Medical Marijuana's Promise of Relief Lures Desperate Parents and Patients to Flee Texas

Categories: Cover Story

Some of the effective compounds in marijuana are already being either used or mimicked in pharmaceuticals. Take the drug Marinol, for example, which uses a synthetic form of THC as its active ingredient.

Marketed as a treatment for the anorexia caused by AIDS, Marinol was originally placed in Schedule II but was moved to Schedule III in 1999. It is now prescribed as a pharmaceutical drug, and there have been a handful of overdose deaths related to its use.

Marinol's patent has expired, which means that should cannabis get a schedule change from the folks in charge, generic Marinol could easily be made with just good old-fashioned THC. It is, after all, what they were trying to replicate in the first place.

There's also the curious case of Sativex. Approved for use in the U.K. in June 2010, the mouth spray treats neuropathic pain and spasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis and provides analgesic treatment in adult patients with advanced cancer who experience moderate to severe pain.

It's also the first pharmaceutical to contain THC and CBD, which are derived from the natural cannabis plant.

A patent has been granted for Sativex in the United States, and the FDA has given its "Fast Track" designation to Sativex for the treatment of pain in patients with advanced cancer, which will expedite review of the drug.

The development of these cannabis-based pharmaceuticals is an interesting turn of events, considering the nation's staunch history of opposition to THC.

There is plenty of evidence that lawmakers have been aware of cannabis' medical properties for quite some time, even if they're hesitant to admit it. This evidence only furthers the frustration felt by parents.

The federal government has been growing medical marijuana at the University of Mississippi since 1974. That school is the only DEA-registered cultivator of marijuana in this country. While a handful of other facilities around the nation are approved to do research, all the cannabis must come from the federal grow operation in Mississippi.

Most of the weed grown at Ole Miss is distributed to scientists for investigations ranging from chemical research to pre-clinical toxicology in animals to clinical work on humans. Some of that federally funded weed will never touch the tables in research labs, though, and will instead be pinched off and sent in little tin cans to regular citizens.

The government began sending monthly shipments of cannabis to a handful of patients after the 1976 lawsuit by Robert Randall, a Washington, D.C., man afflicted with glaucoma. Randall successfully employed the little-used common law doctrine of necessity to defend himself against criminal charges of marijuana cultivation in a case known as U.S. v. Randall, and on November 24, 1976, federal Judge James Washington ruled that Randall's use of marijuana constituted a "medical necessity."

Concurrent with this judicial determination, federal agencies responded to a May 1976 petition filed by Randall and began providing the glaucoma-inflicted patient with licit, FDA-approved access to government supplies of medical marijuana. A handful of others followed suit, and the National Institute on Drug Abuse began supplying cannabis to seven patients under the "compassionate use" act the following year as part of the lawsuit settlement by the Department of Health and Human Services.

While the program allowed for that handful of patients to receive -- and legally smoke -- tins full of rolled joints from the federal government, it was ultimately limited to those original patients. In 1992, at the height of the AIDS epidemic, a slew of new applicants tried to join, and the federal government was urged to make room for more patients. The administration of George H.W. Bush closed the program to all new applicants, and it remains closed to this day.

Those tins of medical marijuana still roll out each month, though, and their recipients are free to smoke anytime, anywhere. They are exempt from marijuana laws.


< Previous>

Advertisement

My Voice Nation Help
24 comments
imgadgett
imgadgett

trust me they are fleeing the blue states as well. especially the cbd only states.
  Extremist prohibitionists come from every political spectrum.  Here in Mn...Republican Pawlenty veto'd a bill in 2009, and recently after many threats of veto Democrat Dayton had a bunch of cop union creeps negotiate an untenable expensive and laughable law if not so sad, that will cost the MN taxpayers millions while only providing about 5000 people (their estimate) any help.  approximately 38000 suffering people were thrown under the bus so to speak and they even had dialog to exclude cancer patients at different stages, and suggestions of limiting help by age...meaning, in one respect that when your epileptic kid turned 18 they could be removed from the program.  The law is biased and i think it may be discriminatory against adults.  It has people who need whole plant cannabis to vaporize hash oil, a sometimes dangerous and/ or expensive alternative to vaporizing the plant material.  The child might have two parents but only one could be certified for dispensing the medication, and that parent would have to pay a high cost for doing.  Like home jail for that one parent for a medication less harmful then aspirin.  In MN if your caught with less then an ounce of cannabis, you pay the fine and go on your merry way.  If your on the program and you get caught with any amount of plant cannabis, you face 90 days in jail, a 3000 dollar fine and permanent removal from the program.  Based on those figures, I sincerely would think any medical patient that can add would certainly not subject themselves to that program, and those people would simply not join.  If anyone thinks the cops wrote it that way so that MN could do anything more then try to get a cbd only law passed in MN for minor children because the governor was losing political points needs to see Gov Cristy for a card to cross the bridge.

healingstonetherapy1
healingstonetherapy1

I'm the MN mom commented in this article. Yes people from legalized states are finding the laws so restricted they too have to relocate. I really could go on and on with all kinds of bitching... but I really just want to reach out to the mother this article was written about. Please feel free to contact me via Facebook. It may not always seem like it, but the Lord will see you through this.

techsofjsc
techsofjsc

As a 30 year native texan and soon to be refugee aswell (fleeing because i have been jailed twice for possession of under an ounce) I am ex active duty military with PTSD and a few other ailments that cannabis really helps with. TEXAS DOES NOT CARE ABOUT CANNABIS OR HELPING ANYONE. THAT IS THE TRUTH. I CHALLENGE TEXAS TO PROVE ME OTHERWISE BUT SERIOUSLY DOUBT THAT DAY WILL EVER COME.. Its very oppressive in the south still and terrible whats happening down here!> 

In case no one believes me.. heres a clip of a news article that we read daily here. Read and weep. 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/20/jacob-lavoro_n_5353696.html

(thats right.. he was facing life recently for bronwies!!) 


RTGolden1
RTGolden1 topcommenter

It is beyond stupid that marijuana is still illegal, anywhere.

frankmockery
frankmockery

I don't like Texas,smug,clueless & condescending right-wing Texas politicians or the ignorant inbred Texas imbeciles who voted for them !!! If you wanted to give America an enema you certainly couldn't pick a better place than Houston to stick the nozzle because Texan's are so full of shit !!! I would encourage all intelligent Americans to BOYCOTT TEXAS, !!!  Don't visit there,don't do business there & don't buy anything made there !!! Voter suppression my ass !!! Let's bleed the red out of Texas once & for all & make Texas a much more pleasing shade of blue !!!

TheRuddSki
TheRuddSki topcommenter

Very interesting headline. I was just wondering if people are "fleeing" the other 27 states which have no med weed, or just the red states.

JFPO
JFPO

Thank God we have Republicans leading the charge to fix this!

JustSaying
JustSaying

I actually know someone right now that is dealing with this. His mother has cancer and the chemo/radiation treatments aren't doing anything but making what are potentially her last months worse. Then he reads about the remarkable success of Simpson Oil (cannabis oil) and wants to get some for his mother. A non-resident can buy 1/4 ounce of recreational weed per day in Colorado but they can't buy anything that is labeled as medicinal grade. So that means he would have to move his sick mother to Colorado, establish residency, and then apply for her medicinal card. At the same time, Simpson Oil is really easy to make at home as long as you can find a source for a high grade Indica strain. But, as we all know, if you get caught with that you are going to jail for a very long time. They don't care that you are making a concentrated oil for potentially life saving medication. They will send you up the river for possession with intent to distribute with that kind of weight.

bvckvs2
bvckvs2

Unfortunately, Democrats don't have time to deal with this issue.  They're too busy fighting for tax breaks for sexual deviants - and to hell with folks who need this medicine.

Montemalone
Montemalone topcommenter

Pharma is the main reason it's still Schedule I.

Free and legal weed would put a huge dent in all sorts of drug profits, everything from aspirin to Xanax.

Not to mention the industrial hemp products that are effectively banned, even though hemp literally grows like a weed.

imgadgett
imgadgett

@TheRuddSki trust me they are fleeing the blue states as well. especially the cbd only states.

TheRuddSki
TheRuddSki topcommenter

@JFPO

Dunno about Texas (being primitive and all), but many conservatives, including the late Bill Buckley, have no problem with legal weed, recreational or medical.

WakeUp
WakeUp

@bvckvs2 Seriously? You're blaming Democrats for not legalizing medical cannabis?


You haven't been paying one ounce of attention, have you?

bvckvs2
bvckvs2

@Montemalone 

There's no indication that they've ever taken a stance against it and they don't have any reason to.  They're always happy to add another item to their catalog of products.  It's just one more thing from which they can profit .

The greater opposition comes from religious leaders.  They profit greatly from desperate people who are suffering and dying without medicine.  If more folks start enjoying the spiritual and physical benefits of pot, they stand to lose a lot of income.

TheRuddSki
TheRuddSki topcommenter

@imgadgett

People "leave" blue states, but they "flee" red states.

JFPO
JFPO

They make policy in Texas.

bvckvs2
bvckvs2

@WakeUp @bvckvs2 

I'm blaming the gay marriage and abortion advocates for taking the focus away from MANY important issues - not just this one.

By focusing entirely on abortion and sexual deviance - they give most folks no reason to support them.

Republicans aren't so much WINNING races in Texas, as Democrats are LOSING them.

WakeUp
WakeUp

@bvckvs2 @Montemalone wrong. they're happy to add items that they can patent and exclusively deal. 


They can't do that with a plant that anyone can grow at home.

bvckvs2
bvckvs2

@WakeUp @bvckvs2 @Montemalone 

They do it with poppies.  And that's just for opiates.  Many drugs come from plants - if you know how to process them.

I think you're referring to recreational marijuana use - which can make use of unrefined material.  Medical marijuana requires a more delicate hand.

Now Trending

Dallas Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...