Captive Audience: Counties and Private Businesses Cash in on Video Visits at Jails

PrisonVisits_creditAmySilverstein-3.jpg
Amy Silverstein
Visits at Hopkins County Jail use to take place face to face through glass, but the county eliminated that practice when Securus signed a contract to profit from video visits.
Securus and its competitor Global Tel *Link have been buying out smaller companies and gaining control of the jail and prison telephone market since the early 2000s, but it took until 2013 for the FCC to finally act on complaints that the companies were ripping off families with excessive phone rates.

"This is a tiny, dark corner of the telecommunications market, and they weren't looking, and it took that long to organize enough political pressure to get the FCC to prioritize this," says Peter Wagner, executive director of the Prison Policy Initiative, "and for people to realize that this affects millions and millions of people."

The market is estimated by Bloomberg News to be worth $1.2 billion, with about half of the correctional phone services contracts belonging to Alabama-based Global Tel*Link. Number two is Securus, with 30 percent of the market. Both are backed by investment banks--Global Tel*Link is funded by American Securities and Securus by Abry partners.

It's a business setup that "creates another incentive to cash out," Wagner says. "There are two kind of strategies with a product like this. One is that you price it cheaply and you encourage people to use your product, and you make it up in volume. Then there's the short-sighted proposal, which is you charge as much as possible, and then you jam on all these little additional fees to eat up the customers' money and you don't care whether they like using your product."

Telephones, like the videos, offer a valuable service that wasn't available to inmates before. In Texas prisons, inmates used to be allotted just one five-minute phone call every 90 days before the state signed a contract with Securus. "In all fairness to Securus," says Darryl Stewart, whose son is incarcerated in Missouri, "if they would stop billing for calls you didn't get, they would be doing a real service." Stewart plans to take the company to small claims court for billing him for calls that he says he missed. His son often calls when he's not around to answer. "They seem to have a phone [in the prison] available 24/7."

Families' attempts to get around the high phone rates have spawned a new industry of services offering cheap jail calls, such as Cons Call Home. The rates for long-distance calls from prisons are substantially higher than local calls, so the services work by rerouting phone numbers that come in from Securus or one of its competitors to a cheaper line. Predictably, Securus has tried to put those companies out of business. When Securus has discovered that its number is being rerouted for cheaper rates, the company has responded by simply blocking the inmate's account and cutting off the funds.

"Today I was told by Securus Technologies that I am masking my true identity and phone number and this is illegal," a woman wrote to the FCC in 2012 after she purchased a Google Voice number to match the area code of where her husband was incarcerated. "I was told that I can face federal charges and so can my husband ... I need to know if I am truly doing something illegal."

She wasn't. Securus asked the FCC to crack down on the third-party calls in a 2009 petition but in 2013 the FCC issued an opinion that Securus and Global Tel *Link had no right to block the calls.

In 2003, a Washington, D.C., grandmother named Martha Wright filed a class action lawsuit against the Corrections Corporation of America for the phone calls that she said had cost her thousands of dollars over the years. A judge sent the case to the FCC, and the agency finally decided in 2013 to cap all interstate phone and jail prison rates at 24 cents per minute.

Despite the FCC's crackdown, Global Tel*Link and Securus can still tack on high fees for things such as using a credit card or setting up an account. More recently, customers say Securus has added mysterious "taxes" to their bills that weren't there before the FCC ruling.

"They are charging a flat rate of $3.15 per call and an additional $2 for taxes, bringing one call to a total cost of $5.15," says a complaint from a Milwaukee customer, sent to the FCC this July. "Sometimes the facility phone hangs up within 1 minute of speaking, and charges you the whole $5.15."

In Dallas, Securus currently provides phone service to the jail and will continue to do so under a new agreement. Securus says people who pay by credit card through the phone in Dallas will be charged a convenience fee "up to $4.95." Using a credit card, Securus says, is one of its "optional services that incur convenience fees or a minimum funding amount."

Carolyn Esparza, a former social worker who founded Community Solutions, an El Paso nonprofit that provides social services to inmates and their families, says most people don't have the heart to say no to an expensive call from an inmate. "It is addictive for the prisoner to be able to call home, to be able to call home, to be able to call home again," she says.



< Previous>

Advertisement

My Voice Nation Help
8 comments
WhoisJohnGalt
WhoisJohnGalt

I love the hypocrisy that thinks that it's perfectly OK for the government to lock people away for all sorts of trumped-up reasons (most of which were invented by the government including the failed "drug war" and all sorts of miscellaneous victimless crimes) but the moment the government interferes with the inmate's visitation rights, THEN they object?  How about objecting to the government that railroaded these people into prison in the first place?

fordamist
fordamist

I know about the jail phone industry.  In the 90's it was $4.95 to start a call, local or ld,   $.50 a minute long distance for time that cost two cents per.  I learned in the LSU School of Bidness,  that was almost 100% profit!  The vendor paid 50%+ commission on all calls,  was responsible for bad debt.

It was 'free money' for the lockup,  especially the private prison companies.

Equipment was supposed to detect the 'click' of three-way or forwarded callings,  automatically terminate the call.  The prisons would provide a list of numbers to be blocked,  e.g.,  lawyers who asked to be,  judges,  courts, police,  etc.  Each outbound number could be called x times in a 24 hour period.  (Occasional violence happened when somebody else in jail was calling the same number).

The weak link was the local telcos had to bill the calls,  they didn't bill to cell phones.  Pre-paid was a very small part of the industry then.  AT&T suddenly decided it wanted to own the industry,  refused to bill for anybody.   The few survivors set up their own billing and quickly converted to pre-pay.

The b-s about 'convenience' is just that.   Expect security problems to quickly arise in Dallas that force an end to the 'free' visitation.  Expect other problems that force an end to 'in jail' visitation.  The end result will be visitation from off-site computers.    It's far more lucrative,  with virtually no overhead.  Third parties will get into the act,  you'll likely see "jail visit" kiosks being started around town.

To quote that great Economist Mr. Randy Newman,  "It's money that matters!"

ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul
ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul topcommenter

I don't know who is more despicable the companies that offer this service or the jail authorities who agree to that.


I can't wait until someone files a writ of habeas corpus in order to have in an person visit.

wcvemail
wcvemail topcommenter

This is exactly the sort of reporting that DO and its ilk do best. The story is untouched by the MSM (to borrow a phrase from the ranters), unknown and uncared-about by the vast majority of citizenry, and sure to be denigrated by a few of those citizens commenting here that "if you can't do the time..." and "jail isn't supposed to be nice." No, it's not, but it's  not supposed to be a gouging business, either. Not even the counties are getting the promised bucks, so it's a gouge on the part of business, no doubt with Austin politicians firmly in pocket.


Paraphrasing Alexis de Tocqueville, "Show me your jails and I'll know the condition of your country."

fordamist
fordamist

Lunch with a Dallas Judge who shares more of the story:


the jail elevators are being replaced.  Moving inmates around again requires shackles, chains and handcuffs.  Visitation requires the same security.  Says in-person visitation has become a nightmare,  and,  at the pace Dallas County does things,  won't get better for a long while.


wcvemail
wcvemail topcommenter

@fordamist

"Third parties will get into the act,  you'll likely see "jail visit" kiosks being started around town." With that statement alone, you got your money's worth at LSU. Heckuva post, thanks.

I wonder, though, since there's a small withdrawal from private prisons nationwide on the part of municipalities, if this sort of gouging news will cause those governments to hesitate on the contracts. Hopkins County is only getting a fraction of what was promised, and that's the only bottom-line news that might get the attention of the undecided governments
, since basic decency and respect for citizenry are out the window.

wilme2
wilme2

@ThePosterFormerlyKnownasPaul I am both a Securus employee and a regular commenter on Unfair Park.  I am very proud of what my company does - we build software to help solve crimes and reduce recidivism by keeping inmates in touch with their families.

fordamist
fordamist

@wcvemail @fordamist 

"the only people who go to jail (and stay there) are THOSE people,  who belong there anyway."

Likely Hopkins County isn't large enough to get a guarantee.  What they do get is the equivalent of found-money,  the Sheriff (there was an AG Opinion in the 90's, commissions were paid directly to the Sheriff,  not the County Commissioners) can do with it what they please.  Private prisons aren't what they once were.  But,  they usually had the wisdom to have local government build the prisons,  they had no capital outlay,  they would contract to operate them,  with all kinds of exits in case the demand wasn't there.  Dozens of Counties now stuck with hundreds of beds that are empty.

The people who can raise Hell and get changes made are those who can bail Jr. out.


"College men,  from LSU.  Went in dumb.  Come out dumb, too!" -- Randy Newman.

Now Trending

Dallas Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...