• Thu
  • Oct 30, 2014
  • Updated: 8:44am
NewsChina Insider
AVIATION

Emergency on smog-diverted Chinese plane as two airports refuse landing: report

PUBLISHED : Wednesday, 29 October, 2014, 1:46pm
UPDATED : Wednesday, 29 October, 2014, 4:17pm
 

Chinese aviation authorities have defended their handling of a Beijing-bound passenger aircraft's diversion to an eastern city after a newspaper alleged that the flight's pilots had been forced to declare an emergency as its fuel ran low. 

Pilots of the Beijing-bound China Eastern Airlines MU750 declared an emergency when smog forced the plane to divert and it was refused permission to land by two alternative airports, the Changjiang Commercial News reported on Wednesday. 

Flight MU750 from Asahikawa, Japan was unable to land in Beijing on Saturday evening due to low visibility caused by heavy air pollution that had enveloped the city, it said. 

The pilots of the plane, an Airbus A321 carrying nearly 200 passengers, then requested to divert to Jinan and Qingdao airports in the eastern province of Shandong. But the request was denied by local air control, who said the airports could not allow the plane to land unless its fuel was running low, the newspaper said. 

The plane was then forced to keep circling in the air east of Beijing. It was finally permitted to land at Qingdao Liuting International Airport when its fuel ran low after circling in the air for 40 minutes. The pilots declared an emergency as the plane flew towards Qingdao, the report said.

When the plane finally touched the ground at Qingdao airport after midnight, it only had enough fuel to sustain flying for another half an hour, the report said.

The report cited aviation experts as saying “the amount wouldn’t be enough for it to make a second landing attempt”.

Qingdao airport did not respond to the Post's enquires for comment on Wednesday.

The Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC) said the flight never requested to land at Jinan airport in a statement on Wednesday afternoon.

“Qingdao Liuting International Airport granted the plane's landing request despite its parking spots being strained,” the statement said, citing CAAC’s investigation of the incident.   

It added that when plane landed at Qingdao, it still had more fuel than the minimal level required by China Eastern Airlines’ Operation Manual.

China Eastern Airlines denied any abnormal situation had occurred during the flight when contacted by the South China Morning Post on Wednesday.

A spokesman said “the cabin crew closely following standard procedures” and “made landing safely." But he said that he was not authorised to elaborate on other details mentioned in the report.

The report has drawn criticism from members of the public who accused air traffic control of neglecting passenger safety.

The aviation channel of news portal Sina.com.cn said Jinan and Qingdao airports would only grant MU750 landing permission on the condition it was running low on fuel because they were already fully occupied at the time. Under civil aviation procedure they could only accept landing requests from flights that were running low on fuel.

Heavy air pollution in Beijing and its surrounding areas severely disrupted flights to and from the city at the weekend when the city’s Air Quality Index surged to 470, or “severely polluted” on Saturday night.

Visibility was down to 200 metres at Beijing Capital International Airport, making it difficult for aircraft to land safely and forcing several flights to land at nearby alternative airports.

Some 60 flights to Beijing were diverted in a two-hour period from 11pm on Saturday.

Aeroflot flight 200 from Moscow circled for 90 minutes above Beijing as it waited for a cold front to disperse smog and raise visibility levels. Meanwhile, Hainan Airlines flight 7602 from Shanghai circled over Beijing for 90 minutes on Saturday night waiting for the smog to disperse and eventually had to divert to Jinan when its fuel ran low.

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

Comments

KwunTongBypass
Standard procedure. The author and SCMP prove once more their ignorance, and that there is absolutely no quality control over what is published!
baysidedweller
I think the story is "much ado about nothing".
"The report cited aviation experts as saying “the amount wouldn’t be enough for it to make a second landing attempt”." The article cited the plane had 30 mins of fuel left after landing at TAO. Here it is not clear as to whether "second landing attempt is at the same airport or different airport. Assuming second landing attempt is from TAO to TNA, the distance between TAO and TNA is about 290km, so CAAC's statement that "when plane landed at Qingdao, it still had more fuel than the minimal level required by China Eastern Airlines’ Operation Manual." probably is correct.
As mentioned in the article, both TAO and TNA are swamped with planes. Diverting the plane to these destinations immediately is just adding unnecessary work load to the personnel directing traffic and can even be more dangerous for the existing planes in the area.
Visibility can be finicky, sometimes smog clears up and provide a window of opportunity for the plane to land. So holding with ample fuel and hope for a "break" is not necessarily unwise.
Holding in the air is commonly done and is not dangerous provided separation of planes in the air are done properly.
peye3515
Only the pilots and the people directing the planes know what really took place and why. What the papers reporting is quite often just BS distribution.
53f6bb39-f430-40d9-ad32-74390a320969
What a bunch of idiots.
ohyeahar
I’m not sure what’s worse. The pollution that’s so severe that it interferes with flights. Or the fact that there’s some idiotic rule that states a plane can’t divert to another airport for landing unless it’s running out of fuel.

In this case, it’s even ironic. Pollution caused the plane to divert to an alternative airport. That airport decided that before they can allow the plane to land, the plane must fly in circles and burn up most of its fuel creating more pollution.
superbuilder205
I totally agree with you
 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or