Steven Joseph Bruno Guilty of Slaying Father

steven-joseph-bruno_square.jpg
Courtesy of IPD
Steven Joseph Bruno GUILTY!
UPDATE, OCT. 29, 4:44 P.M.: After six hours of deliberation, a jury just found Steven Joseph Bruno guilty of second-degree murder for fatally shooting his adoptive father in the chest and head in his Irvine condo. The prosecution, which sought first-degree murder, claimed the slaying was premeditated so the 23-year-old could have money and a car to drive to Ohio to finally meet his Internet girlfriend. The defense countered Ernest Bruno was shot and killed about 9 p.m., Aug. 30, 2012, with a .40-caliber semi-automatic Glock handgun because the younger man feared the 60-year-old.

Ernest Joseph Bruno, 2012 OC Homicide No. 30: Son Steven Joseph Bruno Held in Fatal Shooting

"It's a tragedy all the way around for everybody involved," defense attorney Leonard Matsuk told City News Service's Paul Anderson after the verdict was announced. "The family is forever fractured. I'm just grateful the jury did not find him guilty of (first-degree murder)."

Bruno could be sentenced to 40 years to life in prison at a scheduled Dec. 18 hearing.

ORIGINAL POST, OCT. 14, 6:07 A.M.: A 23-year-old man is scheduled to face trial this morning for the fatal shooting of his father in their Irvine home in 2012.

Steven Joseph Bruno is charged with murder and a sentencing enhancement for the personal discharge of a firearm causing death. If convicted at the trial scheduled to begin this morning in Santa Ana, he faces up to 50 years to life in state prison.

Bruno and his 60-year-old father Ernie had been arguing over money before the slaying, family members said in 2012.

It was also family members who found a large amount of blood in the home at 17 Dartmouth, which is near UC Irvine, and contacted the Irvine Police Department (IPD) around 1:30 p.m. Aug. 31, 2012. Officers then discovered the body of Ernest Bruno in a bedroom that had been locked. The owner of a company that provided embroidered golf tournament shirts and specialty products had been shot multiple times.

Missing from the home was Steven Bruno and his father's 2006 silver GMC Envoy Denali, which was pulled over on 1-76 near Sterling, Colorado, around 5:30 p.m. Aug. 31, 2012--with the younger Bruno behind the wheel. He was arrested by Logan County sheriff's deputies and later waived his extradition back to Orange County.

It is believed Ernie Bruno was killed after 9 p.m. on Aug. 30, 2012. The motive, prosecutors have previously said, was money.

Email: mcoker@ocweekly.com. Twitter: @MatthewTCoker. Follow OC Weekly on Twitter @ocweekly or on Facebook!


My Voice Nation Help
5 comments
Kyle Kula
Kyle Kula

i went to school with that kid in elementary school, he was about 3 years younger. i always thought he was off in the head. screw that kid give him life what a crazy f%$k rot in prison psycho. makes me sick

949girl
949girl topcommenter

Ok, excuse me, but isn't "and a sentencing enhancement for the personal discharge of a firearm causing death" a little obvious.  I've said this before, so if he did kill his dad would it have been less of an offense if he used his bare hands?  I mean, really, why is it an enhancement when you use a personal weapon to kill someone?  I think it's almost better and less painful to be shot than it would to have been strangled.  But that's just me I guess!

Eman64
Eman64

@949girl  It's exactly what it states it is, an enhancement.  If convicted in the murder, the enhancement will add more time to his sentence. 

949girl
949girl topcommenter

@Eman64 @949girl Uh yeah, I get that it is a sentencing enhancement.  My point is that the crime is murder.  And in most cases to murder someone you need a weapon, so my question or maybe my rhetorical question was why does it matter how he was murdered?  So if he had strangled his father as opposed to shooting him it's less offensive and should carry a lighter sentence?  I find most sentencing enhancements to be rather absurd.

Eman64
Eman64

@949girl @Eman64  I guess what we can take from this is, if you're going to kill someone use your bare hands and not a weapon?  Or you can just avoid killing people and not have to worry about any of the repercussions. 


I do, however, agree with you that sentencing enhancements are rather absurd.  Laws need to be updated, but considering who is in charge or rewriting laws, I think it's safe to say our odds of winning the lottery are greater. 

Now Trending

Anaheim Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...