Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Complete Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Prevention and identification of childhood overweight.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium. Prevention and identification of childhood overweight. Southfield (MI): Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium; 2006 Jul. 1 p.

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

COMPLETE SUMMARY CONTENT

 
SCOPE
 METHODOLOGY - including Rating Scheme and Cost Analysis
 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 BENEFITS/HARMS OF IMPLEMENTING THE GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS
 QUALIFYING STATEMENTS
 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GUIDELINE
 INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (IOM) NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY REPORT CATEGORIES
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

SCOPE

DISEASE/CONDITION(S)

Childhood overweight

GUIDELINE CATEGORY

Prevention
Risk Assessment

CLINICAL SPECIALTY

Family Practice
Internal Medicine
Pediatrics
Preventive Medicine

INTENDED USERS

Advanced Practice Nurses
Health Plans
Physician Assistants
Physicians

GUIDELINE OBJECTIVE(S)

  • To achieve significant, measurable improvements in the prevention and identification of childhood overweight through the development and implementation of common evidence-based clinical practice guidelines
  • To design concise guidelines that are focused on key prevention components of childhood overweight to improve outcomes

TARGET POPULATION

  • Parents of children under 2 years old
  • Children 2 years of age and older

INTERVENTIONS AND PRACTICES CONSIDERED

  1. Educating parents of children under 2 years old regarding practices to promote healthy weight, including breastfeeding, age-specific meals, serving sizes, physical activity, parental role modeling
  2. Children 2 years or older:
    • Assessment of body mass index (BMI) and risk factors for overweight and excessive weight gain relative to linear growth
    • Age-specific preventive measures to promote healthy weight (e.g., avoiding high calorie, nutrient poor beverages; replacing whole milk with skim; limiting television and computer screen time to two hours or less daily; healthy diet; regular eating times; physical activity)

MAJOR OUTCOMES CONSIDERED

Not stated

METHODOLOGY

METHODS USED TO COLLECT/SELECT EVIDENCE

Searches of Electronic Databases

DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED TO COLLECT/SELECT THE EVIDENCE

The Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium (MQIC) project leader conducts a search of current literature in support of the guideline topic. Computer database searches are used to identify published studies and existing protocols and/or clinical practice guidelines on the selected topic. A database such as MEDLINE and two to three other databases are used.

NUMBER OF SOURCE DOCUMENTS

Not stated

METHODS USED TO ASSESS THE QUALITY AND STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE

Weighting According to a Rating Scheme (Scheme Given)

RATING SCHEME FOR THE STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE

Levels of Evidence for the Most Significant Recommendations

  1. Randomized controlled trials
  2. Controlled trials, no randomization
  3. Observational studies
  4. Opinion of expert panel

METHODS USED TO ANALYZE THE EVIDENCE

Review

DESCRIPTION OF THE METHODS USED TO ANALYZE THE EVIDENCE

Not stated

METHODS USED TO FORMULATE THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Expert Consensus

DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED TO FORMULATE THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Using the health plan guideline summaries and information obtained from the literature search, the Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium (MQIC) director and/or project leader prepare a draft guideline for review by the MQIC Medical Directors.

The draft guideline and health plan guideline summaries are distributed to the MQIC Medical Directors for review and discussion at their next committee meeting.

The review/revision cycle may be conducted over several meetings before consensus is reached. Each version of the draft guideline is distributed to the MQIC Medical Directors, Measurement, and Implementation Committee members for review and comments. All feedback received is distributed to the entire membership.

Once the MQIC Medical Directors achieve consensus on the draft guideline, it is considered approved for external distribution to practitioners with review and comments requested.

RATING SCHEME FOR THE STRENGTH OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Not applicable

COST ANALYSIS

A formal cost analysis was not performed and published cost analyses were not reviewed.

METHOD OF GUIDELINE VALIDATION

External Peer Review

DESCRIPTION OF METHOD OF GUIDELINE VALIDATION

Once the Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium (MQIC) Medical Directors achieve consensus on the draft guideline, it is considered approved for external distribution to practitioners with review and comments requested.

The MQIC director also forwards the approved guideline draft to presidents of the appropriate state medical specialty societies for their input. All feedback received from external reviews is presented for discussion at the next MQIC Medical Directors Committee meeting. In addition, physicians are invited to attend the committee meeting to present their comments.

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

The level of evidence grades (A-D) are provided for the most significant recommendations and are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Education of Parents Regarding Obesity and Prevention of Risk

Prevention to Promote Healthy Weight

  • Encourage breastfeeding; discourage overfeeding of bottle fed infants [A].
  • Avoid premature introduction of solids and base timing for introduction of solids on child's development, usually between 4 to 6 months of age.
  • Preserve natural satiety by respecting a child's appetite.
  • Educate caregivers on the importance of age-specific meals and snacks, consistent mealtimes, appropriate snacking, serving sizes, reading nutritional labeling, and daily physical activity.
  • Educate parents about the importance of parental role modeling for healthy lifestyle behaviors and of parental controls [D].
  • Avoid high calorie, nutrient poor beverages (e.g., soda, fruit punch, or any juice drink less than 100% juice).
  • Limit intake of 100% juice to <6 oz per day; may offer in a cup, starting at 6 months of age.
  • Evaluate general co-morbidities, including but not limited to cardiovascular disease of parents.
  • No television or computer screen time [D].

Eligible Population

Parents of children under 2 years old

Frequency

At each periodic health exam

Assessment of Body Mass Index (BMI), Risk Factors for Overweight, and Excessive Weight Gain Relative to Linear Growth

General Assessment

Eligible Population

Children 2 years or older

Frequency

At each periodic health exam

1Low/high birth weight, low income, minority, television or computer screen time >2 hrs, low physical activity, poor eating, depression

Prevention to Promote Healthy Weight

Age Specific Prevention Messages

Preschool:

  • Replace whole milk with skim, avoid high calorie, nutrient poor beverages (soda, fruit punch, juice drinks).
  • Limit intake of 100% juice.
  • Limit television and computer screen time to two hours or less daily.
  • Promote a healthy diet (include fruit and vegetables and low-fat dairy) that encourages family mealtimes, regular eating times, and minimizes nutritionally poor food prepared outside the home.
  • Respect the child's appetite and allow him or her to self-regulate food intake.
  • Provide structure and boundaries around healthy eating with adult supervision.
  • Promote physical activity including unstructured play at home, during childcare, and in the community.

School-aged, the above plus:

  • Accumulate at least 60 minutes, and up to several hours, of age appropriate physical activity on all or most days of the week (emphasize lifestyle exercise, i.e., outdoor play, yard work, and household chores).
  • Consider barriers (e.g., unsafe neighborhoods or lack of school-based physical education) and explore individualized solutions.
  • Reinforce making healthy food and physical activity choices at home and outside of parental influence

Eligible Population

Children 2 years or older, BMI for age <85th percentile

Frequency

At each periodic health exam

Definitions:

Levels of Evidence for the Most Significant Recommendation

  1. Randomized controlled trials
  2. Controlled trials, no randomization
  3. Observational studies
  4. Opinion of expert panel

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

BENEFITS/HARMS OF IMPLEMENTING THE GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS

POTENTIAL BENEFITS

Through a collaborative approach to developing and implementing common clinical practice guidelines and performance measures for prevention and identification of childhood overweight, Michigan health plans will achieve consistent delivery of evidence-based services and better health outcomes. This approach also will augment the practice environment for physicians by reducing the administrative burdens imposed by compliance with diverse health plan guidelines and associated requirements.

POTENTIAL HARMS

Not stated

QUALIFYING STATEMENTS

QUALIFYING STATEMENTS

This guideline lists core management steps. Individual patient considerations and advances in medical science may supersede or modify these recommendations.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GUIDELINE

DESCRIPTION OF IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

When consensus is reached on a final version of the guideline, a statewide mailing of the approved guideline is completed. The guideline is distributed to physicians in the following medical specialties:

  • Family Practice
  • General Practice
  • Internal Medicine
  • Other Specialists for which the guideline is applicable (e.g., endocrinologists, allergists, pediatricians, cardiologists)

INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (IOM) NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY REPORT CATEGORIES

IOM CARE NEED

Staying Healthy

IOM DOMAIN

Effectiveness
Patient-centeredness

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium. Prevention and identification of childhood overweight. Southfield (MI): Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium; 2006 Jul. 1 p.

ADAPTATION

DATE RELEASED

2006 Jul

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium - Professional Association

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium Medical Director's Committee

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Physician representatives from participating Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium health plans, Michigan State Medical Society, Michigan Osteopathic Association, Michigan Association of Health Plans, Michigan Department of Community Health and Michigan Peer Review Organization

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Not stated

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

None available

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on October 16, 2006. The information was verified by the guideline developer on November 3, 2006.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which may be reproduced with the citation developed by the Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo