February 24, 2004
The Honorable Nikki L. Tinsley
Inspector General
Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20460-0001
Dear Inspector General Tinsley:
We appreciate the work that you have done in the past two years providing
Congress with important reports concerning funding needs in FY 2002 and FY 2003
of non-federal Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) sites. Congress has a
continuing need for information concerning the funding needs of non-federal
Superfund sites to determine the level of appropriations necessary to
expeditiously complete cleanup of these high-priority sites to remove public
health and environmental hazards from our communities and return these sites to
beneficial reuses. The Office of the Inspector General was provided $13.2
million from Superfund in FY 2004. We know of no higher priority that these
resources can be put to than identifying the NPL sites that need additional
funding to initiate and/or maximize cleanup activities.
Therefore, we again request that your office address the sufficiency of
funding for non-federal sites at all stages of the site cleanup process,
including a more detailed review of a limited number of sites to determine if
cleanup actions are being stretched out over a greater number of years because
of inadequate funding. We found the format of your January 7, 2004, report to be
very informative and request that your evaluation and report cover the same
scope of activities. We would also request that your evaluation and report
include the following information:
1. Similar to the January 7, 2004, report, please provide a chart showing
the amount of funding requested by each Region for each site in FY 2003 for
cleanup activities for remedial investigation/feasibility studies, remedy
selection, remedial design, remedial action construction, and long-term
response actions at each site. Please include the amount the Headquarters has
obligated, deobligated, and expended at each site and identify the sites that
received inadequate or no funding.
2. Please describe internal agency efforts to shift funding from pipeline
operations or other program activities into remedial funding, and attach
relevant supporting documents.
3. The FY 2004 budget for EPA requested an extra $150 million for remedial
action projects in FY 2004 to initiate cleanups at 10 to 15 new sites in FY
2004. Unfortunately, the FY 2004 Omnibus Appropriations Act which President
Bush signed into law on January 23, 2004 (P.L. 108-199), actually cut the
Superfund budget by $7 million from FY 2003 and was $132.5 million less than
the President's FY 2004 budget request. Please identify the "10 to 15
sites" that were to receive funding to initiate cleanups in FY 2004, the
amount of funding that they needed, and the funding actually received in FY
2004.
We would request your evaluation and report no later than July 15, 2004.
Thank you for your cooperation in addressing this most important issue for the
Superfund program.
Sincerely,
JOHN D. DINGELL
RANKING MEMBER
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY
AND COMMERCE
HILDA L. SOLIS
RANKING MEMBER
HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT
AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS |
JAMES M. JEFFORDS
RANKING MEMBER
SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT
AND PUBLIC WORKS
BARBARA BOXER
RANKING MEMBER
SENATE SUBCOMMITTEE ON SUPERFUND
WASTE MANAGEMENT |
|