Profile

Cover photo
Verified name
Scientific American
251,395 followers|2,835,899 views
AboutPostsPhotosYouTube

Stream

 
Extreme weather in arctic communities proves dangerous to people as well as animals. 
51
7
Angel Bear's profile photoFrancesca Stucchi's profile photoCanis Poetam's profile photoMarlaine Khater's profile photo
67 comments
 
+Rich White I read the article,and what they are saying is that records and"near records" are being set. This means that in the past,similar events took place,so this event is nothing new. They mention 1920,the hottest year on record in the US. This was before millions of cars were on the roads,before air conditioning and many of the things that the"Scientists" blame "global warming" on. I noticed that it was mentioned that the buildings in the area were in sludge and debris flow areas,meaning that this isn't the first time that this has happened.
Add a comment...
 
President Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping have struck a historic climate change agreement in Beijing.
49
9
Geofrey Rwamugira's profile photoManuel Hernández Rosales's profile photoCesare Beccaria's profile photoGilberto Sánchez Ortiz's profile photo
34 comments
 
We do need to take better care of this world. I do my small part by recycling what I can. I reuse a lot of stuff too. 
Add a comment...
 
Awesome video of a giant but lightweight helicopter built by two young Canadian engineers.
70
17
Paolo Pascucci's profile photoAlejandro de la Puente's profile photoS. Quark's profile photoQatadah's profile photo
3 comments
 
+Noah Grady It's hard to predict the benefits of basic research.

Perhaps this research will help us to build less expensive, low power, long endurance aircraft that help us spot problems in crops before they fail, preventing famine.

Basic research is an investment in the future of humanity.
Add a comment...
 
¡Bienvenidos a Scientific American en español! http://www.scientificamerican.com/espanol/
27
3
Akinola Emmanuel's profile photoJosemarti Rodriguez's profile photoJessica Schnell's profile photoGilberto Sánchez Ortiz's profile photo
8 comments
 
+Jim Chatman great, so you're just going to attack everyone that doesn't agree with you. Good luck with that. 
Add a comment...
 
To figure out your primary introverted type, take this online test.
71
19
Amanda Park's profile photoGilberto Sánchez Ortiz's profile photoSteffen Glückselig's profile photoNorman davenport's profile photo
7 comments
 
When I clicked on the link it did not take me to any test.  Or any blog about a test.  Is it gone?
Add a comment...

Scientific American

Shared publicly  - 
 
By designing organisms that break the rules of DNA, researchers may be able to make novel life forms resistant to viral infection.
33
6
Kenneth Byrd's profile photoCyto C.'s profile photoRanji R's profile photoGrafen Co.'s profile photo
6 comments
 
"organisms routinely break these rules" does suggest that the "rules" might be presumptuous.  Remember that 99% of the human genome that was considered to be junk?  

It may be true that there are no limits to human knowledge.  Unfortunately, that applies to arrogance as well.
Add a comment...
Have them in circles
251,395 people

Scientific American

Shared publicly  - 
72
23
Garret W's profile photoCesar Mello's profile photoA Kyle's profile photoLynda Hecht's profile photo
11 comments
 
Siempre y cuando esté para ayudar a los más desprotegidos, y este método no se use como objeto de abuso de poder por determinadas clases que establecen burla y nepotismo sobre otras clases sociales y llenar así ratos de ocio o aburrimiento de algún gremio, siempre que no se haga sobre lo dicho anteriormente, me parece bien.
 ·  Translate
Add a comment...

Scientific American

Shared publicly  - 
 
Breaking news today: appeals court in Italy says six scientists did not cause the deaths that resulted from the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake. 

“We don’t want to have to be worried about the possibility of being prosecuted if we give advice on earthquakes,” says seismologist Ian Main, from the University of Edinburgh, UK. “That would discourage giving honest opinion.”
72
20
Wei-Chang Lo's profile photoKenneth Byrd's profile photoJoseph Incatasciato's profile photoGilberto Sánchez Ortiz's profile photo
10 comments
 
i'd be scared to death if someone could create an earthquake in his lab! 
and why did they try to scapegoat the scientists? should they know the structural integrity of the homes people died?, the heart or general health conditions of people who got scared to death?...
well, perhaps on the same basis, they should blame the politicians because they allowed people to live there in the first place, (ok, that was an ancient city if memory serves) and the home owners for not having a seismic certification and the list goes on.
sometimes people needs an escape goat, last time I knew they had the accused scientist drinking poison, now they dropped the charges, progress is being made on europe, while in Kansas they have rejected Charles Darwin...
Add a comment...
 
Zombie apocalypse? "Eau de Death" could protect you. 
 ‪#‎Halloween2014‬
25
3
sara sreen's profile photoDoktor Emm's profile photoPat Smyth's profile photoSashmita Rout's profile photo
 
fear
Add a comment...

Scientific American

Shared publicly  - 
 
Cancer cells are immortal in the sense that they can proliferate unchecked. That ability may have once enabled organisms to adapt to their environments.
51
21
PhysocTV's profile photoRyan Faderogaya's profile photo
Add a comment...

Scientific American

Shared publicly  - 
66
21
Rodolfo Zamian's profile photoAndrew Planet's profile photoGilberto Sánchez Ortiz's profile photoSarah Figueira's profile photo
5 comments
 
I haven't chosen anyone based on scent but I've avoided a few potential "mates" based on it.
Add a comment...

Scientific American

Shared publicly  - 
 
The science of science writing, from a scientist.
44
9
Nestor Melo's profile photoDirk Stanley's profile photoRanji R's profile photoGilberto Sánchez Ortiz's profile photo
7 comments
 
Many Scientists play God, but not all of them.
Add a comment...
People
Have them in circles
251,395 people
Story
Tagline
Scientific American is the authoritative source for the science discoveries and technology innovations that matter.
Introduction

Founded in 1845, the award-winning Scientific American is the authoritative source for science discoveries and technology innovations that matter. For influential opinion leaders who make policy, business leaders, educators, students and science enthusiasts, Scientific American is the essential guide to the modern world. The longest continuously published magazine in the U.S., it is translated into 14 languages, and reaches a global audience of more than 6 million. Other titles include Scientific American Mind and Spektrum der Wissenschaft in Germany.