As for the claims of superior performance, I covered that in my previous posting. This summarizes it the bottom line:
Something's Broken: Hearing on Charter Schools
Excellent student performance at Texas charter schools is by far the exception, not the rule, as amply documented in a dozen state-sponsored evaluation reports. As the latest of these evaluations (Texas Center for Educational Research, July 2011) put it, despite "perceptions that new charter schools, as small schools, provide improved learning environments, this evaluation provides little evidence that new [state-approved] open-enrollment charters are improving students' outcomes."
Most telling for me in this latest development is what IS NOT being addressed - regulation of charter schools since they are exempt form most school regulations:
Something's Broken: Hearing on Charter Schools
Along with Texas AFT, Dr. Soto also noted the lack of enough staff at the Texas Education Agency to oversee charter schools. At last report, after recent budget cuts only seven TEA employees remained to supervise and regulate the hundreds of charter schools statewide enrolling more than 100,000 students.
Soto also raised a more fundamental issue, illustrated with data from his home county. There are 15 school districts wholly within Bexar County, he said, four of them rated "recognized" and 11 rated "academically acceptable." At the same time the county plays host to 26 charter holders-none of them rated "exemplary" or "recognized," and 11 out of the 26 rated "academically unacceptable"-a 42-percent failure rate, Dr. Soto said. Questioning the $31 million in state aid spent on these low-performing charter operators, he added: "We need a clear and coherent vision of how the charter system fits into the overall Texas landscape and into local communities that these charters serve, including how they fit alongside traditional ISDs."
The sad part is that to the degree charter schools are useful for Texas students, we already have access to these benefits inside the public education system. DeBakey High School for the Health Professions is an example. So it the highly acclaimed School for the Preforming Arts. There are provisions for such an expansion in Texas charter law:
Something's Broken: Hearing on Charter Schools
Texas also provides a glimpse of how the original charter vision can still bear fruit. At Friday's hearing we urged legislators to look at the development of in-district charters initiated by parents and teachers working together in their neighborhood schools. There is a specific provision for this in the Texas Education Code (Section 12.052), and it has paved the way for promising experiments within districts such as San Antonio ISD. As of last year, 13 of these in-district charters were up and running there, created by collaborations between members of our local affiliate, the San Antonio Alliance of Teachers and Support Personnel, and parents, with community and administration support.
Why not expand their proven success? The answer is obvious - this it NOT about education, its about ideology pure and simple.
For more reasons that the expansion of charter schools is not a good idea see my previous posting, Inequality Perpetuated-Public Education at the Crossroads.
|