CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Buildings Solar Decathlon 10-29-14 Santa Clara Radiant Heat pumps

Published on October 30th, 2014 | by Amber Archangel

4

Solar Decathlon Technology Spotlight: Heat Pumps

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

October 30th, 2014 by  

1Sun4All.

How much comfort is required to give up if we live in an energy-efficient house? How much would we lose by updating our home to net zero standards? Maybe none. Check out the latest article from Irene Ying for the U.S. Department of Energy Solar Decathlon, that tells us a lot about heat pump systems used to heat and cool the student houses in the competition. She reports that temperature control, whether heating water for a bath in winter or cooling a bedroom on a blazing summer day, is essential to a comfortable home.

Heating and cooling eat up 48% of an average home’s energy bill, but you can have it all—comfort and efficiency—with heat pump systems. In contrast to conventional temperature control, which is achieved by generating heat or cold, these technologies “transfer” heat, which is far more efficient than creating it. In fact, modern heat pumps use about 50% less electricity than a furnace or baseboard heater. In moderate climates, heat pumps can provide up to three times the energy they consume. As a bonus, in warm weather, heat pumps can do double-duty as air conditioners by moving hot air outside instead of in.

Three types of heat pumps, differentiated by heat source, are currently available: air, water, and geothermal.

Solar Decathlon 10-29-14 Santa Clara Radiant Heat pumps

A team member from the Santa Clara University Solar Decathlon 2013 team discusses the heat pump system in the team’s Radiant House. This system used hot water to heat the house and cold water to cool it. | Credit: Carol Laurie | U.S. Department of Energy Solar Decathlon

  • Air-based systems generally use fans to extract heat from ambient air outside the house and then transfer the heat indoors. Air-based systems can also run in reverse, transferring indoor heat outdoors to cool the interior. Such systems are the easiest and most economical to install. However, because they rely on outside air temperature, air-source heat pumps are less efficient in climates in which temperatures dip below freezing.
  • Geothermal systems, which use the heat in the Earth’s crust, can reduce the energy cost of household heating by up to 60%. These systems use long loops of tubing buried in the ground to extract heat from the ground. Because the ground is warmer than air in winter, geothermal systems work more efficiently at lower temperatures than air-source systems. Likewise, the ground is cooler than the air in summer, so geothermal heat pumps are also more efficient air-conditioning devices in hot climates. They are, however, more expensive than air-source installations.
  • Water-source systems transfer heat throughout a building using closed loops of water. These systems are able to simultaneously move hot and cold water to different parts of a building, depending on the needs. Thus, some parts of a building can be heated while others are cooled. For instance, the unwanted heat of a cold storage room could be used to heat a tank of hot water for washing. In addition, if the water heater is located in the basement, it can extract moisture from the air and act as a dehumidifier in wet summer months. This option can reduce water heating costs by up to 50%. However, this technology can require more extensive work to install.

Air isn’t the only thing that can be efficiently heated by heat exchange; water can also be heated using a heat pump water heater. Similar to the water-source heat pump, heat pump water heater systems work by drawing heat from the surroundings—for example, outdoor air in the summer and the warm ground in the winter—but use the energy to heat water instead of air. Compared to conventional water heaters, heat pump water heaters are up to three times more energy-efficient.

Many U.S. Department of Energy Solar Decathlon teams have used heat pumps to achieve energy-efficient competition houses. In 2013, the University of North Carolina at Charlotte used a pump system with both heating and cooling capabilities, plus a system of capillary cubes circulating water, to achieve cooling without using compressors or refrigerants in the UrbanEden house. The University of Nevada Las Vegas team likewise used pump systems for heating and cooling its DesertSol, which was designed for the extreme conditions of desert living. Radiant House, from Santa Clara University, created a uniform living environment using a water-based heat pump system.

As the Solar Decathlon continues to demonstrate, amenities such as hot showers and air conditioning need not be sacrificed when constructing or living in an energy-efficient home.

You can learn more about the benefits of the various types of heat pumps at the Energy Savers website.

Thinking of attending the Solar Decathlon 2015?

The competition will be held October 8-18, 2015, at the Orange County Great Park in Irvine, California. You can check out the new team lineup and the concepts for their net zero houses on the 2015 team pages.

Source: 1Sun4All. Reproduced with permission.

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.



Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


About the Author

-- I am an artist, painter, writer, interior designer, and graphic designer, constant student of many studies and founder of 1Sun4All.com. Living with respect for the environment close at hand, the food chain, natural remedies for healing, the earth, people and animals is a life-long expression and commitment. As half of a home-building team, I helped design and build harmonious, sustainable and net-zero homes that incorporate clean air systems, passive and active solar energy as well as rainwater collection systems. Private aviation stirs a special appeal, I would love to fly in the solar airplane and install a wind turbine in my yard. I am a peace-loving, courageous soul, and I am passionate about contributing to the clean energy revolution.



  • TedKidd

    ” air-source heat pumps are less efficient in climates in which temperatures dip below freezing.”

    This implies they are inefficient or even ineffective at subzero temperatures.

    It’s not 1980 anymore, ashp are very effective and efficient below zero, with some rated to operate down to -20f.

    • Larmion

      Sure, but as the temperature difference between outside and inside increases, your heat pump becomes less efficient. That is simple thermodynamics.

      The days that your pump froze or barely managed to heat a room when it was freezing outside are long gone. But the simple fact remains that heating a room to 20 degrees with an outside air temperature of, say, -5°C will take far more energy than heating the same room in a 5 degree environment. The same logic applies in hot climates, but with cooling rather than heating.

      Since the temperature delta between your room and groundwater is fairly constant (and is surprisingly small even in the very coldest climates of this world), a groundwater (geothermal) system will far outperform air source models in cooler climates.

      It’s well worth examining if the extra energy use that comes with choosing an air source pump in a cold area doesn’t outweigh the air source pump’s lower upfront cost. And if the environment matters to you, you should also ask where that extra electricity comes from.

      • TedKidd

        OK, let’s say you DO get the Geo installed perfectly (highly unlikely) and it DOES mean your heating and cooling annual is $550 instead of $600.

        My position, even flattening performance risk, is you put the delta to solar and produce the whole $600 with the sun.

        When you have significant increment cost I don’t think it makes sense to chase small (and very speculative) incremental benefits.

  • Jan Veselý

    I am a (geothermal) heat pump owner. Whole house is heated by 1.7 kW device with 4.7 heating factor (energy gained/el. energy consumed). The total bill for heating is less than two cellphone bills. Cost in a new house was approx the same as gas heating because I didn’t need – how water boiler, nat. gas pipe and chimney.
    All proven to work even in -30 C.

Back to Top ↑