Statement of Dan Taylor
Thank you for the opportunity to submit this letter to
detail the hardships my family has faced as a result of the Alternative Minimum
Tax. My name is Dan Taylor and I am writing on behalf of my wife Vicki and my
children Trent and Stephanie. I write to you today to beseech you to provide a
remedy to taxpayers and families who have been financially blindsided by the
antiquated tax code that is the Alternative Minimum Tax, especially as it
applies to Incentive Stock Options (ISOs).
In January 1998, I was hired by GeoTel Communications in a
sales position to sell telecommunications software. As an incentive to work
for this small company, I was granted ISOs as part of my compensation package.
These options would vest over time and I would have the opportunity to receive
additional grants for meeting performance goals, which I did. This was the first
position that I held in my career where I received any form of stock option
with my only investment experience being through personal IRAs and company
sponsored 401Ks, so I would consider myself an unsophisticated investor. I did
not know one type of stock option from another which, would prove to be
catastrophic to me and my family later.
In June 1999, GeoTel, with revenues of approximately $40
Million, was purchased by Cisco Systems for $2 Billion, or 50 times sales. I
received a bit more than one share of Cisco stock for every share of GeoTel
that I was holding an option on, so this made my accruing options very
valuable. In June 2000, I left Cisco Systems to pursue other interests and was
required to exercise the options and purchase Cisco stock or lose all the
options at no value. I used some options granted while I was a Cisco employee,
Non-qualified (NQs), to purchase the ISOs that I originally received from
GeoTel. The NQs were taxed as I bought and sold them as ordinary income and
the proceeds from the sale were used to purchase and hold the ISOs. I
purchased 28,000 shares of Cisco stock for $4/share on a day that it was
selling in the open market for $62.
All of these transactions were made with the help of a
professionally licensed financial consultant. Every effort was made on the
part of my wife and me to handle this financial blessing properly with regard
to income taxes. We were advised that we would be taxed when we sold the
ISO-based shares. The resulting tax would be at the long-term capital gains
rate if we held the stock for one year. We were never advised that we had
created a taxable event on the day that I purchased the stock with a tax
liability of approximately $500,000 triggered by the AMT as it is applied to
the exercise of ISOs.
Through late 2000 and Spring 2001, the value of the stock
plummeted. Vicki and I filed our taxes using the accountant recommended by our
financial consultant for the 2000 tax
year. We were not asked any questions about our stock
transactions other than to provide the 1099 for the exercise of the NQ based
options. We were not asked to provide any records for the ISO based options
despite the fact that we revealed to the accountant that I had exercised the
options in June 2000.
In May 2001, I learned through a colleague from GeoTel that
he had paid a tremendous tax bill centered on the exercise of his ISO shares.
We both agreed that our situations were similar enough that I needed to
research and confirm that my taxes had been filed properly. Much to my horror,
I learned that Vicki and I had indeed filed our return improperly. Though we
had paid over $125,000 in Federal taxes, we owed an additional $438,000 on W-2
income of approximately $350,000. The additional tax was generated solely by the
AMT associated with the ISO stock purchase. I had not sold one share of that
stock during 2000. The value of the stock was now less than $125,000.
We did not have the money to pay the taxes, but I was
confident that if we came forward voluntarily that we would be treated fairly
and equitably by the Internal Revenue Service. There was no audit trail, but I
wanted my children to see that we should do the right thing even when no one is
watching. I expected the outcome to be painful, but nothing like what we have
experienced.
Everyone that we have come in contact with at the IRS has
expressed sympathy for our plight, but very quickly made the point that they
have no latitude in how the collection process is enforced. The guidelines are
the guidelines. There are no allowances for anything, only formulas that are
something out of the 1950s. After two and one-half years, we were able to
reach an agreement on an Offer in Compromise in October, 2004. My family and I
will pay $372,000 over two years or about $14,500 per month. This will require
us to sell our home, use all of our savings and tax deferred retirement
accounts, and my son will have to leave a four year university and attend
junior college.
Is this how the tax laws are supposed to work? Are they to
be a snare that catches unsuspecting citizens and devastates them financially?
If financial professionals do not understand how the AMT applies to stock
options, how can the average citizen be expected to understand and comply with
this law?
Thousands of Americans have been caught in this snare, not
just my family. Only Congress can provide a remedy that will insure that more
families will not face similar circumstances. I believe and have faith that you
will enact legislation to abolish the
current AMT tax law and replace it with more straightforward
tax code that the general public can understand. I believe and have faith that
you will provide a remedy and relief to families such as mine with some type of
retroactive abatement of taxes from ISO triggered tax bills. Why do I believe
and have faith that you will do this? The U.S. Congress has the authority to
do so, and it is the right thing to do. Thank you.
Addenda:
This tax has affected our family in every area of life. We have been
uprooted, literally and figuratively. We have paid our tax bill, but at
great personal cost. Our savings and retirement funds are gone. Our
credit report reflects the situation, which, in turn has forced us to pay much
higher interest rates on the mortgage for our current home. It has
affected us in intangible ways, too. The feeling of powerlessness in this
tax condition has bled into other areas of our lives, including physical and
emotional health, and being able to effectively provide for our family, and
continues long after the tax has been paid.
The AMT tax law is far more than leaving a position, the
decision to exercise a stock option, or a dollar figure on a tax return. It
affects individuals and families for years.
Anything that would allow us to accelerate the tax credits
to the shortest time possible would be greatly appreciated.
|