Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Complete Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Practice parameters for the treatment of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano (revised).

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: Practice parameters for treatment of fistula-in-ano. The Standards Practice Task Force. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 1996 Dec;39(12):1361-2.

COMPLETE SUMMARY CONTENT

 
SCOPE
 METHODOLOGY - including Rating Scheme and Cost Analysis
 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 BENEFITS/HARMS OF IMPLEMENTING THE GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS
 CONTRAINDICATIONS
 QUALIFYING STATEMENTS
 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GUIDELINE
 INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (IOM) NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY REPORT CATEGORIES
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

SCOPE

DISEASE/CONDITION(S)

Perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano

GUIDELINE CATEGORY

Management
Treatment

CLINICAL SPECIALTY

Colon and Rectal Surgery

INTENDED USERS

Advanced Practice Nurses
Nurses
Patients
Physician Assistants
Physicians

GUIDELINE OBJECTIVE(S)

To provide uniform parameters for the treatment of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano

TARGET POPULATION

Patients with perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano

INTERVENTIONS AND PRACTICES CONSIDERED

Treatment of Perianal Abscess

  1. Incision and drainage
  2. Antibiotic use (not routinely recommended)

Treatment of Fistula-in-Ano (Simple, Complex, and Associated with Crohn's Disease)

  1. Fistulotomy
  2. Track debridement and fibrin glue injection
  3. Endorectal advancement flap closure
  4. Seton use and/or staged fistulotomy
  5. No intervention (for asymptomatic Crohn's fistulas)

MAJOR OUTCOMES CONSIDERED

  • Healing rates and times
  • Fistula recurrence rate
  • Minor and major incontinence rate
  • Infection rate
  • Success rate of interventions
  • Side effects of treatment
  • Patient satisfaction
  • Proctectomy rates

METHODOLOGY

METHODS USED TO COLLECT/SELECT EVIDENCE

Searches of Electronic Databases

DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED TO COLLECT/SELECT THE EVIDENCE

Pertinent information from the published literature through December 2003 was retrieved and reviewed. Organized searches of MEDLINE and the Cochran Database of Systematic Reviews were performed. Keywords included: abscess, fistula, fistula-in-ano, anal, rectal, perianal, rectovaginal, seton, and Crohn's. Directed searches of the embedded references from primary articles also were accomplished.

NUMBER OF SOURCE DOCUMENTS

Not stated

METHODS USED TO ASSESS THE QUALITY AND STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE

Weighting According to a Rating Scheme (Scheme Given)

RATING SCHEME FOR THE STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE

Levels of Evidence (Class)

  1. Meta-analysis of multiple well-designed, controlled studies; randomized trials with low false-positive and low false-negative errors (high power)
  2. At least one well-designed experimental study; randomized trials with high false-positive or high false-negative errors or both (low power)
  3. Well-designed, quasi-experimental studies, such as nonrandomized, controlled, single-group, preoperative-postoperative comparison, cohort, time, or matched case-control series
  4. Well-designed, nonexperimental studies, such as comparative and correlational descriptive and case studies
  5. Case reports and clinical examples

METHODS USED TO ANALYZE THE EVIDENCE

Systematic Review

DESCRIPTION OF THE METHODS USED TO ANALYZE THE EVIDENCE

Not stated

METHODS USED TO FORMULATE THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Expert Consensus

DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED TO FORMULATE THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Not stated

RATING SCHEME FOR THE STRENGTH OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Grades of Recommendations

  1. Evidence of Type I or consistent findings from multiple studies of Type II, III, or IV
  2. Evidence of Type II, III, or IV and generally consistent findings
  3. Evidence of Type II, III, or IV but inconsistent findings
  4. Little or no systematic empirical evidence

COST ANALYSIS

A formal cost analysis was not performed and published cost analyses were not reviewed.

METHOD OF GUIDELINE VALIDATION

Not stated

DESCRIPTION OF METHOD OF GUIDELINE VALIDATION

Not applicable

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

The levels of evidence (classes I-V) and the grades of recommendations (A-D) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Perianal Abscess

Treatment Recommendations

  1. A perianal abscess should be treated in a timely fashion by incision and drainage. Level of Evidence: Class IV; Grade of Recommendation: B.
  2. Antibiotics are an unnecessary addition to routine incision and drainage of uncomplicated perianal abscesses. Level of Evidence: Class II; Grade of Recommendation: A.

Fistula-in-Ano

Treatment of a Simple Fistula-in-Ano

  1. Simple anal fistulas may be treated by fistulotomy. Level of Evidence: Class II; Grade of Recommendation: B.
  2. Simple anal fistulas may be treated with track debridement and fibrin glue injection. Level of Evidence: Class IV; Grade of Recommendation: B.

Treatment of a Complex Fistula-in-Ano

  1. Complex anal fistulas may be treated with debridement and fibrin glue injection. Level of Evidence: Class IV; Grade: B.
  2. Complex anal fistulas may be treated with endorectal advancement flap closure. Level of Evidence: Class IV; Grade: B.
  3. Complex fistulas may be treated by the use of a seton and/or staged fistulotomy. Level of Evidence: Class IV; Grade: B.

Treatment of Fistula-in-Ano with Crohn's Disease

  1. Asymptomatic Crohn's fistulas need not be treated. Level of Evidence: Class IV; Grade: B.
  2. Simple, low Crohn's fistulas may be treated by fistulotomy. Level of Evidence: Class IV; Grade: B.
  3. Complex Crohn's fistulas may be well palliated with long-term draining setons. Level of Evidence: Class IV; Grade: B.
  4. Complex Crohn's fistulas may be treated with advancement flap closure if the rectal mucosa is grossly normal. Level of Evidence: Class IV; Grade: B.

Definitions:

Levels of Evidence (Class)

  1. Meta-analysis of multiple well-designed, controlled studies; randomized trials with low false-positive and low false-negative errors (high power)
  2. At least one well-designed experimental study; randomized trials with high false-positive or high false-negative errors or both (low power)
  3. Well-designed, quasi-experimental studies, such as nonrandomized, controlled, single-group, preoperative-postoperative comparison, cohort, time, or matched case-control series
  4. Well-designed, nonexperimental studies, such as comparative and correlational descriptive and case studies
  5. Case reports and clinical examples

Grades of Recommendations

  1. Evidence of Type I or consistent findings from multiple studies of Type II, III, or IV
  2. Evidence of Type II, III, or IV and generally consistent findings
  3. Evidence of Type II, III, or IV but inconsistent findings
  4. Little or no systematic empirical evidence

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see "Major Recommendations" field).

BENEFITS/HARMS OF IMPLEMENTING THE GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS

POTENTIAL BENEFITS

The guideline outlines general approaches to the treatment of patients with perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano, which may lead to more appropriate and effective treatment of these patients.

POTENTIAL HARMS

Morbidities associated with operative interventions, such as incontinence and sepsis

CONTRAINDICATIONS

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Active proctitis in patients with Crohn's disease is considered a contraindication for endorectal or anodermal advancement flap closure.

QUALIFYING STATEMENTS

QUALIFYING STATEMENTS

  • These guidelines are inclusive, and not prescriptive. Their purpose is to provide information on which decisions can be made, rather than dictate a specific form of treatment. It should be recognized that these guidelines should not be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care or exclusive of methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure must be made by the physician in light of all of the circumstances presented by the individual patient.
  • This practice parameter has been developed from sources believed to be reliable. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons makes no warranty, guaranty, or representation whatsoever as to the absolute validity or sufficiency of any parameter, and the Society assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of the material.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GUIDELINE

DESCRIPTION OF IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

An implementation strategy was not provided.

INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (IOM) NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY REPORT CATEGORIES

IOM CARE NEED

Getting Better
Living with Illness

IOM DOMAIN

Effectiveness

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

1996 (revised 2005 Jul)

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons - Medical Specialty Society

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Not stated

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Standards Task Force of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Task Force Members: Mark H. Whiteford, MD; John Kilkenny III, MD; Neil Hyman, MD; W. Donald Buie, MD; Jeffrey Cohen, MD,; Charles Orsay, MD; Gary Dunn, MD; W. Brian Perry, MD; C. Neal Ellis, MD; Jan Rakinic, MD; Sharon Gregorcyk, MD; Paul Shellito, MD; Richard Nelson, MD; Joe J. Tjandra, MD; Graham Newstead, MD

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Not stated

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: Practice parameters for treatment of fistula-in-ano. The Standards Practice Task Force. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 1996 Dec;39(12):1361-2.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) Web site.

Print copies: Available from the ASCRS, 85 W. Algonquin Road, Suite 550, Arlington Heights, Illinois 60005.

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

None available

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This summary was completed by ECRI on February 15, 2000. The information was verified by the guideline developer as November 7, 2000. This NGC summary was updated by ECRI on August 9, 2005.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo