you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

the state deemed were important

This is as far as I was able to read.

Thanks for your response nonetheless.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The state has never deemed "what" content was important, just that access was important. Sesame Street, Mr. Rogers, and blues before dawn aren't still around because the state says so, they are around because that is what is successful in a public model.

if you disagree with the reasoning of the state funding access to media, I can accept and respect that. I just hope that you do not write off my thoughts on this matter over the subjectivity of content.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You have no incentive to do real investigative journalism that undermines your public funding.

NPR is beholden to the state and whether you admit it or not, Public Radio is nothing more than propaganda for continuing government corruption.

I used to love public radio until I learned that it's just a 'front' for a advocating more of the same - the same that's enabling corporations to infiltrate the government and write special interest laws that undermine the constitution. You can accept that, but I can't respect it.