Entrepreneurs and Educated Workers Changing the Face of Texas' Immigrant Population

Categories: Immigration

immigrantrally.jpg

After being inundated with images of poverty stricken unaccompanied Central American children this summer, you might be surprised to learn that the stereotype of the poor working class immigrant is rapidly changing in Texas. The growing demographic, it turns out, are educated and highly skilled -- and the Texas economy is increasingly dependent on their money.

The Center for Public Policy Priorities released a report last week that pointed out the economic virility of the immigrant workforce. Small immigrant-owned businesses brought in $4.4 billion in revenue to the Texas economy last fiscal year.

Texas has one of the biggest populations of highly educated and skilled immigrant workforces in the country; 37 percent of all immigrants work in white collar jobs. Among immigrants in Texas, 27.1 percent hold at least one degree, compared with the marginally higher 27.7 percent of citizens in Texas who hold degrees.

The bulk of the immigrant population in Texas, 58 percent, are from Mexico. And many highly educated Mexican immigrants are increasingly flocking to North Texas. The Dallas chapter for the Association of Mexican Entrepreneurs was founded two years ago as a networking organization for Mexicans and Mexican-Americans, mostly businessmen and women, attorneys, bankers.

Many of these immigrants were successful entrepreneurs in Mexico and were able to pay the hefty price of the special investor visa -- anywhere from $500,000 to $1 million that investors drop into the Texas economy through business transplants, in exchange for a green card. Gerardo Garza is one of the founding members of AEM. His story is indicative of the changing face of immigration -- some through investor visas and others, like Garza, who were lucky enough to have company transfers or business connections.

Originally from Mexico City, Garza now works with a Dallas financial firm. "The job market slowed way down with the Tequila crisis," he says, but he circumvented the struggling economy to build a successful career as a banker in Mexico. After expressing interest to move to the United States, he was relocated from Monterrey to Dallas in 2001, and has made his permanent home here.

Garza has two degrees, and nearly everyone involved with AEM has at least one degree. Still, the group's demographic is reflective of a growing population of immigrants.

"We have incredibly successful immigrants who are driving innovation and helping out with the economy boom," says Ann Beeson, an analyst for CPPP. "There's not any question that they bring a huge amount of money, and without it there would be a significantly negative impact on the economy. We're counting on these businesses to drive the economy."



Advertisement

My Voice Nation Help
28 comments
holmantx
holmantx topcommenter

Entrepreneurs and Educated Workers . . . 

don't vote their race.

john80224
john80224

I'm unclear as to whether this article makes a point, though its intent seems to be to do so.  There are a number of statistics that are meaningless since there's no context around them and may speak more to readers' collective ignorance more than the endorsement I assume it is trying to make.  Is 37% white collar supposed to say it's higher than one might expect or simply "good"?  Compared to metro areas nationwide that's underperforming by about 25% (if white-collar is "performing").  Depending on how much rural population is involved perhaps its on par.  And what is $4.4 billion?  More than I have, but about .3% of the gross state product.  It otherwise provides anecdotes that tell nothing of the big picture.


My point is not to judge Texas immigrants, but to warn that excepting dispelling a notion that they are "all" uneducated, blue collar workers there's not much meaning to draw from the bulk of the article.

RTGolden1
RTGolden1 topcommenter

It seems you fail to distinguish between legal and illegal immigrant in your article.  There IS a difference and that difference is crucial to understanding the debate.

wcvemail
wcvemail

Latin American immigration in general and Mexican immigration in particular have almost no middle class. According to the Federal Reserve Bank, although legal immigrants are more likely to have graduate degrees than U.S.-born citizens, Mexican illegal immigrants are the lowest-skilled and least-educated of all nationalities finding their way here, regardless of legal status.


What looks like a barbell on the graph, with the least-educated end much larger than the highly educated end, is adding to that same evolution in America overall.

https://www.dallasfed.org/assets/documents/research/pubs/gonetx.pdf

ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul
ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul topcommenter

Anytime the middle class white collar person immigrants to another country is indicative of extremely poor economic conditions in the home country.


The Republic of Mexico needs to quit adulating oligarchs like Carlos Helu and work on developing economic policies that will help grow a middle class.


Items such as an open banking system and clear land titles would go a very long way.

everlastingphelps
everlastingphelps topcommenter

You know what would increase this trend and give these legal immigrants breathing room?


Closing the border to illegals.

mead0w
mead0w

@RTGolden1 Good point. If we can increase the legal ways to get here we can get more legal immigration and less illegal immigration.

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@RTGolden1 

the linked study on which the artcle is based discusses the composition of the subject population, which inludes naturalized citizen immigrants, legal immigrants and illegal immigrants.

wcvemail
wcvemail

@RTGolden1

Your shorter version happened while I was more slowly learning about that very important difference, as in the Dallas Fed research paper I linked below. 

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@wcvemail 

Latin American immigration in general and Mexican immigration in particular have almost no middle class

not too hard to understand as that mirrors the countries from which they come from, right?

I don't have any data to support this, but it would stand to reason that the same characteristics were present in previous nationalities when they arrived in America.

wcvemail
wcvemail

@ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul

In particular, the brain drain in the 25-50 yr-old entrepreneurially minded population means that Mexican business will see not much, if any, improvement for the next few decades at least. 

dingo
dingo

@everlastingphelps 

The article did not distinguish between legal and illegal immigrants in its attempt at conflating the two in order to paint a rosy picture devoid of societal burdens.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/sep/22/1-million-people-on-obamacare-fail-to-prove-citize/
Amnesty was considered by Congress. It didn't pass. According to Obama, the only reason illegals haven't already been given amnesty is that Congress is not "doing its job."
Congress' job is to represent their districts. House members are doing a better job representing their districts than Obama is doing representing the country.

All is well with according to this article so there is no problem with Obama waiting until after the elections to enact amnesty against the will of his constituents instead of acting now and losing Democratic votes.


 

wcvemail
wcvemail

@mavdog @wcvemail

I suppose so (glances at sports headlines, cracks a peanut, idly wonders about point being made)

Here's my gleaning: by far the most numerous group of immigrants, legal+illegal, are Mexican. By far the most numerous group in that cohort are the least educated and lowest-skilled immigrants coming to this nation among all immigrants. Therefore, the U.S. is rapidly and drastically lowering our already sorry educational level by permitting this flood, regardless of individual success stories such as the banker dude in this article. Further, we are adding to the economic polarization of this country, already in sorry state, by permitting this. 

ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul
ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul topcommenter

@wcvemail 

As long as the Mexican oligarchs can maintain economic and political control over Mexico, there will be no change.

Did you know that after the crash of 2008-2009, the Mexican unemployment rate was lower than it was in the US?  The main reason is that the unemployed Mexicans migrate illegally to the US thereby taking any need away for Mexico to deal with an unemployment problem.

everlastingphelps
everlastingphelps topcommenter

@bvckvs @everlastingphelps Actually, I think that the world I live in is great.


Of course, since your philosophy is based on the idea that everyone who disagrees with you is a bitter hate-monger, you won't let that data penetrate your echosphere.

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@dingo 

The article did not distinguish between legal and illegal immigrants in its attempt at conflating the two in order to paint a rosy picture devoid of societal burdens.

I see, that's why you believed you had the license to link an unrelated article about the suspicion that illegal immigrants were possibly getting health insurance coverage from the government's website, failing to distinguish between fact and fiction in order to paint a bleak picture of potentially oppressive societal burdens?

I guess it was a job well done, you can conflate with the best of 'em!

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@wcvemail 

the point being made (sorry to interrupt the reading and peanut eating) is a) the immigrant population is reflective of their point of origin, b) this is consistent with our past immigrant waves throughout our country's history, and c) it is reasonable to expect that this current wave, just like those before it, will over time advance in their and their offspring's educational attainment and skill development.

history has a way of repeating itself. in many ways it is predictable.

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@everlastingphelps 

you won't let that data penetrate your echosphere

it may be a typo, but it really, really fits.

roo_ster
roo_ster

@mavdog @wcvemail 

a) The trend has been the farther away the point of origin, the better quality of the individual immigrant.  And the closer to the USA, the lower the quality.   Thus, we get more MD/PhD immigrants from India than grunt laborers and more grunt laborers from Mexico than MDs.


b) Not so much.  The current wave is much less entrepreneurial than the past waves. Also, we had many more middle-class immigrants in previous waves.  The largest source up to 1964 was Germany & German-speaking lands.  Mostly middle-class yeoman farmer types, not illiterate bumpkins.  Same with the English.  Less so with the Irish, Italian, and Jews.


c) The initial immigrants do better than their cohort back home.  Folks are generally not starving in Mexico (given Mexico is richer per capita than 5/6 folk on Earth).  They come to America to live large.  They make more money than in Mexico, have more kids, etc.  Second and third and subsequent generations don;t rise like the English, Germans, Irish, Italians, & Jews did.  They are still lolling about the lowest quintile several generations on.  We are importing a permanent underclass.  Want to know why we have not won LBJ's "War on Poverty?"  Because we keep importing poor people.

wcvemail
wcvemail

@mavdog @wcvemail

That's too general, but no argument, Mav. Consider again that we're specifically getting far too many of the least likely to join and preserve the middle class, which is (deep breath) What Made This Country Great.

RTGolden1
RTGolden1 topcommenter

@dingo @mavdog I can see a point being made with your links, but not one relevant to the discussion.


"bite me." Didn't help to clarify the point or strengthen the relevance.


The discussion, and your original point, was centered on the difference between legal and illegal immigration and the article's failure to distinguish.  I don't see how linking a random article about the ACA favoring illegals helps in the discussion.  Perhaps you could illuminate?

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@dingo 

more conflation! well done.

and so eloquent, too!

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@roo_ster 

that's an interesting, but inaccurate, description of our nation's history of immigration.

The immigrants from ireland, Europe and Russia that composed the majority of the 19th and 20th century's immigrants were not any different than what we have today. they were not well educated, although just like most immigrants of today they were literate.

they were not middle class, they were mostly blue collar or agricultural. that is why they came to America, just like those immigrants today who strive for a better life, a safer existence for themselves and their families.

the hispanic immigrants of the last quarter century do exhibit the same tendencies as the immigrants before them, subsequent generations tend towards improved social class and educational achievement.

wcvemail
wcvemail

@mavdog

(edit time expired on above comment) 
We obviously don't know each other, but you do know that I'm not so blindly anti-immigration that I don't value our own history. That history is being rewritten. This isn't our fathers' immigration (heh).

Now Trending

Dallas Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...