keeping a close eye on philanthropy … NCRP’s blog

Latest Posts from Christine Reeves

Mission Investing: A Conversation with Flozell Daniels, Jr. & Foundation for Louisiana

posted on: October 14, 2014

flozelldanielsjrEarlier this year, NCRP released a special edition of our quarterly journal dedicated to mission investing, or making investments that reflect an organization’s values. As foundations are only required to pay out 5 percent of their assets annually in grants and the administrative costs of making these grants, much of the remaining 95 percent is invested to strengthen the foundation’s economic viability. As such, mission investing can be just as important to creating change as grantmaking.

Many great groups promote investments that support both the economy and the greater good, such as Mission Investors Exchange, Confluence Philanthropy, The Forum for Sustainable and Responsible Investment (US SIF) and Divest-Invest Philanthropy, just to name a few.

Foundation leaders,

… Continue Reading

Patrons Can Have Non-Patronizing Site Visits

posted on: October 3, 2014

sitevisitThe National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy (NCRP), like many organizations, encourages grantmakers to meet with their grantees and the communities they serve, as part of a greater strategy of engaging constituents, receiving feedback and witnessing firsthand the impact of philanthropic work in the “real world.” But, let’s face it: not all site visits are equal, and not all site visits are necessary.

So, let’s consider three questions grantmakers can ask themselves before pursuing a site visit.

(1) How do power dynamics affect the grantee-grantmaker partnership?

  • Before a site visit, let’s study the actors (grantees and grantmakers) and the relationship (partnership). “Grantee-grantmaker partnerships” is a popular phrase, but does it reveal a power imbalance? Let’s look deeper. Is

… Continue Reading

Which Executive Director Would You Fund?

posted on: August 21, 2014

If you were a foundation president with one $50,000 grant left to give before your fiscal year ended, which of these three nonprofit executive directors would you fund?

Executive Director #1 wants to end human trafficking, establish safe houses for victims and help survivors start new lives.

Since childhood, she has been a victim of violence and human trafficking, which some conjecture resulted in her mental delay. She has a history of breaking the law, but she was never convicted. She married a violent man and left him. She is illiterate. For years, she has been unable to keep a domestic service job. Chronically nervous, she never stays in one town for more than a few months.

Executive Director #2

… Continue Reading

7 Philanthropy’s Promise Foundations Get “Bolder Together"

posted on: August 27, 2012

In June of 2011, the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy launched Philanthropy’s Promise, an initiative in which foundations nationwide commit to securing at least 50 percent of their discretionary annual giving to target marginalized communities and at least 25 percent to strategies of social justice advocacy, community organizing or civic engagement.  As a result, over the past 14 months, 128 foundations have joined Philanthropy’s Promise and found a great sense of community.
Too often and too easily, philanthropy can find itself in constricting silos. Yet, Philanthropy’s Promise fosters community in different cities and on different issues. A community foundation focused on public health in Seattle can share information with a family foundation focused on arts education in Chicago.  For

… Continue Reading

Philanthropy: Powerful or Empowering?

posted on: June 6, 2012

Each year, roughly 74,000 U.S.-based foundations give away approximately $45 billion, and the fraternity of funders —including Rockefeller, Carnegie, Ford and Gates—who founded the largest foundations are some of the wealthiest people in the history of the world. So, philanthropy is no stranger to big numbers, big dollar signs, big names, and even bigger potential.

Therefore, perhaps it’s easy to focus on all that perceived bigness and forget how small philanthropy actually is.  Philanthropy is eclipsed by the enormous problems our society faces.  So, it is helpful when philanthropy chooses to focus less attention on foundations and more on the work others are doing with foundation grants.  This begs a fundamental question: Has philanthropy prioritized growing the power of foundations,

… Continue Reading

Funding Democracy and Voting: A Must for Philanthropy

posted on: December 23, 2011

“So, what do you do for a living?”

It’s the habitual question at parties, meetings, dinners with friends and family, anywhere. Then, it’s assuredly followed by the habitual answer: a one to two sentence summary, also known as the elevator speech.

Here is mine:

“I work for a watchdog organization that encourages and challenges grantmakers to use funding best practices—high-impact strategies that benefit marginalized communities and promote democratic values of transparency, inclusive participation, accountability, power, and equality of opportunity.”

Depending on my audience’s ostensible interest level, I often elaborate:

“We all witness massive problems in our world, and each year about $45 billion is dispersed to help alleviate some of those problems. This $45 billion per year comes from philanthropy

… Continue Reading

Tougher Questions for Philanthropy (Part 4 of 4): Power

posted on: December 2, 2011

This is the final post in a four-part series on the need for philanthropy to ask itself tougher questions. Each part focused on incrementally tougher questions (part 1: questions of philanthropic participation; part 2: questions of philanthropic accountability; part 3: questions of philanthropic values).

Now, we arrive at the question of philanthropic power in our democratic society. I would like to preface this final blog with the acknowledgement that the issue of power surfaced in the previous three “tougher questions.” So, there is a chicken-or-the-egg aspect to the order. Yet, this is how I organized my thoughts, and I welcome any thoughts you might have.

Power: Miriam-Webster’s dictionary defines it as: “possession of control, authority,

… Continue Reading

Tougher Questions for Philanthropy (Part 3 of 4): Values

posted on: December 1, 2011

Over the past month, I attended four events, and each event made me focus more on a single thought: “Our philanthropic sector must ask itself tougher questions!” In part 1 and part 2 of this series, I discussed some “tougher questions” surrounding philanthropic participation and accountability, respectively. Now, I am led to questions about philanthropic values in a democratic society.

I thought more about the question of philanthropic values when I attended the Resource Generation conference earlier this month. I presented a workshop along with Zeke Spier, executive director of Social Justice Fund Northwest; Elizabeth Snowdon, board chair of The Hill-Snowdon Foundation; and Sean Dobson, field director of the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy (NCRP). Our presentation focused

… Continue Reading

Tougher Questions for Philanthropy (Part 2 of 4): Accountability

posted on: November 30, 2011

During the past month I attended four philanthropic events, and at each event I delved deeper into the same thought: “Our philanthropic sector must ask itself tougher questions!” In part 1 of this four-part blog series, I began the “tougher questions” with a discussion of philanthropic participation in our democratic society. The participation discussion begged the tougher question: what is philanthropic accountability in our democratic society?

Philanthropic accountability occupied my mind when I attended an Emerging Practitioners in Philanthropy (EPIP) event at the Public Welfare Foundation a couple of weeks ago. As a Steering Committee member of the DC Chapter of EPIP, I was interested in a presentation by Camille Henderson and Bart Lubow of the Annie E. Casey Foundation

… Continue Reading

Tougher Questions for Philanthropy (Part 1 of 4): Participation

posted on: November 29, 2011

I just attended my fourth philanthropic event over the last four weeks; and, for the fourth time, I left an event absorbed by a single, unrelenting thought. It is not a new thought, and I desperately hope it is not a unique thought. Complex and important, yet obvious and simple, it leaves me equally divided between frustration and excitement. My thought is this: Our philanthropic sector must ask itself tougher questions!

All four events I attended varied greatly in topics, presenters, audiences, discussions, goals, and locations. Yet, “Our philanthropic sector must ask itself tougher questions!” kept echoing in my mind. I found myself writing and rewriting the sentence in my notes—and, at times—underlining and capitalizing the words. I am a

… Continue Reading

Archives

Author Archives

Keep up with our blog by subscribing to our RSS feed

Or enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner



About 'Keeping a Close Eye'
Join NCRP
DonateNCRP
Tell a Friend
Sign Up for NCRP Updates and News
philanthropyspromise