Edition: U.S. / Global

Real Estate

Gas Drilling Jitters Unsettle Catskills Sales

Niko J. Kallianiotis for The New York Times

JUST REDUCED Leonard Piorkowski, an agent, has been unable to sell a three-bedroom house on 14 acres in Hancock, N.Y., left, despite its price of $107,000.

HANCOCK, N.Y.

Multimedia
Real Estate Twitter Logo.

Connect With Us on Twitter

For news and features on real estate, follow @nytrealestate.

Niko J. Kallianiotis for The New York Times

PRO AND CON Signage seen around Deposit, N.Y., in Delaware County, reflects contrasting opinions on fracking, a controversial gas drilling process that could be permitted in the Catskills region.

IN a secluded spot here lies a vacationer’s dream: a three-bedroom ranch-style house with 14 acres of woods roamed by deer and turkey, just minutes from prime trout fishing on the Delaware River. The asking price is $107,000.

But even at this “just reduced” bargain price, said Leonard Piorkowski, a local real estate agent, he can’t make a sale. “One hundred seven thousand for 14 acres and a house and two garages, and we can’t sell it?” Mr. Piorkowski lamented as he guided a visitor across the property recently.

Coveted for its pristine water, pastoral landscapes and relative proximity to New York City, the Catskills region has long been second-home territory for urbanites. But brokers say many listings are languishing — and not just because of the lag in the nation’s economic recovery. The prospect that New York State will open the region to hydraulic fracturing, a controversial gas drilling process known informally as fracking, has spooked potential buyers.

There is concern that the drilling will not only ruin the natural environment but also depress property values, would-be buyers and real estate agents say.

Until state officials decide where, when and how the drilling process will unfold, many prospective owners seem unwilling to take the leap. But public opposition to fracking has grown in the four years since New York regulators have been studying its potential environmental effect, and Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo is taking his time making a decision. Administration officials recently announced another delay to allow the state’s health department to review drilling-related public health risks.

Some buyers are also deliberating. “What if I got there, and they start signing gas leases all around you?” asked Lauren Carner, 62, a school psychologist from Putnam County who once lived in the area and longs to return when she retires. “Even if I held out, my neighbors could sign leases. As gorgeous as it was when I bought it, it could turn into an industrial site.

“The whole idea seems so awful,” added Dr. Carner, who once owned property near the Delaware County town of Treadwell and fears that drilling would ruin the area.

Properties with gas leases, like the 14 acres in Hancock listed at $107,000, are a tough sell, some real estate agents noted. Leaseholders generally get money upfront and royalty payments on any sales of gas extracted from their land. The owners could end up earning millions of dollars, but they are also inviting large-scale industrial activity.

Many leases in New York were signed for five-year periods for as little as $3 an acre and royalties of 12.5 percent. Leaseholders have since formed groups to negotiate better deals with gas companies or file lawsuits to get out of their leases. In New York, companies have extended leases without the owners’ consent by invoking force majeure, a legal term referring to an unforeseen event — in this case, New York’s repeated delays in allowing fracking.

The drilling would take place on the Marcellus Shale — a rich natural-gas field that runs through several states and spans more than two dozen counties in New York. The most productive area is believed to be in the counties above the Pennsylvania border.

But gas companies have leased land all over the Marcellus Shale, and until it is known where fracking would take place, would-be home buyers fret. Fracking involves injecting vast amounts of chemicals and water into underground shale formations to force out natural-gas deposits. Potential buyers worry that their dream of a serene retreat could turn into a nightmare of water wells contaminated by drilling chemicals, country roads choked by truck traffic and views blighted by noisy industrial activity.

The uncertainty has also upended the long- and short-term plans of sellers, and homeowners who had been contemplating renovations.

Patricia Wallace, whose family has owned a house on the East Branch of the Delaware River near Hancock for generations, said fracking was a major reason she and her brother delayed replacing the 1,800-square-foot house where they spend their summers. The siblings had hired an architect in 2007 to design a new $500,000 structure within the footprint of the 240-year-old house, she said. But then the economy worsened and the gas companies began leasing land around them, as well as across the state line into Pennsylvania, where fracking got under way in earnest in 2008.

“It was one of the things that made us think,” said Ms. Wallace, 56, a professor of psychology at an Oregon college. “What if we invest the money and then fracking is allowed and everything is contaminated?”

But the old house started falling down, she said, and the siblings have now decided to rebuild by next summer, whatever happens. If there is fracking and they want to sell, she said, “there are people who probably would buy the property anyway because the waterfront is so nice.”

Some buyers from downstate have settled on a property only to back out. Six months ago, Arthur Gillett, a resident of Greenpoint, Brooklyn, and the research director for a food sustainability business, found what he considered the ideal spot: a Cape Cod-style cottage with a garden on four wooded acres near Livingston Manor in Sullivan County. At $140,000, the price was right.