After Banning Fracking, Denton Braces for Backlash from Drillers, a Bush and its Own Lawyer

DentonFracking.jpg
Rich Anderson
Denton residents passed a fracking ban, but now it's up to to city leaders to defend it against the powerful oil and gas industry.
Last week, Denton became the first city in the state to pass a citywide ban on fracking. Voters approved the ban in a landslide, with 59 percent in favor of the ban and 41 percent against, after more than five years of struggle between anti-fracking activists and the energy industry.

See also: Denton Fracking Ban Passes, But for How Long?

Now comes the backlash. The General Land Office and the Texas Oil and Gas Association are the first, so far, to file suits against the city. Railroad Commission Chairwoman Christi Craddick is also hinting at legal action, and has announced her agency will continue to grant drilling permits to companies in Denton.

Texas Land Commissioner Jerry Patterson "has a fiduciary responsibility to protect the assets of the permanent school fund. And he feels a ban could affect the value of the schoolkids' assets," says Jim Suydam, a spokesman for the General Land Office. "Commissioner Patterson is still commissioner until January. He said he would do it [file suit] before hand, and he did it."

The city may also face a challenge from within. Activists say Denton's city attorney, Anita Burgess, who should help the city defend the ban in court, was opposed to the measure. Sharon Wilson, an employee of Earthworks and an avid blogger on the Denton anti-fracking movement, says that while she hasn't spoken directly to Burgess, her support for the oil and gas industry is widely whispered throughout Denton. Cathy McMullen, president of Frack Free Denton, tells the same story.

City spokeswoman Lindsey Baker declined to address Burgess' stance on the ban but stressed that Burgess would stay on the case. "She is first and foremost a public attorney for the City of Denton and here to defend any ordinances," Baker says. "She is extremely neutral, and her focus is on the facts."

Still, the city will likely be bringing in outside counsel. Terry Morgan, a Dallas-based attorney who focuses on land use and zoning, has confirmed that he has been in conversation with city attorneys. "I've represented the city on gas well matters for quite some time," he says. No word yet on whether he has been officially signed on as an attorney for these lawsuits.

Anti-fracking activists insist the ordinance was thoroughly screened by lawyers before it went to the ballot, and that is not only constitutional but defensible in court. Still, Denton will be defending it against attacks from the almighty power of the state oil and gas industry -- including that of the newly elected land commissioner, and presidential legacy, George P. Bush.

The GLO is in a time of intense uncertainty as it transitions from a Patterson to Bush administration, and Suydam says he cannot know whether or not Bush will continue action against Denton. But Bush would have a strong interest in preventing the ban. In addition to previous membership on the board of directors of Arabella Exploration, a Midland-based fracking research and development company, Bush was endorsed by the Texas Oil and Gas PAC and received thousands of campaign dollars from various industry groups across the state. The TXOGA lawsuit against Denton was filed through the law firm Baker Botts, whose partner James A. Baker III -- yes, that James Baker -- gave Bush $10,000 for his campaign.

In other words, not only will Denton face the all-encompassing wrath of the oil and gas industries in the state, they will also face that of the Bush family and the seemingly endless supply of dollars and outside donors these entities possess. Dentonites, meanwhile, will be boarding their windows against the encroaching storm, hoping their vote, and the arguments of an ambivalent city attorney, hold up in the courtroom against the Goliath industry.

"It's the city who is on the line now, the citizens have done their part," Ed Soph says, who spearheads the Denton Drilling Awareness Group. "Let's hope that the city will do its part to defend what the citizens want. It's that simple."


Advertisement

My Voice Nation Help
44 comments
rogjohns64
rogjohns64

Why cant we just cut the gas off to Denton? 

paulpsycho78
paulpsycho78

so called replublican conservatives are suing what the people voted in....your government is against you

dingo
dingo

So there is no solid evidence that the Denton City attorney is doing anything less than providing a 100 percent effort in her professional duties serving in an advisory role on this issue toward the best interests of the city but lets imply otherwise because, hey that's what we do best here right?

tronsmart21
tronsmart21

Why do journalist and supporters of the ban pretend like they are fighting an industry when the downfall to the effectiveness of their ban is STATE LAW?


The City of Denton's ban violates Texas Statute, The Texas Constitution, The United States Constitution and undermines the authority and jurisdiction given to the TRCC to regulate the oil and gas industry as set forth by The Texas Constitution.


The powers given to the TRCC are outside of the powers and jurisdiction of the State Legislature. Therefore home rule cities like Denton also do not possess the authority to ban industry processes. 


It really is just a waste of time and money on the part of voters and city council. The only thing good coming from this is that a lot of liberals are learning for the first time that we don't live in a mob rule country (democracy), we live in a Constitutional Republic. We don't just take away people's rights away with a torches and pitchfork mentality. 

What the City of Denton attempted to do is block off private property from the record mineral owners. Cry about the wells and activity all you want, until you own all the minerals under your property, you don't get to say no.

roo_ster
roo_ster

Gah, why oh why did Texas elect another Bush to anything?  I don't care if he walks on water and teaches the fishes to speak.  I don't care if he is running versus the love child of Anton LeVay and Cthulhu.  No more Bushes in elected office!  No more MF-ing dynasties!

ColonelAngus
ColonelAngus

Backlash from a Bush can cause whiplash.

dingo
dingo

Would 'widely whispered' be the same as 'soundly surmised'?

cajunscouse9
cajunscouse9

Miss information and out right lies regarding fracking lead to ignorant people making bad decisions. Its safe. The problem is with salt water injection wells. But let's not let the truth get in the way of environmental scare mongers agenda.

Montemalone
Montemalone topcommenter

Funny how republicans are all anti-gov/pro-individual rights until it matters.

Do you think people will see that now?

I doubt it.

cody.benton
cody.benton

@pak152 f Tuesday’s fracking ban really was the result of a good number of the city’s 50,000 college students exercising their predictably left-of-center viewpoints at the ballot box, perhaps the results of this election would be easy to dismiss. Already you are seeing many among the industry and state entities writing Denton’s historic vote off as the work of an activist student population.  And most national news stories on the topic refer to Denton as “a small college town.”

We don’t yet have specific demographic information for election day voters, but given that an early voting location was on the campus of UNT and we faced all-day heavy rain showers on election day, it is safe to say the college students of Denton were more likely to early vote.

Of the roughly 15,000 early voters in the city of Denton, the average age of all voters was 51. That’s only down slightly from the 2010 midterm elections where the average age was 53.  What’s more, only 1030 of them were between the ages of 18 and 22 (the average age of college students). That’s only about 7% of all the voters (and likely to go down in percentage once the election dat voters are factored in).

That is up from 2010 when only 3.3% of the total voters were of college age.

But, and this is the most important stat, the 7% figure is still below the percentage of college age registered voters in the city of Denton – 12% of registered voters in our city are between the ages of 18-22. College students didn’t even vote in proportion to their numbers in the general registered voter population.

Here’s an additional breakdown from Devin Taylor:

The only group that showed up LESS than the 18-22′s was the 23-30′s. Over half of 70+ year olds early voted, 1 in 8 college age voters and less than 1 in 10 23-30 year olds bothered to show up. http://rodenfordenton.com/2014/11/did-a-college-town-ban-fracking/

Average Early Voter turnout 24.27%
Born after 1991 12.37%
1984-1991 9.61%
1975-1984 15.47%
1965-1974 19.26%
1955-1964 28.16%
1945-1954 44.28%
pre-1945 52.12%

AN UPDATE (11/8): After this post was written, the Denton Taxpayers for a Strong Economy put outa press release arguing that the Fracking Ban “would have failed if not for massive bloc voting by University of North Texas and Texas Woman’s University college students.” Their data is wildly inaccurate, claiming to cite voting data that doesn’t even exist such as supposed distinctions between “permanent residents” and non-permanent residents.

Fortunately, some journalists are beginning to call foul and question their analysis. Here’s a story that aired on WFAA on Friday night.



http://www.texassharon.com

cody.benton
cody.benton

@tronsmart21 you're so misinformed. first of all republicans voted on the ban too. so there's that. second of all those who neighbor the ones with the mineral rights also have whats called property values and noise ordinance issues and air quality issues. how you conveinently ignore this is telling. if you think its a slam dunk case for the industry you are sorely mistaken. texas has a winning record in regards to home rule issues in court. also:

9.  Why can’t we just ban gas well drilling?

A complete ban of drilling would result in a Texas court finding that there has been an unconstitutional taking of property in violation of the Texas Constitution.  That case has not yet been litigated in Texas, but most cities shy away from an outright ban.

10.  Gas industry representatives have asserted that the proposed ordinance is preempted by state law, meaning the City cannot regulate hydraulic fracturing. Is that true?

No. Effective 01/01/2014 the state of Texas has adopted new rules for hydraulic fracturing in Texas. Those rules are found in the Texas Administrative Code; however the new rules do not preempt municipal regulation of hydraulic fracturing. First, there is no doctrine of implied preemption under state law ( meaning that just because the State enacts legislation does not imply that a city is powerless to address the issue) and second, for any municipal regulation to be preempted by state law, the State Legislature must do so “with unmistakable clarity.” There is nothing in the new State rules that specifically preempt the City from adopting the ordinance as proposed.

lecterman
lecterman

@Montemalone Like my brother in law, who moved because there were natural gas wells being fracked a quarter of a mile from his house, because he did not want my nieces to be poisoned.


Oh, did I mention he works for a large, energy company who performs said fracking on a massive scale?

TheRuddSki
TheRuddSki topcommenter

@Montemalone

You're starting to mimic sanders with this "anti-government" stuff, but the stupid voters buy that stuff, just like they bought hopenchange.

Maybe you're thinking of anarchists?

Anyway, you know republicans are pro-money, pro-oil. Money rules.

Montemalone
Montemalone topcommenter

Oh, and wcvemail: First!

TheCredibleHulk
TheCredibleHulk topcommenter

@RTGolden1 @cajunscouse9

We had one of those GPS thingies in the car that tells you where to go and the default "voice" is that of a woman.

We nicknamed her Miss Directions.

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@TheRuddSki 

"hopenchange".

that seems to be exactly who won the vote this past week.

and the "stupid voters" as you call them will be very disappointed in a couple of years, turn and vote for the other guys.

TheRuddSki
TheRuddSki topcommenter

@mavdog

I guess you haven't seen that popular Jonathan Gruber vid yet, and missed the reference.

As for the election, it doesn't matter.

Myrna.Minkoff-Katz
Myrna.Minkoff-Katz topcommenter

@Montemalone  Speaking of that, the cats are upset about the dropping temps.  Miss U, however, has taken it as an opportunity to fashion a scrumptious little capelet, made of emerald velvet, with a hood lined in faux minerva furs.  She's sashaying around pretending to be Queen Phillipa.

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@TheRuddSki 

that Gruber video is nothing new, and if you look Gruber has never been a candidate for office.

btw are you aware that Gruber was an advisor to Romney?

and the point stands, "stupid voters" as you referred to them pulled the lever and bought "hopenchange" last week, and yes they will be disappointed.

TheRuddSki
TheRuddSki topcommenter

@mavdog

the Gruber vid is not new, but it's news.

The stupid voters started rebelling against this fraud quite some time ago, people don't like being blatantly lied to and ripped off with such arrogance.

That is why obama, who rightfully stated the election was about his "policies" was roundly bitch-slapped.

Try adding some sugar to that margarita of despair, it'll help dull the bitterness.

Oh, how'd your gal Burke do? LOL.

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@TheRuddSki 

the Gruber vid is not new, but it's news

quite the contradiction there....

my "gal Burke"? can't say that I ever gave her a second thought, don't live in WI. why do you ask, did you obsess over her?

have you looked at the approval ratings of the 2 major parties? "hopenchange". quite the merry-go-round of who gets changed.

RTGolden1
RTGolden1 topcommenter

@TheRuddSki "people don't like being blatantly lied to and ripped off with such arrogance."

Depends on the lie, and the basis of the liar's arrogance.  Also depends greatly on who benefits from the lie.  People who were tired of not seeing benefits from Bush's lies, voted in Obama.  People who are tired of Obama's lies voted in another pack of Republicans.

The more valid question is: When are all the idiot voters going to realize you won't see any change if you keep voting for Republicans or Democrats?

TheRuddSki
TheRuddSki topcommenter

@mavdog

No contradiction, Mav. Videos and such which media ignores often pop up later.

As to Burke, I seem to remember you hopefully suggesting she might win.

But hang in there, because Hillary! will be the fresh, new face of 2016.

TheRuddSki
TheRuddSki topcommenter

@RTGolden

There was no Bush v Obama, and McCain was the least-liked repub going at the time.

In 2016, I'm considering throwing my vote down a rathole. Think anyone will notice?

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@TheRuddSki 

my my, 2 and 3 year old videos that were available all this time are "news"?

I guess to people who don't follow what can be called "current events", sure.

after all there are History courses that deal with this type of stuff.

"News" is just what it means.

They had Fox News on in the gym during my workout this AM, thought it was interesting they ran the old video and used the label "Obama advisor". wonder why they didn't also label Gruber "Romney Advisor"? not so "fair and balanced" huh?

I didn't "hopefully suggest" anything about Burke, I corrected your remark by posting the polls showing it to be a dead heat.

It sure looks like Hillary will run for Pres, but things could change. I'm sure you are excited to possibly having to choose between a Clinton and a Bush...

dingo
dingo

@TheRuddSki 

It's news to me that someone would consider a newly released video depicting fraud as the basic M.O. behind the centerpiece legislation from the most transparent administration in history not to be news simply because it was recorded a year ago.

TheRuddSki
TheRuddSki topcommenter

@mavdog

You're certainly loyal, but you're behind the curve.

There's three vids now, and no, they weren't "available".

Rather than argue with you, I'll let an enthusiastic lib Obamacare supporter explain it to you. If you're still fuzzy, I can supply more links from angry democrats.

Oh, and check gallup, it seems the majority wants congress, not your guy, to set the agenda.

Have fun!

http://www.nationaljournal.com/white-house/obamacare-s-foundation-of-lies-20141112

mavdog
mavdog topcommenter

@TheRuddSki 

the 2012 appearance at Penn was on Penn's website the entire time. How do you think Weinstein found them?

really, do you think they were never shown before, and he somehow found them at a garage sale?

Why the right thinks that it's shocking that Romneys former advisor says this stuff is itself remarkable. I mean Romney pretty much said the same.

Like I said above, it's "hopenchange" version 2014. good luck with the rejection when it comes back around.

because it does, invariably. history has a way of repeating itself....

Now Trending

Dallas Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...