Donate

Bay Area Votes in Favor of Open Space and ‘Smart’ Growth

  • Share:
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • Reddit
  • Email

Dublin voters defeated a ballot measure that would have opened up Doolan Canyon to development. (Scott Hein, courtesy of Greenbelt Alliance)

A local environmental group is declaring victories for open space preservation and smart growth in the Bay Area.

The Greenbelt Alliance took positions on six measures on Bay Area ballots. While official results have yet to be declared on one of the measures, executive director Jeremy Madsen says signs are good that all the positions he supported came out on top.

“I think it really shows the voters here in the Bay Area have a very strong commitment to open space conservation and to growing the Bay Area in a smart and sustainable fashion,” he said.

Two measures protected open space from development:

  • In Dublin, voters defeated Measure T which would have permitted the development of Doolan Canyon between Dublin and Livermore.
  • Union City residents rejected Measure KK which would have allowed the city council to change the zoning for agricultural land off Mission Boulevard, opening it up for homes and businesses.

One measure approved continued funding for open space:

  • In Santa Clara Valley, 67 percent of voters supported Measure Q, a parcel tax that will increase funding to the Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority. (The measure needs a two-thirds majority to pass, and the results have not yet officially been called.)

And three concerned sustainable development in cities:

  • Berkeley voters defeated Measure R, which would have enacted stricter development requirements in downtown Berkeley. Madsen said the changes set standards so high, they made development impossible and would have defeated the goal of urban growth in Berkeley.
  • Alameda County voters approved the Measure BB transportation tax, which includes funding for public transit, cyclists and pedestrians.
  • San Bruno residents approved Measure N which will raise the limits on building heights, making denser development possible.

Madsen says the election results show that “there’s a growing consensus that the Bay Area wants to protect the lands that are special and wants to support the kind of sustainable, smart development that will make our communities better places.”

Related

Explore: , , , , , , ,

Category: Environment, News

  • Share:
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • Reddit
  • Email

About the Author ()

Marissa Ortega-Welch is an intern for KQED Science News. Prior to this, she interned for KPFA in Berkeley. In addition to her radio work, she has taught environmental education for the past ten years and is currently the Youth Education Manager for the Golden Gate Audubon Society of the Bay Area. She’s also worked as a field biologist, surveying birds on the West Coast from California to Alaska, and specializing in identifying birds by ear. She holds a BS in Conservation and Resource Studies from UC Berkeley.
  • Dar McCray

    Meanwhile in Oakland CA, the City Council wants to give open space away to the Oakland Zoo. Currently Knowland Park is a protected public park with rare native plants and animals including the Alameda Whipsnake. The Zoo wants to acquire additional land for an environmental destructive expansion onto the Knowland Park ridge, thereby killing Alameda whipsnake and developing over 50 acres that are currently wild and free to the public. Where are our priorities? The Zoo can expand within their current 100 acre footprint and leave the ridgeline with rare maritime chaparral plants communities, native grasses and oak trees in tact. The Bay Area needs to speak out against this outdated, environmental destructive give away of our open public space!!