Background Review Document (BRD) | Overview | Other Validation Study Documents |
Peer Review Panel | Presentations | Recommendations and Agency Responses |
Test Method Evaluation Report |
Background Review Document (BRD)
In Vitro Cytotoxicity Test Methods for Estimating Acute Oral Systemic Toxicity
November 2006NIH Publication No. 07-4518
Get Adobe Acrobat Reader
Volume 1 of 2: Sections 1-13
View sections 1 and 2 [PDF] |
Volume 2 of 2: Appendices A - Q [PDF] |
Table of Contents
-
INTRODUCTION AND RATIONALE FOR THE USE OF IN VITRO NEUTRAL RED UPTAKE CYTOTOXICITY TEST METHODS TO
PREDICT STARTING DOSES FOR IN VIVO ACUTE ORAL TOXICITY TESTING
- Historical Background and Rationale for the Use of In Vitro Cytotoxicity
Assays to Predict Starting Doses for In Vivo Acute Oral Toxicity
Tests
- The Multicentre Evaluation of In Vitro Cytotoxicity (MEIC) Program
- An International Evaluation of Selected In Vitro Toxicity Test Systems for Predicting Acute Systemic Toxicity
- The Registry of Cytotoxicity (RC)
- The ZEBET Initiative to Reduce Animal Use
- The International Workshop on In Vitro Methods for Assessing Acute Systemic Toxicity
- The NICEATM/ECVAM In Vitro NRU Cytotoxicity Validation Study
- Regulatory Rationale and Applicability for the Use of In Vitro
Cytotoxicity Test Methods to Predict Starting Doses for Acute
Oral Toxicity Testing in Rodents
- Current Regulatory Testing Requirements for Acute Oral Toxicity
- Intended Regulatory Uses for In Vitro Cytotoxicity Test Methods
- Similarities and Differences in the Endpoints of In Vitro Cytotoxicity Test Methods and Rodent Acute Oral Toxicity Test Methods
- Use of In Vitro Cytotoxicity Test Methods in the Overall Strategy of Hazard Assessment
- Scientific Basis for the In Vitro NRU Test Methods
- Purpose and Mechanistic Basis of In Vitro NRU Test Methods
- Similarities and Differences in the Modes/Mechanisms of Action for In Vitro NRU Test Methods Compared with the Species of Interest
- Range of Substances Amenable to the In Vitro NRU Test Methods
- Historical Background and Rationale for the Use of In Vitro Cytotoxicity
Assays to Predict Starting Doses for In Vivo Acute Oral Toxicity
Tests
-
TEST METHOD PROTOCOL COMPONENTS OF THE 3T3 AND NHK IN VITRO NRU TEST METHODS
- Basis for Selection of In Vitro NRU Cytotoxicity Test Methods
- Guidance Document Rationale for Selection of In Vitro NRU Cytotoxicity Test Methods
- Guidance Document Rationale for Selection of Cell Types
- Overview of the 3T3 and NHK NRU Test Methods
- The 3T3 NRU Test Method
- The NHK NRU Test Method
- Measurement of NRU in the 3T3 and NHK Test Methods
- Descriptions and Rationales of the 3T3 and NHK NRU Test Methods
- Materials, Equipment, and Supplies
- Reference Substance Concentrations/Dose Selection
- NRU Endpoints Measured
- Duration of Reference Substance Exposure
- Known Limits of Use
- Basis of the Response Assessed
- Appropriate Vehicle, Positive, and Negative Controls
- Acceptable Ranges of Control Responses
- Nature of Experimental Data Collected
- Data Storage Media
- Measures of Variability
- Methods for Analyzing NRU Data
- Decision Criteria for Classification of Reference Substances
- Information and Data Included in the Test Report
- Proprietary Components of the In Vitro NRU Test Methods
- Basis for the Number of Replicate and Repeat Experiments for the 3T3 and NHK NRU Test Methods
- Basis for Modifications to the 3T3 and NHK NRU Test Method
Protocols
- Phase Ia: Laboratory Evaluation Phase
- Phase Ib: Laboratory Evaluation Phase
- Phase II: Laboratory Qualification Phase
- Phase III: Laboratory Testing Phase
- Differences Between the 3T3 and NHK NRU Protocols for the Validation Study and the Guidance Document Standard Protocols
- Overview of the Solubility Protocol
- Basis of the Solubility Protocol
- Initial Solubility Protocol Development
- Basis for Modification of the Phase II Protocol
- Components of the Solubility Protocol
- Medium, Supplies, and Equipment Required
- Data Collection
- Variability in Solubility Measurement
- Solubility Issues During the Testing of the Reference Substances
- Analysis of Solubility Data
- Summary
- Basis for Selection of In Vitro NRU Cytotoxicity Test Methods
-
REFERENCE SUBSTANCES USED FOR VALIDATION OF THE 3T3
AND NHK NRU TEST METHODS
- Rationale for the 72 Reference Substances Selected for Testing
- Reference Substance Selection Criteria
- Candidate Reference Substances
- Selection of Reference Substances for Testing
- Characteristics of the Selected Reference Substances
- Source Databases Represented by the Selected Reference Substances
- Chemical Classes Represented by the Selected Reference Substances
- Product/Use Classes Represented by the Selected Reference Substances
- Toxicological Characteristics of the Selected Reference Substances
- Selection of Reference Substances for Testing in Phases Ib and II
- Unsuitable and Challenging Reference Substances
- Reference Substance Procurement, Coding, and Distribution
- Exceptions
- Reference Substances Recommended by the Guidance Document
- Summary
- Rationale for the 72 Reference Substances Selected for Testing
-
RODENT ACUTE ORAL LD50 REFERENCE VALUES USED TO ASSESS
THE ACCURACY OF THE 3T3 AND NHK NRU TEST METHODS
- Methods Used to Obtain Rodent Acute Oral LD50 Reference Values
- Identification of Candidate Rodent Acute Oral LD50 Reference Data
- Criteria Used to Select Candidate Rodent Acute Oral Data for Determination of LD50 Reference Values
- Final Rodent Acute Oral LD50 Reference Values
- Relevant Toxicity Information for Humans
- Accuracy and Reliability of the Rodent Acute Oral LD50 Reference
Values
- Variability Among the Acceptable LD50 Values
- Comparison of Rodent Acute Oral LD50 Reference Values with the Corresponding RC LD50 Values
- Comparison of the Variability Among Acceptable LD50 Values to Those Obtained in Other Studies
- Summary
- Methods Used to Obtain Rodent Acute Oral LD50 Reference Values
-
3T3 AND NHK NRU TEST METHOD DATA AND RESULTS
- Study Timeline and Participating Laboratories
- Statements of Work (SOW) and Protocols
- Study Timeline
- Participating Laboratories
- Coded Reference Substances and GLP Guidelines
- Coded Reference Substances
- Lot-to-Lot Consistency of Reference Substances
- Adherence to GLP Guidelines
- 3T3 and NHK NRU Test Method Protocols
- Phase Ia: Laboratory Evaluation Phase
- Phase Ib: Laboratory Evaluation Phase
- Phase II: Laboratory Qualification Phase
- Phase III: Main Validation Phase
- Data Used to Evaluate Test Method Accuracy and Reliability
- PC Data
- Reference Substance Data
- Statistical Approaches to the Evaluation of 3T3 and NHK Data
- Statistical Analyses for Phase Ia Data
- Statistical Analyses for Phase Ib Data
- Statistical Analyses for Phase II Data
- Statistical Analyses for Phase III Data
- Summary of the Data Used for Statistical Analyses
- Summary of NRU Test Results
- Availability of Data
- Solubility Test Results
- Solubility Data
- Solubility and Volatility Effects in the Cytotoxicity Tests
- Summary
- Study Timeline and Participating Laboratories
-
ACCURACY OF THE 3T3 AND NHK NRU TEST METHODS
- Accuracy of the 3T3 and NHK NRU Test Methods for Predicting Rodent
Acute Oral Toxicity
- Linear Regression Analyses for the Prediction of Rat Acute Oral LD50 Values from In Vitro IC50 Value
- Comparison of Combined-Laboratory 3T3 and NHK Regressions to the RC Millimole Regression
- Analysis of Outlier Substances for the RC Millimole Regression
- Identification of Outlier Substances
- Evaluation of Outlier Substances
- Improving the Prediction of In Vivo Rat Oral LD50 Values from In
Vitro IC50 Data
- The RC Rat-Only Millimole Regression
- The RC Rat-Only Weight Regression
- Accuracy of the 3T3 and NHK NRU Test Methods for Predicting GHS
Acute Oral Toxicity Category
- Prediction of GHS Acute Oral Toxicity Category by the 3T3 and NHK NRU Test Methods Using the RC Millimole Regression
- Prediction of GHS Acute Oral Toxicity Category by the 3T3 and NHK NRU Test Methods Using the RC Rat-Only Millimole Regression
- Prediction of GHS Acute Oral Toxicity Category by the 3T3 and NHK NRU Test Methods Using the RC Rat-Only Weight Regression
- Summary of the Regressions Evaluated
- Correlation of NRU Concentration-Response Slope with Rat Lethality Dose-Response Slope
- Strengths and Limitations of the In Vitro Cytotoxicity Test Methods
with the IC50–LD50 Regressions for Prediction of
Rodent Acute Oral Toxicity
- In Vitro Cytotoxicity Methods
- Use of Mole-Based vs. Weight-Based Regressions for the Prediction of Toxicity for Low and High Molecular Weight Substances
- Salient Issues of Data Interpretation
- Comparison of NRU Test Results to Established Performance Standards
- Summary
- Accuracy of the 3T3 and NHK NRU Test Methods for Predicting Rodent
Acute Oral Toxicity
-
RELIABILITY OF THE 3T3 AND NHK TEST METHODS
- Reference Substances Used to Determine the Reliability of the 3T3 and NHK Test Methods
- Reproducibility Analyses for the 3T3 and NHK Test Methods
- Comparison of Laboratory-Specific IC50-LD50 Linear Regression Analyses to the Mean Laboratory Regression
- ANOVA Results for the 3T3 and NHK Test Methods
- CV Results for the 3T3 and NHK Test Methods
- Comparison of Maximum to Minimum IC50 Values Using Laboratory Means
- Comparison of Maximum:Minimum IC50 Ratios with the Maximum:Minimum LD50 Ratios
- Normalization of Reference Substance IC50 Values Using SLS IC50 Values
- Historical Positive Control Data
- ANOVA and Linear Regression Results for the 3T3 NRU Test Method
- ANOVA and Linear Regression Results for the NHK NRU Test Method
- Laboratory Concordance for Solvent Selection
- Correlation of NRU Concentration-Response Slope with Rat
- Summary
-
3T3 AND NHK NRU TEST METHOD DATA QUALITY
- Compliance with Good Laboratory Practice Regulations
- Guidelines Followed for Cytotoxicity Testing
- Quality Assurance (QA) for NRU Cytotoxicity Test Data
- Guidelines Followed for Rodent Acute Oral LD50 Data Collection
- Results of Data Quality Audits
- QA Statements
- QA Statements from the Laboratories
- Effect of Deviations or Non-compliance with GLPs
- Laboratory Error Rates
- Failure Rates for Definitive and PC Tests
- Intralaboratory Reproducibility
- Prediction of GHS Acute Oral Toxicity Categories
- Availability of Laboratory Notebooks
- Summary
- Compliance with Good Laboratory Practice Regulations
-
OTHER SCIENTIFIC REPORTS AND REVIEWS OF IN VITRO CYTOTOXICITY TEST METHODS AND THEIR ABILITY TO PREDICT
IN VIVO ACUTE TOXICITY AND OTHER TOXIC EFFECTS
- Relevant Studies
- Correlation of NRU Cytotoxicity Values with Rodent Lethality
- Use of In Vitro Cytotoxicity Data to Reduce the Use of Animals in Acute Oral Toxicity Testing
- Other Evaluations of 3T3 or NHK NRU Methods
- Independent Scientific Reviews
- In Vitro Acute Toxicity Testing for the Classification and Labeling of Chemicals
- Use of In Vitro Cytotoxicity Data for Estimation of Starting Doses for Acute Oral Toxicity Testing
- Validation of 3T3 NRU Assay for Phototoxicity
- Studies Using In Vitro Cytotoxicity Test Methods with Established Performance
Standards
- Guidance Document (ICCVAM 2001b)
- King and Jones (2003)
- A-Cute-Tox Project: Optimization and Pre-Validation of an In Vitro Test Strategy for Predicting Human Acute Toxicity (Clemedson 2005)
- Summary
- Relevant Studies
-
ANIMAL WELFARE CONSIDERATIONS (REFINEMENT, REDUCTION, AND REPLACEMENT)
- Use of 3T3 and NHK NRU Test Methods to Predict Starting Doses for Rodent Acute Oral Toxicity Assays
- Reduction and Refinement of Animal Use for the UDP
- In Vitro Testing Using the UDP
- Computer Simulation Modeling of the UDP
- Animal Savings in the UDP When Using 3T3- and NHK-Based Starting Doses
- Refinement of Animal Use for the UDP When Using 3T3- and NHK-Based Starting Doses
- Accuracy of the UDP Outcomes Using the IC50-Based Starting Doses
- Reduction and Refinement of Animal Use in the ATC Method
- In Vivo Testing Using the ATC Method
- Computer Simulation Modeling of the ATC Method
- Animal Savings for the ATC Method When Using 3T3- and NHK-Based Starting Doses
- Refinement of Animal Use in the ATC Method When Using 3T3- and NHK-Based Starting Doses
- Accuracy of the ATC Method Outcomes Using IC50-Based Starting Doses
- The Impact of Accuracy on Animal Savings
- The Impact of Prevalence on Animal Savings
- Summary
-
PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS
- Transferability of the 3T3 and NHK NRU Test Methods
- Facilities and Major Fixed Equipment
- Availability of Other Necessary Equipment and Supplies
- Problems Specific to the NHK NRU Test Method
- 3T3 and NHK Test Method Training Considerations
- Required Training and Expertise
- Training Requirements to Demonstrate Proficiency
- Personnel Needed to Perform the In Vitro NRU Test Methods
- Cost Considerations
- 3T3 and NHK NRU Test Methods
- Rodent Acute Oral Toxicity Testing
- Time Considerations for Performing the 3T3 and NHK NRU Tests
- The 3T3 NRU Test Method
- The NHK NRU Test Method
- Prequalification of NHK Medium
- In Vivo Testing
- The Limit Test
- Summary
- Transferability of the 3T3 and NHK NRU Test Methods
-
REFERENCES
-
GLOSSARY
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - NICEATM/ECVAM VALIDATION STUDY MANAGEMENT
APPENDIX B - VALIDATION STUDY TEST METHOD PROTOCOLS (PHASE III)
-
Test Method Protocol for the BALB/c 3T3 Neutral Red Uptake (NRU) Cytotoxicity Test
-
Test Method Protocol for the Normal Human Epidermal Keratinocyte (NHK) Neutral Red Uptake Cytotoxicity Test
-
Test Method Protocol for Solubility Determination (Phase III)
-
Test Method Procedure for Prequalification of Normal Human Epidermal Keratinocyte Growth Medium (Phase III)
APPENDIX C - VALIDATION STUDY TEST METHOD PROTOCOLS (PHASES IA, IB, AND II)
-
Test Method Protocol for the BALB/c 3T3 Neutral Red Uptake Cytotoxicity Test (Phase Ia)
-
Test Method Protocol for the Normal Human Epidermal Keratinocyte (NHK) Neutral Red Uptake Cytotoxicity Test (Phase Ia)
-
Test Method Protocol for the BALB/c 3T3 Neutral Red Uptake Cytotoxicity Test (Phase Ib)
-
Test Method Protocol for the Normal Human Epidermal Keratinocyte (NHK) Neutral Red Uptake Cytotoxicity Test (Phase Ib)
-
Test Method Protocol for the BALB/c 3T3 Neutral Red Uptake Cytotoxicity Test (Phase II)
-
Test Method Protocol for the Normal Human Epidermal Keratinocyte (NHK) Neutral Red Uptake Cytotoxicity Test (Phase II)
APPENDIX D - SAS CODES
SAS Code for ANOVA and Contrasts
SAS Code for Regression Comparisons
APPENDIX E - NEUTRAL RED DYE EXPERIMENTS
-
Institute for In Vitro Sciences (IIVS) Assessment of Protocol Variables in the NICEATM/ECVAM Evaluation of Cytotoxicity Assays
-
Neutral Red (NR) Dye Experiments - 3T3 Cells - IIVS
-
Neutral Red (NR) Dye Experiments - NHK Cells - IIVS
-
Neutral Red (NR) Dye Experiments - 3T3 Cells - ECBC
APPENDIX F - REFERENCE SUBSTANCE INFORMATION
-
NRU Test Information of the 72 Reference Substances
-
Chemical, Physical and Biological Information from the Literature for the 72 Reference Substances
-
Candidate Reference Substances
APPENDIX G - STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)
-
A Validation Study For In Vitro Basal Cytotoxicity Testing
-
Procedures for Acquisition, Preparation, Solubility Testing, and Distribution of Test Chemicals for a Validation Study for In Vitro Basal Cytotoxicity Testing
APPENDIX H - RAT AND MOUSE ORAL LD50 DATABASE
-
Rat and Mouse Oral LD50 Database
-
Evaluation of the Candidate Reference Data
APPENDIX I - IN VITRO NRU DATA
-
3T3 NRU Reference Substance Data
-
NHK NRU Reference Substance Data
-
3T3 NRU Positive Control (SLS) Data
-
NHK NRU Positive Control (SLS) Data
APPENDIX J - LD50 AND TOXICITY CATEGORY PREDICTIONS
-
3T3 NRU Predictions: RC Millimole Regression
-
NHK NRU Predictions: RC Millimole Regression
-
3T3 NRU Predictions: RC Rat-Only Millimole Regression
-
NHK NRU Predictions: RC Rat-Only Millimole Regression
-
3T3 NRU Predictions: RC Rat-Only Weight Regression
-
NHK NRU Predictions: RC Rat-Only Weight Regression
-
Comparison of Millimole Regression with Weight Regression Regarding Prediction of Toxicity (LD50) for Low or High Molecular Weight Chemicals
APPENDIX K - IC50 AND LD50 DATA FOR REGRESSIONS
-
IC50 and LD50 Values Used for Laboratory-Specific Regressions
-
IC50 and LD50 Values Used for Combined-Laboratory Regressions
-
RC IC50 and LD50 Values for RC Substances with Rat Oral LD50 Data
-
Individual Laboratory LD50 Predictions: RC Rat-Only Millimole Regression
APPENDIX L - OUTLIER INFORMATION
-
Outlier Characterization for the 3T3 and NHK NRU Test Methods with the RC Millimole Regression
-
Discordant Substances for GHS Toxicity Category Predictions Using the 3T3 and NHK NRU Test Methods and RC Rat-Only Regressions
-
Analysis of Outliers by Halle (1998, 2003) for the RC Millimole Regression
APPENDIX M - ACUTE SYSTEMIC TOXICITY TEST GUIDELINES
-
OECD UDP Test Guideline
-
EPA UDP Test Guideline
-
OECD ATC Test Guideline
-
OECD FDP Test Guideline
-
OECD Guidance on Acute Oral Toxicity Testing
APPENDIX N - UDP/ATC SIMULATION MODELING RESULTS
-
UDP Simulation Results Using Starting Doses One Default Dose Lower than the LD50 Predicted by the 3T3 and NHK NRU IC50 and the RC Rat-Only Millimole Regression - 5000 mg/kg Upper Limit Dose
-
UDP Simulation Results Using Starting Doses One Default Dose Lower than the LD50 Predicted by the 3T3 and NHK NRU IC50 and the RC Rat-Only Weight Regression - 5000 mg/kg Upper Limit Dose
-
ATC Simulation Results Starting at the Next Fixed Dose Below the LD50 Predicted by the 3T3 and NHK NRU IC50 and the RC Rat-Only Millimole Regression - 2000 mg/kg Upper Limit Dose
-
ATC Simulation Results Starting at the Next Fixed Dose Below the LD50 Predicted by the 3T3 and NHK IC50 and the RC Rat-Only Weight Regression - 2000 mg/kg Upper Limit Dose
APPENDIX O - FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
-
70FR14473 - Request for Nominations for an Independent Peer Review Panel To Evaluate In Vitro Testing Methods for Estimating Acute Oral Systemic Toxicity and Request for In Vivo and In Vitro Data
-
69FR61504 - Availability of Updated Standardized In Vitro Cytotoxicity Test Method Protocols for Estimating Acute Oral Systemic Toxicity; Request for Existing In Vivo and In Vitro Acute Toxicity Data
-
69FR11448 - Notice of the Availability of Agency Responses to ICCVAM Test Recommendations for the Revised Up-and-Down Procedure for Determining Acute Oral Toxicity and In Vitro Methods for Assessing Acute Systemic Toxicity
-
66FR49686 - Report of the International Workshop on In Vitro Methods for Assessing Acute Systemic Toxicity; Guidance Document on Using In Vitro Data to Estimate In Vivo Starting Doses for Acute Toxicity: Notice of Availability and Request for Public Comment
-
65FR57203 - Notice of an International Workshop on In Vitro Methods for Assessing Acute Systemic Toxicity, co-sponsored by NIEHS, NTP and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Workshop Agenda and Registration Information
-
65FR37400 - Notice of an International Workshop on In Vitro Methods for Assessing Acute Systemic Toxicity, co-sponsored by NIEHS, NTP and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Request for Data and Suggested Expert Scientists
APPENDIX P - IN VITRO CYTOTOXICITY TEST METHODS AND THE HIGH PRODUCTION VOLUME (HPV) CHALLENGE PROGRAM
-
Supplemental Acute Toxicity Protocol
-
Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) Letters to Manufacturers/Importers
APPENDIX Q - ADDITIONAL UDP SIMULATION MODELING RESULTS
-
UDP Simulation Results for the RC Rat-Only Millimole Regression Starting at the LD50 Predicted by the 3T3 and NHK NRU IC50 - 5000 mg/kg Upper Limit
-
UDP Simulation Results for the RC Rat-Only Weight Regression Starting at the LD50 Predicted by the 3T3 and NHK NRU IC50 - 5000 mg/kg Upper Limit