JOHN CARTER

Over the past two months a number of proposals have been tossed around by lawmakers of both parties in response to the record energy prices Americans are facing. These ideas have ranged from a gas tax holiday to increasing our refining capacity. Some of the ideas are a step in the right direction, such as exploring for more energy sources and increasing our refining capacity.

In order to develop a real, commonsense energy policy for the American people we need to focus on a number of issues. More than anything, we need to focus our attention on exploring new American energy through drilling, technology and new development.

Congress needs to understand that the path to lowering prices lies not in windfall taxes or gas tax holidays. It lies in opening up the vast, untapped reserves that are under our lands and oceans. The Department of Interior estimates that there are “112 billion barrels of technically recoverable oil beneath U.S. federal lands and coastal waters,” which would result in enough gasoline to power 60 million cars for 60 years. While Congress has yet to move restrictions on drilling in many offshore areas, China and Cuba are setting up off shore drilling rigs just 50 miles off the coast of Florida.

According to an American Solutions nationwide survey, 69 percent of Americans support lowering energy prices for U.S. consumers by using U.S. domestic energy sources, such as clean coal and oil, even if it means drilling off our coasts and in Alaska. I realize that there is a legitimate concern for the safety of our environment when we talk about drilling in places like ANWR and the ocean. I share these same concerns, but want you to know, that these proposals can be done in an environmentally safe way. The Washington Post recently reported that of the more than 7 billion barrels of oil pumped offshore in the past 25 years, .001 percent-that is one-thousandth of 1 percent-has been spilled. You should also be aware that only 8 percent of ANWR, the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, would be considered for exploration. The remaining 17.5 million acres will remain permanently closed to any kind of development. If oil is discovered, less than 2000 acres of the over 1.5 million acres considered would be affected by production capacity. If this exploration takes place and is developed, between 250,000 and 735,000 jobs are estimated to be created.

Opening up new reserves will increase our supply and bring prices down at the pump. The new exploration and production will provide new jobs, and increase in our supply of crude and natural gas is the quickest and most commonsense remedy to our high energy prices, which are a result of increased global demand. So why the opposition to more drilling? While many in Congress would have you believe that oil companies are to blame for high gas prices, they fail to realize that the large part of the problems lie within drilling obstacles. Republicans have a plan for relief that includes environmentally safe exploration of American energy. It is my hope that Democrats will work with Republicans on this plan to deliver relief to the American people.

Our nation recently celebrated Memorial Day, a day on which we recognize the service of so many brave American men and women. As we honor our veterans and current service members, it’s important that we maintain the promises the government made them in exchange for their service. Just as they have given life and limb in defense of our nation, so the government must honor our commitment to provide health care to those injured in their service.

Recent events have called into question the dedication that the Department of Veterans Affairs has to providing treatment for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). PTSD is a serious psychiatric injury which is often difficult to diagnose. A soldier may develop PTSD in response to the traumatic events he or she often faces in a combat zone. While there are no clear physical symptoms, those affected have persistent frightening thoughts and memories of their ordeal and may even make themselves emotionally detached from their loved ones. While these wounds don’t leave physical scars on our soldiers, airmen, and marines; they are just as devastating.

One of my assignments as your Congressman is to help craft the legislation that provides funds for the Department of Veterans Affairs. In 2007 alone the Military Construction and Veterans Affairs Appropriations Subcommittee provided an increase of over $11.8 billion to the veterans’ healthcare system. My colleagues, both Democrats and Republicans, and I also took specific action to address the increasing cases of PTSD and Traumatic Brain Injury. We required that at least $2.9 billion be spent explicitly on mental health care. We also found it necessary to build a Level 1 Polytrauma Center in San Antonio, supply the necessary funds to provide Polytrauma support clinic teams and additional Polytrauma points of contact, and require that existing Level 1 Polytrauma centers and Mental Health Centers of Excellence be fully staffed and operational in 2008.

My commitment to our soldiers and veterans is strong. I am proud to have worked with both Democrats and Republicans to have supported these and other important issues for our service men and women, both past and present. It is important that we continue to honor our commitment to them and not hamper their recovery efforts in an effort to save a penny here or there. As I begin to work with other members of the Appropriations Committee on the bills to fund your government for the next year, I will continue to fight to make sure that our veterans receive the care they deserve.

In Texas we don’t have to look far to find thousands of the soldiers who contribute to our military’s honor and strength. The 31st District is honored to be the home of Fort Hood, the largest military installation in the world, where roughly 50,000 soldiers are stationed. Many of these soldiers have the comfort of their families close by. These military families make Fort Hood and the surrounding areas their home, contributing to the local economies and communities. As Members of Congress, we must recognize the importance that family plays in maintaining morale and retention in our military and assist them whenever we can.

We ask our soldiers to move numerous times throughout their time in the military. In doing so, we are also asking their spouses to move as well, leaving behind homes and businesses. The Servicemember’s Civil Relief Act (SCRA) allows our military men and women the ability to claim a home of residency and keep that home regardless of where military orders may send them. This state of domicile can be the state where the member lived prior to joining the military or the state where the soldier intends to retire after separating from the military. This not only allows a small level of tax relief, but also makes the move from station to station easier, as common headaches from interstate moves like updating drivers’ licenses and vehicle registration are no longer necessary.

Unfortunately, military spouses are not granted this same consideration though they still move around the country and interrupt their lives because of military orders. In addition to the stress of looking for a job every few years, this inequality means that military spouses potentially pay up to $5,000 more annually in state income taxes than if they had not committed to support their soldier in this way. Spouses are also much less likely to have their names on deeds and titles of family property because of the implications of moving to another state, leaving many feeling like second class citizens.

I introduced the Military Spouses Residency Relief Act that would allow a military spouse who moves out of state because of the service member’s military orders to have the same option to claim one state of domicile regardless of where they are stationed. If a spouse chooses to take advantage of this, the soldier and the spouse must claim the same state.

Military families have shared in the sacrifices of service men and women and I strongly believe they should have the ability to share in the benefits. It is only fair to allow them to claim the same state of residency as their spouse. As the representative for the largest military base in the nation and so many military families, I look forward to seeing this bill passed into law.