o public-privae parnerships in addressing global hunger.
23
The Sae Deparmen works acively on behal o Americanagribusiness ineress like Monsano o promoe bioechnol-ogy in emerging global economies, and he World Food Prize iseeding ino hese efors by awarding he same corporaions.
24
0LVVLQJWKH0DUN
I appears ha he World Food Prize sees agriculural develop-men and hunger alleviaion in Green Revoluion erms — ocus-ing on ood producion insead o access o ood — and awardshe prize accordingly. The 1998 prize recipien was recognized ordeveloping he privae seed indusry in India and ounding hehybrid seed company Mahyco.
25
Monsano acquired 26 perceno Mahyco he same year, and he companies ormed he joinvenure Mahyco Monsano Bioech in India, which has beencriicized or alleged monopolisic pracices.
26
The 2006 World Food Prize recipiens were recognized orconvering a large area o unproducive land in Brazil inoindusrial soy and catle operaions, mosly or expor o de-veloped counries, which raised criicism ha he World FoodPrize was rewarding large landowners in Brazil.
27
Many prizes have been given or achievemens ha ignorehe underlying problem o ood access. Such a narrow ocuson producion — oen rewarding privaizaion — overlookshe realiy o hunger. The world’s armers produce enough oeed everyone; however, povery and lack o access mean hamany o he world’s poor sill go hungry.
28
Even i increasing producion was he soluion, he 2013award or GE crops misses he mark. GE seeds do no in-crease yields, despie arden public relaions campaigns romindusry groups and bioechnology supporers.
29
The seedsare grown wih expensive erilizers, pesicides and mechani-zaion, which keep hese echnologies ou o reach or resul indebs ha cripple small armers.
30
John Deere’s racors andMonsano’s cosly GE seeds and chemicals will no li up heworld’s hungry.There appears o be inernaional consensus on his poin.The Inernaional Assessmen o Agriculural Knowledge,Science and Technology or Developmen, an inernaionalprojec o he Unied Naions and he World Bank, consuledhundreds o expers around he world and, in 2009, concludedha he high coss o GE seeds and chemicals, uncerainyields and he poenial o undermine local ood securiymake GE a poor choice or he developing world.
31
Conclusions and Recommendations
Hunger is a real problem ha needs real soluions. A disin-guished award ha carries a $250,000 bonus is one way oincenivize such innovaions.
32
Indeed, some pas recipiensseem in line wih he World Food Prize’s saed mission omeaningully address hunger issues — providing microloanso subsisence armers, encouraging cooperaive producionand esablishing sorage and ransporaion aciliies.
33
Buoher imes he prize appears o operae as a
quid pro quo
orindusry sponsors whose agriculural innovaions are de-signed o make money, no eed people or help small armersaround he world.Beore being considered a legiimae award or alleviainghunger, Food & Waer Wach recommends ha:
·
The World Food Prize should no ocus he award onincreases in agriculural yields, because his does nocorrelae wih reduced global hunger.
·
The World Food Prize should no award laureaes haare afiliaed wih corporae sponsors.
·
The World Food Prize should increase ransparency byrevealing he secre selecion commitee o ensure noindusry ies.
·
The ederal and sae governmen should no give pub-lic money o he World Food Prize while i coninues oreward privae corporaions.
Endnotes
1 The World Food Prize. “Report to the Joint Economic Develop-ment Appropriations Sub-Committee of the Iowa State Legis-lature: Regarding the Operations, Programs & Expenditures of The World Food Prize Foundation for CY 2009.” December 31,2009 at 3; World Food Prize Foundation. IRS 990-PF. 1999-2011at Schedule B.2 The World Food Prize. [Press Release]. “Three biotechnologyscientists awarded 2013 World Food Prize.” June 19, 2013; TheWorld Food Prize. Background document on 2013 Laureates.Available at http://www.worldfoodprize.org/en/laureates/2013_
ODXUHDWHVDQGRQȴOHDW)RRG:DWHU:DWFK$FFHVVHG$XJXVW
13, 2013; U.S. Department of Agriculture. Economic ResearchService. “Adoption of genetically engineered crops in the U.S.From corn, soybean and cotton spreadsheets. Available athttp://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/adoption-of-genetical-ly-engineered-crops-in-the-us.aspx#.UgufSmRNalh. AccessedAugust 14, 2013. Updated July 8, 2013.3 The World Food Prize. Background document on 2013 Laure-ates. Available at http://www.worldfoodprize.org/en/laure-
DWHVBODXUHDWHVDQGRQȴOHDW)RRG:DWHU:DWFK
Accessed August 13, 2013; James, Clive. “Global Status of Com-mercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2012.
International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications Brief
, no. 44. 2012 at
)HGHUR1LQD6FLHQFH$GYLVRUWRWKH866HFUHWDU\RI6WDWHDQG$GPLQLVWUDWRURI86$Ζ'ΖQDXJXUDO/HFWXUHLQWKH-HHUVRQ
Fellows Distinguished Lecture Series. “Seeds of a perfect storm:
*HQHWLFDOO\PRGLȴHGFURSVDQGWKHJOREDOIRRGVHFXULW\FULVLVȋ
October 17, 2008.4 The World Food Prize. [Press Release]. “Amb. Kenneth M.Quinn’s remarks from the World Food Prize laureate announce-ment.” June 19, 2013.5 The World Food Prize. “Report to the Joint Economic Develop-ment Appropriations Sub-Committee of the Iowa State Legis-lature: Regarding the Operations, Programs & Expenditures of The World Food Prize Foundation for CY 2009.” December 31,2009 at 3. The World Food Prize. 2013 laureate announcementceremony program. October 16–19, 2013. Des Moines, Iowa.6 Park, Alex. “The World Food Prize, brought to you by Monsanto.”
Mother Jones
. June 19, 2013. Based on donations above $5,000.