Skip to main content

President Barack Obama smiling and holding
Yep, it was another pretty damned good week for Obamacare, if you don't count that whole impending Supreme Court doom part. Here's what we found out this week.

This one is particularly salient for a Supreme Court considering stripping subsidies away from millions of people: the uninsured rate dropped more than 30 percent from September 2013 to September 2014. The Urban Institute has been releasing quarterly data since the implementation of the law, and has found that the uninsured rate for adults under age 64 has been significantly lowered, across genders and races and age groups. But not economic groups—the working poor and the middle class saw the largest drops because of the combination of Medicaid expansion and federal tax credits, or subsidies, for the middle class. In other words, the law is doing exactly what it was intended to do. At least in the Medicaid expansion states.

Thanks in part to some of the Medicare provider reforms and incentives in the law, healthcare spending in the U.S. grew slower in 2013 than it had in 53 years. Half a century. Lowest healthcare spending growth. It's worth repeating that the shrinking of Medicare spending has already cut the deficit more than any of the austerity-minded plans that anyone has come up with—Simpson/Bowles, or Paul Ryan, or anyone else.

There's this, too: 50,000 lives saved because hospitals have been made safer. The law included both penalties and incentives for hospitals to reduce readmissions and thus to cut down on the incidence of things like patient falls, poor sanitation practices that increased hospital-based infections, or patients being given the wrong prescriptions. This is all critical in saving lives, but incidentally helped in that whole spending less money on health care part, particularly for Medicare.

Finally, the good folks at the Kaiser Family Foundation released the results of their research into state marketplaces. They found that premiums under Obamacare are being held largely in check for 2015 thanks to the fact that lots of insurers have decided to join in, and are creating competition. As the law intended. That doesn't mean that health insurance premiums aren't still too high for a lot of people, particularly people whose wages aren't keeping up with the growth in healthcare inflation, but it is helping.

What does all of this tell us? That our healthcare system can be made to work better and more efficiently and can save more lives. This is all under a complicated, cumbersome system that still maintains the profit incentive for insurance companies. Imagine what more could be accomplished if Republicans in Congress were to finally accept that it's the law and it's working and can be built upon? Ok, that's a pipe dream. But imagine what could be accomplished if Democrats realized that it's working and can be built upon and start campaigning on that right now for 2016?

The flip side, of course, is not hard to imagine because we've seen it. If the Supreme Court does indeed decide to gut the law by revoking subsidies for millions of people, then those millions will be where the millions who live in states that didn't expand Medicaid are: shit out of luck.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Time for left and right to stop relitigating ACA. (23+ / 0-)
    But imagine what could be accomplished if Democrats realized that it's working and can be built upon and start campaigning on that right now for 2016?
    It's working.  Deal.

    Sign of bad decision making: A sudden leap from "We've got to do SOME thing!" to "We've got to do THIS thing". Having to do something is no reason to do just anything.

    by Inland on Fri Dec 05, 2014 at 09:23:44 AM PST

  •  You know you have won (5+ / 0-)

    when the opposition changes the subject

    https://www.readyforhillary.com/

    by aaraujo on Fri Dec 05, 2014 at 09:27:59 AM PST

  •  As much as I'd like to see improvement in the ACA (8+ / 0-)

    At this point, I just hope we can keep it from being destroyed by the GOP thugs. Between the GOP Supreme Court and the GOP Congress, we are up against a conspiracy to screw the poor and middleclass even if it hurts the country as a whole. It makes no sense, but there it is.

    If I ran this circus, things would be DIFFERENT!

    by CwV on Fri Dec 05, 2014 at 09:34:54 AM PST

  •  Sick and tired of hearing Republicans attempts to (5+ / 0-)

    sabotage a good law. Now, if any changes are to be made, it should be to get single payer to limit the influence of insurance companies. Medicare should also be allowed to negotiate the price of medications with the leverage that they have.

    •  It's just they hate Obama so bad, they see nothing (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Matt Z

      but rage and hate due their empty, and ethically challenged spite filled lives and do not care how their "angry baby" immoral behavior will affect the lives of their fellow citizens.

      It is really a pathetic example of how not to conduct oneself when it comes to presiding over the good of the commons you supposedly represent, and swore an oath when you took on that responsibility to do so.

      On anther note:  The entire modern industrial world is watching, and laughing at us all.  

      “My soul is from elsewhere, I'm sure of that, and I intend to end up there." - Rumi

      by LamontCranston on Fri Dec 05, 2014 at 10:14:19 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  Eliminate networks... (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Mr MadAsHell, greendem, velinath

      People should be able to see whichever doctor they want, and the bill should go to their insurance company (or better, to the single payer). As far as I can see out of network is the biggest hassle for patients.

  •  Lowest Healthcare Spending In 53 Years? (4+ / 0-)

    I wonder if John Roberts knows.....or cares?

  •  I'm certainly not seeing (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Mr MadAsHell, Matt Z, happyshadow

    any of this great news in the MSM.  Why are they ignoring this?

    •  More than this... (7+ / 0-)

      Based on job creation numbers for the first 11 months of 2014, this year has seen the most jobs created since 1999.  More jobs, I'll note, than were created during any year in which Bush was president.

      I'm not claiming (nor are you) that these jobs were created because of Obamacare...but this record certainly serves as further proof that the Republican meme that the ACA is destroying jobs is complete BS.

      If Democrats proclaim the the Earth is round and Republicans insist it is flat, we will shortly see a column in the Washington Post claiming the the earth is really a semi-circle.

      by TexasTom on Fri Dec 05, 2014 at 10:31:39 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  Joan, where is your tip jar?! (6+ / 0-)

    This is the best damn news that I have heard in a long time.  I love this diary so much that I want to tip it a million times.  I want to see it at the top of the Most Shared section of honor ...

    We ARE in the middle of a class war between the have's and the have nots.  The haves, those upper-crusty 1%-ers, don't really give a squat about those of us living "on the other side of the tracks".  Their only focus is one of greed, how can they make even more money?  And they are anti-government primarily as a strategy to not write any checks to Uncle Sam.

    Obamacare is proof that "government", i.e. "we the people" working together, can accomplish good things.  One of the primary issues facing our country was the out-of-control rise in the cost of healthcare.  Obamacare was the first set of baby steps at implementing reforms to address that problem.  YOUR DIARY IS PROOF that those steps are working.  Obamacare is far from perfect - BUT IT IS A STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION.

    The right wants to kill Obamacare becuase a key part of their MESSAGING is that government is always 'the problem', it's never a solution.  The fact that Obamacare is actually bringing down the deficit more than their beloved austerity measures is cruel news indeed to them.  That just does not compute in their tired little brain cells.  The world is mad, and completely upside down for them.

    You have written a fabulous and important diary.  It hasn't even been Recommended yet?  WTF?  This diary needs to be studied and it needs to be shared.  Thank you so much for writing it.  Woo-hoo!  I love the title, and I love the picture :-)

    If a small minority of people is now stealthily ruling what was previously a democratic country, and "the people" don't seem to realize it, should anyone bother to tell them?

    by Older and Wiser Now on Fri Dec 05, 2014 at 09:48:43 AM PST

  •  Competition is not necessarily the blessing (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    limpidglass, annan

    it's being marketed as.  Jon Walker wrote a good article about how free-market competition can actually hurt healthcare customers on the exchanges.   The whole article is well worth reading.   The ACA is a Rube Goldberg system that has all sorts of unintended consequences and booby traps built into it.  

    http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/...

    The Perverse Way More Exchange Competition Could Leave Some People Worse Off

    By: Jon Walker Monday November 24, 2014 8:54 am

    Let’s say a new policy enters the exchange. Its “innovation” is offering the skimpiest coverage and narrowest network possible to qualify as a silver level plan. As a result this new hyper narrow policy is cheaper than any of the other current silver policies. The more competition on the exchange the more likely some insurers will go this route.

    This would changes the “reference plan” and reduce the amount of tax credits people qualify for. That means people receiving tax credits on the exchanges will either need to pay significantly more for their old policies or switch to a new potentially worse policy to pay the same amount they did before. People getting significant tax credits on the exchange won’t really feel any potential price decreases that competition might cause, but will feel any quality decrease competition could cause.

    •  Yup. That's exactly what happened to me. (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      OuijaForestCat

      I'm still happy. Still better off than I was a year ago and I can afford the increase.

      However, a 2-tier system is evolving in Indiana: a real network and a poverty network.

      The silver poverty network is exactly as Walker describes: narrower and skimpier. Competition is also creating a plush, top of the line network at the other end of the Silver spectrum.

      My plan is now right smack in the middle, but the premium has gone up a bit and the subsidy that I will receive in 2015 (for the exact same coverage as 2014) has gone down a bit. Ouch.

      "Let us not look back to the past with anger, nor towards the future with fear, but look around with awareness." James Thurber

      by annan on Fri Dec 05, 2014 at 10:21:40 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Competition on the low end can hurt everybody. (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        annan

        The reference plan for subsidies is the second lowest-priced Silver plan on the network.   That means the effects of competition on the low end will reverberate across the whole network.   Exchange customers can only pray that there aren't insurers on their network competing to offer the cheapest poverty plan.   This is really not a good system.

    •  Well as long as it could do something (4+ / 0-)

      that a blogger on the internet imagined could theoretically be possible even though it hasn't happened and there's no evidence that it's going to and there's no evidence that the result would be what the blogger says it would be, the ACA must suck.

      You should email all 50,000 people who aren't dead now and tell them to just wait because at some point the sky really will be falling.

      God knows why you would, in a post containing actual real life facts and good news, post a link to an article bashing the ACA because something might theoretically happen.

    •  Nope. Even in that scenario, the (0+ / 0-)

      market delivers lower prices.  Your complaint is that the benefit of the lower price accrues in part to taxpayers. IOW, you want the benefit to be distributed differently as between the government and the insured, but divvying up that benefit is a good "problem" to have.

      Sign of bad decision making: A sudden leap from "We've got to do SOME thing!" to "We've got to do THIS thing". Having to do something is no reason to do just anything.

      by Inland on Fri Dec 05, 2014 at 11:44:47 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  There was somebody somewhere who didn't know (4+ / 0-)

    that our health care system could work better and more efficiently?

    LG: You know what? You got spunk. MR: Well, Yes... LG: I hate spunk!

    by dinotrac on Fri Dec 05, 2014 at 10:06:46 AM PST

  •  I just don't understand (3+ / 0-)

    How people in red states don't seem to understand just how much they are hurting themselves by voting for the people they do. It's unbelieveable that they cruelly vote for people in their statehouses who deny them good healthcare. I'm not talking about national elections. Just state elections. It amazes me.

    And if the supremes have there way, they are done.

    It's truly amazing. Hate is just that powerful.

    I saw someone with a bumper sticker on their car the other day that said "I love being uninsured". Is it wrong of me to have wished just a small injury on them?

  •  And I still can't get covered. I have no income. (0+ / 0-)

    And no job. Hell, at this rate, I never will. Florida is the worst state to live in for disabled folks. And it's going to get worse with 4 more years of Governor Burns and his cronies.

    I write a series called 'My Life as an Aspie', documenting my experiences before and after my A.S. diagnosis as a way to help fellow Aspies and parents of Aspies and spread awareness. If I help just one person by doing this, then I've served a purpose.

    by Homer177 on Fri Dec 05, 2014 at 04:48:00 PM PST

  •  this helps how? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Design the Future

    I want to know why nobody writes the truth about this law. The way it actually victimizes working families with employer sponsored plans.

    The ACA originally contained a provision written that an employer must supply a plan which covered employees AND DEPENDENDANTS for less than 9.5% of MAGI but because this would mean that employers would pay more for insurance for low skilled labor that it paid in wages they postponed the employer mandate and Sibilus ultimately eliminated the requirement to cover dependents from the test.

    Now employers simply transfer the cost of the ACA related cost increases to those employees with spouses and families that they must cover under the employers group plan by negotiating with insurers that they give artificially low employee only coverage and build the margin into the spousal and family premium. Since non-employer based premiums cannot be made pre-tax and the test of affordable coverage is now based only on the employee rate even though all Americans must be covered. There is no other conclusion. ACA incentivized the pillaging of working family economics.

    Why is no one telling this story. My employer admits it. 3 Different insurance brokers have confirmed that it is commonplace.

  •  Hey Chuck Schumer: (0+ / 0-)

    Are you listening?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site