ORI Logo ORI Logo Promoting Integrity in Research
Individual | Institutional
 
Home About ORI Privacy FOIA Sitemap Contact ORI
. Search ORI
.
.
.
. Sections
.
.
.Assurance
.Conferences
.Handling Misconduct
.International
.Policies / Regulations
.Publications
.RCR Education
.Research
.RIOs

.
. Newsletter
.
.
Latest Newsletter (PDF)
June 2008


Past Issues...

.
.
. Annual Report
.
.
ORI Annual Report 2007
PDF format

Annual Report
Past Reports...

.
. Graduate RCR
.
.
Graduate Education for RCR
Annual Report
New CGS publication identifies best practices in RCR
.

 
 

 
.
. Policies Menu
.
.
. Introduction
. Federal Policies
. PHS Policies
. ORI Policies
. Statutes/Regulations

.
.
. Misconduct Regs
.
.
PHS Policies on Research Misconduct
HTML | PDF

Requirements for Institutional Policies and Procedures
HTML | PDF

Frequently Asked Questions
HTML | PDF


.
.

Policies

ORI Policy on Plagiarism

Although there is widespread agreement in the scientific community on including plagiarism as a major element of the PHS definition of scientific misconduct, there is some uncertainty about how the definition of plagiarism itself is applied in ORI cases.

As a general working definition, ORI considers plagiarism to include both the theft or misappropriation of intellectual property and the substantial unattributed textual copying of another's work. It does not include authorship or credit disputes.

The theft or misappropriation of intellectual property includes the unauthorized use of ideas or unique methods obtained by a privileged communication, such as a grant or manuscript review.

Substantial unattributed textual copying of another's work means the unattributed verbatim or nearly verbatim copying of sentences and paragraphs which materially mislead the ordinary reader regarding the contributions of the author. ORI generally does not pursue the limited use of identical or nearly-identical phrases which describe a commonly-used methodology or previous research because ORI does not consider such use as substantially misleading to the reader or of great significance.

Many allegations of plagiarism involve disputes among former collaborators who participated jointly in the development or conduct of a research project, but who subsequently went their separate ways and made independent use of the jointly developed concepts, methods, descriptive language, or other product of the joint effort. The ownership of the intellectual property in many such situations is seldom clear, and the collaborative history among the scientists often supports a presumption of implied consent to use the products of the collaboration by any of the former collaborators.

For this reason, ORI considers many such disputes to be authorship or credit disputes rather than plagiarism. Such disputes are referred to PHS agencies and extramural institutions for resolution.

From ORI Newsletter, Vol 3, No. 1, December 1994



 
.
This page last was updated on January 6, 2006
.
Legal Disclaimer / Accessibility

Adobe Reader icon
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Office of Research Integrity • 1101 Wootton Parkway • Suite 750 • Rockville, MD 20852
  Directions to ORI Office
Questions/suggestions about this web page? Contact ORI
. .