Vogel settles suit that claimed he stole $2 million related to Sigillito scheme

Dec 5, 2014, 2:51pm CST Updated: Dec 5, 2014, 3:02pm CST

Send this to a friend

Paul Vogel

Digital Producer- St. Louis Business Journal
Email  |  Twitter  |  Facebook

Paul Vogel and the investment firm he helped found have reached a settlement agreement with 11 investors in Martin Sigillito's massive Ponzi scheme.

Terms of the settlement are confidential.

The investors, led by Phil Rosemann, whose family once owned Eureka-based RotoMetrics, argued in an August lawsuit that Vogel, former chief executive of Enterprise Trust Co. and current CEO of Argos Partners, participated in the scheme, stealing more than $2 million for his failing residential real estate development at the Lake of the Ozarks. Vogel, who has declined numerous interview requests, previously denied the claims, pointing to his family's investments in the scheme.

But the plaintiffs' lawyers, including Sebastian Rucci, countered that Vogel stole more than his family invested. Rucci had demanded $4.3 million from Vogel and Argos.

"We got a good settlement for these people," Rucci said, adding that it was important it come now, before Argos' legal costs ate into its insurance policy.

He also said many of the victims are older, and need money now. Waiting on a potential judgment at trial, Rucci said, would have taken much longer.

One of Vogel's attorney's, Dan Tobben of Danna McKitrick, said documents related to the settlement were being finalized, and that Vogel and Argos would not comment.

The August suit, brought by Rosemann, Suzanne Glisson, Lewis Vollmar, Lewis and Marjorie and Mark Bernstein, Brad Werner and their various corporations and trusts, was the second against Vogel; he and Enterprise Bank settled similar claims in 2013.

The latest suit said Vogel was aware of Sigillito's scheme because, among other things, he completed a due diligence report for it, easing investors' concerns. Vogel, the suit said, traveled to England to examine properties that were central to the scheme, in which investments were sought for loans to Distinctive Properties of London. That entity was used to acquire options on agricultural land, obtain re-zoning for the land, exercise the options and sell the land at a profit of more than 15 percent for investors. But, the land was not worth that much, and investors were paid using money from new investors.

  • Page 1
  • 2
|View All

Comments

If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.

Inside the St. Louis Business Journal

`Irrational Exuberance’: Are We in That Stage Again?

Most Popular

  • Slideshows
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Emailed
  • Mobile

Elizabeth Lampe

UPBrand Collaborative

John Mills

BKD, LLP

Kate Sappington

The Keane Insurance Group

Joan Crenshaw

BKD, LLP

Jack McKenna

Roeslein & Associates

Jonathan Shulan

Missouri Chamber Music Festival

Post a Job View All Jobs

© 2014 American City Business Journals. All rights reserved. Use of this Site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement (updated 12/23/13) and Privacy Policy (updated 12/23/13).

Your California Privacy Rights.

The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of American City Business Journals.

Ad Choices.