July 19, 2004
VOTE "NO" ON PHONY ENRON
ACCOUNTING
"There are cases where you can use equity to impact your
income statement. And the most egregious, or the one that's used by every
corporation in the world is executive stock options. And as a matter of fact, I
think FASB tried to change that, and you introduced legislation in 1994 to keep
that exemption. And essentially what you do is you issue stock options to reduce
compensation expense and therefore increase your profitability." -- Jeffrey Skilling, Former Enron President and CEO, before
the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation, February 26, 2002.
Dear Colleague:
In the immortal words of the late President Ronald Reagan: "There they
go again!"
After making it possible for crooked executives at Enron and other companies
charged with fraud to loot their companies through stock options at the expense
of shareholders and retirees, Congress is poised to repeat that dreadful mistake
by passing H.R. 3574, the Stock Options Accounting Act. This is a bad bill.
Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan warned on April 21, 2004, that
"it would be a bad mistake for the Congress to impede FASB" because
the proposed FASB changes to accounting for stock options "strike me as
correct." In a recent op-ed article, famed investor Warren Buffett called
the legislation "nonsensical" based on "fuzzy math" and
"Alice-in-Wonderland assumptions." See more on the positions of
Greenspan and Buffet in the attachment to this
letter.
H.R. 3574:
- Decrees that stock options be counted as an expense only when they go to
the chief executive and the other four highest paid executives in a company
but be disregarded as an expense when issued to other employees in the
company.
- Mandates that when a company is calculating the expense of the options to
these five executives, it must assume that the stock price has zero
volatility, i.e., it never moves up or down. As Buffett notes, the only
reason for making such an assumption is to "significantly understate
the value of the few options that the House wants counted" in order to
allow executives to lie about what they are being paid and overstate
earnings.
- Prohibits the SEC from recognizing as "generally accepted" any
accounting principle relating to the expensing of stock options unless
and until two conditions are met: (1) an economic impact study by the
Secretary of Commerce and the Secretary of Labor has been completed (due one
year after date of enactment), and (2) the accounting principle complies
with the terms set by the bill, including using exercise or settlement date
measurement and zero volatility.
- Would prohibit the voluntary expensing of options by the over 576
companies, including Ford, General Motors, Microsoft, and Citigroup, that
are currently voluntarily expensing their options at fair value under FAS
123. H.R. 3574 says that there is no GAAP for option expensing for the year
of study and then only for the top five officers using the assumptions and
measurement methods dictated by the bill. Companies wanting to provide
honest numbers would be banned from doing so, and would have to restate
their financials at substantial cost.
Investors are still getting mugged by corporate accounting scandals. Put an
end to bad incentives and phony accounting. Vote "NO" on H.R. 3574.
Sincerely,
/s John D. Dingell
Ranking Member
Committee on Energy and Commerce
/s Jan Schakowsky, Ranking Member
Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade, and
Consumer Protection
Prepared by the Democratic staff of the
Committee on Energy and Commerce
2322 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515
Select Feedback to let us know what you think.
Back to the Committee on Energy and Commerce Democrats Home Page
|