get it home page promo

DEQ, Tintina sued over exploration permit

Proposed copper mine | Enviro groups say EA didn’t do enough to look at impacts to Sheep Creek, Smith River
2014-03-18T06:00:00Z 2014-04-16T23:35:55Z DEQ, Tintina sued over exploration permitBy TOM KUGLIN Independent Record Helena Independent Record
March 18, 2014 6:00 am  • 

Environmental groups filed suit in a Meagher County district court Monday challenging mining exploration near the headwaters of the Smith River.

The Montana Environmental Information Center and Earthworks, represented by Earthjustice, filed the complaint against the Montana Department of Environmental Quality and Tintina Alaska Exploration Inc. based out of Vancouver, British Columbia. The complaint alleges that DEQ failed to conduct an adequate environmental analysis of the Black Butte Copper Project near Sheep Creek, a tributary of the Smith.

Sheep Creek originates in the Little Belt Mountains about 15 miles northeast of White Sulphur Springs before flowing west to the Smith. DEQ performed an environmental assessment of the proposed exploration, which hinged on Tintina mitigating any issues with contamination or in-stream flow.

“The environmental assessment didn’t do enough to look at the impacts of dewatering and water quality from mine discharges,” Bonnie Gestring of Earthworks said. “The department should have done an environmental impact statement instead to do a more rigorous assessment.”

On Jan. 14, DEQ approved an exploration permit for Tintina to build a “decline,” or ramp that would survey the Johnny Lee copper deposit. The permit would give Tintina permission to remove 10,000 tons of rock for sampling. Preliminary economic reports indicate the mine could net 47 million pounds of copper per year. That could put values at almost $2 billion over the next 14 years if the price of copper remains near $3 per pound.

Earthworks and MEIC contend that Tintina’s proposal goes well beyond typical mining exploration. The decline will go a mile deep and well below the water table. In order to explore, Tintina will need to pump water out, which could contain contaminates. Removing groundwater could also impact in-stream flow for Sheep Creek, Gestring said.

Vice president of exploration for Tintina Jerry Zieg said they are still evaluating the lawsuit.

“In general we feel that DEQ went through a pretty thorough and exhaustive process,” Zieg said. “As a company and a group of people we’re as highly concerned with water quality in Sheep Creek and the Smith as anyone else.”

Communications director for DEQ Chris Saeger said the agency had received the lawsuit and its attorneys were reviewing it, but did not comment further.

DEQ received nearly 4,000 public comments on the environmental assessment.

Copyright 2014 Helena Independent Record. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us.

If your comment was not approved, perhaps:

    1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).

    2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.

    3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.

    4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.

    5. You believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write the editor at editor@helenair.com. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.

    6. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.

    7. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.

    8. Your comment is in really poor taste.

    9. Don't write a novel. If your comment is longer than the article you're commenting on, you might want to cut it down a bit. Lengthy comments will likely be removed.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Follow the Independent Record

Featured Businesses