Back to mobile

Bills Aim to Legalize Same-Sex Marriage in Texas

by Published on
Sen. Juan “Chuy” Hinojosa, center, with his son Johnathan Weisfeld-Hinojosa and daughter, Kriselda Hinojosa.
Sen. Hinojosa
Sen. Juan “Chuy” Hinojosa, center, with his son Johnathan Weisfeld-Hinojosa and daughter, Kriselda Hinojosa.

Kriselda Hinojosa recalls how she unintentionally came out to her father in sixth grade.

“He actually saw me kissing my girlfriend at the time,” Hinojosa said. “So he caught me, but he didn’t get upset. He never yelled at me or anything. He was always very open-minded. I’ve never heard him talk bad about the LGBT community.”

Over the years, the now-32-year-old Hinojosa said, her father’s acceptance has evolved into righteous indignation over the fact that his only daughter doesn’t have equal rights.  Two years ago, Hinojosa “eloped” to Las Vegas with her girlfriend for a same-sex commitment ceremony. When she returned to Texas, it hit home for her dad that their certificate means nothing in the eyes of the state.

In 2013, Hinojosa’s father, state Sen. Juan “Chuy” Hinojosa (D-McAllen), authored a bill to legalize civil unions in Texas. And on Father’s Day this year, he penned a heartfelt pro-equality letter to his daughter that was published in newspapers statewide.

On Monday, Sen. Hinojosa took his support a step further, introducing a bill to repeal Texas’ constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage on the first day of pre-filing for the 2015 legislative session. Hinojosa’s bill, SB 98, is one of several that were set to be filed Monday that—if all were to pass—would have the combined effect of legalizing same-sex marriage in Texas pending a public vote.

“He says he’s proud of me, but I’m more proud of him,” Kriselda Hinojosa said. “He’s taking a risk, also, because he could actually lose supporters, but it doesn’t seem to phase him. He’s doing what he thinks is right.”

Rep. Garnet Coleman (D-Houston) filed a companion to Hinojosa’s bill, HJR 34, aimed at repealing the marriage amendment, which was approved by 76 percent of voters in 2005. To pass, the amendment repeal bills would need a two-thirds majority in both chambers, as well as a simple majority at the ballot box.

Meanwhile, state Rep. Rafael Anchia (D-Dallas) and Sen. Jose Rodriguez (D-El Paso) were set to file legislation Monday that would undo Texas’ statutory bans on same-sex marriage, which passed in 2003. Anchia’s bill is HB 130, and Rodriguez’s measure was piggy-backed on Hinojosa’s SB 98. The statutory changes would have no impact until the constitutional amendment is repealed.

LGBT advocates acknowledge that the marriage-equality bills’ chances of success are slim to none in the GOP-dominated Legislature. But their introduction on the first day of pre-filing, coordinated by Equality Texas, could help alter the tone in advance of a session in which the LGBT community is expected to be on the defensive.

The bills also amount to a significant show of support as the issue of same-sex marriage continues to wind its way through the federal courts—an antidote, if you will, to a court brief signed by 63 Texas Republican lawmakers earlier this year that linked same-sex marriage to incest and pedophilia.

That brief was filed by the Texas Conservative Coalition in support of Republican Attorney General Greg Abbott’s appeal of a federal judge’s February decision striking down Texas’ marriage bans as unconstitutional. U.S. District Judge Orlando L. Garcia stayed his decision, and the 5th U.S. Circuit Court has scheduled oral arguments in January. However, it’s possible the U.S. Supreme Court will settle the issue before the 5th Circuit gets a chance to rule.

Last week, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld same-sex marriage bans in four states, splitting with other circuit courts that have struck down similar laws. Attorneys for same-sex couples in the 6th Circuit plan to seek a review of the decision from the Supreme Court, which could issue a nationwide ruling that brings marriage equality to Texas as early as mid-2015.

Rep. Coleman, who’s filed bills to repeal Texas’ marriage amendment in every session since 2007, said Friday he’s optimistic that the high court will settle the issue once and for all.

“I have been fighting to repeal this ban ever since it passed in 2005, and it remains one of my highest priorities,” Coleman wrote. “The persistent advocacy from the LGBT community and allies have turned the tide in public opinion, and in this way we have already won: most Americans now support marriage equality (a huge turnaround in just a short period of time), and for the first time ever a recent poll found that more Texans support marriage equality than those who do not. Even the majority of young Republicans support marriage equality. When the Supreme Court has its say on this issue, it will do so in an environment that already supports marriage equality.”

  • don76550

    No way real Texans will support these perverted bills.

    • raytheist

      You’d be amazed how many “real” Texans support equality these days. There is no rational reason gays and lesbians should not have the same rights as straight folks to marry the person of their own choice, settle down together, raise a family, and experience the ups and downs of marital life like everyone else. EVERY argument against it is either the “Eewww, ICK” argument, or the argument from religion, which has no place in civil legislature and statute.

      • 1bimbo

        homosexuality advocacy threatens religious liberty.. which one do you think takes priority in the lone star state?

        • R1o2b3

          No. Stop the persecution peddling. Discrimination under the auspices of “religious liberty”. That is the same religious argument that segregationists and racists used in the past. It is the same argument used to deny interracial marriages and a woman’s right to vote. Ignorance, bigotry, and intolerance correlate well with particular religious interpretations.

          • 1bimbo

            attempts by homosexuality advocates to try to usurp the plight of black people are not only insulting but inacurrate.. race is an immutable trait.. homosexuality is based on behavior.. you can choose not to be ‘gay married’, you cannot choose not to be black

          • R1o2b3

            Your ignorance is the only thing immutable on this thread. That, and your long history of trolling bigotry on this website. Homosexuality is no more a choice than is heterosexuality. And if you chose your heterosexuality, I wonder what predilections and proclivities provided you with such a choice.

            Furthermore, I have seen you claim your white victimhood persecution in one conversation while claiming to be black on another thread to get away with your racist baloney.

          • George M Melby

            Not only that, but if the writing style MO of this fool is any indication, I think we have an ultrareligious TROLL in this thread! Elsewhere, he is known as Hooper, Inc., who posts under a number of pseudonyms to stave off the wooden stake from being thrust into his black little heart! A Christian s/he is not! Ignore at all costs!

          • 1bimbo

            ‘hooper’? it’s just too shocking to you to see so many different people who have differing views as you that you have to contrive some looney theory that they are all just one person.. this is one of the other (many) reasons why progressive socialist liberal democrats are losing

          • George M Melby

            Your stupid writing style MO gives you away every time. You would THINK you’d learn, but nahh, you’re an ignorant, stubborn, conservative christian freak!

          • R1o2b3

            Bimbo takes trolling to a new level. Can’t even name the liberty he/she/it will lose? Just utter stupidity.

          • George M Melby

            The poor boy can’t hep it. If s/he can get her/his one tooth brushed each day, s/he’s doing more than expected by normal people.

          • R1o2b3

            Yes, George, seeing someone so confident in their own ignorance is satisfying enough, but I am still waiting for the BIMBO answer to what “liberty” this sap is going to lose.

          • George M Melby

            Bimbo is just the tip of the sh*t pile. I don’t know what it is with red States… Kansas City Star today: Kansas revenue short $1 Billion dollars. And yet they re-elect Governor Brownshit, Krissy Kobitch, and McTurtle’s best friend, Patsy Roberts. These Teapublican perverted, retarded citizens deserve exactly what they get. I hope their personal property taxes triple or quadruple… maybe then they’ll get the picture that these Redcoats are scamming them without remorse or mercy!

          • George M Melby

            Bimbo troll seems to have quieted down. His handlers have given him his meds and tucked him in for the night. That POS is toxic!

          • George M Melby

            Ohhhhh, I dunno. You seem to have the corner on Hooper/Susie Sotar/Brad/Paul621/1bimbo… which pretty much describes you to a T! Progressive socialist liberal Democrats will be back in two years to clean up the shit messes you animals leave behind. We did it after GWBunnypants… we’re up to the job again! But you did convince me that there are really a LOT of stupid idiots in Texas! We were aware of that, however! The pendulum also swings the other way, Sonnyboy!

          • 1bimbo

            texas, red to crimson by 2020.. you keep jackin’ around with texas. as your beloved blue states turn purple right in the next 2 years right before your very eyes.. the lone star state is happy to keep you acorn wannabes distracted

          • George M Melby

            Yep, and we’re red to blue all the way down the church aisle with gay weddings, lolol. The 1% lame-brainers lost THAT one also!

          • 1bimbo

            lame duck president vetoing a wave of rapid fire GOP bills from congress… sounds like the biggest ‘mess’ will be the democrat legacy

          • George M Melby

            So be it!

          • George M Melby

            There are many, many people like you out in the world, bimbo… but they don’t hang their ‘stupid’ out to dry like you do. You’re one of a kind!

          • 1bimbo

            crying ‘bigotry’ is just the progressives way of trying to censor speech.. the vast majority of people are onto y’all.. we choose liberty not your intolerance of views you don’t agree with

          • R1o2b3

            But, seriously, who is being intolerant. Because we won’t allow you to discriminate, I assume you mean to say that we will not be tolerant of your bigotry. You can’t make this up.

            What do you lose if gay couples are allowed to be married? What right do you lose? What freedom do you lose?

          • 1bimbo

            ‘we won’t allow you to discriminate’? you think about your comment for a moment.. and do me a favor and actually read the constitution.. the document will be an eye opener for you.. really.. it doesn’t take that long to read it

          • R1o2b3

            Sure. Why don’t you go back and rewrite it without the Establishment Clause. The Free Exercise Clause gives you no right to deny equal protection under the the Fourth Amendment. If it truly doesn’t “take that long” to read, you should take a break from your ignorant bigotry and read.

          • 1bimbo

            why don’t you read the the entire 13th amendment.. the part that details protection from involuntary servitude.. that’s what homosexuality advocates have in mind for religious people.. for moral people.. who do not condone nor support their lifestyle

          • R1o2b3

            That’s hilarious. Did you think you would become a sex slave? What other delusions, perhaps fantasies, do you have?

          • 1bimbo
          • R1o2b3

            Please continue to post and further diminish yourself. Let us know when the 13th Amendment is being used in front of the SCOTUS. LOL. And stop generalizing about religious people as if they are all as stupid as yourself. The religious people who support marriage equality outnumber bigots. Even if they didn’t, we don’t put Civil Rights up for a vote in the end.

          • 1bimbo

            this isn’t complicated.. those who support homosexual ‘marriage’ are not christians.. they are a fraud.. it does’t take much common sense to realize that the sexually disordered will do everything in their power to convince weak-minded people that their lifestyle is ‘heavenly’ or some such nonsense… moral people see right through it … you wield the word ‘bigot’ in much the same way the slave master used to wield the word n!66er.. must make you feel powerful.. guess what.. no one’s falling for it anymore.. that’s why you’re losing

          • R1o2b3

            32 States with Legal Gay Marriage and 18 States with Same-Sex Marriage Bans

            Yeah, it looks like marriage equality is winning over your bigotry and your “moral” compass is failing.

            You never told us what you stood to lose. What liberty is at stake for you?

          • 1bimbo

            activist federal judges.. nothing more.. their rulings are not law.. and sadly not even a constitutional interpretation of law.. homosexual ‘marriage’ is not the will of the people.. the movement is a squeaky wheel that managed to manipulate a segment of the judiciary.. your ‘victories’ are temporary.. inorganic

          • R1o2b3

            You are truly ignorant. Conservative icon Judge Posner slamming the bimbo.

            “[The] government thinks that straight couples tend to be sexually irresponsible, producing unwanted children by the carload, and so must be pressured (in the form of government encouragement of marriage through a combination of sticks and carrots) to marry, but that gay couples, unable as they are to produce children wanted or unwanted, are model parents—model citizens really—so have no need for marriage.

            Heterosexuals get drunk and pregnant, producing unwanted children; their reward is to be allowed to marry. Homosexual couples do not produce unwanted children; their reward is to be denied the right to marry. Go figure.”

            http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2014/D09-04/C:14-2526:J:Posner:aut:T:fnOp:N:1412339:S:0

          • 1bimbo

            ‘unwanted children’.. the rhetoric of immoral people.. no child is ‘unwanted’ except to those who are morally bankrupt… and homosexuality is not the flipside of heterosexuality.. trying to compare the two with analogies would be like trying to compare special needs children with normal brained children.. yes.. i uttered a politcally incorrect truth.. not a ‘slur’.. not ‘bigotry’.. no candy coating.. and definitely not drunk on a liberal victimhood meme… why? because morality.. liberty.. and protection of children

          • R1o2b3

            Your reading comprehension is truly pathetic. What liberty are you going to lose? Come on you little Tea Klanner, out with it. What liberty are you going to lose? Gay folks are already getting married, what have you lost, what freedom, what liberty?

          • 1bimbo
          • R1o2b3

            ” In a 40-page unanimous opinion, Judge Richard Posner wrote that the key arguments supporting the ban — that same-sex couples and their children don’t need marriage because same-sex couples can’t produce children — is “so full of holes that it cannot be taken seriously.”

            “To the extent that children are better off in families in which the parents are married, they are better off whether they are raised by their biological parents or by adoptive parents,” Posner wrote. “The discrimination against same-sex couples is irrational, and therefore unconstitutional.”

            You see, bimbo, even a conservative icon like Posner, the most quoted legal mind of the late 20th century, ruled your bigotry to be irrational and unconstitutional.

          • 1bimbo

            your post proves that the judiciary is politically motivated.. did you miss this post earlier? here’s a recent ruling:

            did you miss this post earlier.. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/11/06/gay-marriage-appeals-court-ohio-michigan-kentucky-tennessee/15712319/?AID=10709313&PID=4003003&SID=8tb5jmu9z8mp

            ‘The 2-1 ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit
            reversed district court rulings that had struck down gay marriage bans
            in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee.’

            “When the courts do not let the people resolve new social issues like
            this one, they perpetuate the idea that the heroes in these change
            events are judges and lawyers,” Sutton said. “Better in this instance,
            we think, to allow change through the customary political processes, in
            which the people, gay and straight alike, become the heroes of their own
            stories by meeting each other not as adversaries in a court system but
            as fellow citizens seeking to resolve a new social issue in a
            fair-minded way.’

          • R1o2b3

            Really? Why so much cowardice? What will you lose, what freedom or liberty have you lost?

            Your ruling is, but the second ruling at that level while over 20 victories are in favor of marriage equality. You aren’t very good at math and it is obvious.

            What will you lose, what freedom or liberty have you lost?

          • 1bimbo

            pay close attention alinsky because your non-responsive questions deserve the following response.. in case you haven’t noticed there’s a backlash underway.. you got your first hint last week tuesday night.. for the next two years conservatives are more engaged and motivated to restore the tenets of our country.. our country’s foundation was forged in constitutional tenets which were written to protect We The People from an unresponsive government, to protect us from tyranny especially by the executive branch and the judiciary.. to protect us from social totalitarianism brought on by any fringe group with an agenda..

            right now, the GOP is on the right side of history because republicans are the party of freedom and the constitution.. democrats with their rhetoric prove they are the party of censorship, government overreach, lack of privacy, judicial tyranny, anti-christian sentiment and anti-semitism.. your party is so blind and in such denial you can’t even acknowledge how much progressive policy has crippled us, stagnated our economy, neutered our foreign presence and rotted away liberty.. you keep defending the indefensible and i predict a GOP sweep in 2016

          • R1o2b3

            Don’t change the subject. You haven’t answered my question.

            Really? Why so much cowardice? What will you lose, what freedom or liberty have you lost?

            Your ruling is, but the second ruling at that level while over 20 victories are in favor of marriage equality. You aren’t very good at math and it is obvious.

            What will you lose, what freedom or liberty have you lost?

          • 1bimbo
          • R1o2b3

            Wow, you can’t even tell me. Instead, you throw up a bunch of links.

            You aren’t very articulate are you?

            Can you demonstrate how your freedom of speech will be taken from you?

            Freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom of speech without consequences.

            Freedom of Association doesn’t mean free to discriminate.

            Same with religion.

            Demonstrate how you will lose freedom to assemble.

            Demonstrate how you will be enslaved, moron.

            Be big person and explain yourself.

          • 1bimbo

            you prove you haven’t read the constitution.. there is no ‘anti-discrimination’ clause or no ‘right’ not to be offended… however, there are laws such as the civil rights act and amendments such as women’s suffrage that have come about as a result of a congress acting, a president signing a bill.. that’s how it works.. otherwise homosexuality advocacy is no better than mccarthyism.. a temporary ‘social justice’ hiccup fueled by mass hysteria or judicial manipulation.. constitutionalists come to their senses and upright the wrong which — in this case — is nurtured by social totalitarianism

          • R1o2b3

            Wow, STILL, you can’t even tell me. And, the equal protection clause sure seems to be the end all be all of anti discrimination clauses, moron.

            You aren’t very articulate are you?

            Can you demonstrate how your freedom of speech will be taken from you?

            Freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom of speech without consequences.

            Freedom of Association doesn’t mean free to discriminate.

            Same with religion.

            Demonstrate how you will lose freedom to assemble.

            Demonstrate how you will be enslaved, moron.

            Be big person and explain yourself.

          • 1bimbo

            whose consequences? yours? or mine? social ‘consequences’ are arbitrary and not governable .. should never be legislated because if the neonazis are ever in charge we sure as h*ll don’t want their ‘consequences’ .. if and when you actually get around to reading the constitution, you might start to understand why liberty is better than your politically correct nonsense and censorship..

            progressives make no bones about attacking freedom to assemble
            http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/11/07/ucsb-porn-professor-sued-by-pro-life-activists/

          • R1o2b3

            Stop dodging the question. Wow, STILL, you can’t even tell me. And, the equal protection clause sure seems to be the end all be all of anti discrimination clauses, moron.

            You aren’t very articulate are you?

            In your own little words:

            Can you demonstrate how your freedom of speech will be taken from you?

            Freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom of speech without consequences.

            Freedom of Association doesn’t mean free to discriminate.

            Same with religion.

            Demonstrate how you will lose freedom to assemble.

            Demonstrate how you will be enslaved, moron.

            Be big person and explain yourself.

          • 1bimbo

            are you sure you’re not spam?.. this is a one-sided conversation.. i’m giving examples, you’re copying and pasting the same thing over and over again.. oh well.. other readers probably found some good research material in my responses so it’s worth it

          • R1o2b3

            You are only providing junk links with spam. No. No one found anything in your links. We want you to be an adult and use your own little brain. Stop dodging the question. Wow, STILL, you can’t even tell me. And, the equal protection clause sure seems to be the end all be all of anti discrimination clauses, moron.

            You aren’t very articulate are you?

            In your own little words:

            Can you demonstrate how your freedom of speech will be taken from you?

            Freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom of speech without consequences.

            Freedom of Association doesn’t mean free to discriminate.

            Same with religion.

            Demonstrate how you will lose freedom to assemble.

            Demonstrate how you will be enslaved, moron.

            Be big person and explain yourself.

          • 1bimbo

            ok now i see what you’re doing.. attempts to ignore or discount my responses only reinforce the lunacy which accompanies homosexuality advocacy.. you’ve lost the argument when you’ve devolved into intellectual tourettes syndrome..

            so i’ll use this response to offer an example of something i find so heartbreaking but unashamedly homosexuality advocates consider the following a form of s e x ‘expression’ and ‘exploration’ for children !! as the next step in indoctrinating young people into the lifestyle.. all the more reason to protect the children from such a sex-centric notion of being

            http://www.camparanutiq.org/camp-for-ages-8-15

          • R1o2b3

            You didn’t answer the question, bigot?

            What have you lost? What freedom?

          • 1bimbo

            please don’t discount freedom from public health threat.. with all the romanticism about ‘equality’ and ‘acceptance’, it’s critical to unveil the truth about the lifestyle.. everyone should have all the information..

            http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/top-doctor-gay-blood-will-taint-u-s-supply/
            ‘Should homosexual men – a group with the highest HIV-infection rates in the nation – be allowed to donate blood? . . .a leading pathologist is warning that the move would heighten the risk of spreading HIV to other Americans.

            ‘Gay’ men have ‘much higher prevalence’ of HIV

            Dr. Jay Brooks, an expert in blood banking and transfusion at the University of Florida’s College of Medicine, told WND the problem with “donations from men who’ve had sex with men is that they have a much higher prevalence of HIV than the heterosexual community.”

            “They have a much higher prevalence,” he emphasized.

            The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or CDC, released a 2010 analysis of heavily affected populations showing “men who have sex with men,” or MSM, account for a large majority of new HIV infections, much more so than even injection drug users, or IDUs:…’

          • George M Melby

            WORLD NEWS DAILY???? That crap faux noise is even more bigoted than Faux Noise Facks! Geeez, at least use resources that have some legitimate intelligence to it. You really can’t do better, can you?? Ewwwwwwwww…. WND??!!!

          • 1bimbo

            the progressive socialist liberal democrat ‘bigot’ meme is as dead as the ‘war on women’ meme, but keep up the good work for you side

          • George M Melby

            Oh, c’mon… you can dig deeper in your brain than that, cowboy. No memes… just pure fact! Now go to bed… you’re boring us, as usual.

          • 1bimbo

            goodnight, melby.. and always remember………………..’the fight for liberty never ends!’

          • George M Melby

            Out of all your meanderings today, finally a truism! We ALL fight for liberty, daily!

          • R1o2b3

            Yeah, you never told us what liberty you stand to lose from marriage equality. You did however demonstrate you are a bigot of the highest magnitude.

          • R1o2b3

            All you’ve done is highlight the condition of institutionalized bigotry and societal shaming. Access to healthcare has always been made more difficult by shaming from bigots like you. Increasingly, this has become much a thing of the past in the medical field, but the misinformation and propaganda in society from folks like yourself is still quite prevalent. And it would be, considering the bimbo neo nazi fascism spewing from religious hicks like yourself.

          • George M Melby

            As you can see by bimbo’s/Hooper’s remarks below, s/he is not interested in anything but aggravating people and proving nothing in his/her/its favor. Let sleeping dogs with fleas lie, nothing to see or read in the diatribes from the recht!

          • George M Melby

            This is all right wing trash, you arrogant zombie! Get some intelligent resources to back your story up, not back alley anti-abortion crap!

          • George M Melby

            If you care so much, why not adopt 4-5 of the little ones? On second thought… I would so not trust you with even pets!

          • George M Melby

            LOLOL… they may not be ‘law’ in your eyes and pea brain, but you take that to Court and you’ll be pleading the fifth in no time. The food is terrible. I work as an educational mentor to inmates before they get out. They know.

          • George M Melby

            That’s one thing I love about you self-styled christians… You’re so heavenly minded, you’re no earthly good! I’m sure Jesus is so proud of you!

          • George M Melby

            Uh oh… more right wing whizbang propaganda again… to prove the pot AND kettle are both black.

          • George M Melby

            You choose ‘liberty,’ and yet you ‘discriminate’… make up what mind you have left!!!

          • George M Melby

            BUT… BUT…BUTTT…RIGHT WING RELIGIOUS EXTREMISTS WOULDN’T SURVIVE WITHOUT PERSECUTION! NO NO NOOOOOOO…!

        • raytheist

          Homosexual “advocacy” threatens religious liberty? Did you actually write that without noticing how ridiculous it is? Homosexual advocacy — sticking up for an oppressed minority. So you seem to think religion should be allowed to continue oppression.

          The reality is that enabling equal treatment for ALL citizens will do nothing to religious liberty. Religious people can keep their beliefs and churches can continue to close their doors to LGBT citizens.

        • George M Melby

          I prefer to let the SCOTUS kick Texass in the brains/ass (there’s difference in the South?) to make the point crystal clear!

          • 1bimbo

            it’s a never ending loop for homosexuality advocates.. marriage is not in the constitution.. the constitution defers the right to define it to the states.. if states wanted to, they could remand ‘marriage’ to churches and require everyone to enter into civil contracts with one another for legal purposes.. ‘marriage’ is a faith-based covenant between a man, woman and god.. states choose to sanction it.. scotus knows this and will allow states to decide how to define it

          • George M Melby

            Ohhh, how you wish! Talk to some of the 31 States that now have marriage equality and sk if their fighting it did them any good?! (Psst… Hi Hooper… good to see you spewing your silly drivel here… people are catching on, you ol’ boll weevil!).

        • George M Melby

          Of all the States that have had, or now have marriage equality, not one has threatened religious liberty! You are still free to make as big an ass out of yourselves as you deem necessary! Regarding public businesses… go by the law, shape up, fly right… or close down! S’at simple!

    • RRiggs

      And no true Scotsman!

      (You probably won’t get that.)

    • George M Melby

      Hah! There’s no way we’re going to let perverted Texass christian fakes get away with it!

  • R1o2b3

    This is great news. The bills may go nowhere, but it is a start in the fight against ignorance and bigotry that Texas has been home to for far too long. Equality under the law.

  • Chip70

    This is a great bill!! I’m very excited to watch. It might fail (likely), but it being introduced is a step forward.

    • 1bimbo

      democrats still spinning their wheels in the texas legislature i see

      • Chip70

        Hey, look at it this way Bimbo… Just cause the Insane Asylum is run by the Patients, doesn’t mean the Orderlies won’t keep trying…. Gotta have Hope… :-}

      • George M Melby

        Hey, lolol, somebody’s got to spin their wheels… the right wing loonies aren’t giving up, soooo….!

      • Burzghash

        Just a decade ago, gay marriage wasn’t allowed anywhere, and Texas was solidly red across virtually every county.

        Look at where we are now. Then realize that you have no way to reverse that trend. And weep.

        • 1bimbo

          you. are. in. denial.

          • George M Melby

            That’s not what facts are saying, bimbo-bobblehead! South Carolina looks a’teeterin’ — and TN, OH, KY, and…. and… go ahead, Mr. Knowledge, fill in the blank! ___ ;-)

  • Arthur Paliden

    “All men are created equal” nothing about women and certainly nothing about lesbians being anywhere near equal.

    • George M Melby

      Lordy, you fools are stupid… The SCOTUS will handle the final outcome!

      • 1bimbo

        actually, here’s where we’re headed:
        http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/11/06/gay-marriage-appeals-court-ohio-michigan-kentucky-tennessee/15712319/

        ‘The 2-1 ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit
        reversed district court rulings that had struck down gay marriage bans
        in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee.’

        “When the courts do not let the people resolve new social issues like
        this one, they perpetuate the idea that the heroes in these change
        events are judges and lawyers,” Sutton said. “Better in this instance,
        we think, to allow change through the customary political processes, in
        which the people, gay and straight alike, become the heroes of their own
        stories by meeting each other not as adversaries in a court system but
        as fellow citizens seeking to resolve a new social issue in a
        fair-minded way.”

        • George M Melby

          Whateva!

  • 1bimbo

    it’ll be a cold day in h*ll before that bill passes.. but i betcha the following bill passes lickety split http://www.legis.state.tx.us/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=84R&Bill=HB209

    • George M Melby

      I think you might want to wait until the SCOTUS takes you wacky Texans to the Constitutional cleaners. What makes you think Texas is so special, since 39 States are in the process of, or now have marriage equality. You do have a right to be stupid, just don’t put it on display quite so much!

      • 1bimbo

        by totalitarian activist federal judges who are attempting to exact their brand of ‘social justice’ on the masses.. what those judicial fascists refuse to acknowledge is that all their efforts will eventually be overturned by true constitutional judges and most likely a scotus with constitutional integrity.. mass hysteria takes hold for a limited time.. it never sticks.. like the time the supreme court ruled that black people were 3/5s of a person..what happens with social issues changes with the politics of judges over time

        here’s where homosexuality advocacy is headed from a legal perspective because of judicial activism:
        http://money.howstuffworks.com/10-overturned-supreme-court-cases.htm
        • States can amend the Constitution itself. This requires approval by three-quarters of the state legislatures — no easy feat. However, it has happened several times.
        • The Supreme Court can overrule itself. This happens when a different case involving the same constitutional issues as an earlier case is reviewed by the court and seen in a new light, typically because of changing social and political situations. The longer the amount of time between the cases, the more likely this is to occur (partly due to stare decisis).

        • George M Melby

          Oh. Right. (Yawwwnnn!).

  • R1o2b3

    What, your perceived right to discriminate is being taken away from you? There is a particular religious sect that has a persecution complex large enough to park a truck in. Stop the persecution peddling. Discrimination under the auspices of “religious liberty” is just asinine. That is the same religious argument that segregationists and racists used in the past. It is the same argument used to deny interracial marriages and a woman’s right to vote. Ignorance, bigotry, and intolerance correlate well with particular religious interpretations. Folks need to stop trying to codify religious bigotry into secular law. We don’t live in a theocracy.

    • 1bimbo

      your arbitrary anti-religion sentiments is one of the reasons why progressives are losing and they don’t even see it.. democrats are the anti-constitution party – the party of censorship and social totalitarianism, hiding behind the veil of political correctness… you’ve lost young people because progs are a threat to liberty.. and there is no ‘right’ not to be offended.. the reason homosexuality advocates want to call their couplings ‘marriage’ is to try to force social acceptance of their lifestyle through government mandate.. it’s unconstitutional.. there is no ‘right’ to marry

      • R1o2b3

        How asinine of you. There are already many married gay and lesbian Christians, Jews, and even some Moslems in this country. Anti religion I am not. Anti bigotry, anti idiocy, and anti bimbo ignorance…….I am. Marriage predates your asinine interpretation of Christianity. It is also a legal contract with certain privileges, rights, and responsibilities. You have trolled on this site for far too long unchecked.

        • George M Melby

          I so wish I could upvote your comment 50+ times! You are so spot on the mark, R1! These armchair “theologician” magicians have no idea of what the Holy Writ says, except for what Mammy and Pappy taught them while milking ol’ Bessie! The TRUE nature of homosexuality didn’t even exist in ancient language OR literature. What DID exist during the early ages (as evidenced in the “Roamin'” Catholic church was indeed marriage equality! Male church leaders indeed did have marriage together and it was only centuries later where they tried to cover it up, but not very successfully! Scholarly work in the last 50-60 years has come a long way in proving false the asinine views of the extremist ‘christians,’ or as I call them, the AcT = American christian Taliban!
          Let’s get one thing straight (pardon the pun!) right now. Marriage in the ancient Jewish culture was NOTHING but a LEGAL covenant denoting property rights of the bride, groom, and their respective parents! Nothing more, nothing less! God was not present, nor was God asked to be present. Anything said to the contrary is purely political/false, religious hogwash! bimbo +2 is correct in one aspect only… there is NO right to marry in the Constitution! Except for that little piece of info which they neglect to observe: the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness!! If there is no right to marry, that alone should scare the sh*t out of all the straight couples who thought otherwise. What I would like to see in the future is the government, for a fee, finding two people married for legal purposes… just the Marriage licence will do that! THEN, if the couple want that solemnized, go find a church of their choice… OR NOT! It is STILL a legal document! Then maybe these irreligious wishy-washy busybodies will go back to their wood carving and knitting clubs and shut the heck up!

          • R1o2b3

            “Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”. So true. The Bible in the hands of the religious right is despicably poor fiction full of poverty of reason. They present an exegetical nightmare full of cognitive dissonance. Their interpretation leave us with a god who when presented with the choice of condemning shellfish or slavery chose shellfish. Thankfully, not all religious people share this interpretation. Moreover, more people have learned to contextualize the scriptures to the time and culture they were written in.

            However, since we are not a Theocracy, literalists have been relegated to even worse arguments. Arguments like “procreation” which seems to render Gregg Abbott’s marriage and that of Chief Justice John Roberts unconstitutional. If you have a widowed mother whose had a hysterectomy, she too, shall not marry again.

            These arguments are just pathetic.

          • 1bimbo

            your anti-christian diatribe is old tired rhetoric…’slavery’? ‘shellfish’? really? and you prove you have not read the constitution.. because the phrase is ‘life, liberty and property’… ‘pursuit of happiness’ is in the declaration of independence. . . and you better get to reading the ‘friend of the court’ brief in the texas case.. scotus does take those into consideration as well as the AGs appeal.. here’s the information from one of the homosexuality advocate propaganda machines http://www.lonestarq.com/63-tx-legislators-sign-court-brief-linking-sex-marriage-pedophilia/

          • R1o2b3

            Most likely Jesus was gay or bisexual. It doesn’t matter to me if he was straight either.

            I wouldn’t call you a Christian, bimbo, as much as I would call you a bigot who cannot demonstrate how its freedom is being taken away from itself.

          • George M Melby

            As a Christian, and a Christian minister, believe me, bimbo-0 is no Christian. christian, yes! Christian? Not by a long shot!

          • R1o2b3

            You truly are an idiot. I was agreeing with George with his quote from the First Amendment.

            It probably never occurred to you that your 13th A. argument regarding enslavement and gay marriage is really pathetic compared to the reason the there is a 13th A.

            And no, your percieved right to discriminate does not trump the equal protection clause.

          • George M Melby

            Let the old coot bimbobrain drip in his Depends at will. Kansas now has full marriage equality rights, so one more State on the + list!

          • George M Melby

            Listen, Bimboblond, you’llhave plenty of time to gnash your teeth with Governor Browshit and AG Krissy Kobitch from Kansas. They now have that dratted marriage equality to deal with, and there’s no going back. Get your Depends out for when the fit hits the shan in TexASS!!! ;-)

          • R1o2b3

            Looks like marriage equality is coming to South Carolina, too! Bimbo might be eating her lunch all by herself.

          • George M Melby

            We can only hope she upchucks during Communion, if their church believes in such stuff!

          • 1bimbo

            it’s a never-ending loop.. lawsuits, pushback for religious liberty, state legislation, state amendments, case after case ad infinitum .. just like gun laws, gambling laws, marijuana laws that differ in each state.. all those perceived ‘affirmations’ come crumbling down as the will of the people rejects judicial fiat

            here’s what’s next and oklahoma is ground zero…
            http://www.news9.com/story/24543033/lawmakers-consider-preventing-all-marriage-in-oklahoma

          • R1o2b3

            “Supreme Court Allows Same-Sex Marriages To Proceed In Kansas”

            George, you were spot on.

            http://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/supreme-court-ends-stay-on-kansas-same-sex-marriage-order?s=mobile

        • 1bimbo

          ‘married’ gay ‘christians’ are a fraud

          • R1o2b3

            You are a fraud and trolling ignorant bigoted one at that. Your entire premise is predicated upon the fraudulent claim that homosexuality is a choice when science says otherwise. You claim that the only real “Christians” who are married are heterosexuals. What? Are they trying to force social acceptance? By the way, the gay and lesbian couples are pretty much accepted by a majority of the American public who feel they should have marriage equality. You and your ilk are the exception. Get over it.

          • George M Melby

            I warned you, the stupid in this one is strong! 1bimbo/Hooper troll will keep you posting for hours in rebuttal and it does no good, no matter how much sense and intelligence you pour into him/her… it does no good! Ignore the bastard!

          • R1o2b3

            I know. I have watched her troll for a long time. She has taken every bigoted position bigotry has to offer. Just another tea klanner. Come to think of it the Texas Klan supports the same position as bimbo does on marriage equality.

          • George M Melby

            Yeah… and OUR side is losing…?????????? Go figger, bimbo ass!

      • George M Melby

        Are they STILL losing, bimbo-from-the-Bimblebelt? Ummmmm… let’s see… Kansas yesterday, Missouri next couple of weeks, South Carolina is teetering… if this is losing, what are you going to do when all 50 States are in the “Win” column?? You are truly in the winning column, Bimboy!

  • Keith Pullman

    Make it so. There is no good reason to deny that we must keep evolving until an adult, regardless of gender, sexual orientation, monogamy or polyamory, race, or religion is free to share love, sex, residence, and marriage (and any of those without the others) with any and all consenting adults. Polyamory, polygamy, open relationships are not for everyone, but they are for some. The limited same-gender freedom to marry is a great and historic step, but is NOT full marriage equality, because equality “just for some” is not equality. Let’s stand up for EVERY ADULT’S right to marry the person(s) they love. Get on the right side of history!