White Women: Let’s Get Our Shit Together


In the run-up to the Texas gubernatorial election, much hand-wringing was done over the Hispanic lady voter: Are they too socially conservative to support Wendy Davis? Will they come around to Abortion Barbie? Will they cotton to Greg Abbott’s but-my-wife-is-Hispanic schtick?

I was guilty of a version of this, myself.

I should have looked in the mirror.

It was women like me—married white women, specifically—who failed Wendy Davis—and ourselves, and our families, and Texas families—on Tuesday night. According to exit polls, Black women, Black men, Latinas, and a near-majority of Latinos who voted turned out in solid numbers for Davis.

Among voters, 94 percent of Black women, 90 percent of Black men, 61 percent of Latinas, and 49 percent of Latinos in Texas voted for Wendy Davis.

Meanwhile, just 32 percent of white Texas women who voted did so for Wendy Davis.

You’ll hear that Greg Abbott “carried” women voters in Texas. Anyone who says that is also saying this: that Black women and Latinas are not “women,” and that carrying white women is enough to make the blanket statement that Abbott carried all women. That women generally failed to vote for Wendy Davis. As if women of color are some separate entity, some mysterious other, some bizarre demographic of not-women. 

The story does not begin and end with “men” and “women”; we have to look at which men, which women—particularly if the Democratic Party is ever going to decide to come out fighting hard on issues like immigration reform and moving the gamepiece aggressively forward, rather than backward, on reproductive rights.

Once more, with feeling: Greg Abbott and the Republican Party did not win women. They won white women. Time and time again, people of color have stood up for reproductive rights, for affordable health care, for immigrant communities while white folks vote a straight “I got mine” party ticket—even when they haven’t, really, gotten theirs.

The trend is echoed in national politics; we saw it play out across the country last night. To be sure, there are many factors that contributed to America’s rightward dive over the cliff: In a post-Citizens United electoral landscape, racist gerrymandering and voter ID laws appear to have had their intended effects of dividing and disenfranchising already marginalized voters.

But there’s another factor at play that Democrats fail to grapple with, and the Republican Party capitalizes on, time and time again: the historical crisis of empathy in the white community, one much older than gerrymandered congressional districts or poll taxes.

Let’s talk about what a vote for Wendy Davis meant: It meant a vote for strong public school funding, for Texas Medicaid expansion, for affordable family planning care, for environmental reforms, for access to a full spectrum of reproductive health-care options.

On the flip side, a vote for Greg Abbott meant a vote for the status quo, for empowering big industry and big political donors, for cutting public school funds and dismantling the Affordable Care Act, for overturning Roe v. Wade.

White women chose Greg Abbott Tuesday night. We did not choose empathy. Texas has been red for two decades. We do not choose empathy. We choose the fact that our children will always have access to education, that our daughters will always be able to fly to California or New York for abortion care, that our mothers will always be able to get that crucial Pap smear.

We chose a future where maternal mortality—but not our maternal mortality—rates will rise. We chose a future where preventable deaths from cervical cancer—but not our deaths—will rise. We chose a future where deaths from illegal, back-alley abortions—but not our illegal, back-alley abortions—will rise. We chose ourselves, and only ourselves.

Without empathy, a culture of fear is allowed to foment and thrive. It is that culture that has ensured that white folks never need engage with the idea of non-white humanity, with the concept of lives of color. It is this culture of fear, our culture of fear, that put Greg Abbott in the governor’s mansion, and it needs to be cut out of our communities like the cancer it is. We do this by rebuilding ourselves in a better image, in the image of our sisters of color who, time and again, have shown that they care that we have access to health care, to the voting booth, even though we have not done the same for them.

We have much to learn by witnessing the strength of Texans of color, by respecting and supporting the work of groups like the National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health, the Afiya Center, SisterSong, the Texas Organizing ProjectMamas of Color RisingRise Up/Levanta Texas, and asking the question: What role of assistance can we play as you lead?

We have so, so very much to learn.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

To schedule an interview with contact director of communications Rachel Perrone at rachel@rhrealitycheck.org.

Follow Andrea Grimes on twitter: @andreagrimes

  • fiona64

    Frankly, this white woman remains baffled that *any* woman would vote against her own self-interest. The only explanation I have for GOP women is Stockholm syndrome.

    I am willing to entertain the idea that part of the thinking is “but that only happens to *other* people, not me,” which demonstrates how very blind some folks can be.

    • Lightwing1

      Never underestimate the cognitive dissonance of people who adhere to extreme religious beliefs – where self-righteousness prevails over empathy every time. They don’t care about logic or harm. They just want to be “right” (not kind). If they have the right answer, they believe that they please their God who will shower them with earthly blessings and heavenly privilege.

      Most major religions have repressive views about sex, especially with reference to women’s sexuality. This inculcates a belief in adherents that actively sexual women are somehow “bad” and should be “punished” for their transgressive behavior. Punishment is the right answer, in their world view.

      Reproductive freedom is most important to economically disadvantaged women and white women’s privilege and economic advantages (for the most part) allow them broader choices. If your a** is covered and you can escape or evade societal repressions, why care about your less-privileged neighbor?

      • fiona64

        Your point is, sadly enough, quite accurate. I am amazed at many self-proclaimed Christians and their hateful behavior in the name of Jesus. :-/ I should have taken that into account.

        • Lightwing1

          Yes, I was raised by very repressive/strict Xtian parents and am quite familiar with their psychological processes. They will choose self-righteousness even over love of their bio or adopted children (I was adopted) and never give an inch across decades. If they won’t even bend for their children, neighbors and “others” don’t stand a chance.

          And, yes, it is quite sad. Especially if you are a highly compassionate person or simply mature enough to realize that life is not black and white.

          There is a curious proclivity toward “purity” in the American social fabric (esp. for women) that I blame on our Puritan forebears. It is that energy that we fight against. Would that we could see some definitive wins for a change. These people truly frighten me…

          • Ella Warnock

            I was raised the same way. No matter how ‘lovingly’ it’s applied – and I’m speaking of the very restrictive fundamentalists – it’s child abuse. Instilling a fear in me that any minute ‘unrepented’ sin would send me to hell should I die before I had a chance to get on my knees and beg forgiveness. The kind of OCD that fosters is textbook abuse.

          • http://www.federaleagent86.blogspot.com/ Federale

            Hating your parents. Good way to get through life. Good luck with that. LOL.

          • Lightwing1

            I don’t hate them. I pity them. They could have chosen love. Instead, they chose righteousness and judgement.

          • http://www.federaleagent86.blogspot.com/ Federale

            So, move to Iran then.

          • A. T.

            *ships you there*

        • night porter

          Yeah, I was reading TFA today, and apparently many godly loving Christians are wishing that Brittany Maynard burn in hell for eternity.

          • fiona64

            Jesus wouldn’t recognize his teachings in their hate-filled mouths.

          • Lightwing1

            Agreed. Where is the love Christ spoke about?

          • http://www.federaleagent86.blogspot.com/ Federale

            Can’t see that love in your heart. You completely missed the lesson. Try again and jettison your own judgement and hatred.

          • A. T.

            Do not shame my religion with your idiocy and ignorance.

          • http://www.federaleagent86.blogspot.com/ Federale

            Coming from an atheist, that’s rich.

          • fiona64

            And you assume I’m an atheist *why,* exactly?

      • Arekushieru

        Yup, I think that was one of the points around the suffragette movement?

      • lady_black

        That’s why I really have no time for religion whatsoever. They can all bite me. I don’t have to live by their nonsense.

        • Ella Warnock

          The growing number of people who’ve realized they don’t have to live ruled by that nonsense is what’s setting these people’s hair on fire. And people who are just saying ‘no’ are, of course, waging a ‘war on christianity.’ Seriously, by being completely uninterested in religion of any kind I am a soldier in the war on christ. Or something.

          • lady_black

            If their hair was literally on fire, I wouldn’t spit on them to put it out. I literally have no care for extremists. The world would be a better place without them.

        • http://www.federaleagent86.blogspot.com/ Federale

          And in Iran, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia you would be executed. Think about where you are now, idiot.

          • A. T.

            And here she gets to deal with racist bigots like you who harass her online and vote to take other rights. Adorable.

          • lady_black

            Non-sequitur.

      • http://www.federaleagent86.blogspot.com/ Federale

        Islamophobe.

        • Lightwing1

          My, aren’t you charming!

    • http://www.federaleagent86.blogspot.com/ Federale

      Honey, white women have no common interest with minorities on welfare.

      • A. T.

        Again, go back to Stormfront.

      • fiona64

        Someone is woefully ignorant about the demographics of welfare, I see …

      • Unicorn Farm

        Huh what?

      • A. T.

        What about the other white women and men on welfare?

    • Kelli Crackel

      Sugar, I feel the same way. I live in my native deep south and I cannot fathom any woman, of any race, class or level of education, voting to hurt their own self. But that’s part of the problem. The women of color turned out beautifully, as they did in my home state, but there as with here, white, married women, who don’t vote Republican were really underrepresented. I voted, but i’m annoying like that. I’m one of those southern liberals from a racially privileged background. I appreciate that fact because it makes me aware of how much inequality there really is in this country. As a middle class, married, white woman, I recognize the advantages I have and have had over people of other races simply by being born white, something totally beyond my control. I don’t think I can vote for a Rep until they undergo a major sea-change and catch up to the rest of us who already know all humans deserve the same rights as all other humans. Period.

    • DonnaDiva

      Feeling superior to the “lesser” women is a very important part of their identity, which the GOP skillfully manipulated in this midterm.

  • Brakedust

    None of you seem to venture outside your unimpressive little progressive coccoons to actually meet the Diverse Conservative Women who vastly outnumber intellectually truncated, not to say brainwashed, zombiettes like yourselves.

    • Shan

      Nice to meet you, too.

    • Lightwing1

      Wrong. I am a free thinker and registered independent that votes conservative on many issues. It is your assumptions that are truncated…

    • Arekushieru

      No, the only ones that don’t seem to venture outside of their unimpressive little REGRESSIVE cocoons are nasty fundie Christian Conservative men and women. Intellectually truncated? Brainwashed? Musta been lookin in the mirror when you said that.

    • cjvg

      Wow, irony is a completely foreign concept to you, isn’t it
      It is almost funny to see you rant and rave all while alleging that those you are ranting and raving against (people you do not even know and just now had some minimal interaction with) are living in a cocoon. As for your claim that there are more conservative voters then liberal voters, that is funny since the popular vote is always a majority liberal/democratic. It is only through gerrymandering and the antiquated

    • http://www.scientificabortionlaws.com/ Russell Crawford

      You have a choice Brakedust, you can save innocent born babies or you can let them die and save a fetus instead. Your choice is to let babies—die.

    • Jennifer Starr

      Wow. A lot of assumptions here, Brakedust–and most, if not all of them are completely wrong. Anything else you want to say or did you just want to leave your little rant and run?

    • fiona64

      Gosh, I’m so glad you came here to give us so much information. Idiot.

    • Unicorn Farm

      Au contraire. I spend more time reading sites I disagree with than those I do. That’s why I’m pro-choice- because I understand exactly how wrong you are.
      I’ve never seen more truncated, brain washed zombiettes than I have on Jill Stanek’s site, life site news, life news, faux news, wa-po, live action news, and secular pro-life.
      Plus, I live in a conservative state and come from a conservative family. I’m still not impressed.
      Try again.

      • night porter

        Au contraire. I spend more time reading sites I disagree with than those I do.

        Me too. I abhor an echo chamber, and I find the rightwing nutjobs to be so very entertaining.

      • Pinkladyapple

        You brave little soldier you. I can withstand so many posts and comments until my blood starts boiling from those sites. Jill Stanek and her followers are cray cray, hats off to you.

        • Unicorn Farm

          They make my blood boil, too, and I come back here to cleanse. I used to practice rebutting their “arguments” but the nonsense on Jill’s site is so weak minded and repetitive in recent years that I just go back for amusement. Seems her site has lost a lot of its followers lately, and she barely posts anything of “substance”, but the core crazies remain. I’m glutton for punishment, I guess. I am a litigator after all :)

    • jill hives

      this opinion piece never resorted to name-calling. you went for it with every other word in your sentence-long rebuttal. how about less condescention and more conversation? you know just how much us sheltered womenfolk do like to gab, after all.

    • P. McCoy

      When your enemy cannot win cognitive arguments against opponents, they always resort to the bottom feeder resort of name calling.

    • A. T.

      Sweetie, you need to work on your pick lines.

  • http://www.scientificabortionlaws.com/ Russell Crawford

    Until the pro choice movement acknowledges that pro lifers have real heart felt “belief” in their movement, no progress will be made with regard to the rights of women.

    Pro life women actually believe that the fetus has rights, is a “baby” and that they are “saving babies” There will be no advance in the pro choice movement until it addresses those beliefs.

    Having a choice to “kill a baby” is not a choice palatable to those who “believe” the pro life mantra. I was pro life for half my 65 years on this earth. I know what they believe.

    Move on. Address that issue. Bodily autonomy will not trump the life of a “baby” in their minds.

    • Laurel Sorensen

      Having been raised in a household by a vicious man…and woman who nearly chose a back alley abortion (legal was not available at the time of her last pregnancy)…and just having lost that brother to suicide…i can absolutely testify that often you are doing nothing more than trapping the people involved (children and adults), into a Hell on earth. Those narrow minded women need to worry about themselves…and give others the ability to live as their hearts and minds dictate. I can only pray that karma pays them back for their lack of compassion to anything but their narrow-minded views.

      • Lightwing1

        Truer words were never spoken. As an unwanted child myself who flirted with suicide multiple times in my life due to the horrific burden of being unwanted and rejected by my own family, I am so sick of people writing off my life experience as if it didn’t matter. Russell, the pro-life contingent you speak of – they have the right to apply their beliefs to themselves and nothing more. They DO NOT have a right to proscribe the behavior of others and never will.

        I never knew what it was to be a loved human being until I was 34 years old. Imagine 34 years of wandering the world, isolated, alone – desperately seeking family and community and not finding it. You are heartless, sir, to wish that upon any human being. And, you can likely do it because you have never experienced what I have. How dare you judge me? How dare you find my experience and my voice insignificant to justify your formula for “goodness?”

        Have you no clue of the burdens unwanted children bear in the name of “punishing those ebil, sexual womenz?” How we bear the emotional burden of shame, of abuse, of rejection and marginalization, of having our souls crushed and our lives twisted because “every sperm is sacred?” Of course, emotional wounds are invisible so “just get over it,” right?

        Get off your high horse and get real. Look into the eyes of an unwanted, desperate child sometime. You might learn something…

        • Z Z

          Are you saying it would have been better if you were aborted? Obviously it wouldn’t have been, in your eyes, since you made the choice not to commit suicide and you speak of finding a better life after 34 years.

          I do agree with Russell because I believe that a fetus is a baby. It has a right to life and to ignore that is wrong in my opinion. You can argue that the woman has an overriding right if you want.

          What are your opinions on euthanasia, assisted suicide and termination of life due to extreme disability? Are you consistent in that you favor them?

          What about drug and gun laws? As long as I’m not harming someone else, what do you care what I do with my life?

          Not trolling you here, I’m curious as to what you think and how is squares with what I think.

          • Lightwing1

            Yes. Unequivocally should have been aborted – best choice for all concerned. Our family is fragmented and pretty much non-existent because my brother and I were unwanted and that destroyed cohesion.

            Also, my spiritual beliefs inform me that the human spirit or consciousness or whatever label you prefer doesn’t die when the body does and that corporeal beingness is not the defining boundary of existence. So, therefore, souls can re-incorporate into human form through another woman’s body if denied access via termination. Nothing essential is destroyed.

            And, my opinions on other issues are irrelevant. You do not get to decide whether I meet your logical bar so that I can grovel at your feet and ask permission to believe in reproductive freedom.
            That said, I do have a strong libertarian streak on some issues.

            BTW, I don’t care what you do with your life. That’s the whole point. I wish you would stop caring what I do with mine (or other women do with theirs) and allow us the free will to make our own moral choices. You don’t have to agree with me. But you do have to allow me the right to self-determine.

          • Z Z

            Thanks for the response.

            I wish there were more people like you that believe in self-determination. My body, my life and if it isn’t hurting you, you’ve got nothing to say about me.

            I’m not asking for groveling but have found that my people who are pro-choice, aren’t pro-choice about much else. They tend to pick and choose what they believe in without any reference to some framework; they believe in something because it suits them at that moment. I’m not saying framework in terms of religion, so lets not go there.

          • Lightwing1

            Okay, sorry about the groveling comment. I misunderstood your point. I am very pro-choice across the board on almost all issues. Mostly, I just want the right to be left alone.

          • Z Z

            No problem. My views have changed quite a bit over time and I enjoy hearing what others have to say. It forces me to rethink what I believe. Unfortunately it is usually just talking points or ‘yelling’ that I’m a conservative heartless woman hating white guy.

          • Lightwing1

            There is alot of yelling going on these days. People are afraid. Alot of sacred cows and traditions are being turned upside down along with a concomitant loss or gain of privilege. This causes confusion and anger – and yelling. We like traditions – then we don’t have to think too much. It hurts, ya know.

            I don’t mind alternate or even opposing viewpoints. I served in the military to defend people’s right to believe what they want. I just don’t believe in codifying personal beliefs into law. The whole point of the US is as an experiment in pluralism. Can we maintain opposing viewpoints without killing each other? I’m afraid the jury is still out on that one…

          • Z Z

            Yeah, I’m afraid the jury may be out but I think I know how it will end. Too much struggle is spent on trying to get you to believe what I believe, this race to like that race, city people to like rural, etc. We need to accept that people are different, we like different things and that isn’t bad. Too many people have to exert their control over others.

            That’s one thing I hate about the fed/govt increasing regulation over more of our daily lives. It eliminates options because the fed is involved in everything – education, health care, EPA, nutrition, etc. Let the states decide. If you don’t like the state’s rules, move to one you like or shut up. Though too often the states are getting in to deep – ex. smoking laws, soda pop bans, etc.

          • Z Z

            You are right about the changing of traditions. Change is hard and defending those traditions sometimes gets in the way of a good change.

            Good luck to you. You sound like a very interesting person.

          • Z Z

            If we could get the government to recognize self determination, we would be so much better off.

    • Lightwing1

      Law cannot be extricated from reality. If laws work, they survive. If they don’t, the give rise to scoff laws (example: cannabis). You simply cannot reduce a woman to the function of her womb. It requires abrogating her civil rights. The rights of the born person will always trump those of the unborn in a non-theocratic society.

      “I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I
      tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free,
      because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything that I do.”
      – Robert Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress

    • feloneouscat

      Until the pro choice movement acknowledges that pro lifers have real heart felt “belief” in their movement, no progress will be made with regard to the rights of women.

      I have talked with many anti-choice women (let’s not bandy words about – it is about whether one has the choice, not whether one is for or against life). Yes, many do indeed have very strong views.

      The problem is not accepting that they have a belief, they can believe that their belly-button is Jesus for all I care, it is their unwillingness to acknowledge that my belief is just as strong and just as reasonable. I do not ask that they get an abortion. I only ask that they attend to their business and not butt into mine.

      And if it were just about abortion, I would be more forgiving. But it isn’t. It’s about contraception, too (which have been know to PREVENT pregnancies which might lead to abortions). It’s about teaching anything, everything, but sex education – because you know, that will give them ideas (seriously – I’ve been told that).

      I have to ask, where in this discussion do the anti-choice have to acknowledge my “heart felt belief”? Because, in all my discussions I have YET have one agree that I was entitled to my belief.

      Is this a one way street?

      • A. T.

        How many foster children have you adopted?

        • Guest

          And that is relevant to what I posted in what way?

          It might be two or it might be zero. It really isn’t any of your business, is it?

          • A. T.

            If you were/are the pro-life person that is so concerned about babies, I like to see if you actually do something about children that lack homes or prefer to make women have children they don’t feel they can care for/want at that time. If you aren’t part of providing for them, that tells me something about how deep your conviction goes.

            A lot of people have an opinion when it personally costs them nothing.

          • feloneouscat

            You misread my post. I’m pro-choice. Always have been.

            However, it doesn’t stop me from talking to people with opposing views.

          • A. T.

            I realized I had posted to the wrong person and edited, but not in time for you see it before responding I think. I made a mistake. ._. I sorry!

    • A. T.

      How many foster children have you adopted?

  • jill hives

    excellent piece. when i was a teenager (’90s) and starting to really learn about feminism and roe v. wade, i never thought those issues would be issues i would have to fight for because the ladies in the 1970s did the legwork for me. when did “progress” become such a bad word?

    unfortunately, “baby killer” is a catchier soundbite than “logical & empathetic consideration for your fellow humans who may not have the same resources as you.”

    • Lightwing1

      I wish I could like this x 1,000,000!!!!!!!

    • Anne Boleyn’s Ghost Bitches

      I really wish we could everyone to agree to stop calling anti-choicers “pro-life.” Call them pro-fetus or anti-abortion rights or whatever you want. “Pro-Life” feeds into their narrative.

      • Z Z

        Pro-fetus would be fine with me. And at the same time let’s call you pro-abortion.

        • feloneouscat

          They remain anti-choice. Because, in the end, that’s what it is.

          When anti-choicers tell me “well, I’ve always been anti-choice, but I had an abortion because of xyz” (whether true or no, no idea) it hammers the point home: they want ME to have no choice, but they want to retain choice for THEMSELVES.

          • Z Z

            As long as you are willing to respect my choices, no problem. I guess I prefer anti-choice over baby-killer.

      • jill hives

        i’ve taken to calling them “pro-birth.” certainly they are anti-choice, but more than that they are anti-caring-once-a-human-is-actually-here-alive-and-in-need.

        • Jim Kramer

          This is exactly why I’ve started calling pro-abortion candidates pro-scissors to a baby’s skull candidate. It’s long, but own it.

  • julian francisco

    ffs, why are the comments about religion? Black women are statistically more religious than white women and they still voted progressive. This isn’t about religion. This is about white women being indistinguishable from white men in their contempt for progressive values and policies.

    • itgurl_29

      Thank you! Both Black women and Latinas are more religious than white women. Even after reading this eloquent article, people don’t want to be real.

    • JennySE

      Because that’s how the power structure of the institutional left is set up. Just like the right, it’s a coalition of interest groups, not monolithic. And some animals are more equal than others.

      Top level is largely northeastern upper class white secular liberals.

      Rising mid-level are largely atheist coastal hipster types.
      (who you you think is writing most of the articles / designing the twitter campaigns?)

      Starting to outlive their usefulness / on the way out midlevel is mostly white union members. (why do you think the racial angle is played up more lately?)

      Black and Hispanic communities are ground troops. Just like the evangelicals in the institutional right coalition – there for numbers, but not actually supposed to have an appreciable voice in the party. Too much dated BadThink.

      • http://www.federaleagent86.blogspot.com/ Federale

        Minorities aren’t smart enough to be any other than useful idiots.

        • A. T.

          Go back to Stormfront, you racist twit.

          • http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/ Stacey Burns

            We’ve banned Federale from commenting. Thanks for flagging.

          • A. T.

            Thank you, it is appreciated.

      • julian francisco

        The heads of the democratic party are predominantly deists and practicing Christians. This maps almost perfectly onto leftist circles. In the US atheism is more closely linked to libertarian ideals and ideology. I’m sorry but the hierarchy you outlined doesn’t reflect the left in the US.

    • http://www.federaleagent86.blogspot.com/ Federale

      Yes, and we are proud of being smarter than the lazy welfare dependent minority Demoncrats.

      • A. T.

        White people are the majority of people on welfare. Try google.

      • julian francisco

        Whites receive more public assistance than nonwhites.

  • knittingknots

    less than 28 percent of the Texas electorate voted. That too might be part of the problem. How many women just didn’t vote?

    • Lightwing1

      I believe it is because extreme religious beliefs are one of the main ideological forces driving anti-woman policies. I am not anti-religion, per se. I am just against legislating specific religious screeds. I don’t feel that any religion has a right to coerce non-believers, through the force of law, to follow their religious tenets.

  • libkid08

    Well, I actually speak with “white” women and I’m ashamed to say, they vote like other married women. With their husbands. Minority men vote for the Democrats and therefore, their wives will as well. I’m sorry to break it to everyone but many women are still voting the way their husband does. Often with limited information. My own family members are guilty of such. Friends I thought were smarter but alas…
    I don’t think people want to admit this reality. They pretend it isn’t true. I hate it but I have to accept it. When women vote for their own interests they don’t vote republican. When women are convinced their interests lie in the men in their life doing better…they just vote how their husband says the best way to vote is.
    Also, if someone wants to make it sound like Abbot did well with women of any kind to gain his position…they will just embellish. This isn’t the first time. It doesn’t sound fun to say hey, men and white men’s wives towed the line for me! Texas toast rules!

    • Unicorn Farm

      “Well, I actually speak with “white” women and I’m ashamed to say, they vote like other married women. With their husbands”
      Not all of us……
      ugh, I can’t believe I just #notallmen’d here, but I did.

    • Lightwing1

      Not all of us…

      I am a white woman who has never voted with my spouse. We discuss candidates and issues but vote independently. Please don’t broad-brush us…

    • Nessie

      To be fair, a large part of why women tend to vote the same as their spouses is that they’re simply more likely to marry someone who shares their political views.

      • Jim Kramer

        No its Stockholm Syndrome. Married women just think they are happy and all those single 40 plus mid-level executives haven’t started to feel the tick of their biological clock, they have been Brain washed by the Koch Brothers and the ghost of Jerry Falwell.

        • A. T.

          … o_o

  • blfdjlj

    This is identity politics at its worse. Yes, Greg Abbott did carry women. By this logic, Obama did not carry women in 2012.

  • ReeFungorio

    Both Latina and Black women are more religious (Christian) than White women regardless of how you measure. This article is a great big pile of stupid and an attempt to somehow “blame” Whites for voting for what they want. Why does the left so desperately have to cling to identity politics? I know it’s hard to believe but one can be against abortion and not be religious. American liberals are the most intolerant, racist and sexist group of people on the planet. Go start your own country where uniformity of thought is required–this one is founded on the principle that you are able to have your own opinions.

    • Jennifer Starr

      Of course you have the right to your own opinions. But that doesn’t grant you freedom from disagreement.

    • KWedel

      Thank you!!! Could not have said it better myself. So nice to see a sane comment on here.

    • A. T.

      lolol. Tell me about the diversity of thought and belief you support. Go for it. :)

    • Lightwing1

      “this one is founded on the principle that you are able to have your own opinions.”

      And also the right for your neighbor to be free from you coercing those opinions on them.

  • Noah Bama

    Math are hard for Andrea Grimes

    • Nessie

      And grammar is impossible for Noah.

      • Noah Bama

        bwahaha too funny, youre apparently about as smart as Mrs Grimes.

        • A. T.

          you’re.

          • Noah Bama

            OMG apparently the dumbest of the dumb hang out on this website

          • A. T.

            Sweetie, if you’re going to to call people dumb, please correct your spelling and grammar. :)

          • Noah Bama

            IT WAS DELIBERATELY UNGRAMMACIAL TO MAKE A JOKE YOU IDIOT!

          • A. T.

            And it still diminishes your point. You seem rather stressed out. Perhaps try going for a walk? Taking a deep breath?

  • http://www.federaleagent86.blogspot.com/ Federale

    Honey, white women are as much women as lazy minority women on welfare. Abbott got a majority of votes from men and women. Stop being a whiney bitch about this tectonic skull fuck you Demoncrats received, it makes you appear to be a sore looser.

    • A. T.

      Oh, the respect for women that shines through. Texas gentleman. <3

    • feloneouscat

      Wait. I thought it once again proved that Voter ID laws (which, BTW, have been touted by Republicans for suppressing votes) actually worked. When little more than a 1/4 of the population votes, you get whacked results.

      Let’s go can compare this to 2012 where had 8% of Texans voted for Obama this would be an officially Blue state.

      If you look at a map you will see that ALL of the major cities voted Blue. As someone who lives rural I can tell you where the kids are going – the cities. Where they will vote Blue just like their friends.

      • Clarence Whorley

        Hahahahahahahaha

        Hold on in Spanish

        Jajajajajajajajajajajja

        Liberals lost because the War on Women is a joke. Republicans elected white women, black women, Indian women, Latinas, young women to Congress, Senate, Governor’s office, state senate etc.

        • Lightwing1

          That would be German, oh-so-enlightened one. :-)

          • Clarence Whorley

            Um guess you’ve never texted with a single Cuban, or Venezuelan, or Colombian.

            Its always Jajajaja :)

        • feloneouscat

          Sadly, the whole country loses because the only phrase Republicans understand is “tax cut”.

  • Clarence Whorley

    So white women don’t count as women or women who vote GOP don’t count as women?

  • A. T.

    Anyone else notice all the white men coming to speak up for white women? Weird.

    • feloneouscat

      Not so much to “speak up for” as to “speak down to”. Same shite, different day.

  • BevfromNYC

    Wendy Davis lost because she was a single-issue candidate who insulted the intelligence of any thinking person who could vote against her and those who were so turned off by her that they couldn’t even be bothered to vote at all. She started her campaign off with a big lie and it went downhill from there. And since when are “white women” not women?
    What Dems and the “Turn Texas Blue” crowd should be asking is WHY couldn’t they get more people out to vote? Because those numbers (94% of Black women and 61% of Latinas) were of voters who bothered to vote. That 94% could very well just represent that there only the only 100 Black women voters who actually voted, not the percentage all eligible voters.

  • IA_Adam

    The typical progressive is a malignant narcissist, which explains why they are both so confused and nasty when they encounter people in their own progressive defined socio-economic demographic that don’t think exactly like they do. As usual, the diverse thinking of women is not allowed when it counters the goals of progressives. Perhaps conservative women think of themselves as a lot more than just an ambulatory set of female-specific organs. Perhaps they actually care about people who fall into the progressive boogie-man categories like whites, males, Christians, and heterosexuals.

    Why don’t you progs just get the psychological help you need and quit trying to make our entire country as insane as you are. People aren’t buying it anymore.

    • Unicorn Farm

      You sound unhinged.

      • IA_Adam

        And you’re projecting.

        • Unicorn Farm

          Boring troll is boring.

    • A. T.

      Go back to Stormfront. The women there can hold your hand and keep the scary people away.

  • bserius

    then by this logic, Barack Obama won black men and women who voted for him by 96%
    yet 240 million Americans did not vote for him in 2008 and 20012
    ——————————————-
    Bottom line, the majority of citizens, regardless of race or gender voted to keep Abortion Barbie back where she belongs

    • Johnny Argon

      and using exit polls as if they are scientific is ludicrous;
      lets poll how many are illegal ?

      • A. T.

        What bias might you have, hm.

    • A. T.

      Abortion Barbie? Where might we get the impression that the GOP doesn’t respect women? I can’t imagine.

      • Lightwing1

        LOL!!!!!

        • A. T.

          I love how they can’t simply say ‘we disagree with her policies on abortion or whatever’, they have to a degrading nickname for her that emphasizes her being female. But respect for women! ;)

  • DonnaDiva

    Yep. Ken Cuccinelli won white women in VA’s Governor race last year. Women of color saved Virginia’s ass.

  • RSpung

    “Once more, with feeling: Greg Abbott and the Republican Party did not win women.”
    The last time I checked, 52 is more than 47, so… Yes, you frigging moron, Abbott won women.

  • Daniel Martin

    I’m more interested in what the turnout percentages were. If non-white voters had turned out in the same percentages as white voters, would that have been sufficient to make a difference in the outcome? (Assuming that the voters who didn’t show up voted on average like the voters who did)

  • IA_Adam

    Anti-whitism is racism. And when white people practice anti-whitism, it’s pure mental illness. You progressives have taken an anti-white strategy in a country that is 65% white, and you’re so stupid and/or crazy that you can’t even figure out why it’s failing. As long as you keep exacerbating race hatred against whites, you will continue to bleed off white votes as more and more whites, including ones who used to vote democrat, have really bad experiences at the hands of white-hating progressives.

    • A. T.

      Who invited Stormfront readers? Go back to back to your forums.

      • IA_Adam

        Fine, keep doing what you’re doing, and get used to losing all the time.

        • A. T.

          This is a common pattern for elections. Parties win, then lose. Democrats and Republicans have both done it. It’s like the tide coming in. You are the one pretending it is a) new and b) a reaction to ‘race hatred’ rather than a normal series of events.