Oil & Gas Trouble In Texas Ranchland: Whose Road Is It?

Joel Rodriguez is the County Commissioners Court Judge in LaSalle County

Joel Rodriguez is the County Commissioners Court Judge in LaSalle County

The Railroad Commission of Texas will meet Monday morning to consider an issue of huge importance to landowners across Texas. It has to do with how the state oversees energy companies that need access to private land. At issue at the hearing will be pipelines for oil & gas.

But there are other land use issues emerging in the hot plays including the Eagle Ford shale of South Texas. One local dispute involves one particular county road, Hindes Road. It’s in LaSalle County, which lies halfway between San Antonio and the Mexican border.

“When it rains, it has standing water and mud holes where you need four-wheel-drive,” said Steven Mafrige, who lives on a nearby ranch.

Ranchers have always shared the land with energy companies: They make money together. But this oil & gas boom is like nothing ever seen here before. And maybe that’s why this little road has become a source of conflict.

“Every rancher, landowner on Hindes Road has signed a petition,” said Mafrige.

They’ve signed a petition against the county taking over Hindes road. Because while the first few miles of the road are already county-owned, the road comes to a locked gate and the rest continues on private property.

But why so much concern?

The private road bisects land holding a growing number oil wells.

Earlier this month at a district court hearing in the LaSalle County courthouse, attorneys for the Hindes family argued against the county taking over what they said was a private road belonging to the Hindeses.

But LaSalle County’s lawyers argued the county had a right to make the road public. Otherwise, the county said it’d be like allowing landowners to act as toll bridge operators, charging all those trucks to get to the oil and gas that benefits the public.

The county’s lawyer, Chris Johns, told News 88.7 outside court he wasn’t alleging that the Hindeses were actually doing that.

“We’re still deciding and analyzing whether it’s been a county road or a public road from a long time back,” said Johns.

Also attending the hearing was Joel Rodriguez, the LaSalle County Commissioners Court Judge.

“The thing is your county changes. You see all this development? It’s changing, access changes,” said Rodriguez.

Deciding who gets access is at the root of an increasing number of land disputes in Texas where drilling has surged.

Eric Opiela is a lawyer whose family ranches in South Texas and is a member of the South Texans’ Property Rights Association. He recently ran unsuccessfully for Texas Agriculture Commissioner.

“If it’s your property you have the right to control access as you see fit and charge for that access,” said Opiela.

He said it’s also about preserving a way of life where your land … is your land.

“It’s not that landowners want ever increasing amounts of money as some people try to characterize it. They want to make sure they can continue a way of life that they’ve had in their families for generations.”

Comments

  • AIC

    Chris Johns is wrong. The oil and gas industry is a private and HIGHLY profitable business venture. Justifying the taking of private real estate for oil and gas production by saying it “benefits the public” is like using eminent domain to build an Apple store. Sure iphones benefit the public, but the corporation that is making and selling them needs to incur ALL expenses of such. And the terms of the rent should be negotiated by the property owner.

    I have nothing against the oil and gas industry (I even own some oil stock) but they are no different. If they need a road to conduct their operations, then they should negotiate it’s use and maintenance with the OWNER. Not a government official.

    • samhall

      What you say is true, however The Texas Railroad Commission was created because the railroad, a private business, was overcharging farmers and ranchers for carrying their products. Regulation is a good thing against monopolies and if you control the only access road, you have a monopoly.

  • otc

    One property right that is not mentioned in this article is the right of unrestricted access to one’s property. No one in this country would buy property without having access to that property. The disputed road that the Hindes family claims to own provides access to ranchers that live along that road. Yet the Hindes family now wants to charge their fellow ranchers a road usage fee to gain access to their own property. That’s just plain nonsense. Now ranchers like the Hindes justify this practice with flowery phrases like “property rights” or “preserving a way of life.” Most people would call this robbery without a gun. I always thought there was a friendly rapport among ranchers, especially in Texas. But clearly this rapport disappears if there is a dollar to be made. Unfortunately, that’s what this oil bonanza in South Texas is doing, turning landowners against each other.

    This article is clearly biased toward those ranchers like the Hindes. I certainly hope Mr. Fehling writes a follow up article about those ranchers who signed a petition to condemn the Hindes road.

About StateImpact

StateImpact seeks to inform and engage local communities with broadcast and online news focused on how state government decisions affect your lives.
Learn More »

Economy
Education