"BIPARTISAN PATIENT PROTECTION ACT OF 2001" February 6, 2001
The bipartisan bill allows states to develop their own patient protection laws, and empowers the governors to certify that they are comparable to federal law. If the state law is comparable to those at the federal level, the state law will remain in effect.
The bill provides a federal cause of action for negligent plan administration, which will provide uniformity for how the health plans are administered. Only when a plan makes a medical decision, will it be subject to state law.
This compromise contains stronger provisions to protect businesses from frivolous lawsuits and wild jury verdicts. The Bipartisan bill protects employers from liability unless they directly participate in making a medical decision. Punitive and exemplary damages are prohibited at the federal level.
When a patient is injured by the decision of an insurer, the patient should be able to hold the insurer accountable. This bipartisan bill strikes a solid compromise, recognizing that employers should expect uniform, federal standards for administrative processes, but any "medically reviewable decisions" should be subject to state law with regard to medical decisions. If the dispute is an administrative benefit decision, the patient will be able to seek limited damages in federal court. Punitive and exemplary damages are prohibited at the federal level. A civil assessment up to $5 million could be available if clear and convincing evidence of bad faith and flagrant disregard for a patient's safety is proven meeting the highest legal threshold. If the dispute involves medical judgment, the patient will be able to seek redress in state court under applicable state law subject to state damage caps (currently, 33 states have implemented some level of caps on damage awards).
This proposal uses language developed on a bipartisan basis in the managed care conference during the 106th Congress. | |
|