63,000 People Don't Want Royse City Man to Shoot a Black Rhino to Save Black Rhinos

Categories: Animal Welfare

blackrhinowikicommons.jpg
Matthew Field
Shooting one of these guys is hard enough, but just try to bring it back home.
Corey Knowlton has a problem.

The Royse City hunter, who paid $350,000 in a Dallas Safari Club auction for the right to kill a black rhino in Namibia, may not receive a permit to bring his trophy back from Africa.

As Eric Nicholson first reported for Unfair Park in October 2013, the reasoning behind issuing Knowlton's permit had a certain logic. Namibia allows for up to five post-reproductive-age male rhinos to be killed for sport each year to raise money for black rhino conservation. It's state-sponsored creative species destruction, if you will.

As things stand, Knowlton's quest to bag one of the majestic creatures is, ahem, endangered. In order for a hunter to bring back a dead member of an endangered species as a trophy, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service must issue a permit. Knowlton has applied for such a permit, according to the USFWS.

"The applicant requests a permit to import the sport-hunted trophy of one male black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis) taken from the wild in Namibia, for the purpose of enhancement of the survival of the species," it says.

Public comment regarding the potential permit is being taken until December 8. In order to view the comments being made, the USFWS requires you visit their Branch of Permits in Falls Church, Virginia. That's a bit far away to verify that some people think killing a member of a species of which fewer than 5,000 remain for fun is wrong. Meanwhile, a Change.org petition started to encourage the USFWS to deny the permit has received a ton of support.

Despite only receiving its 50,000th signature on Sunday, the petition has, as of this writing, 62,713 supporters. Once it reaches 85,000 names, the petition will be sent to the USFWS.

Joy Benson, the woman who started the position, writes: "It made me sick to read that this guy wants to go to Africa to kill this endangered species as a way to 'be intimately involved with a black rhino.' This is like Noah's Ark in reverse."


Advertisement

My Voice Nation Help
80 comments
casiepierce
casiepierce

I know a little something about big game rhino hunting. In Far Cry 4, they charge you and tump your machine-gun mounted truck over and start goring you. They are very hard to kill, especially with a bow and arrow. 


But not as hard as the honey badger, those fuckers are vicious! I have to unload a whole 12 from my grenade launcher at just one, and when I'm done, the pelt is in bits and I can't even use it at Kyrat Fashion Week. 

JackJett
JackJett

My hope in the story is that the "hunter" dude will NOT shoot the animal and still  donate the money and allow all the publicity he created to help save these incredible animals. Texas had more than firmed up it's status as the number one redneck state and the world knows we love to kill anything and are not shy about it.   So allowing this creature to live will not hurt our street cred.  


The reality is that shooting a fenced in animal (like our new super butch gov) is taking an unfair advantage to the extreme.   Respecting animals does not distract from your masculinity.  Simply look at me, they don't get anymore mas macho than this amigo. 

Sharon_Moreanus
Sharon_Moreanus topcommenter

Kill the rhino slash his throat bash him in.

leftocenter
leftocenter

Look...I don't get it...hunting that is.  I love to shoot, but paper targets and cans are all I've aimed at. It doesn't appeal to me on many levels, especially early morning hours, ugly clothes, and of course the killing.  Deer in particular are lovely to look at and make me feel serene.  Not so much with a bullet in them.

All that said, the folks in Namibia have come up with a pretty clever way to raise a lot of money for conservation of these animals.  It seems counter-intuitive to non-hunters, but so what?  That doesn't mean it isn't logical and effective.  I would prefer he have to capture it alive and keep it as a pet (that might discourage him), but it is what it is. 

Refusing to let this guy bring home his $350,000 trophy won't accomplish anything but keeping this one rich guy from doing something he thinks is cool.  Rich people are hard to entertain. 

I say we give it a rest...

RTGolden1
RTGolden1 topcommenter

For the nay-sayers that think controlled hunts, culls, have no place in wildlife conservation, think about this.  Before Panthera, the leading big cat conservation group, got into the game in South Africa, there was legal, uncontrolled hunting and illegal poaching of leopards, combined with 'nuisance' killing by farmers protecting their livestock.  Most of this killing happened in a small area, to a single population of leopards.  Panthera got involved and convinced the government there to establish hunt controls and worked with farmers to find ways to control herd predation.  Using science, instead of emotion, to protect endangered species does a lot more good.

Another program that worked is very similar to this auction.  The government paid a portion of the hunting fee to the farmer whose land a leopard was killed on.  This way, the leopard had a tangible value to the farmer, was not just a nuisance to be slaughtered.  The farmers went out of their way to keep a leopard alive and happy.  When that bounty program ended, the farmers went back to killing the leopards as a nuisance.  This is one of the ways paying to hunt cullable members of an endangered species can work to enhance conservation efforts.

ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul
ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul topcommenter

Joy, like it or not, the Namibian government will kill this particular rhino regardless of any raffle held here in the US.  The difference will be that Namibia will not receive the $350,000.  If they don't, they are likely to sell it to another hunter from another country for less money.


Please go and study herd management on a closed range prior to your reaction to this hunt.

Montemalone
Montemalone topcommenter

Is this "hunt" like Darth Cheney's hunts? Where the animals are tame and inside fences, and probably doped up? Or is "black rhino" the name they give to the guide that accidentally takes a bullet?


I feel sorry for this guy's wife, if he has one, because she may never know the pleasure of orgasm.

MattL11
MattL11

I consider it more than a little weird that a guy would be willing to pay so much money to go half-way around the world, see an incredibly rare and endangered animal, and kill it. However, if the money is going where everyone says it's going, and the rhino is expendable, I'll choose to give a shit about more pressing matters. Like, oh, curbing the demand that causes people to poach the things in the first place.  

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

So Knowlton will back out of the deal if he isn't able to not only shoot the animal but also be allowed to bring the "trophy" back home to IDK stand in his living room so he can look at it?

Having a mounted wild animal standing around  that has been rendered by a taxidermist must be important to his psyche....

Myrna.Minkoff-Katz
Myrna.Minkoff-Katz topcommenter

@casiepierce Stop killing honey badgers and other wild animals unless you intend to provide food for yourself or your family.  No one eats rhino, so there's no reason to kill them.

ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul
ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul topcommenter

@JackJett 

Jack, the animal in question will be shot.  It is not a question of if but when.  If the person who purchased the hunting permit from the Namibian government doesn't do it, the Namibian government will find someone who will.  Failing that, they will do it themselves.

Tim.Covington
Tim.Covington

@leftocenter I completely concur with you. But, I also want to add a couple of things:

1. Deer are very tasty.

2. There is a reason that farmers call deer "rats with hooves." They (and other herbivores) can do massive amounts of damage to fields. These fields provide food and livelihood for farmers.


Hunting raises tons of money for wildlife conservation and habitat preservation. Hunters have learned that conservation and controlled hunting is the best way to preserve future hunting opportunities. There is a reason that the world's largest populations of several species are here in Texas (I believe gemsbock is one of them). If people were not willing and able to legally hunt them, those large populations would not even be here.

ColonelAngus
ColonelAngus

@RTGolden1  "Before Panthera, the leading big cat conservation group"


They were also a kickass metal group.  RIP Dimebag!

JackJett
JackJett

@ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul  Give me a link please because I am not finding this information. Are you getting it from a magazine that promotes this sort of killing?   Also how is the killing of this ONE animal going to control herd management?  


I honestly don't believe anyone who spends that sort of money to kill an animal or those that hunt and kill lions and tigers on safaris have any interest in preservation.   They are out to kill a majestic animal in a totally unfair fight.   Killing an animal with a gun is no different than killing an unarmed person with a gun. 


However, if it is legal to do so, I fully support anyone's right to do it.  I proudly just successfully completed years of work with Dan Matthews to get the horse drawn carriages in NYC removed and the horse are being placed in retirement pastures all around the east coast.   So my animal activism is more focused here in the US.   And as a member of the Animal Beta Project we are focused on those who videotape themselves or others abusing animals and posting them online.  Tracking the down, making certain they get the harshest sentences available and supporting legislation to lengthen the sentences.  


I have noticed that as divided as or nation is and becoming more divisive every day, the love of animals is usually the one thing that will bring both sides together.  Yet when it comes to hunters it is a different story.  I can't imagine intentionally killing an animal while hunter can kill several, place them on their car and not give it a second thought.   Just a difference in people.  I think it is called divershitty here.  

WhoisJohnGalt
WhoisJohnGalt

We can study the herd of ill-informed right here!

JackJett
JackJett

@Montemalone  M. Killing a fenced in animal is about as much of a sport as the gay rodeo having a "putting panties on a goat" contest.   Didn't you win that title several years in a row.   Fastest goat pantier in the west!  

pak152
pak152

@Montemalone ah yes another low-informed individual. thanks for sharing your ignorance

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@Montemalone 

you've got it! THAT'S why he wants to bring the "trophy" home, he puts it in his bedroom so when his wife says he can get some, he looks up at the rhino and it gets him up...

casiepierce
casiepierce

@Myrna.Minkoff-Katz @casiepierce I'm not sure if you're trying to be humorous but I was (and it is).


See, Far Cry 4 is a video game, it just came out a couple of weeks ago. In it, you are on a series of missions (let's call them "quests"), and in order to advance the game in some ways, you must go out and hunt the wild animals, so you can craft your clothes and your holsters and things, which are then used to SHOOT THE BAD GUYS. I think there is even a quest where you save some farmer and feed his family. Your character is appalled at killing the animals, but he has to in order to survive (he audibly groans every time he has to skin an animal, which oddly comes out looking like a wad of steak, except for the MacCaque monkeys, for some reason the game designers decided that skinning monkeys is too weird.) The one thing you can't kill, (on purpose), but you can ride them, is the Asian elephant, although I did accidentally blow one up when I ran him into a generator- oops.


And, BTW, in case you're worried that all this killing and maiming and skinning and shooting will someday inspire me actually go out and stalk big game animals IRL (or shoot up a school, or kill my family), it's a great escape. I highly recommend it. You should try gaming sometime, seriously, I think you could use the distraction.....

ColonelAngus
ColonelAngus

@Tim.Covington @leftocenter By "preserv(ing) future hunting opportunities" I presume that you meant preventing mass starvation among game herds - this is a great point.  Without controlled hunting the deer multiply to unsustainable numbers in the lush years, then die off massively in the dry and lean years.  It is similar to what happens to cattle during drought, as we have seen again recently.  Ranchers are forced to sell off their herds due to lack of feed.  Man is part of the equation, and our prudent intervention improves long-term prospects for wild game, both big and small.

ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul
ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul topcommenter

@JackJett @ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul 

Jett, I have managed wild game herds in the past.

It will take more than just a link.

Please start with some of the articles that were first published  when this occurred.  Please pay particular attention to the articles describing Namibia's efforts to preserve and grow the rhino herds in their country.  Please compare Namibia's efforts to those in South Africa.

As far as herd management goes, I recommend going to the library.

I am glad that you feel that you are accomplishing good in animal welfare by your efforts.

I can't comment on the horse drawn carriages in  Central Park.  How severe was the abuse and what did it consist of.


Please read my comment carefully.  The Namibian government will cull the aging bull rhinoceros.  It is not a question of if, but when.  The fact that someone is willing to pay $350k for the opportunity to do so is a function of the free market.  Scarcity of a good in demand causes the value of that good to increase in value.


If you would really want to do something great for animal conservation in southern Africa, work on stopping the illicit trade to China where people will eat powdered rhino horn because they think that it will increase their virility.  It is really no different than eating your own fingernail clippings.


What is your opinion of the sentence that Michael Vick received?

Lakewooder
Lakewooder

Myrna, you clearly know nothing about wildlife conservation. Without hunters like Knowlton, the black rhino and countless other species would have vanished long, long ago.

skippyaveo
skippyaveo

@casiepierce @Myrna.Minkoff-Katz I was laughing through both of your descriptions, knowing what you were talking about. But please to not be running elephants in the generators please. :) Did you lose points per chance?

leftocenter
leftocenter

@Tim.Covington @ColonelAngus

BTW, I totally get the herd control aspect of hunting -- hunters play an important role in preventing over-population which can lead to animals starving.  I just don't get the enjoyment of hunting, but I don't judge anyone who does.

JackJett
JackJett

@ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul I am not really involved in animal conservation outside the US. My focus in on the abuse in carnival (my focus is in smaller carnivals that transport animals in harmful ways.  So while I dislike the killing of animals in foreign lands (especially elephants that I think are incredibly beautiful and smart), I do not spend my activist time with them   I will be honest with you though and say, I do understand the need for thinning out certain herd so that others (or greenery) may flourish, I still cringe at the thought of an animal being shot.  


All you would have to do is take one look at the horses that were forced to pull a carriage all day in Central Park and the dangerous streets on NYC and see how malnourished and mistreated they were.   We spent years lobbying to free the and we got lucky with DeBlasio who loved horses and made it the second law he signed.   The horse owners were going to have them all euthanized after making them a living all these years. Once they sent them to the glue factory, they were intercepted and sent to various farms that promised them full retirement.


Michal Vick?  The damage he created has had a massive domino effect.   Most personally, my friend Big Dick Hunter ended up with one of Vick's abused dogs.   The dog has spent years in re-training and on a ton of medications and to this day is STILL shy and trust very few people.   And even though Vick has to pay for the upkeep of these dogs, the example he set for those young fans of his is disgusting.  

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@everlastingphelps @mavdog @Montemalone

"support"?

if he needs to have a "trophy" to get an erection, not going to stop him.

I'd rather support his access to viagra or perhaps "replacement therapy"" as it were, rather than the primal urge to mount an animal as a trophy.

(btw that's "mount" as in taxidermy... ;)

markzero
markzero

@leftocenter I agree, culling herds is important because we've killed or run off most of their natural predators. However, when predators kill they tend to first go for the weak, the sickly, and the old, leaving the most healthy to continue to breed. I wonder if sportspeople trying to get the most "points" on their bucks are really leaving the best animals alone.

Myrna.Minkoff-Katz
Myrna.Minkoff-Katz topcommenter

@leftocenter People who depend upon hunting for food is one thing.  Hunting for the "thrill" of killing is another.  The nomads of the Asian Steppes honor the goat for its sacrifice before it is dispatched.

ColonelAngus
ColonelAngus

@markzero @leftocenter  Many, if not most, of the weak, sickly and old become coyote food.  Trust me, there are coyotes everywhere. 


I know a few folks who hunt deer actively every season.  None of them would pass up a buck because it was "merely" a six-point.  Deer hunting is expensive, difficult and time-consuming.  And the old bucks with the big racks did not get that way by taking chances - they are wily as hell.  There are trophy hunters looking for a great rack to hang on their wall, but in my experience they are a small minority.


Plus, the younger ones are tender and tasty.

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@everlastingphelps 

disagree that everyone is "born" with the inate desire to kill animals. it is a "choice".

as for judging, that's what message boards are made for...

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@everlastingphelps 

you're "talking about sex" when you said people "born being attracted to animals"?

odd of you to make that statement.

can't agree with you on that....

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@everlastingphelps 

nope, you didn't say that "there are some people..". You said "You're born being atttracted..". as in people are born being attracted.

if you would like to change your statement go ahead....

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@everlastingphelps

ah, the "I suck at writing what I mean to say" defense. I guess if you can't belly up and say you failed, you try and make it like the other side is in error.

everlastingphelps
everlastingphelps topcommenter

@mavdog @everlastingphelps The good news is that the readers are the judges.  Either they are as stupid as you and can't read and think you are UBER SMRT or they know that you are grasping at straws.

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@everlastingphelps 

yes, they can read and see exactly what you wrote.

too bad it is too late for you to change it.

Now Trending

Dallas Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...