forma pauperis status, he claiming she is indigent and unable to pay for filing fees and transcripts fees, etc. We note there are six essential prerequisites to the granting of preliminary injunctive
relief.
Warehime v. Warehime,
580 PA 201, 860 A2d 41 (2004).
We find the preliminary injunction is necessary to prevent immediate and irreparable harm that cannot be adequately compensated by damages. We note that because of the nature of well site preparation and drilling, heavy machinery is involved. Workers must always be aware for their own personal safety as well
s
the safety of others upon the site upon which they are working. A common trespasser would only add to the dangers upon the work site which have a distinct probability in causing injury and/or death to workers and others upon the well sites, including trespassers. We further note, as we have stated, that Defendant Scroggins claims to be indigent. Hence, there could be no reasonable expectation of her adequately compensating Cabot, GDS and/or workers or their families for harm for which she may have been a legal cause. Greater injury would result from refusing an injunction than granting it. Defendant Scroggins, by our injunction, will still have plenty of geographical space in which to protest. Other interested parties, not named and not being required by this court to be named, are landholders who have entered into leases now held by Cabot Oil and Gas Corporation. They benefit by this limited injunction in not having their possible liability increased by Defendant
Scroggins' unconsented to intrusion upon their lands.
The preliminary injunction restores the parties, Cabot and Vera Scroggins, to their status immediately prior to the alleged wrongful conduct of Defendant Scroggins. We find the activity to be restrained is actionable, it constituting entry upon Cabot's
owned realty without permission and also upon well pads and access roads under Cabot's