The Tres Pendejos: Adios to Larry Agran, Curt Pringle and Miguel Pulido

Larry-Agran-Meranda_carter.jpg
Meranda Carter/OC Weekly
Adios, Agran!

In June 2004, the Orange County Register published an article that was simultaneously preposterous yet prophetic. It was a profile of three mayors--Curt Pringle of Anaheim, Miguel Pulido of Santa Ana, and Irvine's Larry Agran--who had become what reporter Jeff Rowe called "the most unusual of political allies." The story hailed their partnership as a lesson for a county that had moved past suburbia and needed new ideas to govern the post-modern metropolis OC is today.

I remember reading the story in the Weekly world headquarters with my colleagues, Nick Schou and R. Scott Moxley, and howling in laughter. Agran, Pringle and Pulido--who called themselves the Tres Caballeros--were the most powerful mayors in Orange County history, bucking a politician's usual trajectory to Sacramento or Washington, D.C., to forge local machines that were reshaping their cities in their own image. The article dripped with their smugness and came with a photo of the three, all suited and proper and ready to conquer the county. Each mayor was a personal bugaboo of ours--Pringle for Nick, Agran for Scott, and Pulido for me--and now they were aligned together in OC's own Axis of Evil, ready for their comeuppance.

It would take a decade, but the Tres Pendejos are finally leaving, brought down by their own hubris.

On Nov. 4, voters in Anaheim, Irvine and Santa Ana rejected their respective city's longtime boss. Anaheimers overwhelmingly re-elected Mayor Tom Tait, a Pringle ally turned foe, as well as knocked out one of Pringle's favored council members. While Miguel Pulido won re-election for a 10th time, his council slate failed to win a single seat, leaving him more isolated than ever. And, in the most shocking development, Agran finished fourth, two years after he failed to win the mayoral seat; it's the first time he has been swept out of office since 1990.

Each left a legacy--Ozymandias comes to mind.

No one fell further from grace than Agran. Once the county's progressive lion, 2004 had Agran prepping to unveil his lasting legacy: the Great Park, a public-works project to be built on the former El Toro Marine Corps Air Station that OC business leaders and politicians had long slated to turn into an international airport. Agran created a grassroots coalition that not only beat back the airport, but also put forth his audacious plan as an alternative. Impressed by Agran's heroic efforts, county voters gave him carte blanche to create the Great Park, and Agran promised everything from man-made canyons and museums to a board of directors, on which Pulido earned a plum seat.

But Agran was also sowing the seeds for his own demise. Contracts for projects and consulting were being drafted for Agran confidantes, deals the old Agran would've lambasted as political cronyism at its worst. The onetime slow-growth advocate was already in bed with the Irvine Co., the very group that had helped push Agran out of office in 1990. Agran's goodwill in Irvine was such that he and his allies long tricked Irvine voters into dismissing the ever-louder dissenters as spouting partisan lies. But the truth won out through the years: As it stands, $200 million has been spent on a project the vast majority of Orange Countians still know only for a hot-air balloon in the shape of an orange.

By the end, many of Agran's former progressive allies had turned on him, disgusted by his increasing paranoia and pettiness. As a result, Agran was abandoned: His longtime 3-2 council majority became a minority in 2012; with Agran's loss last week, his sole acolyte on the council is the ever-screeching Beth Krom.

The same Macbeth turn happened to Pulido, Santa Ana's mayor since 1994 who has served on the City Council since 1986, when he ran as a radical reformer ready to take down City Hall. Instead, Pulido used his position to become part of the city's power structure, embarking on projects that glamorized the city--a gentrified downtown, an expanded Bowers Museum, a beautified Bristol Street that kept Mater Dei High School happy--while ignoring the town's increasingly restless community groups. Candidates who opposed Pulido's policies had a habit of getting either recalled from office or arrested by the feds--and Pulido's influence grew.

That banana republic way of rule has now come back to haunt him. Whereas Pulido was once a political kingmaker, only one of his chosen few--Vince Sarmiento--remains on the council. In 2012, Santa Ana passed a measure that imposed term limits on the mayor's seat, a direct hit designed by Pulido's opponents on the council and the activists he once ignored. And his love of serving as a go-between for people wanting to do business in Santa Ana--usually with Pulido getting a consultant's fee--led to a city investigation that says he should be charged with a felony for conflict of interest.

The most unlikely collapse, however, belongs to Pringle. He pulled off a masterful coup in 2002, when he successfully ran for Anaheim mayor by making peace with Latino leaders who hadn't forgiven the former Speaker of the Assembly for his role in an infamous 1989 poll-guard scandal. As late as 2006, those leaders still loved Pringle; no less a figurehead than longtime Los Amigos head Amin David told the Los Angeles Times he wanted Pringle to continue leading Anaheim because "he cares about doing something different and decent for the working class."

(Meanwhile, Pringle was creating a developer-friendly council--including a Democrat, Jordan Brandman--that was signing off on deals favoring the downtown and resort areas at the expense of the rest of the city and prepping Anaheim for a high-speed rail project that Pringle just happened to head for years.)

Pringle was termed out of office in 2010, but he never left Anaheim City Hall, as his firm's lobbying and his council members served as a shadow government. But Pringle's plans backfired dramatically. His handpicked successor, Tait, turned on him, arguing his predecessor's policies were terrible for the city's financial future. And 2012 brought forth the double blow of Pringle's former Latino allies suing the city to create district elections, as well as anti-police brutality riots; the two developments exposed for the world to see what Pringle's fruits had borne for Anaheim.

Yes, Pringle's favored candidates maintain a majority on the City Council. But the writing is already on the wall for his regime. Anaheim voters approved measures that, in 2016, will increase the size of the council to seven and force candidates to live in the districts they'll represent, severely diluting Pringle's power base. The rank crassness of Pringle's associates woke up a previously dormant Anaheim voter base that refuses to allow his tentacles to choke Anaheim much longer--just as with his amigos Agran and Pulido in their former fiefdoms.

It's not known if the three still talk as much as they did in 2004, when OC was theirs for the taking. But in that 2004 Register story, Agran told Rowe he felt the Tres Caballeros would inspire the county to follow their version of "innovative governance."

Agran called it a decade before it happened: The Tres Pendejos' governance inspired voters to finally sweep them out of office. See you at the Catch, pendejos!

Follow OC Weekly on Twitter @ocweekly or on Facebook!



Advertisement

My Voice Nation Help
8 comments
RATEROS
RATEROS

Pulido is not going anywhere.  He leaves when he wants as long as you have a team of mental midgets on the City Council or retreads like Lou Correa gunning for him. 

I'm glad you point out the gentrification going on in the downtown town.  Even the progressive Chicanos and Labor types in SA don't seem to mind that Mexicans are being displaced as long as they can drink their craft beers.  So, Miguel isn't the only problem.  Having pollitos on the Council that take their orders from a few property owners and developers is an even bigger problem.

artpedroza
artpedroza

Pulido created Benavides too.

One reason Pulido keeps on winning is the terrible opponents he has been running against since Al Amezcua ran in 2010.

Pulido tells me that he likely will not run again in 2016. I hope we find better candidates to replace him than Amezcua, Benavides and Roman Reyna.

rexmiller2012
rexmiller2012

"Tait, turned on him, arguing his predecessor's policies were terrible for the city's financial future." 


If that were true, why is the city financially stable? Tait was never able to enact financial reform, yet we still have a city open for business. Tait was wrong on this.


"Pringle's former Latino allies suing the city to create district elections, as well as anti-police brutality riots; the two developments exposed for the world to see what Pringle's fruits had borne for Anaheim"


Districts are a power play for certain Latino individuals with a political agenda. Disney supported this because it will help drive even more money into the resort district. This was very bad for Anaheim, especially the lower class. Not sure how you can blame those "riots" on Pringle. It had more to do with agitation from outside, LA based interests and poor coverage by the OCW. Further, it also became very clear in the follow up investigations had brought to light that the issue is more gang related than police brutality related.

DavidZenger
DavidZenger

@rexmiller2012 No, once he got in office Tait realized the City was bleeding red ink. 

The policies that are terrible for the City are the tax kickbacks, City Charter end runs on bond issuances, and of course the proposed massive giveaway to Arte Moreno for future development of the stadium property that have been pursued by Pringle's mannequins on the city council.

rexmiller2012
rexmiller2012

@DavidZenger so what policies has he changed? none, yet the city budget is fine. The "giveaway" to Arte Moreno, I agree, is not favorable, but even if the land was "given away" it's still going to generate increased sales tax revenue. It's clearly a financial positive for the city.

rexmiller2012
rexmiller2012

@GustavoArellano I just looked up Los Amigos. Established in 1978, claims to represent the interests of the largest minority group in OC, but has a barely functional website? Los Amigos is clearly a platform for a few politically motivated individuals looking for a career in public office. They don't care about poor mexicans.

DavidZenger
DavidZenger

@rexmiller2012 @DavidZenger Nobody said Tait changed any policies. He can't, by himself. He opposes the crony capitalism that  rewards a handful of Pringle clients. There is more to governance than having a balanced budget. A lot more.


And frankly, I don't know if the budget is "fine," since the City uses it like a perpetual shell game with various enterprise activities.  I do know that the City is ripping off utility rate payers to backfill the GF which isn't a good practice.


But back to Moreno: I'm glad that you, too, believe the deal(s) with Moreno are "unfavorable." You may be interested to know that the way the MOU was structured it left the door wide open for Moreno to receive tax increment from future development.  And of course I find the de-linking of the stadium lease to the land lease ($1 per year!) an appallingly negligent proposal.


Though the MOUs are now dead I notice you still refer to the deal as a going concern. Are you expecting a miraculous post-election resurrection? I am.






Now Trending

Anaheim Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

Fashion

General

Loading...