suspicion and should be reexamined in 1-2 months, preferably the week after menses in premenopausal woman. If a localized area remains abnormal on repeat exam then workup for possible malignancy is indicated, with diagnostic imaging and referral to a breast specialist. Persistent asymmetry, especially in postmenopausal women, is more suspicious than asymmetry that varies with the menstrual cycle [D].
  • Referral to breast care specialist is recommended for: (a) any suspicious mass, (b) any mass that is undiagnosed after diagnostic imaging, or (c) any woman at very high risk for breast cancer [D].

Breast Pain - Negative Exam (See Figure 2 in the original guideline document)

  • If physical exam and appropriate breast imaging are negative, the likely diagnosis is benign cyclic or noncyclic mastalgia: reassure patient. Trial of evening primrose oil (1000 mg twice a day [bid] for 3-6 months (or its active ingredient, gamma linoleic acid 160 mg bid) is reasonable [A]. Topical diclofenac gel is also promising for mastalgia [A]. Recommendation for a well-fitted bra is often helpful [C].
  • If persistent or localized pain not responsive after 2 to 3 months of conservative treatment, refer to breast specialist [C].

Nipple Discharge Without Abnormal Exam Findings (See Figure 3 in the original guideline document)

  • If discharge is serous or sanguinous, or if other risk factors are present (spontaneous discharge, single duct discharge), refer to breast specialist [C].
  • If discharge is not suspicious. If clearly galactorrhea, pursue medical workup and do not refer to breast specialist [D]. If discharge is from multiple ducts and gray to green in color do not refer to a breast specialist unless patient requests referral for symptomatic relief.

Assessment and Management of Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer

Primary care providers (PCPs) should identify and counsel women regarding breast cancer risk. Breast cancer screening frequency for high risk women is in Table 4 in the original guideline document. Women at high risk (5 year risk >1.7%) according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (http://www.cancer.gov/bcrisktool/) should be:

  • Offered referral to breast specialist, if available
  • Considered for risk reduction therapy if appropriate candidate and with appropriate follow up

Definitions:

Levels of Evidence

  1. Randomized controlled trials
  2. Controlled trials, no randomization
  3. Observational trials
  4. Opinion of expert panel

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

The following clinical algorithms are provided in the original guideline document:

  • Palpable Breast Mass or Asymmetry: Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Breast Pain Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Nipple Discharge Diagnosis and Treatment (no mass)

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see "Major Recommendations" field).

Conclusions were based on prospective randomized clinical trials (RCTs) if available, to the exclusion of other data. If RCTs were not available, observational studies were admitted to consideration. If no such data were available, expert opinion was used to estimate effect size.

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • University of Michigan Health System. Common breast problems. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan Health System; 2007 Oct. 10 p. [7 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2007 Oct

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

University of Michigan Health System - Academic Institution

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

University of Michigan Health System

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Breast Care Guideline Team

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Team Leaders: Amy F. Saunders, MD, General Medicine

Team Members: Amy B. Locke, MD, Family Medicine; R. Van Harrison, PhD, Medical Education; Lisa A. Newman, MD, MPH, General Surgery; Mark D. Pearlman, MD, Obstetrics & Gynecology; Mark A. Helvie, MD, MS, Radiology/Breast Imaging

Guidelines Oversight Team: Connie J. Standiford, MD; William E. Chavey, MD; R. Van Harrison, PhD

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The University of Michigan Health System endorses the Guidelines of the Association of American Medical Colleges and the Standards of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education that the individuals who present educational activities disclose significant relationships with commercial companies whose products or services are discussed. Disclosure of a relationship is not intended to suggest bias in the information presented, but is made to provide readers with information that might be of potential importance to their evaluation of the information.

None of the members of the Breast Problems Guideline Team have relationships with commercial companies whose products are discussed in this guideline. (The members of these teams are listed on the front page of this guideline.)

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

PATIENT RESOURCES

The following are available:

Please note: This patient information is intended to provide health professionals with information to share with their patients to help them better understand their health and their diagnosed disorders. By providing access to this patient information, it is not the intention of NGC to provide specific medical advice for particular patients. Rather we urge patients and their representatives to review this material and then to consult with a licensed health professional for evaluation of treatment options suitable for them as well as for diagnosis and answers to their personal medical questions. This patient information has been derived and prepared from a guideline for health care professionals included on NGC by the authors or publishers of that original guideline. The patient information is not reviewed by NGC to establish whether or not it accurately reflects the original guideline's content.

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on January 24, 2008. The information was verified by the guideline developer on February 11, 2008.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is copyrighted by the University of Michigan Health System (UMHS).

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo