ADVERTISEMENT
  About the SA Blog Network













Plugged In

Plugged In


More than wires - exploring the connections between energy, environment, and our lives
Plugged In HomeAboutContact

When It Comes To How We Vote on Energy Issues, Age Matters

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.


Email   PrintPrint



A new poll from The University of Texas at Austin reveals markedly different perspectives on energy issues based on the age of voters, a finding that could help determine the outcome of next week’s elections.

The latest UT Energy Poll, conducted Sept. 4 -16, shows contrasting views and preferences among consumers in numerous areas, including energy policy, preferred sources of energy and financial support from the federal government.

Varying perspectives can be traced to several demographic variables, including gender and political affiliation, but the most pronounced differences reflect the age of survey respondents.

For example, 41 percent of survey respondents under age 35 say the U.S. should permit export of natural gas to other countries, while just 22 percent of those age 65 and older support the policy.

Nearly half of the 2,105 U.S. residents surveyed (46 percent) say candidates’ views on energy issues will greatly influence their choices at the ballot box.

The online poll also corroborates a longstanding trend among likely voters: A much higher percentage of older respondents (87 percent) indicate they are likely to vote in the Nov. 4 election, compared with 68 percent of those age 35 or under.
“Consumer perspectives on energy issues continue to track political party lines, but we’re seeing a widening gulf among older and younger Americans,” said Sheril Kirshenbaum, director of the UT Energy Poll.

The generational divide surfaces in several areas, particularly the importance of environmental protection and support for renewable forms of energy:

* Fifty-six percent of younger consumers say they are willing to pay much higher prices to protect the environment, compared with only 20 percent of respondents age 65 and older.

* Sixty-eight percent of survey respondents under age 35 say they would be more likely to vote for candidates who support steps to reduce carbon emissions, compared with 50 percent of those age 65 and older.

* Support for renewable sources of energy is considerably stronger among younger consumers, with nearly 2 out of 3 (65 percent) favoring an expansion of financial incentives for companies engaged in renewable technologies. Less than half of older respondents (48 percent) say they would support candidates who endorse such incentives. Likewise, 62 percent of younger respondents favor requiring utilities to obtain a percentage of their electricity from renewable sources, versus 48 percent of older voters.

* Younger consumers also strongly support subsidies for renewable energy, with 72 percent saying they back federal government support, compared with 58 percent among Americans age 65 and older.

* Fifty-two percent of respondents 65 and older say they are familiar with hydraulic fracturing for fossil fuel extraction, compared with 39 percent of younger Americans. Among those familiar with the term, only 37 percent of younger survey respondents support its use, compared with more than half (52 percent) of Americans age 65 and older.

For complete topline survey results, charts and other information, visit www.utenergypoll.utexas.edu.

Data from The University of Texas at Austin Energy Poll were weighted using U.S. Census Bureau figures, as well as propensity scores, to ensure the sample’s composition reflects the actual U.S. population. The poll was developed by the McCombs School of Business to provide an objective, authoritative look at consumer attitudes and perspectives on key energy issues. It is designed to help inform national discussion, business planning and policy development. This is the seventh wave of the Energy Poll, which was launched in October 2011.

Sheril Kirshenbaum About the Author: Sheril Kirshenbaum is Director of The Energy Poll at The University of Texas at Austin where she works to enhance public understanding of energy issues and improve communication between scientists, policymakers, and the public. Follow on Twitter @Sheril_.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.





Rights & Permissions

Comments 3 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. johnog 12:20 am 10/29/2014

    I’m 70 and was not polled, but my views align almost completely with the under 35s. But then, I have a degree in Physics.

    Link to this
  2. 2. schatzieD 10:59 am 10/29/2014

    @johnog: that just means that you are young at heart :^ )

    Link to this
  3. 3. Banquosghost 8:09 pm 10/29/2014

    Johnog,

    I congratulate you on gaining your physics degree and attaining the age of 70. I wish you many more productive years. I’m not that far behind you in age. But I’m not sure age is as significant in energy attitudes as energy understanding. If you had an engineering degree, perhaps you would vote differently. I don’t agree uniformly with either age group. I look to both the environmental and economic impact of each issue.

    I used the link to the poll to read how it was conducted. I’m confident they were successful in making their sample representative of likely U.S. voters. So, it is a very interesting and informative result. My problem with likely voters is how much they really understand energy issues.

    My contention is that very few likely voters regardless of age have even a cursory understanding of energy issues. People with Ms. Kirshenbaum’s knowledge of energy production and consumption are rare indeed. I suspect you would get a result similar to this poll result by for example polling viewers and non-viewers of John Stewart’s The Daily Show independent of viewer age.

    Just because the under 35 crowd votes in agreement with you and schatzieD, does not mean they have any idea why they vote that way or that their views actually favor the environment. A DOEd study from about 10 years ago found that only 15% or so of the adult population had the reading comprehension of an entering college freshman. I shudder to think what the science comprehension percentage of even the literate 15% may be.

    So, while the poll is interesting, one can’t conclude that either age group holds their views based on actual knowledge of the issues. schatzieD kindly educated us on confirmation bias sometime back on an environmental topic. I believe both you and schatzieD have fallen into the confirmation bias trap by assuming the <35 folks are necessarily correct. If you asked either demographic (or any demographic for that matter) why they hold a particular energy policy view, I doubt many could provide a cogent answer.

    Yet another informative post by Sheril Kirshenbaum. Thanks.

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Scientific American Back To School

Back to School Sale!

12 Digital Issues + 4 Years of Archive Access just $19.99

Order Now >

X

Email this Article

X