Asymmetric Politics Project
David Hopkins and I are working on a project on the implications of party asymmetry in American politics. We see the Republican Party as an agent of an ideological movement and the Democratic Party as a coalition of social groups and believe this distinction helps explain the influence of the Tea Party and the lack of an equivalent movement among Democrats.
Two papers are available from the project: “The Ideological Right vs. The Interest Group Left" from MPSA 2014 and ”Policymaking in Red and Blue: Asymmetric Partisan Politics and American Governance" from APSA 2014.
Our book proposal is available here: “Asymmetric Politics: The Republican Ideological Movement and the Democratic Group Coalition.” A version of the MPSA paper is now forthcoming at Perspectives on Politics in March.
The project has also stimulated media interest:
- “Why Democrats and Republicans don’t understand each other" by Ezra Klein on Vox.com
- “How Republicans Can Get Things Done" by Reihan Salam on Slate
- “No end in sight to the polarization vortex" by Dan Balz in the Washington Post.
- “Bobby Jindal: One Wonk to Rule Them All?" by Seth Mandel in Commentary.
- “Did Vox Justify the Tea Party?" by Pocket Full of Liberty
- Vox Chart of the Week
- Are Progressives Too Pragmatic to Vote for Progressives? by Slate Gabfest
- “The Obamacare Train Did Not Wreck" by Jonathan Chait in New York Magazine.
- “The GOP’s Anti-Obamcare Dogma" by Andrew Sullivan in The Dish.
- This tweet from Nate Silver of FiveThirtyEight.
- Chuck Todd Interview on Unscripted, POTUS Siriux XM
For further related reading, see my book Artists of the Possible: Governing Networks and American Policy Change Since 1945, my op-ed “The Liberal Arc of U.S. Policy,” my co-authored article “Party Coalitions and Interest Group Networks,” and this forthcoming article by Yphtach Lelkes and Paul Sniderman.