Will There Be a Republican Wave? A Guide to Reading the Currents.

Who's winning, who's losing, and why.
Oct. 29 2014 9:48 PM

How to Read the Waves

Will there be a Republican wave? That depends. A guide to reading the political currents.

Rep. Cory Gardner, R-Colo., talks with an aide during a House Energy and Commerce Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee.
Rep. Cory Gardner, R-Colo., talks with an aide during a House Energy and Commerce Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee hearing on Oct. 16, 2014.

Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call

Will this be a wave election? In these uncertain times, when we use a weather metaphor it should be clear. You're either wet or you're not. But it's not clear, because we're using the wrong metaphor. The Republican tide is coming in this election—the GOP will pick up seats in the House and Senate—but the question remains: How big will the wave be? Will it be a gentle lapping that excites the ankles or will it knock you back and part your hair?

John Dickerson John Dickerson

John Dickerson is Slate's chief political correspondent and author of On Her Trail. Read his series on the presidency and on risk.

This isn’t just a matter of abstract classification. Whether a party’s victory is declared a wave or not sets the conditions for the conversation when that party turns to governing. It is a shorthand expression about the power of one party's ideas, or at least a signal of public revulsion about the ideas of the losing party. It matters in the public debate; if the GOP does well enough, Republicans will point to that strong result as a ratification of whatever they’re pushing (even if they didn't mention those ideas during the actual campaign). If Republicans win in states where Democrats traditionally do well, there will be less introspection about party positions. If they are only victorious in the places where they were expected to win, the internal spats over hot-button issues or whether candidates were too moderate (and not proud conservatives) will recommence. 

Political scientists would warn us about drawing conclusions about the fundamentals of politics based on a handful of off-year election victories—and they’d be right. But one thing is certain: The outcome of these races and how they are characterized will provide the language for strategists, politicians, and party fundraisers in the conversations to come. It is in that context that we offer a preliminary classification scheme for the results in the Senate races. In other words, how to read a wave: 

Advertisement

Undertow: The GOP doesn’t take the Senate. Republicans have everything going for them this cycle. They recruited good candidates, the president is unpopular, and they have plenty of money to compete. If Republicans do not win the six seats needed to take control of the Senate, it will be because they lost at least one state Republicans regularly win in presidential elections. Not only would they have failed to take advantage of Obama’s dismal approval ratings, they would have failed to win on their home turf.

Nature's Course: Victories in the six states Mitt Romney won by double-digits. If Republicans win in Louisiana, Alaska, Arkansas, Montana, West Virginia, and South Dakota that's great for the party, and it would give the Republicans control of the Senate, assuming they don't lose in any states Republicans currently hold. Simply winning control of the Senate would give the Republican brand a good push. A lot of voters would equate winning the big prize with a national ratification of GOP ideas. But for people in the trenches, such a victory would only be meeting expectations. Historically, six seats is about the number of seats a president's party loses in the sixth year of a presidency. This result would also represent the new norm for Senate elections, where the trend has been that voters elect senators from the same party as the person for whom they cast their presidential ballot. As a matter of policy the verdict it would render would be that Republican voters agree with Republican policies.

Life raft: A GOP victory in Kansas. This doesn't really fit the tide analogy, but that's fine because Kansas didn’t fit any model of how this election was supposed to proceed. President Obama lost the state by 22 points and Sen. Pat Roberts, the three-term Republican incumbent, should never have been in such serious jeopardy, but then it was unexpected that the Democrat would be convinced to drop out and previous Democrat would run as an independent. Given how bad things looked for Roberts, defeating independent Greg Orman will be a victory, but the fact that he required buckets of emergency cash and a squadron of surrogates is not a sign of party health.