U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL ANNOUNCES SETTLEMENT OF FIRST AMENDMENT CASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - 5/16/00
CONTACT: JANE MCFARLAND
(202) 653-7984
The U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) today announced
a favorable settlement of the petition for corrective action that it filed
against the Department of the Interior, on behalf of Deane Zeller on October
19, 1999. OSC’s petition alleged that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
violated the First Amendment when it reprimanded and reassigned Mr. Zeller
in response to a letter that he wrote to Government Executive magazine,
which was critical of the agency’s affirmative action program. The
specific terms of the settlement are required to be kept confidential by
agreement of the parties. The parties, however, have expressed their mutual
satisfaction with those terms.
OSC’s petition alleged that Mr. Zeller was reprimanded
and then reassigned to a non-supervisory position based upon the views he
expressed in a letter to the editor that he had written to Government
Executive magazine. Mr. Zeller’s letter responded to an article on
affirmative action in the federal government, which highlighted the opinions
of a high-ranking Bureau official. In his letter, Mr. Zeller was critical of
BLM’s affirmative action policies.
Mr. Zeller’s letter was published in July 1996 and the
magazine identified him as “Deane H. Zeller, District Manager, Salt Lake
City District, Bureau of Land Management, Interior Department.”
Approximately one month later, Mr. Zeller was issued a Letter of Reprimand
for “using [his] official title in [his] private capacity [in his letter
to the editor] and in doing so, making statements contrary to Bureau
policy.”
In September 1996, the BLM Director sent a memorandum to
all employees disagreeing with the views expressed by Mr. Zeller in his
letter to the editor. The BLM Director attached a copy of his own letter to
Government Executive magazine that was subsequently published in November
1996.
In January 1997, BLM informed Mr. Zeller that it was
permanently reassigning him from his supervisory position. At that time,
according to OSC’s petition, some agency officials made verbal references
to Mr. Zeller’s letter to the editor as a basis for the reassignment.
In challenging the agency’s reprimand and the
reassignment, OSC cited the First Amendment. Thus, while Government-wide
ethics regulations generally prohibit the use of official titles in personal
correspondence, such regulations do not permit agencies to discipline their
employees for speaking out against agency policies.
Special Counsel Elaine Kaplan thanked the Department of
the Interior for its cooperation in resolving Mr. Zeller’s complaint
without the need for protracted litigation. She observed that the
“protection of government employees’ First Amendment rights is a central
part of OSC’s mission,” and that “OSC intends to continue to pursue
cases, like Mr. Zeller’s, where we believe that those rights have been
infringed.” “No federal employee,” she said, “should fear that they
will be penalized on the job for expressing their opinions on controversial
matters of public concern.”
(MSPB Docket Number CB-1214-00-0001-T-1.)
***
|